Editor’s Pick
AUGUST 12, 2008 5:45PM

Shup up, American Olympics commentators

Rate: 4 Flag

I don't like to be one of those foreigners that complains about Americans' patriotic chauvinism, but the Olympic commentary is really bothering me.

The set-up: the French men's 400 meter free relay team said they are going to "smash" the Americans.

Americans love to hate on the French, so this was commentator gold: the commentators ran as far as possible with it.

Watch the whole race here.

The Amercans came from behind and won by 8/100 of a second

Immediately after the win, it began. The incredibly offensive commentary starts at 5:45 in the video above.

Commentator: "Who's talking now? Stunned. I think they need to use another word other than "smash." That might be the most incredible relay split I've ever seen in my entire life...French are still in shock. We're going to play the footage here in real speed here, to give you an idea...Let's watch it again, you've got to watch it from above. Watch how he gives into this way, just a huge lunge. I just can't believe that Lesak just did that...At the other end, you've got Bernard, who did the talkin', and he's not saying much right now...So the results. The heavily favored French bow to the Americans. They smash the world record."

Interviewing the American team, at 9:02:

Q: "Well, the French said we're going to smash the Americans. Who's talking now, guys?"

A:  "We are, the United States of America."

At 11:00: "Bob came by and said the Frenchies were talking stuff, and I said, 'I don't even wanna hear it, we're goign to take care of business when we get to the pool, and we took care of business, that's all that matters." 

People ask, "why do they hate us?" I'll show you:

phelps

Compare this with the women's 100 meter butterfly final, involving the same commentators. Here, the American swimmer Magnuson won silver, in a similarly close finish, with Australian swimmer Trickett taking gold.

Immediately after the Australian takes the gold, the commentator stresses that she's "just off the world record."

Then, incredibly, "what a race by Magnuson, holding off Schipper. Trickett, she almost didn't make it to the semis from the heats... what a beautiful swim by both these swimmers right there, the two of them together, both quick off the blocks, Magnuson just a tick faster on her reaction time...look at the turn, Trickett had a great turn, but you know what, Magnuson never panicked, never never panicked, she was really so good."

Bottom line: when Americans win, they're so great, everyone else sucks. When Americans get silver or worse, they did a great job, and it was so close anyway.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I watched the 2000 Olympics while living in Sydney. It was difficult to listen to the Aussie commentators as well...I sat through it, but I did learn MUCH from the experience about the bias commentators have for their own nation's athletes.
Since I'm not watching the Olympics it's been interesting for me to read about various reactions to it. As one who doesn't watch any kind of sports on television, I guess you could say one of my avocations is to read commentaries about the Olympics.
In fairness to the men's team, they genuinely weren't expected to win. I'm willing to spot them a little excitement for having a 32 year old overhaul the world record holder.

As for the gold "we rock, you suck" and silver "we were so close mode of commentary, it exists elsewhere, just in slightly different form.

For instance, on the BBC:

- English athlete wins - "A magnificent victory for the English runner here..."

- English athlete loses - "A valiant effort by the British sprinter, but it was not to be..."

- Scottish athlete wins* - "An unexpected but satisfying win for the British runner..."

- Scottish athlete loses - "Another crashing disappointment for the Scottish runner..."

*This is by far the rarest of the different calls listed above.
Haggis, you're hilarious.

Lisa & Haggis, yes, of course, but we're already the only superpower, we're already awesome, we don't need to rub it in. A little humility and downplaying of accomplishments could go a long way.

Designator, I only watch 2 events, evah: Olympics and World Cup. But i'm an Olympics omnivore, I'll watch anything. I got into archery last night, and weightlifting.
I agree the Americans can be oppressively chauvinistic. However, the gold medal for that sort of thing goes to the Koreans during the Seoul Olympics. for instance, they lost a boxing match, and the coaches attacked the judges. The Korean boxer refused to leave the ring and stayed there for over an hour in protest of losing the match. There were other instances of aggressive nationalism in those games, too, but the boxing matches were the worst.

Maybe it's just more noticable when it's the Americans since our media and physical presence is so overwhelming compared to most other countries. I do cringe when I hear the chants of "USA, USA,USA..."
MB, I have no idea what you're talking about, but then I gat all mu Olympics news from BATZ!
I don't have a problem with the home country commentators rooting for the home country athletes. I'd like to think that in their place I'd be a bit more admiring of the winning endeavors of other athletes, but it is, after all, *a competition*. And the idea that b/c we're 'already a superpower' we need to be humble about winning - I just don't get that. Each athlete at the Olympics has sacrificed and trained to win. They deserve their accolades, and you can bet that each one is getting them from their home country commentators.
Hi Mme Castor, encore,

Dont make me use 'Bitch' cuz you aint

Intense, yes, Bitch, no.

Mucho congrats on the univ success!


I will post soon: do I get 1 freebie rant

as a long term protagonist? No? I didnt think so

tsk, -intense.

This is an opportunity to let all the worms out of the

can. None of us will have Any secrets left after 6 mo.

or so.

Really glad to be writing this: I was concerned for

a while, that you were a victim of the economic

storms.

Need advice (optional, if you have Time/ or not)

--I ve dragged the guts (content) out of Memory (a

decades worth. -weird clippings and pix from waay

back.

Query: what blog content, and expression (worthwhile

topics vs crap), --good writing of course, originality vs

sheep dip, --that kind of critique. (you dont know if you dont

ask), Actually, advice on this from Anyone, is welcome,

(Rilly asking for it huh ). I dont want "No more artsy semi nudes

dude, just Think and write!! " ---in my mailbox: so this is

preemptive avoidance. What works What not?? outrageous?

scandalous? spicey? funny as hell always works, deep wit?

irreverence? -it cant be a Keynes retrospective and fears of

Weimar All the time.

You suprised me! --that you took the Olympic commentator

seriously enough to comment (or even get p---ed about it)

'Dont sweat the small stuff' is religion to me, but I had to learn

that the hard way.

En tout cas: (btw some of the new blogs are, uh, un peu Snob??

I dont care, but isnt that a rather obvious bait?

Take care mme C: & giveemhell. Cheers

Argonne
You mean jingoism isn't built into the very heart of the Olympics? Let's see what Pierre de Coubertin had to say about that. . .

The Olympic Games were created for the exaltation of the individual athlete.

The most important thing in the Olympic Games is not winning but taking part; the essential thing in life is not conquering but fighting well.

Stupid Frenchman. What does he know?
I had no problem with the organic jubilee the swimmers displayed when realizing they had earned an unlikely win.

And Phelps was nothing but a gentleman when he turned to the French swimmer who had bragged about smashing him and his fellow teammates, held out his hand and congratulated him for his silver.

The American commentators--idiots. But they're just typical of the MSM--making predictions before events actually happen.
Ya know they have a sayin'down here in Texas which I think applys to you. "You'd bitch if you had a golden ass," which you do çause... you're an American.
Huh, John Walker, I lived in Texas for 6 years, and you're just as judgmental and ignorant as I remember people being.
mademme:
Interesting that you would declare the entire population of a state, judgemental and ignorant just because one of them disagrees with you. Perhaps it's not everyone else, whadaya think?
Disagrees? No, you didn't disagree, friend. You assumed i'm an American. Joke's on you.

Back in Dallas, when I still had my accent, "friendly" Dallasites would always be asking, "where you from?" and then follow up with "well, welcome to mer'ca!"
Well then, no wonder you have such an anti-American attitude. But, nevertherless, welcome to 'merca!
So, a guy from Texas stereotypes all Americans, then criticizes stereotyping all Texans, and then stereotypes all foreigners.

Yup, just as I remember...

It was also very charming when y'alls middle-school-aged chirren didn't know the difference between "Jewish" and "Satanist." Good times.
Wow! Perhaps you're one of those angry and bitter folks that Barrack was talking about. I'm not sure, nor is it my business what makes you that way, but I'd suggest seeing someone about it. And remember, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not after you.
Oh, you're so quickly jumping to the psychiatric diagnosis via internet (insult #23)? Bo-ring.

Plus, it would be hard for me to be one of those angry and bitter folks Barack was talking about, since I have neither guns nor a religion to cling to.
okay, Ms. "B" you win. You waste my time. Sadly I have wandered into a battle of wits with an unarmed person. So, as a Texan let me welcome you to New York.
lol you're kidding, right? toodles, sweet pea. free advice: go take a class in logic or something.
So any acknowledgment of the misplaced arrogance displayed by the French team is in beyond the pale? Honestly, who isn't happy when braggarts receive their comeuppance? In this case, the French have learned an important life lesson. The American team was phenomenal, and so was the French team. The difference is the American team wasn't talking "stuff" beforehand about the French (as far as we know). "They hate us" because of our joy in victory? Give me a break. It's not like they went over an taunted the French after they won. As another poster said, Phelps even graciously congratulated them. "Why they hate us" indeed.

For the commentators - what country do you expect their audience to cheer for? When broadcasting for American audiences, the focus is on the achievements of the American teams. No surprise, and nothing to get all bent out of shape over.
Jake, if you don't get it, you haven't stepped into anyone else's shoes.

Argonne, I'm not really sure what to make of your posting, but I'm flattered to be the first person you posted to on OS.
while there's no argument that we see much more about american athletes than the athletes of another country's olympic team, i think you've picked a poor example with this race because of a few facts specific to it. first, it was truly a thrilling comeback victory in an event that the french were heavily favored in, and the excitement of the moment is important to consider when critiquing the comments of people talking about a live event, not to mention the other guys on the team that just won in thrilling fashion. also, there was trash talking by the french team, and it's perfectly acceptable that the athletes would be asked for their reaction to that talk - this happens in all of sports.

i think it is interesting that it's the trash talk and rebuttal aspect that seems to have rubbed you so wrong. i guess the question is: are the olympics above that sort of behavior? maybe it is and we're fed so much "glory of the games" hype that it certainly seems so. but, competition is still competition and it breeds this.
Matt, I think the commentators have an extra duty to not act like drunk spectators.

I think what rubbed me the wrong way was not the trashtalk and rebuttal, but the particular glee of the commentators that the trastalking losers were French. The French were not classy with what they said, but the Americans LOVE to hate on the French, which is very odd to me. I never understood this hatred, and I find it kind of crass.
I definitely give you that the commentators were gushing, acting like drunk spectators I'm not sure. As I said before, I don't think you are giving the nature of the race itself enough weight in their reactions. I just think holding replays of a close finish against sports commentators a little bit of a stretch.

As for hating on the French, you are absolutely right, there was a lot of pleasure seemingly taken in taking them down. Whether this is because of the underdog thing, the trashtalk, or some sort of residual "freedom fry" hangover is really the question, I think. Either way, you're right that it's crass.