Steve Klingaman

Steve Klingaman
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota,
Birthday
January 01
Title
Consultant/Writer
Bio
Steve Klingaman is a nonprofit development consultant and nonfiction writer specializing in personal finance and public policy. His music reviews can be found at minor7th.com.

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
JUNE 21, 2012 4:03PM

Young Earth Creationism and the Texas Textbook Wars

Rate: 22 Flag

the_revisionaries-3 

Don McLeroy: the Howard Jarvis of Young Earth Creationism?

Image: indiewire.com 

The new documentary “The Revisionaries” highlights the Texas textbook wars of 2009 and their “hero,” protagonist/antagonist Don McLeroy, former chair of the State Board of Education.  The conflict resulted in a temporary erosion of the standing of the teaching of evolution as the scientific standard to explain creation and the origins of life on Earth.  This was a big deal because Texas and California are the two states that mandate textbook content at a state level.  So, as goes Texas, or California, so goes the nation.  This is particularly important in a moment when California can’t afford to update textbooks but Texas can.

            Evolution’s loss was creationism’s gain, particularly under the banner of intelligent design during McLeroy’s tenure on the Board.  Director Scott Thurman chose to highlight the involvement of McLeroy, a dentist turned state politician, as a way of “humanizing” the story, which was appropriate enough on one level because there would have likely been no story without McLeroy.

            Governor Rick Perry appointed McLeroy to the state board to fill an open seat in 1998, likely knowing full well the mischief McLeroy had in mind for the nation’s children.  As a young earth creationist with an agenda, McLeroy figured his religious liberties extended to and beyond the doors of the public schoolhouse.  McLeroy is a true believer with the gift of gab.  His gab goes beyond religious polemics to embrace the ancient art of pure sophistry.  By “sophistry’ we mean a specious argument based on an attempt to deceive.  Sophistry, done properly, is characterized by the appearance of logical thought devoid of a factual basis but built on an edifice of pure rhetoric, meaning word play.

            McLeroy believes God created the world six- to ten thousand years ago, and the all of natural history must be squeezed in to this time period.  And he believes that if you in any way assail his beliefs you are attacking his religious liberty—a liberty he would extend to your children’s education, given the chance.  For a while he did succeed in doing just that, until a successor, also deeply religious in McLeroy’s sense of the word, presided over a 2011 revision of the patent assault on evolution.  It should be noted that even the Texas legislature voted to mitigate the textbook attack on evolution.

            Today, McLeroy remains at-large, and “The Revisionaries” have given him an extra-large megaphone.  This is probably the most controversial aspect of the documentary—as it should be.  The difference between buffoon and demagogue is power.  And many a buffoon achieves power via a dense electorate.  McLeroy has all the tools, smooth talker that he his, and now he has a bully platform at precisely the moment that state legislators across the nation are concluding, for example, that personhood begins at conception, not birth.  This legal pivot would have profound consequences for pregnant women who stand to lose many of the perks of citizenship, liberty, and personhood under such a regime.  So dangerous ideas given good timing appear to matter.  Stand Your Ground anyone?

            McLeroy figures the best defense is a good offense.  He attacks evolution and the scientific method because he says they cannot explain human consciousness.  He attacks atheism because “something cannot spring from nothing.”  These are his exact premises as expressed this week on a nationally syndicated NPR show.  He explains how he has studied the works of the all the scientific writers on evolution and—trust him—has found the gaps in all of them, such as that in his view the fossil record does not support evolution.  Of course he’s a nut case.  He conflates the scientific method with the discourse of theology.  He’s the freak in Thruman’s freak show.  But here’s the deal:  when interviewed on Talk of the Nation, his host, Neal Conan, didn’t challenge any of the fundamentals of his presentation.  Nor did the documentary’s executive producer, Vijay Dewan, who is, for promotional purposes, temporarily joined at the hip to McLeroy.

            Stephen Colbert took an entirely different tack with McLeroy on April 23rd, deftly ridiculing—that is to say engaging—McLeroy as only Colbert can do.  McLeroy, like a lamb to slaughter, appeared not to know the nature of Colbert’s schtick.  I don’t want to let Conan off the hook, though, nor Dewan.  Because as soon as McLeroy gets himself elected somewhere deep in the heart of Texas, people on the front lines—teachers—are going to have to worry about endangering their jobs if they take him on.

            Dangerous ideas are dangerous because as author Peter Edelman (“So Rich, So Poor: Why the Wealthiest Nation in the World Is Losing the Battle Against Poverty”) says, often “people deal in the simplest way to view a problem.”  The tendency allows simple-sounding explanations to sometimes trump reasoned analysis.  With McLeroy’s adherents in control that’s going to happen to your children’s textbooks.  As Amanda Marcott points out in a June 18th Salon article, 46 percent of Americans believe in the creationist version of natural history, and that number has been on the rise lately.

            So go see “The Revisionaries” if you want.  But do it knowing that as you learn about the great Texas Textbook Wars, you are more or less encouraging Don McLeroy in his young earth creationism mission as he continues to make the media rounds on the heals of the release of the film.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Thanks, Steve, I wasn't aware of this. And I loved that Colbert clip! Particularly where he says: "I believe science can be a matter of personal choice."

Rated.
Remember as children how we embraced every word we read. The children, our students of the 21st century are so much more cynicalo and here is why.
Alan, Thank you so much for highlighting that priceless quote. Now I'm wondering why I wasn't clever enough to lead with it!
I'd just like to see Mexico take Texas back. Whether they want to or not.
Why can't these fools just be satisfied to miseducate their own spawn in their Kristian "schools"?

And I'm with Nerd Cred, only Texas ain't enough -- let 'em have Arizona and New Mexico back, too. Hell, I say we should let the South secede.
Horrifying news.
Science takes a great leap in the U.S.--backwards.
R
They aren't getting my money - it's bad enough that NPR feels that they should give morons air-time, without pointing out that they''re morons. On the other hand, the textbook industry has always been prone to stupidity. I once did production on a history textbook for middle schoolers and the illustrators were tasked with putting a black guy, an Asian guy, a woman and someone in a wheelchair into the Continental Congress signing of the Declaration of Independence. Lets face it, our kids aren't taught what's true, but what the current meme says is true. (re "Lies My Teacher Told Me", by Loewen)
As has been said before, McLeroy is one of those clowns who thinks that The Flintstones was a documentary. I don't know if you've ever seen that Doonesbury cartoon where Duke has to take his medicine:t.

Duke: TB! My God! Are you SURE?
Doc: Afraid so. But we caught it early.
Duke: So my prognosis is good?
Doc: Depends. Are you a creationist?
Duke: Why yes I am. Why do you ask?
Doc: Because I need to know whether you want me to treat the TB bug as it was before antibiotics, or as the multiple drug-resistant strain it has since evolved into.
Duke: Evolved?
Doc: Your choice. If you go with the Noah's ark version I'll just give you Streptomycin.
Duke: Um...What are the newer drugs like?
Doc: They're intelligently designed.
Let's teach our children Cutting-Edge Science (1), even when it supports the Biblical creation account.(2) A few examples include:
- Molecules-to-man evolutionism violates the Law of Biogenesis: Life does not come from non-life.
- The specific complexity of genetic information in the genome does not increase spontaneously. Therefore, there is no natural process whereby reptiles can turn into birds, land mammals into whales, or chimpanzees (or any other kind of creature) into human beings.

References:
(1) What Does Cutting-Edge Science Teach about Origins?
http://www.kolbecenter.org/images/kolbe/pdfs/what_church_teaches.pdf

(2) Genesis 1-11 (NIV1984 Bible) :
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. ..."
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis1-11&version=NIV1984
Joseph, I'm glad you brought that up. You would be signifying for Creation Science or scientific creationism, the branch of tautological logic that says atheists are wrong because something can't come from nothing, ergo...God. Not so fast. Astrophysics would be a good place to start. A little Einstein, a little Big Bang Theory, not the sitcom. God is strictly optional. That goes double, triple, for Genesis.
Abrawang, priceless. I had not seen that one. Yet JosephU has some personal science that says it can't be so, that silly cell mutation science.
"Life does not come from non-life." JosephU clearly doesn't understand the logical conclusion that can be drawn from his illogical supposition -- he's offering a "proof" that God doesn't exist.
Steve, you've once again written about one of my favorite topics: the re-writing of history by the "super-patriots" who can't stand the country we've actually got -- or in this case, the undermining of the democratically accessible scientific method for uncovering truth in favor of the religious doctrines that empower those theocratic oligarchs put in charge of the holy deposit of sacred wisdom.

My own interest was in the damage McLeory's gang on the Texas Board of Education did to the history curriculums in that state, which earned a near-failing grade of "D" from the right -leaning Thomas B. Fordham Institute, which issues annual report card on the state of history instruction in US public schools.

The group nearly accused the Board of educational malpractice for the ideologically-saturated drivel that five million Texas school children are now forced to endure after controversial social study standards were adopted by the religious right-dominated Board in 2010.

The Board of Education made no secret of their evangelical Christian right wing biases or their determination to "inculcate biblical principles, patriotic values, and American exceptionalism" into the regular public school day.

The result, says the Institute, is a "confusing, un-teachable hodgepodge."

Specifically, the Fordham Institute says the heavily politicized document "distorts or suppresses" those "less triumphal" chapters in American history that the Board deemed "politically unacceptable," such as slavery and segregation, while "Biblical influences on America's founding are exaggerated, if not invented."

Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it, says George Santayana, which seems to be precisely the point among right wing reactionaries who want to turn back the clock.
As a biologist --- and a person living in Texas --- this makes me so sad. I wouldn't be the person I am today if I didn't have the outlet of a good science education, which was one of the few havens in my life where I could ask questions freely and think analytically, rather than having to swallow questionable doctrine with unthinking obedience.

We need good science education in this country if we are ever to regain our status as innovators.
"And many a buffoon achieves power via a dense electorate."

Explains how President Obama got elected.
I was unaware of this....I'm shaking my head in disbelief....
The idiocy...it's painful.
The idiocy...it's painful.
I don't know, pretty much this whole discussion makes me think what we need to be teaching people is philosophy and critical thinking. I'd even go so far as to say most people posting here don't even know what God means. I'm much more afraid of atheists closing down honest, logical discussion and free thinking than I am of theists. They are the closed minded people I fear the most.
(By "they" I obviously mean atheists, less there be any confusion.)
In the grand scheme -- sex, drugs, and rock&roll are winning.

Some sort of tactical victory over science is pathetic on so many levels, I can't even really comment.

I don't remember a single thing from any biology textbook I may have been assigned in my early education.

Teach em Hardy-Weinberg and let it go at that.
Beyond Texas politics, there is a mechanism here that has nothing to do with any God. Human fear has always been a strange attractor for power throughout history. To see how this remains confined to "subcultures" in prosperous times look at the pulp output of the last century-Replace "aliens" with "scientists" or whatever. Our current economic paralysis only encourages this political movement.
Awesome post, Steve.

I always find it fascinating when creationists use “something cannot spring from nothing," yet, that's precisely what creationism is; not one creationist can answer the question; if God created man, the heavens and the earth, who/what created God?" The answer is always the same "God has always been" unless of course you're Mitt Romney, then it's; "man is as what God once was and man may become what God is" as if that somehow answers the question; "where did it all begin?"

Another curious observation; indoctrination of our youth by the Bible demagogues seems to have taken on frantic expediency since Islam has become the enemy of the Christian State.
You cannot have a sensible logical reasonable democratic government with a populace that is so mentally distorted with mythical nonsense that it is incapable of thinking clearly. The latest polls indicate that 40% of the population believe that humans were created by God in their present form within the last 10 thousand years. An additional 38% believe that humans evolved with the guidance of God. In other words, scientific evolutionary principles themselves were insufficient to create humanity without super being guidance is believed by 78% of the populace. (see http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_publia.htm ). The belief seems to be that not only you cannot expect life to emerge from non-life, you cannot expect intelligent thought to emerge from stupidity. Stupidity wins every time, hands down. This is evident, no only in textbooks, but in every aspect of government, economic, militaristic, and financial life in the current USA. Pigs ears are rampant.
I'm constantly hearing politicians say, "The American voters are smart!" ...I don't think so. Otherwise those idiot creationists would be ridden out of town on a rail.
As a longtime resident of Texas who is used to being collared in public by literal-minded, Christian fundamentalist Bible-thumpers, I've nevertheless always wondered why it matters so much how we were created. It wonders because, according to the fundies, if you don't believe all the Bible, word for word, you don't believe any of it.

The Bible, you see, is the literal word of God. But God made a lot of mistakes in the writing of the Bible. I'd suggest God take a non-fiction writing course at the University of Iowa before engaging in a Newer Testament.
Well, at least your suggestion was the non-fiction course.
Considering the skyrocketing prices of tuition these days I doubt God could afford it.
I think the most upsetting thing about your piece is that you didn't capitalize creationism....
Another great post.

I was wondering what was happening with this whole issue. Nothing else seemed to come out in the news... or maybe I wasn't paying close enough attention.

I find it amusing how this guy, a dentist and polician, has qualifieed himself to make the determination that there are "gaps in the fossile record". He doesn't seem to realize that one of the most astounding things is that Darwins theories have been consistantly upheld even to advanced genetic studies.

153 years later, the theory still holds. I find that amazing.
How in the world did McLeroy get into, let alone through, dental school without being an adherent of reason and the scientific method? I hope the dental school is examining its entrance requirements. R
Don't you love how the right wingnuts scream about 'the nanny state'? And aren't these the same coneheads who are afraid that sharia law is going to be imposed on the USA? Yeah, we're promoting freedom of speech by having kids pay attention to Christian fairy tales.

Too often, the right wing covers its ears and sings as loudly as it can so that it will not hear the nasty intrusion of fact-based reality. More magical thinking -- that's what we need to correct all of America's ills!