Vatican Reprimands U.S. Nuns For "Radical Feminist Themes"
The church says it discovered "serious doctrinal problems" during an investigation into an influential group of American nuns.
By Abby OhlheiserThe New York Times reports that the crackdown on the Leadership Conference of Women Religious was the result of a lengthy investigation into the group that began in 2008. Archbishop J. Peter Sartain of Seattle will oversee the reform effort.
The women's group, which was formed in 1956 at the Vatican's request, represents roughly 4 in 5 American nuns. The organization speaks out on policy issues, especially those pertaining to social justice, and provides leadership training to the approximately 57,000 nuns it represents.
The religious disagreement between the Vatican and the LCWR has a lot to do with end-of-life and abortion debates in the U.S., especially in the context of President Obama's health care reform law. As the BBC notes, the Vatican chastised the group for ignoring the church's stance on euthanasia and abortion, and for making public statements that "disagree with or challenge positions taken by the bishops" in the U.S. The Vatican is also upset with the group for apparently challenging church teaching on homosexuality and male-only priesthood.
According to the Times, the reforms will take place over a five-year period, and will involve the approval by the archbishop of every speaker the Leadership Conference has at their public events, a revision of their group statues, the replacement of the group's handbook, reforming the group's stances on issues to reflect those of the Vatican, and an investigation into the Leadership Conference's connections to Network, a Catholic-run social justice group founded by nuns, and the Resource Center for Religious Life."
April 19, 2012 11:10 AMVatican Moves To Rein In Nuns
By Ed Kilgore
"The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), the Vatican agency (and distant descendant of the Roman Inquisition) once led by Pope Benedict XVI, has issued a document rebuking the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, the umbrella groups that often speaks on matters of public policy for America’s 55,000 nuns. Its alleged sins include association with “radical feminists,” an unwillingness to speak out on behalf of “the church’s biblical view on family life and human sexuality” (code for opposing same-sex marriage, contraception and abortion), and most of all, its failure to follow the lead of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops on controversial issues. A smaller but closely associated group founded by nuns to promote social justice, Network, was also reprimanded by CDF.
The timing of the action is interesting indeed. According to David Gibson of the Religion News Service, the investigation of LCWR was apparently initiatedin 2008 and concluded in 2010, with the pope signing off on sanctions early in 2011. Hard to believe it’s a coincidence that the Vatican moved to curb the nuns for implicit insubordination against the Bishops just as the USCCB announced a big summer series of protests for “religious liberty” keyed to categorical opposition to the Obama administration’s efforts to implement a contraception coverage mandate, particularly since LCWR has been notably willing to support compromise efforts and earlier supported the health reform legislation that authorized the mandate.
Laurie Goodstein of the New York Times quotes Sr. Simone Campbell, executive director of Network, as acknowledging the political intent of the rebuke:
“I would imagine that it was our health care letter that made them mad,” Sister Campbell said. “We haven’t violated any teaching, we have just been raising questions and interpreting politics.”
It’s noteworthy that an American, former San Franciso archbishop William Cardinal Levada, now heads the CDF and issued the rebuke. And he’s clearly putting his former colleagues from the USCCB in charge of the nuns’ “rehabilitation,” reports Goodstein:
He appointed Archbishop J. Peter Sartain of Seattle to lead the process of reforming the sisters’ conference, with assistance from Bishop Thomas J. Paprocki and Bishop Leonard Blair, who was in charge of the investigation of the group.
They have been given up to five years to revise the group’s statutes, approve of every speaker at the group’s public programs and replace a handbook the group used to facilitate dialogue on matters that the Vatican said should be settled doctrine. They are also supposed to review the Leadership Conference’s links with Network and another organization, the Resource Center for Religious Life.
There’s a separate investigation, dubbed a “visitation,” also underway under Vatican auspices to examine the overall situation of “women religious” in the U.S., that could lead to other sanctions and “reforms.”
And I’d bet it’s just a matter of time until other conscientious objecters against the Bishops’ declaration of culture war, such as the Catholic Health Association (itself led by a nun, Sr. Carol Keehan) and various Catholic colleges and universities, get a taste of the lash and some sternly worded advice and direction."
Dear Members of NCAN -


Salon.com
Comments
Separation of church and state, separation of church and state, say it again and again and try to comprehend the wisdom of that. Saying or claiming a religious control over a nation is a dangerous and slippery slope. Take a look at those nations out there with state religions. Do we really think that is what we want in this country?
The both faced the same moral dilemma - how to live with your conscious while living under a dictatorship. Ratzinger should have spent more time studying the sermons of Cardinal Newman as Sophie did.
In the end, who is more worthy to see the face of God?
r
People forget how many women in this country use birth control, that is a no no in the catholic church, not to mention ABORTION! How many catholic women have had an abortion? Would love to know that. Also how many catholic women gave birth to, loved and nurtured a gay child? Wow, amazing huh?
Time for everybody to wake up and smell the coffee. Stop funding this crazed anti women institution, stop supporting a follower of Hitler, stop making excuses that this is the religion you were brought up with. Just a thought, or stay in it and try to change it, improve it, the way so many have, including these nuns, only to find out that they are being reigned in and chastised and discriminated against and demeaned.
According to the moral code of the Historical Jesus, the sisters are right. Yet, according to the Catholic doctrine, they are wrong! Thank you so much, Sheila, for your excellent work on this issue. I want to see what happens. R
They've been pulling this crap since the beginning and the suppressed the Gospels of Mary Magdeline.
The only thing I find surprising is how many women have put up with their BS for so long!
the copper-silver penny reads "Liberty Parent of Science & Industry."
"At the time, industry and science reflected an enlightenment mindset," Imhof said. "People believed freedom of thought and industrial growth would bind and unify the new country, not religion or God."
So our founding fathers did not want church to have this much power. Guess our Congress needs to re-read their history.
Phyllis: I did not know that....amazing isn't it? They do need a history lesson and so do all these crazy right wing evangelicals that seem to believe otherwise too.
Zuma: You are so right, the reformation was a good thing, thanks to Luther and his fierce will. We need another one. Thanks for reading.
Thank you, Sheila.
r.
My hat's off to the women who dare to speak out.
Pope be dammed.