
~photo courtesy of worldnewsnow.com
On Sunday's "Meet the Press," House majority leader John Boehner of Ohio got a pitch over the heart of plate and rather than hit the home run, he fouled it off.
Asked by Moderator David Gregory about President Obama's citizenship and religion, both of which are called into question by more Americans than can even be imagined, Boehner missed an opportunity to unambiguously declare that the President is both a citizen of the United States and a Christian. Furthermore, he missed the chance to say once and for all that discussing these absurdities is pointless.
Instead, Boehner commented, "It's not my job to tell the American people what to think. Our job in Washington is to listen to the American people." And while Beohner went on to say that he accepted the President's word that he is a Christian, as well as, the "facts" of Obama's citizenship, his refusal to "tell the American people" what to think crept eerily close to wimpiness.
Gregory even played a portion of a Fox News conversation with Iowa voters. When the moderator of this "focus group" asked how many thought President Obama was a Muslim, nearly half of them raised their hands!
When pressed as to whether it was Boehner's responsibility to "stand up to that kind of ignorance," the pitch to the heart of the plate, Boehner then fouled off the pitch with his inane comment about not telling the American people what to think. He went on to say that he believed both Obama and the State of Hawaii, but, was not going to tell either the right-wing members of his party and the American people, "stop it!"
Leadership is tricky. A leader walks a dangerous tightrope, one that spans the divide between empowerment and retreat. Boehner finds himself in the position of leading his own Republican Party. He can nurture ignorance, which has the potential to fan the flames of fear, or he can empower others to a greater good. To do the latter, there will be moments when he alone must stand up, hit the home run and declare the facts as they are, not back-step with some imbelic elucidation.
Leadership requires stoutheartedness and the ability to communicate a vision that may indeed yet be in the minds of those listening. I am reminded, for instance, of Dr. Martin Luther King. "I have a dream today..." Reminded, too, of President John F. Kennedy's clarion call, "Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country."
These words were not an attempt to tell the American people what to think. These were visionaries with their fingers on the pulse of their times who had the courage to trumpet a clarion call. Never mind that as a nation we weren't there yet.
Even within the long, storied history of his own party, John Boehner sits atop the legacy of those leaders who went before him. Think Abraham Lincoln's words to a fractured nation or President Ronald Reagan's ultimatum, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall."
Boehner's appearance on "Meet the Press" could have been an opportunity to lead by example. He might have said something like this. "David, I am glad you asked that question. Let me be absolutely clear. I believe the President is a citizen of this great country. Furthermore, I completely believe him when he says he is a Christian. It is time to lift our eyes from issues long ago decided and dedicate ourselves to restoring American jobs and completing our missions around the world. I call on all of us to rededicate ourselves to doing both."
This would have been true leadership. A home run.
Instead, he fouled off the pitch and now looks like a man who is not ready for the Major Leagues.


Salon.com
Comments
*yeah, I know but I couldn't resist.
One leadership of one party will do and say absolutely anything to regain the majority, and the the other will do absolutely nothing to stand up to the propaganda of the other.
First, he's asking a member of the legislative branch to opine on the President’s constitutional qualifications to hold office. If I had been Boehner, then I might have responded with my preference to let the judicial branch decide who satisfies the requirements to become President.
Second, he’s asking a citizen to opine on the religious beliefs of another. If I had been Boehner, then I might have responded by reminding the moderator of the Free Exercise clause of the First Amendment that makes his question irrelevant, because it allows Obama to follow freely any religious belief.
Both answers would have scolded Gregory, failed to respond directly to a stupid question, and left open the possibility that Obama could be both unqualified to be President and a Muslim. On the other hand, I am glad to hear of Boehner’s belief that Congressmen should not think for their constituents. Funny. . . .
nice post, nothing personal. rated.
I'm disappointed in you kid. What the fuck difference does it make at this point aside from attacking Obama's credibility, which anyone with a brain by this point understands is a stupid thing to do.
Forget about my recommendation to teach Twain's autobiogaphy to your class. You'll probably mistake him for Kafka.
one thing all you commie-democraps will agree was not the truth like the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution" of 1964 that 99-1 passed the Senate and Congress 400+to how many whatever it was....now, you all know that was master LBJ's lie just as he told us blue-collar boys
that "NOT one American Boy will shed any blood fighting an Asian Boy's War" when two neighborhood buddies US Marines asses were in South Vietnam in 62-63 as JFK's advisors....If you join the U.S. Marines, then you volunteer to go where the President orders you to go....more than a few blue-collar shed some blood and a few made the ultimate sacrifice with many more to follow with the ultimate sacrifice over the next 4 years with not one senator's son among them, those rich-kids mostly if not all white-boys started going to Canada in 1968 when duty and service called upon them after college....
so it is your move in the Editor's weekly pick's to love to hate the new white bishop of Congress, last week it was fuck Ronald Reagan on his 100th birthdate and my red pawn responds was fuck william jefferson clinton, so it is your move to protect your white king {President Obama's lost any blackness color learning the 3'rs from all the left-wing domesticated white professors @harvvvard} from the 10 black pawns of untruth from Iowa.....
got 313 million more birth certificates of non-amerikans for you to defend as true original Americans....this rant of pulp fiction chant continues @John's Lennon's "Watching the Wheels" come off from the four corners of the fucking world for another 675 days.......
Spending too much and taxing too much seem like the language of opinion but stating whether someone is a citizen is a matter of fact. Boehner bunts when he should be swinging.
Wide right seems to be within Boehner's strike zone.
Great piece of writing and I couldn't agree with you more - send these chumps back to the minors!
I'd like to repeat your words concerning leadership. This time let's read them and see if they apply to President Obama and his handling of these issues.
"He can nurture ignorance, which has the potential to fan the flames of fear, or he can empower others to a greater good. To do the latter, there will be moments when he alone must stand up, hit the home run and declare the facts as they are, not back-step with some imbelic (sic) elucidation."
Part of the reason these issues have gotten more attention than they deserve and are being asked of House Speaker Boehner by David Gregory is because President Obama has slouched to the plate with his bat resting on his shoulders and made a low crouch stance hoping to get a free pass.