To Barbie or Not to Barbie Is Not Really the Question
Warning: this post contains images that some parents may find disturbing, namely, a picture of Barbie’s waistline.
The Gabriella doll came first. It was an innocent gesture from an old friend of mine who now works for the Princess Headquarters conglomerate otherwise known as Disney. Leaving work one day, on his way to meet me for dinner and a 20 year catch-up and knowing that I had a young daughter, he filled a bag with Disney film franchise goodies which included DVD copies of The Little Mermaid and Sleeping Beauty, as well as the aforementioned Gabriella doll, which looks a little bit like a young, hip Latina version of the once-popular Midge doll.
Midge was Barbie’s brown-haired predecessor, and, to my mind, the one with much better fashion sense, playing respectable to Barbie’s hoochie mama look that has been both trumped up and down over the last five decades. But Barbie didn't start off as skanky. Originially she looked like a gal who could have been in Antonioni film or at least someone I might want to have coffee with.

My five-year-old was thrilled to receive the Gabriella doll, which came with a red one-piece bathing suit and some tiny red and white shorts modeled from the outfit the real Gabriella wore at her summer job as a lifeguard.
In case you don’t know who Gabriella is, and you should feel blessed and possibly even superior to me for this ignorance, she is the female protagonist in the High School Musical trifecta, a series of Disney movies that, in my efforts to begin schooling my daughter in the wonderful whimsical and edifying world of musicals, I “exposed her to.” (I assuaged my guilt by repeating the phrase both to myself and to other moms who hadn’t seen it yet, “It’s Harmless,” which is basically true.) Gabriella (Vanessa Hudgens) is a young Latina high school genius who falls in love with Troy Bolton (Zac Ephron), the school’s handsome young, white, not-so-dumb basketball star who may have also been responsible for the recent trend of boys with shags and long bangs that nearly cover their eyes.

Troy and Gabriella sing songs together, dance together, and eventually, although not until High School Musical II, kiss. The grand conclusion of the triad (though I believe more is on its way) is that Gabriella, despite being in love with this Troy Bolton character, goes off to an early admission to Stanford, leaving behind her foxy basketball star and musical co-star, who ultimately decides to attend UC Berkeley in an effort to be closer to her. It’s a moment any skeptical parent could be proud of. For me it was the first time that my daughter and I talked about universities in California.
“What is Stanford mom?,” she asked as the movie was concluding. It wasn’t a conversation I thought I’d be having with my then 4.5-year-old.
But I wanted her to know that Stanford wasn’t some evil halfway house that stole girls away from their first boyfriends. A good mom would have surely said, “Stanford! Why that’s the college you’re going to go to someday!” But, in light of our recent finances, it would have been smarter for me to say, “Better start working towards that scholarship now so that you, too, can go there, or any college for that matter, some day.” I said neither. I did tell her that it was a big school not far from us, and that we could go visit someday and see if we think it is worthy of Gabriella’s brilliance and charm.
Then came Sleeping Beauty. She was a birthday gift from a classmate. I’m sure my daughter must have blurted out the name on the playground, giving her classmate a helpful bit of information when it comes to shopping for a birthday present for someone you barely know. Sleeping Beauty doll is a bit taller and more exaggerated than the Gabriella doll. She is decidedly white and blue-eyed and tan with heinously dyed blonde hair that looks more like tacky costume jewelry than something that actually grows on your head. She’s Barbie on steroids and she’s got those awful Barbie feet, too. The standing-on-her-toes ones that make it impossible to wear comfortable shoes, god forbid she ever step foot in a gym or go for a run, or go do relief work in Sudan or something. It’s impossible! Not with feet that are only made for stilettos.
Our Gabriella, on the other hand, wears cute little ballet flats and preppy sneakers. She’s in high school, after all. I’m pretty sure Sleeping Beauty, whose real name is Aurora, never went to school. She was too busy, as the story goes, with her peasant life (which doesn’t explain the feet at all or the fact that I had to explain to my daughter what a “peasant girl” was, and that this was supposed had to be my example!?)
I should tell you that Barbie has been a source of conversation in my family of origin. My mother, a pretty traditional woman, is rather proud of using me as an example of a former Barbie owner who “turned out all right.” It’s true. I had a bunch of them as a kid in the 70s. I had several, and a Skipper, and a Ken, and a GI Joe doll. I used to stage a kind of Melrose Place with them, giving them weddings and divorces and having them talk behind each other’s backs and argue and make up.
Actually, I’ll just come clean about all of it. When I was a kid, I had a three-story Barbie penthouse, with a pool and a car. My Barbie lived large, had a lot of bling in her life, lots of friends, and a couple of guys to chose from. Although, I don’t know if my mom knew how this played out in my room.
A dozen years later, after I joined the Women’s Studies department at UC Berkeley, I do remember having more than a couple of Barbie discussions. My mom seems to remember me saying that I would never let my own daughter play with a Barbie. I don’t think I was quite that pedantic, but Women’s Studies classes can make you say things that, in retrospect, sound rather—pardon the expression—cocky.
There comes a time in every feminist's life when she or he has to face this Barbie issue. At the very least I had hoped to not go through the whole Disney princess thing with a daughter, but I have come to realize that as humans we are attracted to what we are attracted to, and that much of it is based on archetypes that we can explain without too much judgment and anger at our culture—which I still have plenty of. When she gets a little bit older we can start busting through the assigned gender roles and stereotypes and, of course, the sexing up of young girls that we all bristle at. With an opinionated loud-mouth for a mother, my daughter isn’t going to have much of problem distinguishing between the passive and active roles that women play in our culture, still the definitions of beauty conversation isn't going to be an easy one. I am confident that she’ll get it without me having to pull out the documentaries or make her read Simone de Beauvoir in middle school, but peer pressure is another can of worms.
So, as a mom, I’ve wondered quite a bit about this Barbie thing. I suppose I let them enter my house even if I didn’t purchase them. And, I think at some point they will be useful in having a conversation about gender roles and women’s bodies, etc. I wasn’t ever personally angry about the role that Barbie played in my life anyway. Despite having been born and raised with blond hair, I never wanted to be her, or to look like her. If anything, I think that falling asleep each night to my little FM radio and listening to all the "love songs" of the 70s did more damage to my life expectations and feelings about gender roles than Barbie ever could.
Still, Barbie has had a tough life, and I feel for her. From the get go in 1963, she was told she was too sexy, too mature for young girls. I mean, come on, is that her fault? Midge and her counterpart Skipper, which I also owned, were apparently created to appease the Barbie critics. Midge, originally marketed as Barbie’s best friend, had a fuller face that was supposed to be “less sexually intimidating.” And, she had freckles. Eventually Midge came in pregnant version, was sold with a husband, and later in an African American version and was picked up by Wal-Mart. But, as we all know, Barbie is not alone. There are hundreds of both slutty and the more buttoned-up variations of Barbie, Gabriella dolls among them.
Barbie has been the source of so much parody. She's been accused of being a meth maker and dealer, which could help explain her unusually low weight, and an anorexic. Can't a girl be skinny anymore without being a drug dealer or having an eating disorder? (Oh, and don't forget the Karen Carpenter story retold in a film acted out with Barbie dolls. I haven't.)
To make everyone else feel better, Barbie’s gone through a great deal of reconstruction, too. After spending a long time looking demurely to the side, her eyes look forward now. Since 1997, her waist has been widened, her boobs softened and reduced. She doesn’t come equipped anymore with a scale that reads 110 pounds, as she did in 1965. With the advent of high fructose corn syrup and hydrogenated oils, how could she? That would be so unrealistic.
Mattel has tried to make her body look more teenage and less grown-up.
She keeps current, has her finger on the pulse, and, well, at least she doesn’t say unrealistic things, as she did in her 1992 version that generated many phrases such as “Math class is tough!” Today’s Barbie is a math whiz, a candidate for a Nobel Prize in Economics, or like Gabriella, a genius who corrects her own high-school math teacher’s formulas. She’s just a girl on her way to Stanford who is not going to let Troy stand in her way of future success or future earning power.
As for the Sleeping Beauty doll my daughter received, that’s another story. She has that glassy-eyed soul-less look, like she might just spend her life in front of the mirror, or worse, asleep, and waiting for her prince to come and kiss and revive her. She wears nothing practical, or even fashionable. Pink, always pink. She's all glitz with nothing interesting to say.
But, despite all of this, I knew things couldn’t be all that bad when I came into my daughter’s room the other night and listened to her playing with both of the dolls.
This was what I overhead:
Gabriella: Hey Sleeping Beauty, you better get up. Stop sleeping all the time!
Sleeping Beauty: (silent, asleep)
Gabriella: Come on Sleeping Beauty you have to get out of bed. You’ve gotta get up and go to Stanford!
Then Gabriella leans over and kisses her and Sleeping Beauty wakes up.
P.S. Since Barbie turned 50 this year, I've been wondering about the possibility of a Menopause Barbie. Wouldn't a Barbie that has hot flashes and mood swings be kind of cool to own?


Salon.com
Comments
Mom got worried about my self-esteem and went in search of a Barbie that looked like me. She came back with a (no lie) Brooke Shields doll. But I never played much with her because her underpants were painted on and her leg kept falling off during the more athletic pursuits.
OK, now that I've calmed down...
I still HATE Barbie....and princesses.
My daughter does not need to learn the message of "it's best to wait for someone with a penis to save you." We'll save our own damn selves! You should see my two year old yell, "We're warrior women!"
OK, you started it with Barbie! :-)
I certainly can't blame my image issues on Barbie. I don't think dolls had anything to do with it.
I do wish that ethnic dolls were more in fashion. I wish it were easier to find Mexican, Asian, and African heritage dolls. That would be awesome!
None of Emma's 3 younger sisters even asked for one. However, I have been amused by t my two-year-old grandson's play with the Barbie in his community playroom. Just last week he was trying to figure out how Barbie could be the Sugar Plum Fairy and the Ken figure her cavalier. (I just wrote about his Nutcracker obsession.) Barbie could do a split, but otherwise they were a cruel disappointed. My favorite Barbie comment was said by a three year old in the playroom--"Mommy, her breasts are all wrong."
But with sons, liberals like me definitely agonize about toy guns--and then most of us just give up or come up with some version of "boundaries": neon squirt guns are fine but no realistic toy guns, etc., etc. With us, my agony started when my son--in pre-K--wanted camo pants, because his seventh-grade buddy had them.
Then my guy became obsessed with *A Knight's Tale* and jousting. At the time, we allowed no toy weapons in our house, so my son promptly figured out how to make lances with cardboard tubes. They looked so cool that he ended up teaching most of the boys in his class to do it. His pre-K teacher told us, "If you'd told me five years ago that we'd have a jousting area in our Quaker classroom, I would've said NAAAW! But it works for them."
Barbies seem positively tame compared to Bratz dolls. I was horrified when my 4-year-old step-granddaughter asked for one for Christmas. I refused to buy it for her because it was not age appropriate.
I think Barbies are OK as long as they are put into context. Most kids will play with all kinds of toys, but the best way to make something appealing is to deny it.
Want your daughter to grow up knowing that Barbie's praying-mantis proportions are completely unrealistic (and really, has anyone met a single person who LITERALLY wanted to look like Barbie naked, what with the freaky waist, club feet, and complete lack of nipples and rotation in her hip joints)? Take her to swim lessons at the YMCA. Let her change in the women's locker room. Seriously, I knew from three or four onward that adult women, even the most beautiful ones, do not actually look like Barbie.
BTW, even though none of my Barbies (most were knockoffs, few were the true Mattel dolls) came dressed as hookers, I made hooker outfits for them by cutting up their tighter and more spangly outfits with scissors, and in at least one storyline this one doll was an aging Vegas showgirl with a 12-year-old son and an ex-husband in prison, and she had to turn tricks to make ends meet and buy bologna. I was probably about eight or nine at the time and I really have no idea where I got that idea from because my parents were pretty strict about what movies and TV shows we could watch.
I was surprised to learn in college (right before they thickened her up) that Barbie's unrealistic proportions were damaging to the female psyche.
I never thought that women were actually supposed to look like Barbie, any more than real vehicles were supposed to look like Matchbox cars.
What damaged MY psyche as a size 10-12 teen were my mother's unrealistic expectations that I be a size 6. I didn't even know I was overweight until my mother told me that I was and started putting me on a series of fad diets.
Great piece as usual, Palindrome.
I remember opening that box, her back was turned at the time, and when I looked down into that thing and saw a tiny Barbie head looking up at me I was immediatly terrifed.
Who the hell does that? What does this mean?
I almost ran right there and then.
I'm glad I didn't. Oh, and when I told her about finding it, much later, she proceded to 'hide' it in places I would find it for years. I haven't seen it in a long time, but I'm still on the look out!
Rated!
I played with Barbies too, as a kid, despite my mom's almost flat-out refusal to buy them for me and naked loathing of the whole message of Barbie. Actually, that may have contributed to my interest in the dolls....but even so, I have grown up to be a staunch and healthy feminist, albeit, one with a good sense for how to dress. :)
One of my Barbies (Princess Jasmine, appropriately enough) got mummified for a high school art project and another one got painted to look like a vampire. Those are the only two I have left.
I did write a blog about playing with Barbies , which you may (hopefully) find amusing. Hope you'll let me know:
http://open.salon.com/blog/littleboxofspoons/2009/02/09/pole_dance_barbie
My daughter has two. She never played with dolls much. She played with stuffed animals. She had no interest in my saved Barbies, Skipper, Madame Alexander dolls. Nor in my mother's Shirley Temple or Dionne Quints dolls. Nor in my grandmother's leather jointed doll. She's the only granddaughter and all that wonderful doll heritage was saved for her.
I never showed her my grandmother's topsy turvy doll. Turn it one way and you have a pretty blonde, turn it the other way and the blonde's skirt covers her head and you have a black Mammy. I thought it was unfair to black kids since my doll (the blonde) was pretty and well-dressed. Their doll (the Mammy) wasn't. That was the sum of my racial analysis of the doll.
Barbie is about sex and fashion and dating. Period. My daughter loved to nurture and got cool baby dolls as gifts and loved the hell out of them. I loved playing with my Barbies as a kid (except when my brothers caught me when I was eleven) but my child never dug them. My mom bought them at a yard sale, along with clothes and shoes.........I made my own clothes for my dolls and they mostly wore strapless gowns---one snap inexpertly sown in the back----or panchos.
Rated, for a great topic, and also for not mentioning the recent report that a famous fashion designer is chagrined that Barbie's ankles are thick........
I encouraged Groovy Girls. She got a Bratz doll collection thing for her birthday which I vetoed. Like others here, that one is off limits. Too risque. I would boycott Barbie if it was the earlier model, or the tattoo version, but overall I have tried to steer her from it.
She mostly plays with animals - thank God. Dolls are just not her thing. Phew! Great post. (Rated).
To see them casually destroyed by a bored 11 year old leads me to believe that whatever symbolic message an adult parent might think they are sending, the kids have a mind of their own.
And exactly what is on that mind is well beyond the comprehension of any adult.
:)
And thanks everyone for sharing their real Barbie stories. She is just a vehicle for fun, isn't she???
This comment of yours kinda gave me the heebie-jeebies:
"When she gets a little bit older we can start busting through the assigned gender roles and stereotypes and, of course, the sexing up of young girls that we all bristle at. With an opinionated loud-mouth for a mother, my daughter isn’t going to have much of problem distinguishing between the passive and active roles that women play in our culture, still the definitions of beauty conversation isn't going to be an easy one."
"When she gets a little older we can START..."?! and
"...the definitions of beauty conversation isn't going to be an easy ONE." !?
Yikes, they must do graduate feminist theory and sociology of gender classes quite differently wherever you are. As I would have presumed you knew and were acting on, from the first blue blanket or pink blanket point in infancy, children are perpetually being socialized into gender norms, the romantic social script, and cultural constructions of beauty.
Any attempts at resisting that ongoing onslaught and implementing any hint of critical thinking must be equally perpetual and start at an equally young age. I just don't see how one conversation at some mid childhood or later time will have much affect at all.
At least, that's how I done lurned it in kollej ;-)
I don't think most of you appreciate that it is a pretty amazing thing. It's also a toy line that's been produced for over 50 years, and at least 3-4 generations of women...often with grandmothers and moms handing their own dolls (wanted or not) to daughters and granddaughters...
I just think you are too quick to disparage Barbie for (I guess) embodying all-too-accurately our culture's existing ideas about what an adult woman looks like (very thin and curvaceous) and her ethnicity (white, blonde, blue-eyed). Mattel didn't invent those ideals. We all had a hand in it, including Madison Avenue. Dolls are a reflection of culture, not the other way 'round.
Of course I am prejudiced. I am an adult collector of dolls, with plenty of Barbie and Barbie-like fashion dolls. Since I grew up in the 60s, I played with early Barbie's myself -- I like to say to people who are bewildered that I collect dolls (because I am not very girly otherwise) that "I played with dolls as a child and I just never stopped!"
Funnily enough, neither my mom nor either of my grandmothers (all very traditionally feminine housewives) EVER liked or played with dolls, so I never had the good fortune to inherit any vintage dolls like say a Shirley Temple. I really envied girls who did! Oh -- and none of my kids had the slightest interest in dolls, not our daughter nor our nieces nor a single goddaughter. I struck out, not to mention I have no idea why I have this bug and not a single other woman in either direction on my genealogical chart.
I guess if I have a point it's not to be too doctrinaire and joyless about judging dolls (i.e., "Bratz are too hootchy", "Barbie is too materialistic"). You are looking at dolls as an adult, not the way a child does. You are forgetting the joys of play. It's a rare child so dull that he/she plays with any toy the way the manufacturer advertises it; Barbies are probably more often used as missiles or dog toys or astronauts or zombies or Amazonian explorers than they are as some kind of trampy party girl.
The degree to which a toy allows a child to use his/her imagination is the measure of how really good it is....and I think dolls (in general, and sometimes Barbie specifically) are pretty darn good.
And this: leave your child alone and let them guide you to the kinds of toys THEY are interested in...and don't be too quick to judge. I know very non-mechanical guys who loved Lincoln logs and Erector Sets, and women engineers who happily played Barbie's Dream Wedding. The worst stereotypes are, I believe, in the eyes of judgmental adults who don't want to let kids be kids.