"
How America turned poverty into a crime
"When "Nickel and Dimed" was published in May 2001, cracks were appearing in the dot-com bubble and the stock market had begun to falter, but the book still evidently came as a surprise, even a revelation, to many. Again and again, in that first year or two after publication, people came up to me and opened with the words, "I never thought..." or "I hadn't realized..."
At the time I wrote "Nickel and Dimed," I wasn't sure how many people it directly applied to -- only that the official definition of poverty was way off the mark, since it defined an individual earning $7 an hour, as I did on average, as well out of poverty. But three months after the book was published, the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., issued a report entitled "Hardships in America: The Real Story of Working Families," which found an astounding 29 percent of American families living in what could be more reasonably defined as poverty, meaning that they earned less than a barebones budget covering housing, child care, health care, food, transportation, and taxes -- though not, it should be noted, any entertainment, meals out, cable TV, Internet service, vacations, or holiday gifts. 29 percent is a minority, but not a reassuringly small one, and other studies in the early 2000s came up with similar figures.
Perhaps the constant suspicions of drug use and theft that I encountered in low-wage workplaces should have alerted me to the fact that, when you leave the relative safety of the middle class, you might as well have given up your citizenship and taken residence in a hostile nation.
Most cities, for example, have ordinances designed to drive the destitute off the streets by outlawing such necessary activities of daily life as sitting, loitering, sleeping, or lying down. Urban officials boast that there is nothing discriminatory about such laws: "If you're lying on a sidewalk, whether you're homeless or a millionaire, you're in violation of the ordinance," a St. Petersburg, Florida, city attorney stated in June 2009, echoing Anatole France's immortal observation that "the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges..."
That could be me before the blow-drying and eyeliner, and it's definitely Al Szekeley at any time of day. A grizzled 62-year-old, he inhabits a wheelchair and is often found on G Street in Washington, D.C. -- the city that is ultimately responsible for the bullet he took in the spine in Phu Bai, Vietnam, in 1972.
He had been enjoying the luxury of an indoor bed until December 2008, when the police swept through the shelter in the middle of the night looking for men with outstanding warrants. It turned out that Szekeley, who is an ordained minister and does not drink, do drugs, or cuss in front of ladies, did indeed have one -- for "criminal trespassing," as sleeping on the streets is sometimes defined by the law. So he was dragged out of the shelter and put in jail.


Salon.com
Comments
Other's would say: "he's doing the best he can with the cards he's been dealt."
I am Barack Obama, President, and I approve this post.
Sometimes I think things have to get a lot worse before there is a chance they can get better. We will go through another election cycle and little will change for the better - we will have a choice of the lesser of two evils.
Nice post / R
:-)
Thanks for stopping by to visit poor, little, old(e) humble me.
It shows that You care.
It is rare that a day goes by, when Yahoo news doesn't report a mass shooting. This news, quickly, fades (replaced by another) except within the community in which it occurred.
I think all signs point to a REAL man of principle and morals; one who doesn't think principles run schools, and morals are a genus of mushroom to appear on the scene.
Maybe NO lesser of two evils, a blog post of mine, several down this time.
My hopes, currently are on Kucinich, Feingold, and, long shot Sanders to mount a credible primary challenge to the liar-in-chief.
We desperately need some of the caliber of the late Mark Hatfield (may He r.i.p), who a fellow blogger wrote so eloquently of, only days ago.
Thanks for stopping by.
...
If I'm not confused?
I observe street folk.
I watch hubris/lowly.
`
The veteran do
He's the same one?
He does wheel`ies.
He has hugged me.
I always share coin change.
Whenever I share change`
`
He's stands-up and smiles.
He sure can do maneuvers.
He's a jolly veteran to me.
He rides via the DC traffic.
He does wheelchair tricks.
He do a wheelchair popup.
`
Gads
I scribble in a hurry to say:
If your spine is blow away:
You still have a`Spirit Life.
He's animated and Beauty.
`
I can't figure those politicos.
They assemble to get drunk.
After sitting in DCs cubicles?
They rush to buy bad booze.
The veteran...
He's viewed as waste to them.
In their waste basket I sense?
Their heart is waste/void duh!
No doubt - Politico is de' trash.
Who's the bad depraved ones?
The vet in the wheelchair isn't.
I've no eloquent reason nor ask:
Who experience vast sorrows?
I discern an enormous lostness.
Politicos can't even smile at awe.
The war mongers are total losses.
I sense desperate misery's pains.
To cover their misery they drink.
I see these sad jokers on K & G. St.
I wonder the DC street and speak.
Veteran speak back kinds` to me.
They are more secure and know.
They know about `Immortality.
No doubt - Politicos are Pathetic.
I see a radiance and big old smile.
I rarely sense joy in the politicos.
On Thursdays I wander G & K St.
A smile radiates from homeless.
Of course, there is the derelict.
The arrogant are so depraved.
They smirk. They fear. Panics.
Thanks for taking the time to visit, Art.
A. War: six, now seven if You count the raging drugs wars of South America.
B. Arms sales, we ARE #1, and don't mind selling to both sides in a conflict.
C. Prison industrial complex, we a ARE #1, there, too, with the highest percentage of citizens behind bars, such that, we now, outsource the job, much as we outsource many other things, and Your prescience leads us to:
D. Removing dead bodies of the starving (don't want such disturbing images to be seen by the impressionable)
.
Thanks as always, for the value you add to my posts, RW.
I'd read Ehrenreich, before, but somehow, I missed this one, amidst the chaos of 2001.
Another line to add to my to do list.
Thanks for stopping by, SnarkyChaser, and I hope to see more of You whenever I post something of interest.
Thanks for stopping by, Snoreville.
Stick around Snoreville -- maybe we can draw a crowd, (or prepare a new career in Vaudeville).
An interview with Barbara Ehrenreich by Amy Goodman, yesterday.
It's unsurprising (and serendipitous) that she would have Barbara on, yesterday, as AMY does her homework and knows who she schedules and why.
Thanks for the link, Inverted Interrobang -- I do all the cooking, here, and I'm TOTALLY up to date on my antiwar.com radio shows. I need something to listen to, while cooking today.
Your link is serendipitous, too, and I thank You for it.
Thanks for visiting.
homelessness in America is a non-political non-media non-national conversation subject tragically. (although the population hasn't been included in the political or media conversations for a good long time!) i honestly think not addressing the homeless crisis was a major part of our moral desensitization program and how ripe we were to be economically raped by the saturated with corruption three dimensions of society, pols, corporatists and self-aggrandizing academcis. politicians assuming non-homeless citizens should not be considered "citizens" ... they so easily exclude the bottom-line poor and mentally/emotionally challenged, from their supposed birthright as citizens. it makes it all the easier for them to expand the legions of the "nouveau poor" (my comment phrase of the week).
Christ's haunting comment about what you do to the least of us, you do unto me! now we are all sliding down to deeper poverty. will it enhance empathy among us or will stress make us all the more narcissistic?
my own near bottom of corporate food chain job is becoming more and more psychologically oppressive. ridiculous power and control shenanigans. the buyer's market and the "lucifer effect" among management at all levels. sustaining personal dignity and trying to survive. a challenge!
thanks for your spirit, wisdom and messaging! [r] libby
It's just too convenient to blame the plight of the poor and homeless on themselves.
Even, here on OS, I hear a refrain of I made it through adversity why can't they. Hello, the jobless rate hovers near 20% at least.
americans have become a nasty, retribution, it could never happen to me, bunch of sheep, without realizing the apocalyptic future being offered them.
Thanks for stopping by and allowing me to express my disgust, LibbyLiberalNYC.
I'm known for crankiness, but I just saw Your film rec. "Inside Job" and I'm furious, infuriated and despairing, AGAIN.
One more "doing the best he can with the cards he's been dealt," and I might bust (which likely would delight many here).
Sh*t, I'm a radical and I support obama - ROTFLMAO! What a group of idiots.
I don't know what to say about the lack of community among the citizenry. I think the media is evil in focusing always from the perspectives and with empathy for the power brokers, not real people. It makes the viewers identify with their own oppressors. It flips critical analysis into coldly watching a game, without embracing the consequences of said game. And games are about admiring power and winning, not about empathy and spiritual wakefulness.
CNN is all excited about what the jobless statistics, etc., will do to poor Obama's election in 2012, as if people drowning in poverty is not the important reality but what Obama will have to do next year. It is awesomely callous. Gamesmanship of the big guys, the hell with the plight of the people .... ANY people ANYWHERE, except if it is really titillating for a few minutes! Some exploitative human misery up close and personal. Then off to find some other titillation without ever helping people see the big evil picture or even followup on the blasting initial coverage of tragedy.
I can't access what is going on at OS. Personally, I am grateful for the hits I get sometimes, but the precious number of ratings (from allies like you) reveal the hits are not necessarily endorsements of the thinking. But at least people are reading some of the stuff I am putting out.
But I think there is a shift taking place, though I have not been here long. I think Obama is Captain of the USS Titanic and more and more people are wanting off before the 2012 crash and want a better option than him or the rabid rat bastard Republicans. It is a false choice, but learned helplessness and US political fatigue has made people cynical and passive, along with the distractions of the harsh reality of our personal economic lives.
We deserve a better choice than the political blackmail perpetrated for so long from front-stabbing but please don't notice it Dem Party.
I, also, agree with You that a, now silent, but tectonic shift in sentiment is taking place.
Thanks for the return visit.