Steve Klingaman

Steve Klingaman
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota,
Birthday
January 01
Title
Consultant/Writer
Bio
Steve Klingaman is a nonprofit development consultant and nonfiction writer specializing in personal finance and public policy. His music reviews can be found at minor7th.com.

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
OCTOBER 28, 2010 8:24AM

How the Democrats Will Hold the Senate

Rate: 24 Flag

Christine O'Donnell  

Christine O'Donnell -- File Under:  Opportunity Squandered

Image: knoxnews.com 

In the last two weeks Senate races have tightened noticeably.  Whether due to inept candidates (O’Donnell), late-stage revelations (Miller), or flat-out screw ups (Rand), aggressive, well-funded challenges are falling short in a number of states.  But the key to understanding how this will affect control of the Senate is the measure of current party control of the seats most up for grabs.

            The current Senate split is 57 – 41 in favor of the Democrats, plus the two members who are nominally independent but caucus regularly with the Dems.  That makes the effective majority 59 – 41, plus a Democratic tiebreaker in Joe Biden.  In terms of control of the Senate, it doesn’t matter whether Lisa Murkowski or Joe Miller wins, because the seat was already in Republican hands.  Same with the battle between nominally independent underdog Charlie Crist and Tea Partier Marco Rubio in Florida.  Safe Republican seats in Ohio, Missouri and New Hampshire are likely to stay that way as well. 

            But turning the Senate red requires that the Republicans sweep the toss-up races, and more—and that’s just not likely.

Here’s how some of the close races and party changes break out.

Democratic Wins:  Delaware

   Chris Coons will ride his First Amendment quiz show knowledge to victory because Chris O’Donnell is just too lame.  It isn’t that the Republican shadow funders picked a candidate that was too conservative to win; they just picked one who is too inept to win.  This race alone may very likely save the Senate for the Democrats.

Republican Wins:  Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, North Dakota

   In Arkansas, the health care reform debate doomed Blanche Lincoln, who from her vulnerable perch out on that limb found that folks back home just didn’t want to hear it.  Now she’s reduced to buttonholing people in parking lots.  Republican John Boozeman will cruise to victory according to those who claim to know.

            The Florida seat already was in Republican hands, and Crist, were he to eke out an unlikely victory, would likely caucus with the Republicans, so no change here.

            Indiana and North Dakota represent to almost certain blue-to-red transfers.  In Indiana, Dan Coats maintains a significant lead and North Dakota Governor John Hoeven has no opposition to speak of.

Running Tally:  54 - 44

Leans Democratic

Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, California

   While none of these races are a sure thing by any means, the Democrats have shown a remarkable reluctance to roll over and die, and in Kentucky most notably the Republican candidate was not all he was cracked up to be.  In Connecticut, Linda McMahon the wrestling magnate is likely to once again prove that throwing one’s personal fortune at a Senate seat sometimes comes up short.  Carly Fiorina is looking likely to prove the same in California where voters seem ready to say, “Barbara Boxer is a weak Democrat, but she’s our weak Democrat.”  Fiorina’s hospitalization for a breast cancer-related infection will probably inspire a bit of sympathy while at the same time reminding voters of the uncertain nature of her health status.  Plus, she’s missing all those last-minute campaign appearances.

            In Pennsylvania, Joe Sestak benefits from his state’s nominally blue reputation, plus the fact that he already knocked out one state icon, party switcher Arlen Specter.  Kentucky’s Rand Paul has been branded with the Libertarian weirdo tag effectively enough that Democrat Jack Conway should be able to close the deal, in what would count as a remarkable defeat for insurgents on the right.

Running Tally:  55 - 43

Leans Republican

Wisconsin

   This Midwestern tale of heartbreak confounds all the analysts.  Russ Feingold trails by six to nine points despite the fact that he shows high positives in recent polling.  Wisconsinites seem to be ready to sacrifice him on the alter of… what was it exactly?  Oh, limited government, sorry.

Running Tally:  54 - 44

Toss Up

Alaska, Colorado, Illinois, Nevada, Washington, West Virginia

    Don’t take my word for it, non-Republicans from across the punditry spectrum put this collection of races in the wild & wacky category.  Some of the outcomes, as in the case of Alaska noted above, don’t affect control of the august debating society.  Colorado shows temporary incumbent Michael Bennet defying earlier polls and hanging on for dear life.  Illinois is definitely in the wild and wacky category in a race that proves President Obama’s coattails are not a factor even for his own old seat.  Plus, his Democratic buddy Alexi Giannoulias is a member of a banking family with a bad banking record.  Not to mention the foreign sounding name.  (Russian and Greek?  Where’s his birth certificate?)

            Nevada.  What can be said here?  Sharron Angle is a nutcase with too many r’s in her name, but the whole state seems ready to use a second amendment solution on the never-worse-off Harry Reid.  This race proves how little national leverage counts when the folks at home hate you.

            Washington.  I refuse to believe that the Democrats can lose here, but that’s what they say—it’s a tossup.  Have the militia types relocated from Idaho?  Incumbent Patty Murray shows just how feeble the so-called advantage of incumbency is in this election cycle.  Republican challenger Dino Rossi has honed his campaigning skills after two previous runs for governor and has so far avoided big blunders.

            West Virginia.  Governor Joe Manchin, (D), who never met a mountaintop that he wouldn’t mind sacrificing to the national addiction to coal, is no friend to the progressive wing of the party in his state.  In this race for the (somewhat wrongly) hallowed seat held by the former Senator Byrd, Manchin could not run any farther away from President Obama if call told him to just shove it.  Despite Manchin taking the hugely retrograde stance of wanting to sue the EPA for enforcing the law of the land, and wanting to repeal parts of health care reform, Republican challenger John Raese remains locked neck-and-neck.  Who knows?  Perhaps West Virginians feel like why elect an ersatz Republican when Raese is the real deal.

 

Running Tally:  Here’s where it gets interesting.

 

    Say the Republicans win Wisconsin and six of seven tossup races.  That means they win seven races, but only pick up six new seats, due to Alaska’s previous red status.  That leaves the split at Democrats 48 –  Republicans 50, with two independents on the Democrats side for a tie of 50 – 50, but Joe Biden is still the tiebreaker.  Given Biden’s role in a tie, the Republicans are effectively one seat short.  So they still have to win one out of the blue-leaning category of Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Kentucky and California—and the odds of picking up six of seven tossups are very low.

            You might say you see a real shot for them in Pennsylvania and Kentucky.  But I’ve already spotted them Colorado, Nevada, and Washington.  So, while not impossible,  a Republican win would give new meaning to the term, “running the board.”  Don’t expect to learn the complete outcome on election night though.  Close races, absentee ballots, and a write-in candidate could cause final tallies to be determined in a matter of days or weeks rather than hours.

            How much does it matter?  Lots, really.  And yet not so much at all.  But we won’t go there here.  Some say it would be better for Obama to have a solid Republican Congress he could run against, á la Harry Truman.  Which brings us to the central takeaway from all of this.  No matter what happens, odds are the 2012 race for president will begin on November 3, 2010.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
This will be very interesting to watch. Regarding birth certs, Senators dont need to be native, do they? Only naturalized.
Just a small joke, Bill. Thanks for commenting!
Hope you're right.

I read somewhere that blue dogs are in trouble. If y'all could get true Dem majorities, with some party cohesion, maybe things would change...
Unless dems get back up over 60 Senate votes, they might as well be in the minority...Maybe that would make it easier in 2012....I still hold out hope for Feingold; surely people aren't that deluded.
Sounds like Civil War to me. Reds against the Blues so evenly matched that only a good fist fight can decide. Your post really nailed it all straight tho and gave me HOPE. Thanks
For the November 2nd election results won't be final until the 5th of January when the Federal Election Commission certifies them. Any results that you see with regards to candidates for federal offices previous to the 5th of January are preliminary results rather than final results unless a candidate for federal office concedes.

As for write in candidates... I could give you the long answer but it would take up a whole lot of space so I will stick with "If a write in candidate has not filed the appropriate paperwork it does not matter how many votes they get, the votes for them are not tabulated at the end of the night."
Maybe it's just me, but I love that picture of Christine O'Donnell. We need more pictures of our politicians in ridiculous shots.
With a 50-50 split, I'm having visions of Lieberman being carried around by litter-bearing Democratic supplicants, or joining the Republicans. I think Dems need to hold 51 to confidently claim control.
Mrs. Raptor: good points. I was thinking of Lisa Murkowski, who has filed.

Duane, yes, Christine has quite a "can do" pose, doesn't she?

Paul: I agree. Although a fellow like Crist, were he to be elected, might swing both ways (figuratively speaking).

Thanks, all.
I'll probably be up all night on Tuesday. I hope you'll do a post-mortem next week!
Jeanette: Thanks! I am looking forward to Stewart and Colbert together on election night: 9 p.m. ET.
An excellent report of the midterms. I hope you've made an exception for Liebermouse in your tally.
I think you're right. All I know for sure is that I'll be vastly relieved when the campaign season is finally over. Of course, the following day the campaign season for 2012 gets under way. Nooooooo!!!!!!!!!!
I really hope you are right! The current crowd of tea party candidates is appropriate for Halloween because the thought of them having any power terrifies me! R
I wouldn't mind seeing the Senate change hands, so Obama can campaign against the "do nothing Congress of the 21st Century.
I'm not sure I agree Barbara Boxer is so weak...If she is, why haven't the repubs ever been able to beat her? She's certainly got some fervid backers in this state because she has the courage to be an actual Liberal Democrat. (Maybe we really love endangered species here.)

This year is a nail biter for certain, but Carly Fiorina is doing as well as she is BECAUSE she's getting so much backing from Karl Rove and GOP money and noise. It sure isn't because Californians find her endearing. Former HP employees she laid off hate her infernal guts. I find her despicable because, after going through all the fear and vulnerability of fighting breast cancer, she has so little empathy that she's willing to possibly cut off other women's access to medical care by pledging to vote against health care out of her dislike for poorly defined "socialism." Does she think only rich women get cancer? Feh on Carly!
Mr. Klingaman:

I suppose I'm somewhat comforted by this.

However, Nevada, my adopted home state, was recently voted Dumbest State In America. The dumbshits that account for this statistic vote. It appears that Sharron Angleidiot appeals to dumshits.

Will all of you other 49 states come to Nevada and claim your dumbshits and take them back home please?
I don't care which side of the isle you sit on, this has been a fun cycle for those who like elections.
I like your analysis, Steve. Prior to reading it, I've comforted myself with the thoughts that even if the Republicans take Congress, their inability to do anything beneficial for the country will ensure that 2012 will be another Democratic victory. Still, if the Dems manage to hold onto Congress, we can be spared the Republican posturing altogether. Crossing fingers (and voting, of course!)
Interesting take. I am pretty amazed Feingold is taking on water. I am a center right guy, but I thought he was pretty well entrenched. Tough to say which is better, a slim majority or slim minority. I argue slim minority as the expectation is you cannot do anything, and the odds of holding all folks on the same page of blue dogs to progressives or moderates to tea partiers to social cons is harder.

I have long assumed Dems hold the senate, with a skinnier majority and reps get the house. The question then becomes if they learned from their mistakes in 94 taking over the house for the first time in decades and not really knowing what it took. It was if they were greyhounds in 94 catching the mechanical rabbit. Now what?

The key is business confidence to begin investing again. Too much policy uncertainty for them to do reasonable ROI analysis and put money at risk. Get the legislative arena settled down, and hopefully they will get back to it.

That is the hope, at least. We'll see. Will be fun to look back on this on 11/3.
gosh, this is exciting. which party will attack global warming? neither. which party will address fundamental economic problems? ummm, neither. which party will redress human rights abuses?nup. but golly this is exciting...
First off, I would have bet it would be WWE's Linda McMahon who would have a supporter stomping someone, not Rand Paul. Second, I can't believe that nutjob Angle might actually knock off Harry Reid, and that Feingold is probably going to lose.

Interesting analysis I saw yesterday - incumbents in the areas with harder times are more likely to stay in office than in areas where they are weathering the economic storm better. What? Just shows how irrational voters can be.
"I don't care which side of the isle you sit on, this has been a fun cycle for those who like elections."

WOW, the idiot bought an island. No wonder he gets to say stupid stuff and lie all the time.

Get a DICKtionary, moron -start with "a" and look up "aisle."

Try "too," (while You're out there - literally and figuratively). "To" does NOT equal "too" does NOT equal "two."

Os's class clown, once again, proves why he is the dumbest one around.

I wish that I could be as optimistic as You, Steve, but I think when the final tally is in, we will see that the liars, bigots, and ignorant lumpin' (m)asses have carried the day.


-R-
I certainly hope this country can stay out of Sen. Franken's "ditch"!
Unfortunately we aren't too big on history or economics: We like brain-bites. There is a possiblility that the American people have been sold the "Dream like It's 1994" song: "1994 was followed by a period of nationwide prosperity; Republicans held Congress - Democratic President thru the century. Hell, a bunch of Senators just said they missed Clinton; Think they'll aim better this time?"
I can't think of a bridge....
I notice the emails I get from the Dems--and I'm signed up with just about every Dem org you can think of--are mostly for the push to hold the Senate, by about 10-to-1! So I think they've given up on the House. Finally. I think they'll hold onto the Senate easy...and maybe even surprise some folks by not completely collapsing in the House. The Republicans have so much ground to make up over there, they could end up with only a dozen seat lead, or so, not nearly enough to get anything passed with ease.

rated.
Based on nothing but my pretty reliable gut, I think you might be right. I'll be looking forward to your post-mortem, Steve.

Lezlie
I ask myself how much all of this matters? Even if red rules by a vote or two... or it's the other way around, nothing positive will get done in the next two years. Nothing..
Good analysis. It is nice that someone actually sat down and thought things through. And explained it to the rest of us, plain worried. Thanks!
If anything good can come out of this fiasco, hopefully it will be ALL of the politicians will have learned a lesson. Stop the arrogance of trouncing on the will of the American people and begin to act in a manner of trustworthy principles and charcter, as well as higher moral values.

The stench from all politicians needs to be stopped along with their personal agendas.
I am actually slightly more optimistic. I think that Tuesday is going to be a big surprise for the Republicans....but they are not going to like it. I think that when the dust settles, it will be 52 -48 in favor of sanity.

The House....well, I never had much use for the Reps of either party.

The really big takeaway through all of this is that it doesn't actually mean anything at all because the Republicans will not get the two-thirds majority they need to overturn a presidential veto, which leaves Obama firmly in control for the next two years.

In fact, that being the case, they might find themselves forced to make deals with Obama that will stand us all in good stead.

Of course, a Republican House could vote to impeach the President, probably on questions of his legal right to the office, which would then be tried in the Senate, where it is very unlikely that a conviction would result.

But one never knows. I am quite certain that one of these lunatics is going to try to make the case that Obama is not legally a citizen....and that's when the fun really begins.
Well, Wednesday morning we'll see if you're right. And then you can write a follow-up to this.
Nice work.... We shall see! Working the polls as usual so I will come home to results...
Hope you're right. Fine post. Thanks- R