As a professional meat-cutter, I have been barraged in recent days with a single question that I am sure is echoing across the meat coolers of America. All day they call on the phone, ring the buzzer and grab my arm as I fill the case to ask in a panicked voice:
“Does your ground beef have that pink slime stuff in it?”
Where did this come from? We’ve known about pink slime for years. Basically it is recycled meat-trimmings that would typically be unsafe or used for pet foods that, through a patented process, is cleaned and sanitized for human consumption and labeled with various harmless sounding monikers like “lean textured ground beef.” It is used as filler in a wide variety of ground beef products. The meat-industry defends the practice as necessary for “affording cheap nutrition for a growing population.”
Many people, of course, have written about the questionable practice including the FDA official who coined the term “pink slime.” The process was even shown in disgusting detail in the movie Food, Inc a few years ago. Until a couple weeks ago, however, I had never received a single question about it. Somehow the issue, through a combination of media outlets including social media, reached a kind of tipping point. I guess it’s not unlike the recent lottery hysteria. When the numbers grow to a certain level—then everyone has to play.
Fortunately the answer to my customers’ question is “no.” For once my company is out in front of a trend. Almost two years ago, we started grinding everything in-store—out of fresh primal chunks of meat. Our ground sirloin is ground from whole sirloin tips, our ground round from whole bottoms rounds, and our ground chuck from whole chuck shoulder clods. Before that we used bulk coarse-ground chubs—long tubes of previously ground beef that we simply slit open and dumped into the grinder. I don’t know if they had “finely textured” ground beef added to it or not, but they were often slimy, gassy and stinky.
Our consultants and advisors were aghast when we made the switch. One group toured our store and literally gasped. Not only is it more labor and slightly less profitable than using pre-ground or gas-packed ground beef (with a shelf life of several weeks), but what concerned these accountants the most was the liability issue. By grinding our own beef, we are setting ourselves up for a catastrophic lawsuit. In the case of an e-coli outbreak most chain stores can just shrug and say—we don’t touch it here, therefore we have no liability. It’s one of those Catch-22s of the modern supply chain. By grinding everything in a central processing plant--where working conditions and sanitization is questionable at best—the risk of contaminating huge segments of the population increase, but the liability for the retail outlets is deferred, so the practice is encouraged.
There lies the rub. Many, if not most, decisions made in the food business today are not based on the common good or common sense, but on the whims of accountants and lawyers.
Pink slime, meanwhile, has the meat industry reeling. Several plants across the country have quit production. Hundreds of people have been laid off. One company has already filed for bankruptcy. The governors of several Midwest states have gathered to rail against this smear campaign against “affordable, safe protein.” They accuse the “twitter twits” of mass hysteria, misrepresentation and a general blowing of things way out of proportion.
Maybe. Never the less, people are freaked out. Not only are their hamburgers filled with disgusting fat scrapings, but they are realizing, maybe for the first time, that the people who make their food, fabricate their clothes, construct their shoes and brew their drinks give a damn about one thing and one thing only: profit.
Is pink slime really a way to provide cheap nutrition for a growing population? Or is it just another way to turn an extra buck? How much of it is imported to impoverished third world nations and how much is simply stuck in every product they can possibly stick it in? Increasingly we question the dynamics of our corporate state. Call us jaded, but we increasingly believe they will wheedle, lie, manipulate, poison, and scrape the last bit of fat off the last questionable hides to wring a few extra pennies out of the process–no matter what the cost to quality, ethics and morality. And all the while cutting pay and benefits to the people making the crap.
While many blame social media for the pink slime hysteria and claim it is indicative of the senseless, inaccurate, unaccountable, destructive, rumor-mongering that is running rampant across the internet, I’m beginning to think it’s part and parcel of a larger grass roots movement, including OWS, that is growing in this country. Like the guy from the movie Network, we have reached our limit and pink slime is our battle cry.
We’re mad as hell and we ain’t gonna eat it anymore.


Salon.com
Comments
And, over the years, I have posted here several times in my "Cheap Bastid" persona on getting excellent, fresh ground beef with minimal risk of any contamination by buying a boneless roast (bottom round, chuck or sirloin) when it is on special and having it ground (which Stater Bros. will do for free) and then dividing it into freezer bags when you get it home.
So, thanks for this. I agree. It's all about profit. I can live with it (but wouldn't buy it) if it were labeled clearly as containing this product as a "beef by-product" or an "additive". Consumers deserve at least that much. And our school kids deserve at least that much as well.
If we could all get as mad about the corporate wheedling, manipulating, lying and poisoning for profit as those governors are about the pink slime "smear campaign", we just might stand a chance.
If you think this is new, there's a song by the talented and cynical musical duo Paul and Storm called "Nugget Man," about the scientist who created chicken nuggets. And describes what's in them. Here's the song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEa8wqv4QM0
http://enews.penton.com/enews/nationalhogfarmer/nutrientmanagement/2009_12_14_nutrient_management/display
The chemicals they are injecting in pigs are making their manure grow a foam on the top that contains methane and is very explosive. But instead of changing the way they keep the pigs, they are going to inject them with a new drug to prevent the foam. Pure insanity. That's the way industrial agriculture works....
grimes . . .
gofer guts!
ANYMORE!
and SPAM!
any longer.
We eaters are weary of gagging when we visit the Bush's FDAs etc., MONSANTO!
stacked-CRAP!
Greedy CROOK!
Crime-Gang-GOO!
O anymore-Longer!
`
FOOD INC. is a must.
View that documentary.
The goo is fake glues.
`
Congratulations. YEA, EP!
I wonder? We ditch all TV's.
WE can join a clown circus.
Grow leafy green lettuces.
No fight over garden arugula.
Lettuce is a `sativa' calm green.
We can swing on garden swings.
Tie hemp-rope in cotton woods.
That tree is safer than FDA/EPA.
The Greedy Corp Kill Copperheads.
Lettuce eat healing grub real victuals.
Pigs are grown fat under chicken coops.
The pork is lethal. Google` Vadana Shiva.
She is a physicist who travels and WARNS.
Plant a backyard garden. Michelle Obama?
email her staff and ask her to plant garlic.
I know where they buy their potato seed.
My son buts seed potatoes from the sane.
Honest . . .
My son said the White House potatoes are:
`
Organic.
They come from Washington State. Healthy.
Root crops are heavily doused with chemicals.
The Center For Disease Control know this fact.
on and on . . .
Before the dang
computer gizmo
my focus was on:
`
Food Earth Safety.
No beast defiles.
Only greedy kill.
Be Forewarned.
Thanks. Sanity.
Good article. Rated.
In some ways the greed of corporate America is only a reflection of ourselves as consumers. We all want good jobs with benefits, but at the same time we want cheaper and cheaper goods including food. Maybe if we took a quality over quantity approach our food would be processed in store with butchers and bakers who earn a living wage with benefits instead of in factories with cheap labor using sub standard food to keep profits high and prices cheap. We cannot have it both ways.