
In one sentence:
Ban political ads from television.
That's it. That would do it -- stymie the billionaires, circumvent the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling and turn America back to the rule of its own citizens . That's right -- democracy is just a single step away. We banned cigarette ads from the airwaves, and political ads are even more toxic. All the money that superpacs raise goes to attack spots on television. Without that venue there would be no place to spend the billions and billions of dollars our mini-pharohs are pouring into the system. If politicians didn't need those massive infusions of cash to fight the reprehensible prime-time propaganda wars, they wouldn't come to Congress as the wholly owned subsidiaries of the men who are going to be financing their next campaigns.
It's staggeringly simple, a 'silver bullet' that could cure the metastacizing corruption of our political system with one shot.
Without television, candidates would have to campaign the old fashioned way, one hand-shake, one stump-speech, one baby kiss at a time. Voters would have to form their own opinions by -- I hesitate to even whisper the word -- reading about the issues. When a politician won, it would be fair and square and they could vote their conscience on the floor of the house, not the Koch brothers' pocket book.
This would be an authentic revolution. How would Senators sound, unfettered by the need to please a corporate master? I have no idea. Maybe they've lost the knack of having their own opinions, maybe integrity can wither like any other unused muscle. Like those lions who pace their newly-opened cages, unequipped for freedom, perhaps the members of Congress will be unable to grasp the concept of free speech. But I believe they'd figure it out eventually. They'd get to know their own minds, start hearing themselves think again and begin the unique adventure of actually representing their constituents.
Of course there would be problems. This plan could bankrupt every local television station in the country, who thrive on elections like a summer town in tourist season. But the govertnment pays farmers not to grow certain crops. It should pay these stations not to run political ads. It would be government subsidy money well spent.
To sum up, in the terms a modern politician can understand best:
TELEVISION: BAD FOR ELECTIONS, BAD FOR AMERICA.
My name is Steven Axelrod and I approved this ad.


Salon.com
Comments
I'm sure broadcasters would prefer other advertisers that they could charge at market rates.
Since Bain owns Clear Channel, the money goes back into Mitt's pockets eventually.
Pretend a well-funded Republican leaning individual(s) wanted to make a movie about Barrack Obama. The film will paint Obama as a terrible president and hold him responsible for the terrible state of the U.S. economy.
Are you suggesting it would be illegal to make a movie like this? If yes, who’s to decide what movies, books, newspapers, etc. are deemed “illegal”?
Your inability to answer the second question is exactly what the Supreme Court grappled with during the Citizens United ruling. In other words, assume you get your way and political ads are banned on TV, there will still be a way for well-funded individuals to “advertise” their political preferences. That is why, at the end of the day, freedom always trumps stupid laws. My suggestion when you see a political ad…change the channel. Ahhhhh…..freedom.
But alas, none of that is going to happen.
Select those who represent us by means of a lottery format. All adult, non-criminal, mentally competent citizens eligible to be chosen to serve for one term only. No repeats so there can be no career politicians. No political parties so there will be no "buying" of a party by the wealthy. No racism, genderism, ageism, etc.
Just regular citizens, presumably pretty honest folks, who serve their society for a few years, once in a lifetime. They might not always be the brightest lights on the tree but which would you rather have as leaders; honest, average citizens or very intelligent crooks?
You already know which we have now......
;-)
.
best, libby