Cathleen Black and the Realities of School Leadership
The New York Times reported yesterday that Cathleen Black has resigned as New York City’s schools chancellor. The former publishing executive was on the job for only three months and had received licensing wavers in order to be assigned to her post. Mayor Michael Bloomberg was determined that she should lead the city’s schools, reflecting a view by many that what schools need today is no-nonsense, real-world managerial strategies. The result was a fiasco and a bitter humiliation for the Bloomberg administration.
We can interpret the significance of this episode in a variety of ways. In my own career as a teacher, I have seen many people enter the profession after many years of work in the so-called real world, and I have seen mixed results. Occasionally, a new teacher makes a difficult but successful transition, and a school is better for the arrival of new talent. More often, however, the poor person is ground into a fine powder between the grindstones of the unexpected volume of work and the startling realities of dealing with young people, their families, and a school’s administration. I saw one gentleman in his sixties conclude his career as a research chemist and take a position as a high-school science teacher as something to do in his retirement. He lasted until December of that school year. Another fellow was an engineer in his forties who thought that teaching math in a middle school would be more fulfilling. He left after only a few weeks on the job. Yet another professional—this one a woman who left a career in management—became a middle-school language arts teacher and decried the lunacy of students, parents, administrators, and other teachers for months before leaving mid-year, presumably fearing for her own sanity.
These examples are all anecdotal, of course, but typically, people in such situations express shock, frustration, disappointment, disgust, and anger at the state of education today. I, however, cannot help but suspect that the true source of these people’s consternation has more to do with having underestimated the demands of the teaching profession, as so many people do.
So when Michael Bloomberg touts proven corporate leadership a prescription for success in public education, and Ms. Black lasts only three months, we wonder how Mr. Bloomberg would have fared if he had taken on the job himself. When Chris Christie, our governor here in New Jersey, decides to limit the salaries of most school superintendents to the figure he receives as governor, it sounds reasonable enough—assuming that being an effective school superintendent is comparable in challenge to being a state’s chief executive. It is worth considering, however, how Governor Christie would fare as a superintendent, as a principal, or even as a classroom teacher.
A patronizing and confrontational style of leadership sometimes serves government leaders because public perception is an important determiner of the defined successful outcome: reelection. To be fair, both Bloomberg and Christie reasonably claim notable success in other careers as well, again based on positive defined outcomes: in Bloomberg’s case, a multibillion-dollar corporate empire; in Christie’s, an impressive record of bringing about convictions as a prosecutor. But school leadership involves so much that most people outside of education only dimly suspect. The political forces in even some small school districts are easily intense enough to compete with what a high-profile mayor or governor has to face. Add to that the hands-on work of managing everything from facilities to finances to state assessments to an increasingly unmotivated population of students, and we find ourselves living in…the real world. Imagine that.
Few educators if any would diminish the importance and intensity of work in other fields. Teachers, paraprofessionals, and administrators all have parents who have worked as physicians, attorneys, carpenters, engineers, social workers, masons, artists, plumbers, network administrators, nurses, cooks, politicians, roofers, firefighters, journalists, and police officers. They work assiduously to prepare students for real-world experiences in these professions. Not everyone truly understands the demands and intensity of the work of an educator. By now, however, Cathleen Black apparently does.


Salon.com
Comments
Your last paragraph is so very important. Teachers aren't demonizing other professionals, but people sure don't seem to have any problem blaming teachers for anything and everything.
My sister in law once made a crack that I don't live in the "real world" because I teach. I nearly choked on my food. The frightening part is that everybody I know went to school somehwere, so why don't they understand this....
The last time I attended a school board meetings during which any attention was given to how well students in the district were doing academically were ones at which I was a member of the school board asking those questions. Even then, most of my time on school boards has been spent discussing budgetary or policy matters.
The last time I taught, I did it with a partner for 9 weeks. We taught algebra to a combined class of 28 7th and 8th graders at an inner city charter school. In that brief amount of time, my partner and I graded 1,500 classroom and home work papers, over 200 tests, prepared nearly forty 30-minute lectures (with props, awards, and educational resources), and threw two parties for the students.
In our view, the students we taught were extremely successful. This most recent experience was sufficiently satisfying for me to post an essay on OS about it.
However, after having education as an avocation for nearly 30 years, I am no longer donating time, talent, or treasure to a cause ever more burdened with a technological vocabulary and some major philosophies that contribute practically nothing to enhance student learning as well as a set of administrators more driven by regulatory compliance than the welfare of their teachers or students. Instead, I spend ever increasing amounts of my time saying 'good bye' to acquaintances who worked as teachers, administrators, and school board members by attending their retirement parties and funerals.
I long for the day when courageous national leadership will do away with the federal Department of Education and courageous local leadership will restore some sanity to the education of our children.
In January, I had 56 students on my roster for two classes on one campus. By last Friday, that was down to 39--17 had been dropped for non-attendance. 30 of those students showed up for class. Of those 30, 14 had brought their textbooks.
Note that I didn't say 14 had done the homework and were prepared to participate in class discussion. I said that 14 had showed up, textbooks in hand.
You know, there's only so much teachers can do.
Rated.
Thanks for your comment! Much appreciated.