Recently, a friend on Open Salon asked how I managed to keep reading and writing about politics, when the last few months have been so full of disappointment and frustration. Part of my answer was simple dorkness: I've been reading a lot about the American revolution -- right now I'm working on an Alexander Hamilton biography -- and everything about that time reminds me that everything we're looking at now, all of the ugliness, all of the craziness -- it was ten times worse back then, and the country was much shakier at the time, too. I mean, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams both took over newspapers to essentially slander each other's characters, Alexander Hamilton was killed by a former vice president in a duel, and now we remember them as wise heroes of a kinder age. And they fought all their battles when the country could've easily broken apart around them. So I spend some time telling myself, OK, things suck, people are getting crazy and illogical, but -- at the end of this, even if things go as badly as they possibly could, we'll still have the status quo, which is a functioning government, regular elections, and continued chances to change things every time we go to the polls.
I've kept thinking about this as time has gone on and as I've read more about the early years of the Revolution. Unlike now, every one of those early patriots had to go to bed with the fear that he would wake not to another day of controversy in America, but to a new day of no country at all. Anarchy and chaos were real possibilities. No matter how terrible things get -- and yes, they've been pretty terrible of late -- I have never gone to sleep thinking that, perhaps, tomorrow, there will be no more United States.
Maybe that's terrible optimism. Governments rise and fall all the time in the world, in countries small and large, and people survive. I'd like to think that I'm not so blindly tied to my nationality that I could survive in a world without America, where an American identity was meaningless -- but I'm not sure it's true.
Thus today is of special import for me. It's Constitution Day. Two hundred and twenty-two years ago, on September 17, 1787, the new Constitution of the United States of America was adopted by the Constitutional Convention, signed by the 39 delegates, and sent out to the states for ratification. The National Archives, where the original text still lives, headlines it as "a model of cooperative statesmanship and the art of compromise," and that has continued to be true throughout its history. We may not agree upon its meaning, always, or its deployment, but Americans almost to a person seem to agree upon its value. Our stability as a country -- and we are a shockingly stable union -- rests most firmly upon the survival of this document.
That's not to say that the Constitution is a stony, implacable thing. In fact, for all the stability it's inspired, it's hard to mark even a concrete date of its birth. It would take another three years before the Bill of Rights were added, in 1791, and it's been amended another 17 times since then. Even now, there are several proposals for amendment before Congress, and 11,000 amendments have been proposed over time. Sure, it's been used for good and for ill, to justify moments of greatness and horrible errors, but it's still there, binding us to a common set of purposes. Is it outdated? Moldy in language and, certainly, in its descriptions of who should be a citizen? Absolutely. But what do you expect from the oldest written national constitution in the world? Perfection? No -- never in our Constitution. It is a document notable for its mistakes, but also for its ability to rise above them, to amend its own content without changing its real purpose. It is a truly American thing.
So -- go forth and celebrate like it's 1787. Lift an ale (Sam Adams, maybe?), try the Which Founding Father Are You? quiz (I'm James Madison), take a stroll about your free and enduring country, and meditate on the meaning of the document still holding us together:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Salon.com
Comments
A great book on this is Gore Vidal's "Burr." Historical fiction to be sure, but I believe most of it.
Thanks for this. R
john blumenthal, what do you mean when you say "it wasn't that widespread"?
selves that the sainted founding fathers were in fact just as vile as the current crop of politicians.
if you trouble yourself to read private correspondence by the writers of the constitution, you would stop using the word 'democracy' in connection with the usa. it was not their intent, and broadening the franchise did not change the nature of the constitution.
Hah! I'm James Madison too. Now I gotta go look him up, learn more and share with others. ;-)
It does not surprise me that those in power would challenge the restraints of the Constitution, what does surprise me is how quickly we rollover in the name of security when they do.
Con, that is excellent. I will have to make a pilgrimage, someday.
I am so disgusted by the Hispanic immigrants.. (not Vietnamese, Korean or Tagalog.. who all do endeavor to the English language)... it is the Hispanic that comes to America, to absorb the benefits of this document and the others.. yet change the fabric of this society without adopting the language it was created in.
Majority of Hispanics feel they must be adapted to.. not adapt.. as clearly reported by the Pew Hispanic Reports.. btw.
And this is why this document is weakened each year in the passing.. because it was never meant to be remolded to other cultures.. but to stand as a beacon for all cultures. That's how American twists itself into an unrecognizable state.
This is the culture that does not respect what America was founded on.. and in.. English.. and the current government.. oddly enough.. doesn't either.
If you look for pretzel logic.. and you find it.. beware.. corruption is at it's center. Life is too simple to not see clear truths.
Where chaos is twisting.. and corruption is its center... that's akin to evil.
The more technical argument to this is, simply, that naturalization still requires a test that's more stringent than most born-here citizens ever have to face, so those from any country who choose to make America their home plausibly have a deeper understanding of the written Constitution than many of us born into the rights granted in that document and its amendments.