Every Day Should Be Champagne Friday

Because bubbles are more fun.
Editor’s Pick
NOVEMBER 25, 2008 4:17PM

Rebranding Feat: Reader's Digest Considering Name Change

Rate: 10 Flag

ReadersDigest

In publishing, naming magazines, articles and columns is an art in itself. My mentor is a master copyeditor from newspapers and she is a natural at that kind of thing. I love the challenge of writing headlines, cover blurbs and call-outs that say a lot in few words.

The New York Times recently reported that Reader's Digest Assn.'s chief executive officer Mary Berner is considering changing the name of the corporation to encompass everything that her company has become. RDA doesn't just publish magazines, it has a huge direct marketing arm too,"claiming data on 100 million American consumers," and it is forging full force into multimedia platform ventures including a newly signed deal with a megachurch in California, according to FolioMag.com.

Changing this company's 86-year-old name and re-branding the company will be a challenging feat and if it isn't done right, could go badly. Branding is a hot topic in publishing these days as media companies struggle to establish their identities across new media platforms. One of my favorite books on branding is The Culting of Brands: When Customers Become True Believers by Douglas Atkin. In it Atkins draws parallels between religion and consumerism, beliefs and buying instincts, and says that companies' best bets for profitable branding is to create cult-like following.

So after reading Atkin's book, I'm not sure RDA should mess too much with a good thing, after all they have the largest consumer magazine circulation in the U.S., and there may be a big risk in alienating readers already fiercely loyal to their brand.  

But just for fun, all you clever OS writers, what are your suggestions for Ms. Berner?

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I often ask people to "give me the Readers Digest version" of the story. It is far more than a brandname, it is an adjective. I think it's a bad idea to change that name. (rated)
I assume the company's flagship product, the Reader's Digest, would keep its name, and only the company name would change? Because it would be foolish to change the name of the magazine.
Ugh, this is a sore spot for me...I'm not helping them. I was supposed to be in the current issue of Reader's Digest, featured for being a snowman expert and they bumped me and they bumped me good...having spent a a few days photoshoot, interviewing...ugh. (my cartoons do appear in there)...okay, I'm pulling myself together, good post! It's not always about me, it's not always about me.
Interesting conundrum, especially since I continue to question which percentage of the populace would even self-identify as readers nowadays.

So, redline that word and just call it The Digest.

Also works better with convergence of text, video, audio, and interactive content on their web site(s).
I have to agree with Roger and Procopius that renaming the magazine would be a mistake. Apparently, the company is worried that it isn't "cool." Well who reads Reader's Digest to be cool?
That Little Magazine with the Smallest Versions of the Bigger Work, for Those Who Like to Read in Waiting Rooms?

No, probably not sexy enough.

I agree with everyone here. Reader's Digest isn't supposed to be sexy. That's crazy talk.
Reader's Digest was a staple in my grandparents' homes. It usually highlighted at least one scam going on. Old people love scams, especially those people raised during the Depression. Everything is a scam to them. We could rename it Scams Monthly.
Scruffus,
You made me laugh and I think it's a great re-name.
Name it "Jumbo Coaster", and sell it near the Big Gulps at 7-11.
I don't know, the reader's digest is a standard. We used to be asked to read RD in school to improve our language.
Somehow changing the name would make it difficult for me to identify with the brand.
J T-H, that's hilarious!
Somyr, first off, I have to say that I made an easy $200 from the Reader's Digest in the late '70s when I was paid for a funny anecdote I submitted to their "Campus Comedy" section.

The second point, is that they are not located in Pleasantville, NY but rather Chappaqua, NY, the same town as the Clintons live in. That seemed like an ongoing kind of deception to me. The company was in the process of selling the large Chappaqua campus where "Reader's Digest" has been for decades, and for all I know they may have already sold it and moved.

I'm surprised they would change such a well known name as the "Reader's Digest." I suppose they could change to a magazine featuring stories and pics of supermodels and call it "Looker's Digest."
This takes me back 50 years. There was also a kid's version of the Digest but I read the adult version. It seemed like every couple months they would republish Ike's essay on the Flag and other short articles how good it was to live in America. There were articles besides the shortened books and stories. By my turbulent teens, Reader's Digest was thrown in my toss out pile along with Look, Life and Saturday Evening Post. I would suggest grabbing a few disgraceful writers from Rolling Stone Magazine as a start. Grab some gusto and some gonzo. Condense some older and newer stuff and pay attention to the web. Like you are doing right now. Set up your own site along with contests seeking book reviews.
Have some fun. It looks like that is what you are going to do. Good luck.
to me, all of these comments seem to highlight the REASON the name change -

the brand just screams old people magazine

I used to read it and love it, especially for the short snippets and vocabulary quiz, but it seems to have taken a pretty right-ward, faux news sort of slant the last few times I've picked one up. I'm not sure they know who their audience is OR
they have found it in the mega-church deal
and want to more reliably be associated with this part of the culture.

I don't mean to sound so negative, but it's sort of got that Oprah/the Notebook kind of feel to it these days

maybe they just need a new tag line
smaltzy shit in quick bites
Actually, in this case I do not think rebranding RD will be detrimental to the brand - it has evolved so far away from its original position as a nice, populist little magazine to become a conservative Christian socio-cultural moral gatekeeper. If they rebrand, it can have the advantage of more staunchly defining itself to the hardcore true believer repeat purchasers that are its bread and butter.

New names that would fit its current editorial direction:

The Magazine For People Who Look Like You and Think Like You
We Value Families Just Like Ours, The Rest Are No Good

In seriousness, Verbal Remedy's idea is the most workable one for them. Or maybe they could spice it up a little, with a version that reflects the paternalistic authoritarianism that pervades the mag, e.g. call it Digest This
Readers Digest conjures up images of my grandparent's red bathroom.
The little magazines were in a red basket in front of the toilet, below the tissue. They were pretty handy.
That bathroom is where I learned to smoke. My cousin and I would sneak a Moore from our Nanny's little leather cigarette pouch and puff away under the fan vent.
Those were the days.
Cinnamon potpourri and cigarette smoke is still one of my strongest and favorite memory scents.
I don't think they should change the name. I like my red bathroom image just the way it is.
Great-Grandmother Earth

OLD People

The PBS Companion
New title for Reader's Digest?

The word "reader" is no longer fashionable because there are about 50% fewer readers now than there were 10 years ago, and there will be 50% fewer readers next year.

So how about Non-Readers Digest? Or Skimmer's Digest? Or Looker's Digest?
Aww. I think my main problem with the rapid evolution/termination of print publications is the loss of tradition, and this is a prime example. I understand ... but still.