Richard Rider

Richard Rider
Location
San Diego, California, USA
Birthday
August 24
Title
Chairman
Company
San Diego Tax Fighters
Bio
Biography of Richard Rider (Updated July, 2011) San Diego, CA 92131 E-mail: RRider@san.rr.com * AGE: 66 * EDUCATION: B.A. Economics, University of North Carolina, 1968 * MILITARY SERVICE: Commander, Supply Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve, retired after 26 years (four years active, the rest in the reserve). ** OCCUPATION: Retired stockbroker and financial planner. Lifetime member of the International Association of Financial Planners. Former business owner. * AFFILIATION: • Chairman, San Diego Tax Fighters • National Taxpayers Union • Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association • San Diego County Taxpayers Association * POLITICAL ACTIVITIES: • Successfully sued the county of San Diego (Rider vs. County of San Diego) to force a rollback of an illegal 1/2-cent jails sales tax, a precedent that saved California taxpayers over fourteen billion dollars, including $3.5 billion for San Diego taxpayers. • Actively supported a variety of tax-cutting ballot initiatives including Proposition 13. Has written ballot arguments against numerous county and state tax increase initiatives. • County co-chair of both California term limit initiatives (Prop 140 and Prop 164). • Libertarian Party candidate for governor in 1994. • Candidate for the 3rd District County Supervisor in 1992 (third place among six candidates with about 20% of the vote). • 1993 – appointed to (and then elected chair of) the San Diego County Social Services Advisory Board. • 1996 – appointed as a Commissioner on the California Constitution Revision Commission by state Assembly Speaker Kurt Pringle. • Has been involved in legal actions against City of San Diego to force a public vote on issuing bonds for Qualcomm stadium expansion, convention center, baseball ballpark and other projects. • 2005 – Unsuccessful candidate for Mayor of San Diego, though his reform ideas have since taken hold. • 2007 – Columnist for NORTH COUNTY TIMES and SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT • 2009 - The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association's "California Tax Fighter of the Year" * FAMILY: Married. Wife, Diane, is a retired public high school teacher. Two sons, ages 32 and 27.

FEBRUARY 25, 2012 5:54PM

California traffic fines are INCREDIBLY low -- honest!

Rate: 0 Flag

Here's a trick question:  How much is the driving fine in California for a "rolling stop"?  (Counterintuitive hint:  It's cheap!)

The answer?  

$35.  Yes, that is correct.

The trick part of the question?  I said "fine."  Not "ticket," or total cost.

Add on to the $35 fine the many "fees" now imposed by California courts, and the ticket you must pay is about $235.  Plus a $65 fee if you want to go to "traffic school" to remove the ding on your driving record.  

And that $65 does NOT pay for the school itself -- it's just another state fee -- you pay for the driving school IN ADDITION to paying the driving school fee. 

Hence on such minor infractions, our state and local governments rake in either $235 or (more often) $300.  Boss Hogg of Hazzard County would be green with envy. 

http://www.dailybreeze.com/latestnews/ci_18211219

 

In California, red light camera tickets are $480.  The second highest state is $250. Most are around $100.  

http://reason.org/blog/show/red-light-cameras-and-the-enigmatic 

Consider how devastating a $480 ticket is for someone struggling to get by, paycheck by paycheck.  Such a regressive penalty could put a family out of their apartment.  

And, I might add, there is zero evidence that red light accidents in CA are lower than in other states with far lower traffic ticket costs.

Why this bizarre California pricing structure?  And why so high?  

In essence, our free-spending California politicians are desperate for more money so that they can avoid serious fiscal reform.  Unfortunately for them, we have modest constitutional constraints on further tax increases in this high-tax state, hindering their kneejerk efforts to bump up rates. Their biggest problem is that voters won't approve such state tax increases when put on the ballot -- the last seven failed.

But no such pesky limitations exist for "fees."  So in California, "fees" are often the new taxes.

How nutty can it get?  Consider the city of San Diego building permit structure and rates.  

The planning department is funded as an "enterprise fund," which means that their budget is largely paid by the permit fees they generate. While superficially this might seem to make sense, when economic downturns come, these rogue agencies too often run amok.

Here's one example:  A building-savvy acquaintance of mine wanted to add a very modest balcony on to his upstairs bedroom -- a balcony smaller than a Ping-Pong table.  He figured it would cost about $2,000 to build, and applied for what he presumed would be a routine city permit.  

Care to guess the cost of the permit?  

Wrong!  Too low -- WHATEVER you guessed.

The INITIAL permit fee would be over $8,000.  And if there were permit complications ("complications" as judged by the planning department), that figure could grow.

And as if that wasn't bad enough, the permit process for the balcony promised to run on for months -- even if "routine."  This permit should have been handled in well under a week -- probably a day.

But the enterprise fund structure gives the planning department a perverse incentive -- the more hours they can "bill" to a permit, the more money is available for the department.  Under this screwy plan, we citizens pay them NOT to work -- or at least not to produce -- indeed, to hinder production.  If they want to remain fully staffed in economic downturns, they have learned to gin up the "work," and bill accordingly. 

Yes, supposedly there are constraints on such bloated fees.  But it appears that too often the courts have decided to let fees run wild -- in no small part because our court system is a government entity, dependent on coercive public funding.

Oh -- my friend's balcony?  Never got built.  He's less happy with his home, and one more building project failed to employ anyone (even as tiny as it was).

Yeah, that went well!

Author tags:

regulation, taxes, california

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Comments are now closed.

Richard Rider's Favorites

  1. No relations made yet.