Although I love the new balance of Blue and Red in our electoral map, as a picture of the real America, much less as a picture of the change-to-come, it seems far from the reality. Each state actually has major scattered mixtures of red and of blue. But, As Obama has been saying since the onset (rough quote): "We are not a white america, we are not a black America, we are the United States of America."
I would like to see that mix. I would like to see the blue and the red spots on the map within each state. I would like people in each state to know the vast mixture within their own state. The televised news has that information; many channels would blow up a state to look at the red, blue and still grey/unknown spots in states under discussion. The information is out there. Woudn't that be amore healing and forward-looking image for the country?
If we had such a map, and you stood back a bit, what do you want to bet that it would look purple?
Above is a blank map: get out your crayons!


Salon.com
Comments
Right now the electoral map looks like a pixelated digital image of the United States, a picture taken at the wrong resolution and stretched too much, exposing a lack of detail in the underlying photo. In this case, detail that should have been there. Detail that matters.
However, an interim map, still pixelated but with finer pixels, would, I think, be heuristic. It would be a version of truth that could be better used to promote "purple", not only by visually demonstrating the blue/red-ness of people who are our actual neighbors, but more important by giving people the experience, the oportunity to do the visual transmutation themselves: To step back from their individual state-identity and see the red/blue merging to people. If you will: a dynamic visual metaphore of Obama.
Professor, I am honored by your approbation and your rating.
Thank you both for coming by and commenting!
Is it just a coincidence that your favorite color happens to be purple?
rated for purpleness
Perhaps all the new media may resolve that issue but not until we get some resonable liberal voices on talk radio.
rated
However, such unevenness appears built into even the current system. Certainly the distribution of presidential candidates already has a similar bypassing of some states, based not on population but on past voting records. For example, I'd heard that during the campaign season Obama had not set foot in Oregon, a "sure" state. That avoidance is not based on the particular characteristics of a state, the supposedly different interests that underly the reliance on the electoral college. It is yet another phenomenon.
What do others think?
rated
Here's to a more purple world!