When Your Spirit Whispers

Pay Attention! _ Write It Down!
MARCH 25, 2010 12:04PM

Deconstructing The Tobacco Paradigm

Rate: 1 Flag

Let’s be honest and stop pretending that smokefree laws discriminate against so called smokers.  Here’s what advocates of smokefree laws are saying. You do not have the right to pollute the air of the people around you. You do not have the right to endanger the lives of others, nor do you have the right to compromise their health!

Here is the most often used phrase by defenders of public smoking. “If you don’t like the smoke don’t go there!” Tobacco defenders are very transparent in their advocacy of discrimination of people who do not breathe smoke into their lungs! They very clearly represent their intent to exclude a very well defined class called human beings. It is no different than saying no Blacks, no Jews, no Gays, no Hispanics, no Asians.

First of all, let’s be clear that the word “smoker” defines an action, not a class of people. Smokefree laws prohibit the act of smoking in places where the act would jeopardize the rights of others. Smokefree laws in no way prevent any human being from going to any public places. They prevent lighted cigarettes and other smoking devices from being used in public places.

So let’s stop the BS once and for all. There is no such thing as Smokers’ rights, because there is no such thing as a “smoker.” When a smoker is not smoking, he or she is simply another human being. Smokefree laws are directed at protecting the rights of all human beings.

Without smokefree laws, a small minority of nicotine addicts are simply allowed to continue to discriminate against everyone else by saying, “if you don’t want to breathe smoke into your lungs, then don’t go out in public.” In order to perpetuate this ludicrous hypothesis for the past century, we have all been asked to pretend that smoke is not smoke. We have been asked to believe that smoke does not drift, that it respects imaginary boundaries, that it does not seep through the cracks in floors and ceilings, that it does not cause harm when it enters the lungs of someone outdoors.

The smokefree movement is a civil rights movement like all of the other civil rights movements that came before. It is an evolutionary process that requires the entire population of the world to eventually admit our complicity in a belief system that allows more preventable deaths than any other action in the world.

In order to stop the tobacco genocide, we must first admit that sucking smoke into human lungs is not only deadly, it is absolutely ludicrous. We must deconstruct a belief system that pretends compassion for nicotine addicts, but in reality demonizes those who are victims of secondhand smoke. We must deconstruct a paradigm that legitimizes an act that literally kills its participants and many bystanders. But our biggest task is to educate those who are still unaware that they have the right to a better life. Whether we smoke or not, the entire world are slaves to tobacco. In order to destroy the tobacco paradigm, we must first convince the world that slavery is wrong, that we all have a right to be free. When that finally happens, then perhaps reason will replace illogic in the conversation about tobacco abuse. There are two points that, in a rational world, would be self evident. Everyone has the right to breathe clean unpolluted air! No one has the right to sell a product that kills its users!

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
It would be difficult for anyone to argue your salient and clear points. And honestly, I thought smokefree environments were being accepted everywhere. Living in Boulder, I honestly rarely see a smoker so this isn't something I even think about. It's bothersome to me that the way the language is being used for smokers...who at this point knowingly choose to engage in an activity that has been proven to be unhealthy, not only for them but those around them, that there is an audacity to convince people that there are such things as "smoker's right". Where is the logic? We certainly accept that the alcoholic or those imbibing do not also have the right to drive under the influence. Excellent post as always.
Everyone, everywhere has the right to smoke-free air. When smokers talk about their "rights", I always ask them about their right to a product which is NOT addictive, NOT defective and NOT lethal, WHEN USED AS INTENDED.

Tobacco is ALREADY an ILLEGAL drug. It is NOT legal to poison people, no matter how slowly you do it.

We should ban tobacco immediately and prosecute the pushers for the wanton murder and genocide of the human race.
Mary,

I am happy you can have that experience. For the first couple of years after the California law banning smoking in bars was enacted in 1998, it was pretty easy to avoid smoke in most public places here in San Francisco. But then, the City Attorney conspired, with the prodding of then Mayor Willie Brown, to exploit the vagueness of the state law in favor of businesses who chose to ignore the intent of the law. Together they redefined enclosed spaces to allow businesses to permit smoking once again. Over the last decade I have fiercely advocated strengthening the law to close those loopholes. An attempt by the state legislature to close the loopholes was vetoed by our cigar toting governor. A few weeks ago, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors finally strengthened the city’s smokefree legislation, but not without watering it down to allow exemptions for businesses who modified their structures in order to avoid compliance with state law.

Always, that invisible invasive hand of the tobacco industry squashes any hope of real reform. They continue to control the minds of the masses by infecting them with the idea that it is impossible to completely eradicate the scourge of tobacco addiction. As they successfully and deliberately addict young children in developing nations, they also plot their comeback in the developed world. They brutally defend the last vestiges of normalcy, because they know that this is their foot in the door that we try to close on their illegitimate profit from death.