Obama: Speaking When You Know What You're Talking About
I thought the high point - in terms of communication policy - of President Obama's press conference, just concluded, was his response to a jibe from CNN's Ed Henry about why Obama took a few days to express his outrage over the AIG bonuses. Obama's response: "It took us a couple of days because I like to know what I'm talking about before I speak."
Good for Obama - refreshing in a President and a politician.
Obama also showed an admirable sensitivity in his answer about adult vs embryonic stem cell research: he takes no pleasure in stirring up controversy. If and when science can provide through adult stem cells, what it currently can through embryonic, then Obama would be happy to go the adult stem cell route - as would everyone.
As for the economy, Obama stood his ground about not sacrificing health care, new energy sources, and other key steps to a better America, on behalf of keeping spending down.
And, although Obama didn't explicitly say this, I will: balancing the budget is not the most important goal of the Federal government. Instead, as FDR and John Maynard Keynes realized, and Nobel laureate Paul Krugman has been repeatedly urging, the goal should be to spend as much money as needed to reboot the economy. Once that happens - as Obama did say - then all the other financial problems, including the budget deficit, will be more easily resolved.
The United States of America, after all, is neither an individual nor a company. Not even a municipality. We have never gone bankrupt, nor will we - unless we allow the country to get browbeaten by pursuit of balanced budgets.


Salon.com
Comments
Yeah, thinking before speaking. What a concept!
Re balanced budgets, funny the FIRST three quarters of this incredible deficit poured down the rat hole of the Iraq war didn't seem to bother the Republicans at all. But actually spending in a way that doesn't directly pamper rich people and they have the Lord of the Hissy Fits.
I think the press is so used to dealing with Bush who just made shit up as he went along, they didn't expect a common sense reply.
RATED
Rated
Thanks for your analysis.
Good post Paul. Rated.
This is an observation I've been making for a while, and I appreciate your confirmation of it.
do you really think so? i thought i was on to something.you seem like a really cool guy and i bet your students really enjoy you. i was just making observations. the whole thing seems like a lot of smoke and mirrors, and i don't mean dope smoke and lines on a mirror. i don't think i insulted anyone , but i did use the word fuck. i have a question for you what would president obama have to do, say or not do make you change your opinion of him. thanks.
.........to do or not do to make you change.....
The AIG thing is baloney. He's picking up where Bush left off.
Bush gave us manageable debt while fighting a war which was admittedly -- an ill-advised war. Funny how every Democrat in Clintons cabinet agreed with it until 6 years later when election time rolled around.
No doctor worth his salt supports socialized medicine, since they know the gov't will tell them what fees they can charge for what.
And this anti-business president is what is keeping this economy from doing anything except shedding more jobs.
Keynes is a 100 year old quack. FDR's plan did not work. If you call 10 years of 25% unemployment and then getting US involved in WW2 -- for a 'war jobs' economy; all to then set up a 50 year old cold war; not to mention tens of millions dead in the process a success -- then what the hell is failure to you people?
Then there was the 70's -- mired by hyper-inflation both in engalnd and under Carter's America.
I guess I shouldn't expect more from the lesbain/gay, old hippys, new hippys crew.
He had to wait for the media to queue up outrage among the lemmings in order to ride the bandwagon point the stick at "greedy executives". All the while he agreed to this deal all along.