JULY 13, 2012 6:52AM

My Simple Cure for American Politics

Rate: 11 Flag

  TV

 

In one sentence:

Ban political ads from television.

That's it. That would do it -- stymie the billionaires, circumvent the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling and turn America back to the rule of its own citizens . That's right -- democracy is just a single step away. We banned cigarette ads from the airwaves, and political ads are even more toxic. All the money that superpacs raise goes to attack spots on television. Without that venue there would be no place to spend the billions and billions of dollars our mini-pharohs are pouring into the system. If politicians didn't need those massive infusions of cash to fight the reprehensible prime-time propaganda wars, they wouldn't come to Congress as the wholly owned subsidiaries of the men who are going to be financing their next campaigns.

It's staggeringly simple, a 'silver bullet' that could cure the metastacizing corruption of our political system with one shot.

Without television, candidates would have to campaign the old fashioned way, one hand-shake, one stump-speech, one baby kiss at a time. Voters would have to form their own opinions by  -- I hesitate to even whisper the word -- reading about the issues. When a politician won, it would be fair and square and they could vote their conscience on the floor of the house, not the Koch brothers' pocket book. 

This would be an authentic revolution. How would Senators sound, unfettered by the need to please a corporate master? I have no idea. Maybe they've lost the knack of having their own opinions, maybe integrity can wither like any other unused muscle. Like those lions who pace their newly-opened cages, unequipped for freedom, perhaps the members of Congress will be unable to grasp the concept of free speech. But I believe they'd figure it out eventually.   They'd get to know their own minds, start hearing themselves think again and begin the unique adventure of actually representing their constituents.

Of course there would be problems. This plan could bankrupt every local television station in the country, who thrive on elections like a summer town in tourist season. But the govertnment pays farmers not to grow certain crops. It should pay these stations not to run political ads. It would be government subsidy money well spent.

To sum up, in the terms a modern politician can understand best:

 TELEVISION: BAD FOR ELECTIONS, BAD FOR AMERICA.

My name is Steven Axelrod and I approved this ad.

 

 

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Whatever its limitations, TV is a great way for politicians to reach an audience. The air waves are not owned by the TV stations, they are owned by the federal government and as a necessary venue for the people in power and seeking power it simplifies and economizes reaching a responsive audience. But there is no reason people concerned with public policy must pay for that ability. If the money is removed from the time but the time is allocated by some other fair means it could be a very useful service. It's the money that screws it up. I don't see why a TV station couldn't make its profit from commercial ads while seeing to it that free time is allocated to government activities as a price to retain a license.
Steve, I'd go with Jan's plan...take the $$$$$$$ out of the system and bring back the Fairness Doctrine that vanished under Ronnie Reagan!
i shut down the idiot box over 15yrs ago.......one of my better decisions......
It's a little known fact that political ads on TV and Radio are always billed at the lowest rates on the stations' rate cards. This is regulation.

I'm sure broadcasters would prefer other advertisers that they could charge at market rates.

Since Bain owns Clear Channel, the money goes back into Mitt's pockets eventually.
Yeah but if you did that banning of ads...Why we'd have to bring back that old tradition of objective journalism and like, actually start talking to each other. That can't be good, either...some of us might listen! (Excellent post!)
Sounds like a good idea but allow me to give you a not so fictional story of why it can’t work:

Pretend a well-funded Republican leaning individual(s) wanted to make a movie about Barrack Obama. The film will paint Obama as a terrible president and hold him responsible for the terrible state of the U.S. economy.

Are you suggesting it would be illegal to make a movie like this? If yes, who’s to decide what movies, books, newspapers, etc. are deemed “illegal”?

Your inability to answer the second question is exactly what the Supreme Court grappled with during the Citizens United ruling. In other words, assume you get your way and political ads are banned on TV, there will still be a way for well-funded individuals to “advertise” their political preferences. That is why, at the end of the day, freedom always trumps stupid laws. My suggestion when you see a political ad…change the channel. Ahhhhh…..freedom.
This is brilliant in so many ways. If there's ever a Constitutional Convention, I'll immediately plump for this to be a new amendment.
Sounds good to me. How about just "Ban political ads"? Make 'em walk up and down the streets knocking on doors campaigning face to face.
But alas, none of that is going to happen.
I like simple answers as much as anyone, but I doubt that political ads make much difference in voting. What the campaign laws do is provide cover for payoffs and kickbacks, finding jobs for the kids, tax avoidance. The amounts collected are totally disproportianate to the votes. Most of the people watching television don't even know where the polls are.
I have an even simpler solution. Ban elections.

Select those who represent us by means of a lottery format. All adult, non-criminal, mentally competent citizens eligible to be chosen to serve for one term only. No repeats so there can be no career politicians. No political parties so there will be no "buying" of a party by the wealthy. No racism, genderism, ageism, etc.

Just regular citizens, presumably pretty honest folks, who serve their society for a few years, once in a lifetime. They might not always be the brightest lights on the tree but which would you rather have as leaders; honest, average citizens or very intelligent crooks?

You already know which we have now......

;-)
.
[r] Yeah, the ads are pretty creepy, but creepier is "political" stations that mask themselves as "news" presentations and they are propaganda for oligarchs and oligarchical political puppets. Don't be played, America. 24/7 non-stop infotainment, a carpetbombing of lies and distractions. 5 major media conglomerates run most of US media. Those 5 CEO bastards of the universe have tremendous power to frame all perspectives no matter how charming and feisty the MSNBC or Fox News personality postures to be. I love Chris Hayes and Cenk U. but have they mentioned Jill Stein? Nope. She did make the NYT this week, so that is a big deal. Naughty, Jill. She is campaigning using non-corporate funding. America likes to complain about corporate money, but support a candidate who refuses it? Well, then again, where are they gonna hear about her if the idiot box is where they get their faux-news and the idiot box is instructed to keep her off the radar because of the threat to the money robber class.

best, libby