‘Why Do They Hate Us?” Egyptian-American writer Mona Eltahawy laments on the cover page of Foreign Policy, in an article illustrated by provocative photos of a naked woman painted to look as if she were wearing a niqab. Who are the ‘They’ and who are the ‘Us’ referred to in the title of Eltahawy’s piece? She claims, in her many television interviews since the publication of the piece, that her intention was to turn the 9/11 mantra ‘Why Do They Hate Us?’ on its head. But in fact, she subscribes to it. The ‘Us’ she claims to speak for are Arab/Muslim women, but the ‘They’ accused of hatred are the same: Arab/Muslim men. In subscribing to that sweeping generalization, Eltahawy created a media controversy in the States but forfeited the support of a considerable segment of the women she purports to champion.
It is easy to understand and sympathize with Eltahawy’s bitterness and disillusionment: a vocal supporter of the January 25th Revolution in Egypt, she was assaulted sexually and had both her arms broken by riot police during a demonstration in Cairo. But Eltahawy’s article is a blanket condemnation, not only of the tactics of the riot police under Mubarak and his loyalists; not of a misogynist interpretation of Islam pushed by an extremist sect called Salafis; not even of regressive attitudes toward women arguably prevalent, especially among the less educated, in the Middle East.
Eltahawy’s generalization tars all men in the Muslim/Arab world with the same harsh brush, as if the riot policeman stripping a female protester were indistinguishable from the young man trying to protect her. She ignores the experience of thousands of Egyptian women who camped side by side with men in Tahrir Square day and night during the heyday of the revolution, without being subjected to harassment or intimidation.
With similar lack of distinction, she makes sweeping generalizations about all Arab countries, as if Saudi Arabia, the only country where women are not allowed to drive and are forced to wear a niqab, were indistinguishable from Tunisia, where policewomen direct traffic.
Eltahawy selects the worst instances of abusive laws or practices from each country and throws them indiscriminately into her quiver of accusations: for instance, the abhorrent practice of female circumcision is still common in parts of Egypt, but it is a Nilotic practice, not an Islamic one, and is unknown in the Muslim country most repressive against women: Saudi Arabia. On the other hand Egypt and most Arab countries enforce a minimum age of sixteen for marriage for girls, whereas Saudi Arabia does not.
By wielding her weapon so bluntly and indiscriminately, by making the same mistake Western feminists have historically made in trying to disassociate the ‘Oriental’ woman from her context, Eltahawy risks alienating the support of the women she may sincerely be trying to champion. A woman does not exist in a vacuum; she is a mother, daughter, wife, sister; she is a Muslim or an Arab. There are claims to her loyalty other than gender. At a time in history when her sons or brothers are indiscriminately branded as potential terrorists for being Arab or Muslim, she will shrink from comforting those dangerous stereotypes by subscribing to an equally reductionist diatribe against them as misogynists; at a time when wars are being waged, or threatened, against Arab and Muslim-majority countries partly with the justification of ‘saving women’, these same women fear the consequences of such reasoning.
But perhaps the most misguided aspect of Eltahawy’s indiscriminate attack in ‘Why Do They Hate Us?’ is that it leaves the women’s rights movement in these countries with nowhere to go. If feminists in Arab and Muslim-majority countries are to gain the full measure of rights and liberties for women, they will need to enlist the support of a sizeable segment of the male population, not antagonize it wholesale. Women’s rights cannot be imposed from outside, by marshalling public opinion in the West. Eltahawy’s courage and sincerity must be tested by the same measure as any feminist facing the same dilemma: by her efforts to change facts on the ground in Egypt, not by success in creating a media uproar in America.


Salon.com
Comments
To me, both from her writing prior to her attacks and in her interviews shortly thereafter, she expressed herself as a very thoughtful and nuanced writer and speaker. Looking at it from the outside, it seems she has shown great courage and sincerity, and she has joined in trying to change things on the ground in Egypt.
Her question of hate may be a good one, because sometimes when one individual or a group is harming another individual or group, it is actually not out of hate. Sometimes it is just that they feel their needs are more important than others' needs. Sometimes they feel their actions are protecting something, and the ends justify the means. Sometimes they are doing it to fit in with their peers, or because that is the way it's been done for a long time.To have someone say, "Why do you hate me, why are you treating me like this? This is not love, this is not respect, this is not in accordance with basic human rights," can be very helpful.
Her question may come from a very personal place, her own attack, but it applies to many women who are hurt for no other reason than being female.
I do not know for sure, but maybe Mona Eltahawy's goal is to start a conversation among people. The mistreatment of women is such a huge problem worldwide, it really is a good conversation for all of us to have, and to keep having.
Thank you for sharing this very thought-provoking post, and the view from within Egypt...I always appreciate your excellent posts and insights, Naqib's daughter!
Mona Eltahawy
For example, FGM "the abhorrent practice of female circumcision is still common in parts of Egypt, but it is a Nilotic practice, not an Islamic one".
So?
Having lived in Eritrea in the 60s, when 90% of all women, christian and muslim had been "cut" I can tell you from first hand experience it makes no difference to the woman that it is a nilotic practice.
Eritrea outlawed FGM in 2007. What has Egypt done to outlaw the practice?
So Mona is out of line because she was sexually abused and had her arms broken? I think not.
It is women like Mona who will change Egypt - when they are all as brave as she. I'm thinking very hard as to whether or not I should post this comment.
Oh hell......"post"
I don't doubt that Mona Eltahawy is braver than I am- I have demonstrated in Tahrir in January 2011 and since then, but was fortunate never to have felt threatened , let alone had my arms broken and been sexually assaulted.
Nor would I cast doubt for a moment that women in the Arab world have a long struggle ahead to gain their full rights, liberties and dignity. But, in my view, Eltahawy's article, by playing into the stereotype of the Arab male as terrorist abroad and brute at home, is unlikely to further the cause she espouses, and which I espouse as well.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/04/23/why_do_they_hate_us?page=0,0
Make up your own minds.
Regards,
Frank
Perhaps you have been fortunate to have been less traumatized.
Her irrefutable point is that virulent, violent misogyny is deeply institutionalized in all Islamic societies. Her essay challenges men and women to recognize that and take responsibility for it.
I think both approaches — hers, more confrontational; yours, more conciliatory — will be needed to liberate Muslim women. Eltahawy is not your enemy, save your energy for the real fight.