Richard Rider

Richard Rider
Location
San Diego, California, USA
Birthday
August 24
Title
Chairman
Company
San Diego Tax Fighters
Bio
Biography of Richard Rider (Updated July, 2011) San Diego, CA 92131 E-mail: RRider@san.rr.com * AGE: 66 * EDUCATION: B.A. Economics, University of North Carolina, 1968 * MILITARY SERVICE: Commander, Supply Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve, retired after 26 years (four years active, the rest in the reserve). ** OCCUPATION: Retired stockbroker and financial planner. Lifetime member of the International Association of Financial Planners. Former business owner. * AFFILIATION: • Chairman, San Diego Tax Fighters • National Taxpayers Union • Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association • San Diego County Taxpayers Association * POLITICAL ACTIVITIES: • Successfully sued the county of San Diego (Rider vs. County of San Diego) to force a rollback of an illegal 1/2-cent jails sales tax, a precedent that saved California taxpayers over fourteen billion dollars, including $3.5 billion for San Diego taxpayers. • Actively supported a variety of tax-cutting ballot initiatives including Proposition 13. Has written ballot arguments against numerous county and state tax increase initiatives. • County co-chair of both California term limit initiatives (Prop 140 and Prop 164). • Libertarian Party candidate for governor in 1994. • Candidate for the 3rd District County Supervisor in 1992 (third place among six candidates with about 20% of the vote). • 1993 – appointed to (and then elected chair of) the San Diego County Social Services Advisory Board. • 1996 – appointed as a Commissioner on the California Constitution Revision Commission by state Assembly Speaker Kurt Pringle. • Has been involved in legal actions against City of San Diego to force a public vote on issuing bonds for Qualcomm stadium expansion, convention center, baseball ballpark and other projects. • 2005 – Unsuccessful candidate for Mayor of San Diego, though his reform ideas have since taken hold. • 2007 – Columnist for NORTH COUNTY TIMES and SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT • 2009 - The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association's "California Tax Fighter of the Year" * FAMILY: Married. Wife, Diane, is a retired public high school teacher. Two sons, ages 32 and 27.

FEBRUARY 27, 2012 10:46PM

What Research Says About School Choice - NEA & CTA angry

Rate: 1 Flag

Below is a great summary of the many research studies concerning school choice.  Most studies by those friendly to vouchers, etc. show modest to major improvement in student performance. Most opposition studies to school choice show little or sometimes no student improvement.  Essentially NO studies show a DROP in results for students empowered with school choice.

Given these facts, let's take it a step further and consider per student education COSTS.   Private school tuition averages $6K to $9K, depending on locale and grade level.  Contrast that with TRUE total public education costs (including school district administration, county boards of education, state eduation bureaucracies and the U.S. Department of Education) and we find that the per student taxpayer outlay is somewhere north of $12K per student.

So, given that private schools provide as good as and usually a superior education, and given that the cost to taxpayers is AT LEAST 30% less per student, why are we still so enamored with government-provided education monopoly?  

 Sadly, the answer is that the public schools are run for the employees, with the kids' welfare a real but secondary concern. And these employees have very powerful public labor unions spending hundreds of millions every year to sell the public and the politicians on the benefits of government education -- and to oppose school choice options.

BTW, the fun part of the article on which this summation is based is that it was published in EDUCATION WEEK, a slavishly pro-public school publication loved by teachers and their labor unions.  The reader comments after the article can best be summarized as dazed disbelief that "their" publication would print such an analysis. 

 
 NCPA Logo - National Center for Policy Analysis
 

Daily Policy Digest

Education Issues

February 27, 2012

What Research Says About School Choice

Last year there was an unprecedented wave of new school choice programs launched across the country.  Following 20 years of heated debate, new programs reflect a growing sophistication regarding the design and implementation of school choice policies.  In a report for Education Week, scholars and analysts who support school choice examine the track record so far of these programs.  They find it is promising and provides support for continuing expansion of school choice policies.

  • Among voucher programs, random-assignment studies generally find modest improvements in reading or math scores, or both.
  • Achievement gains are typically small in each year, but cumulative over time.
  • Graduation rates have been studied less often, but the available evidence indicates a substantial positive impact.
  • Some high-quality studies show that charters have positive effects on academic outcomes; in other contexts, the findings are more mixed.
  • In general, charters seem most likely to have positive effects on student achievement at the elementary level, in math, if the school is part of a well-established charter network, if the student has been enrolled for a while, if the student is disadvantaged, and if the school is in an urban area.

In addition to effects on participating students, another major topic of research has been the impact of school choice on academic outcomes in the public school system.

  • Among voucher programs, studies consistently find that vouchers are associated with improved test scores in the affected public schools.
  • The size of the effect in these studies varies from modest to large.
  • No study has found a negative impact.
  • Fewer studies have examined the competitive effects of charter schools on achievement in traditional public schools, and the studies that do exist vary greatly in quality.

A third area of study has been the fiscal impact of school choice.  Even under conservative assumptions about such questions as state and local budget sensitivity to enrollment changes, the net impact of school choice on public finances is usually positive and has never been found to be negative.

Frederick M. Hess et al., "What Research Says About School Choice," Education Week, February 21, 2012.

For text:

http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/02/22/21campbell.h31.html?tkn=XRZFPe1bCETYq4lnHz%2BXTFwSPb83THXQHZBL&cmp=clp-edweek

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Comments are now closed.

Richard Rider's Favorites

  1. No relations made yet.