Richard Rider

Richard Rider
Location
San Diego, California, USA
Birthday
August 24
Title
Chairman
Company
San Diego Tax Fighters
Bio
Biography of Richard Rider (Updated July, 2011) San Diego, CA 92131 E-mail: RRider@san.rr.com * AGE: 66 * EDUCATION: B.A. Economics, University of North Carolina, 1968 * MILITARY SERVICE: Commander, Supply Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve, retired after 26 years (four years active, the rest in the reserve). ** OCCUPATION: Retired stockbroker and financial planner. Lifetime member of the International Association of Financial Planners. Former business owner. * AFFILIATION: • Chairman, San Diego Tax Fighters • National Taxpayers Union • Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association • San Diego County Taxpayers Association * POLITICAL ACTIVITIES: • Successfully sued the county of San Diego (Rider vs. County of San Diego) to force a rollback of an illegal 1/2-cent jails sales tax, a precedent that saved California taxpayers over fourteen billion dollars, including $3.5 billion for San Diego taxpayers. • Actively supported a variety of tax-cutting ballot initiatives including Proposition 13. Has written ballot arguments against numerous county and state tax increase initiatives. • County co-chair of both California term limit initiatives (Prop 140 and Prop 164). • Libertarian Party candidate for governor in 1994. • Candidate for the 3rd District County Supervisor in 1992 (third place among six candidates with about 20% of the vote). • 1993 – appointed to (and then elected chair of) the San Diego County Social Services Advisory Board. • 1996 – appointed as a Commissioner on the California Constitution Revision Commission by state Assembly Speaker Kurt Pringle. • Has been involved in legal actions against City of San Diego to force a public vote on issuing bonds for Qualcomm stadium expansion, convention center, baseball ballpark and other projects. • 2005 – Unsuccessful candidate for Mayor of San Diego, though his reform ideas have since taken hold. • 2007 – Columnist for NORTH COUNTY TIMES and SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT • 2009 - The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association's "California Tax Fighter of the Year" * FAMILY: Married. Wife, Diane, is a retired public high school teacher. Two sons, ages 32 and 27.

JULY 23, 2012 11:22AM

Solid Takedown of Obama’s ‘You Didn’t Build That’ Speech

Rate: 0 Flag

Below is an odd post that quite impressed me -- a comprehensive takedown of Obama's "you didn't build that" speech.   All of my allies know that Obama is oh SO wrong, but dissecting his populist argument for others to understand doesn't come easy.

What is odd about this solid refutation is that it's an anonymous piece. But the lack of authorship ID should not diminish the value of the message.  This piece deserves dissemination.

Business owners throughout the nation (and many others) have to be angry about Obama's disdain for entrepreneurship.  But the Obama speech was not some flippant, off-the-cuff rant.  It is a carefully crafted commentary, intended to draw the Occupy sympathizers and shallow thinkers (overlapping groups whose "members" are FAR more numerous than just the Occupy movement itself) to his banner while somehow shaming business owners.   

Surely the crafters of such policy have done the "focus group" analysis and found that, on average, it's a winning strategy.  After all, essentially the same speech was given by Elizabeth Warren a few months ago, and I bet the Obamites liked what they saw and heard afterwards.

That's why this rebuttal piece (admittedly long, but logic and fact driven) is so important.  Not everyone will read it, but everyone who wants to advance the cause of limited government (and to persuade others) SHOULD read it - or at least scan it.

To summarize (an excerpt):

[The Obama speech/assertion] relies on three assumptions that must all be true for the argument to remain standing: 

  1. That the public programs he mentioned in his speech constitute a significant portion of the federal budget;
  2. That business owners don’t already pay far more than their fair share of these expenses; and
  3. That these specific public benefits are a federal issue, rather than a local issue. 

If any of these legs fails, then the whole argument collapses.

For good measure, we won’t just kick out one [leg], we’ll kick out all three.

. . . 

Yes, there are other cogent arguments against Obama's thesis, but I found this summation the best I've seen to date.   The rebuttal is too long to replicate here (especially considering the graphs, videos and formatting), so I recommend clicking on the link below. 

http://pjmedia.com/zombie/2012/07/18/the-ultimate-takedown-of-obamas-you-didnt-build-that-speech/

Author tags:

warren, business, obama

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Comments are now closed.

Richard Rider's Favorites

  1. No relations made yet.