Alan Nothnagle

Alan Nothnagle
Location
Berlin, Germany
Birthday
May 04
Company
InterpretBerlin.com
Bio
I am a freelance writer, YA author, and interpreter based in Berlin.

Editor’s Pick
JUNE 3, 2009 8:58AM

10 reasons why Obama isn't Hitler

Rate: 28 Flag

 

 ...and neither is anybody else.

 

Obama as Hitler
 

 

TRY GOOGLING “+obama+hitler” and you’ll come up with eight and a half million references. Switch on talk radio and you’re liable to hear twice as many before cocktail time. New York Times columnist David Brooks recently succumbed to the temptation, insinuating certain parallels between the American president and the German dictator.

 

But it isn’t just Obama who gets compared this way. Playing the Hitler card is quickly becoming America’s pastime. It certainly requires a lot less skill than baseball. Whether it is Saddam Hussein, George W. Bush, Osama bin Laden, Rush Limbaugh, Kim Jung Il or Vladimir Putin – they have all seen their card pulled from the deck the moment they got in someone’s way. And as everyone knows, there’s “only one way” to deal with Hitler. But this is not just a diversion. FOX News commentator Bill O’Reilly famously compared abortionist Dr. George Tiller to Hitler and the Nazis, and we have seen the result.

 

George Orwell had this game figured out as early as 1946, and probably much earlier than that: “The word Fascism has now no meaning,” he wrote, “except in so far as it signifies ‘something not desirable.’” Back in 1953 neocon philosopher Leo Strauss identified the “reductio ad Hitlerum,” by which any person or argument could be demolished by even the most tenuous association with Hitler. (Example: Hitler liked German shepherd dogs. Joe Blow likes German shepherd dogs. Ergo, Joe Blow is like Hitler. Joe Blow is Hitler.) Today anyone who has ever ventured onto an Internet forum knows all about “Godwin’s Law,” which states that “as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.” Rants about “econazis” and “feminazis” clog the blogosphere like hair in a sink. While the United States does not have a monopoly on this sort of rhetoric, it’s hard to imagine a country where the H name is thrown around with less basic curiosity about the man and his career.

 

I think it’s time we put the bite back into this name. So who was Hitler really and how useful is he as a political touchstone? In the following I have compiled a list of ten key character traits of the historical Hitler that can be used as points of comparisons with other public figures. So step up and take the challenge: Can your favorite politician or pundit pass the Hitler test?

 

Adolf Hitler
 

 
  1. A complete absence of normal human relationships. Hitler never married (aside from a last-minute hitch in the bunker), had no known children, and conducted only a handful of enigmatic relationships with women that usually ended in suicide or attempted suicide. Despite many rumors about Hitler’s abnormal sexual practices, there is no solid evidence that he ever engaged in any sexual practices. The one true love of his life appears to have been his young niece Geli Raubal, who was still a minor the first time they met. This incestuous liaison also ended with her suicide. Nor did Hitler have any friends. His relationships with his subordinates were always cool, and he ordered the only real friend he could be said to have had – Storm Trooper commander Ernst Röhm – shot as a traitor in 1934. Without any human attachments, he was literally a man with nothing to lose.
  2. An utter lack of empathy for the suffering of others. Hitler may have appeared polite and even charming to his entourage, and yet he did not hesitate when it came to literally exterminating entire peoples and sacrificing his own armies to hopeless causes. When informed in the latter stages of the war that thousands of young German officers were being slaughtered by the Red Army merely so that he could postpone the inevitable, Hitler’s only reply was “But that’s what the young people are there for.”
  3. Eccentric health habits. Hitler was a teetotaler, anti-smoker, and vegetarian. Now these are all wise lifestyle choices in themselves, but they are disturbing in a man not otherwise interested in physical fitness and sports. This focus on bland food and quack medicine highlighted a general eccentricity and an unwholesome obsession with his health and mortality that cut him off from the rest of humanity.
  4. A previous history of failure ending with treatment for acute psychosis. Hitler failed wretchedly at everything he put his hand to before joining the German army in 1914, and even there he was never promoted beyond corporal despite four years of loyal service. After being temporarily blinded by a gas attack in November of 1918, and then hearing the news of his country’s defeat while recuperating in a military hospital, Hitler suffered a mental breakdown and received psychotherapy. This marked the start of his political career. What he himself viewed as a moment of illumination probably had a more clinical definition. However, the Gestapo destroyed all of Hitler’s medical records after he came to power, so we will never now the exact nature of this breakdown and how it affected his later career. But political epiphanies are always suspect. Every Hitler candidate should have at least one such episode in his or her past.
  5. The ability to forge vast coalitions and bring together vastly different people. Hitler’s popularity among his own people did not stand at twenty percent or thirty percent or even sixty percent, but at as much as ninety percent at one time. His charisma and his promises (including, yes, the Autobahn and the VW) united millionaires, army generals, engineers, academics, tradesmen, workers, farmers, poets, Lutheran deaconesses, and Catholic priests in a common cause. No section of society was immune to his charm. Even some Jews tried to join the movement in 1933, and the only reason more did not do so is that they were never invited. Millions were eager to die for him, and thousands literally took their own lives when they received news of his death.
  6. Fanatical racial and ethnic prejudice. While virtually everyone suffers from at least some sort of intolerance, political leaders included, Hitler focused all his hatred on a single group – the Jews – whom he regarded as the “poisoners of humanity” and the sole barrier between himself and his inflated ambitions. (He regarded such phenomena as pacifism, communism, homosexuality, abstract art, atheism, and some aspects of organized Christianity as products of this “spiritual poisoning.”) Moreover, he was willing to deploy the entire resources of the state – in the midst of a war of national survival, no less – in order to root out every last member of this group. He was entirely open about his beliefs. “By defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord,” he wrote in his best-selling manifesto Mein Kampf. “We are quite clear about the fact that the war can only end with either the eradication of the Aryan peoples or with Judaism disappearing from Europe,” he told his associates in 1942.
    Any serious contender for Hitler status should have at least a few such no-nonsense quotes on hand in his or her file.
  7. A neurotic identification with his own people. Hitler believed that he had been chosen by God to embody the very essence of the Germanic peoples and the “Aryan race,” so that if he were defeated in his reach for world domination there would be no point in allowing them to live on after him. Towards the end of the war he issued orders to destroy his country’s entire infrastructure and food supply, and would likely have ordered the extermination of the German people itself if he had had the means to pull it off.

    Ahmadinejad weds Hitler
     
  8. An obsession with art and architecture. Hitler had always regarded himself as an artist and architect and regarded his Third Reich as a Gesamtkunstwerk (“total work of art”) in the Wagnerian mold. He spent thousands of hours planning the complete reconstruction of Berlin (“Germania”), Nuremberg, and his hometown of Linz. He actually drew the first sketches for the Great Hall, the nine hundred fifty foot tall domed temple of his movement, as early as 1925. He was in such a hurry that he actually pushed to complete his new capital and its victory monuments before the war was won – in fact, he issued the orders before the war even started. He diverted valuable resources to his narcissistic building projects and worked thousands of slave laborers to death to quarry the stone he needed. Towards the end of his life, he personally designed his own monumental tomb in Linz where he hoped to enjoy eternal rest. Before the Germans could start building the new Berlin government district near the Reichstag in the 1990s, they first had to dynamite the foundations of Germania.

    The Great Hall
     
  9. Crackpot irresponsibility. Unlike, say, George Washington, who was willing to give things time to develop at a reasonable pace, Hitler insisted on realizing all of his ambitions within his own lifetime regardless of the consequences. He did not just gamble with his country’s economic health and diplomatic position, but with its very physical existence. For him everything was a “roll of the dice.”
  10. Suicidal determination. Hitler spoke frequently of suicide and nearly killed himself on a number of occasions, including after the fiasco of his “Beer Hall Putsch” of 1923 and his poor showing in the November 1932 election. His fallback plan for failure during the reoccupation of the Rhineland was to put a bullet through his head. This “secret weapon” made it possible for him to “go to the limit” every time he made a decision. He inevitably hit this limit on April 30, 1945, when he dictated a testament blaming everything on the Jews, then bit on a cyanide capsule and blew his brains out.
Clearly this list could be complemented with such items as “unattractive facial hair” (Ahmadinejad) or “dodgy citizenship status” (Obama, anyone…?), but these ten will do for the moment. Now a lack of empathy is pretty much a given among authoritarian leaders. The usual candidates frequently share one or more of the other characteristics (for example, Saddam Hussein’s and Nicolae Ceausescu’s penchant for palaces and George W. Bush’s black sheep youth and subsequent “rebirth”), but a mere hankering for white marble and delusions of chosenness do not a Hitler make.

 

I would like to suggest that #10 is decisive. Just about every politician or pundit I have come across is looking forward to enjoying a comfortable retirement complete with a book deal and some quality time with his or her grandchildren. Hitler was a psychopathic cult leader, but politicians and pundits are survivors. Show me another serious national leader whose sole aim in life is to end his life and you’ll have my attention. But if it is only a matter of workaday cruelty and megalomania, it is usually possible to identify some common ground – even if this common ground is merely that of survival.

 

So how did you make out? I’d say that if your man or woman hits even four or five out of ten, you might have something to talk about at parties. Otherwise, I urge you to choose a different villain to weigh your enemies against. The Hitler comparison is meaningless. In fact, it has become downright embarrassing.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
You left out:
11) stylish mustache
12) intravenous amphetamine addiction
oh yeah, and
13) genocide
Genocide is obviously included in #6.
oh yeah, sorry. then you just missed the mustache and the speed.
Great list, very well put. I might have to link this to other sites where they banter about the name Hitler in response to any and every comment.
Thank you! I am so sick and tired of people comparing various leaders to Hitler at the drop of a hat.
I see a little of #5 in Obama so, clearly, he is headed down the Hitler path.

Seriously, though, this is fantastic.
You'd better leave Obama alone. He might go Wayne Brady on you all!

Seriously: A most excellent post! Rated.
Hitler does appear to be "The Man of the Century." When there is an absence of intellect critics always seem to generate to him. He seems to be the god of short notice or shorthand for a phenomon we keep close at hand because we are so limited in comparing the myth from the man.

Hitler, facinating as he was, has no comparison in history and is used like the Boggy Man to perpetuate and pass on our own pathetic propaganda. When we examine what Hitler is or was, we can only come up with the word evil. But what was he because words are always asymptotic to the reality they hope to create.

You are correct in citing George Orwell because he understood what Hitler was about as did Hannah Arendt, but those who wish to set up straw men disregard these two philosophers of Modernity.

Perhaps one day like Pogo, we will all look into the Mirror and see that Hitler is us.

Excellent as always.
Cheney doesn't care much about art and architecture, so I guess he's out.
Excellent post-very thorough! I have subscribed to the belief for awhile now that if you bring up Nazis or Hitler- you have lost the argument.
@JustJuli
I certainly agree, although I'd go you one better and propose that people who play the Hitler card don't want to argue at all. While political discussions are subtle, everybody imagines they "know" who Hitler was. Looked at this way, the Hitler card game is an effective tool in stifling all intelligent debate on just about any topic you can imagine. It's time we left it behind.
Yep, the Hitler/Nazi trump card is usually the last refuge for people that have been out-debated. I would suggest Stalin as an example of megalomania with a dab of political righteousness. Any University Action Commitee comes to mind...
@Darryl Ross
Amen. Hitler has degenerated into a mere comic book character, but Stalin is downright scary. At first it might seem odd that hardly anyone ever introduces Stalin into political debates, but then again that would require doing at least a few minutes of reading, and most people can't be bothered.
Thanks for posting, good research. I always use the vegetarian angle myself--"Lentil soup? What are you, some kind of Nazi?"
"but Stalin is downright scary"

True, but even Uncle Joe would probably score around 5 on your
10-point scale:

1. A complete absence of normal human relationships.
Half a point - not complete absence: married twice, three children, very abusive, possibly caused the death of a wife and a son.

2. An utter lack of empathy for the suffering of others.
Full point - same thing. He called it: historical necessity.

3. Eccentric health habits.
No eccentricity. His "normal" unhealthy life was customary in his environment

4. A previous history of failure ending with treatment for acute psychosis
Half a point for paranoia, which might have been even warranted in the political environment he himself created

5. The ability to forge vast coalitions and bring together vastly different people.
Full point - although in his case "love of people" was a smaller, terror a bigger component.

6. Fanatical racial and ethnic prejudice.
Half a point - Class prejudice more than racial, In his last years stronger antisemitism

7. A neurotic identification with his own people.
Half a point - not that extreme but well-developed sense of being Russian (which he was not).

8. An obsession with art and architecture.
Full point - No artist or writer was ever safe from his strong, often lethal. "criticism".

9. Crackpot irresponsibility.
No similarity - With those he could not control he was flexible, cunning and patient.

10 Suicidal determination.
No similarity: natural "survivor"
I think pure evil should be a category by itself. The kind of evil that would destroy the world if not stopped. There are just some people that are evil. Hitler was one of those people.
Brilliant post.

Can I still compare people to Mussolini? Specifically, I'm thinking Limbaugh. It's the jerky dance moves.
I think Stalin and Mao both make that list, as do Cromwell and Napoleon, Caesar, Alexander, Genghis Khan.
I think the Caesarist part per Spengler makes it more important than you do personally, and that per Spengler, we are in the age of the Caesars.
But rated for very good presantation of issues.
A Holocaust survivor by the way and professor of mine, Harry Eckstein, thought his painting was better than given credit; the big what if, had he been an artist, or even an architect.
But very good historical discussion.
Wow, I am surprised that no one has pointed out the obvious ways that W., especially in his first term, fits the profile as outlined above. To elaborate point by point:

1. Though W. was married, his relationships appeared to be based more on a test of loyalty, than on affection or caring. Since we saw a parade of his "old friends" prance throughout his administration, we had a good 8 year window seat to disfunctional relations of the G.W. Bush family. One could argue that this constitutes a lack of normal relationships.

2. From his time as governor of Texas, W. has shown a distinct lack of sympathy or understaing for those under his influence, wether it be potentially innocent prisoners, or under supported American Soldiers in Afghanistan or Iraq.

3. OK, to be honest, I don't know about this one.

4. Bush's forays into business was one disaster after another. And it can be aruged that he was able to drive our country into a ditch with ihs poor management. So, while one could argue that to be elected might be success - complete inc9mpetence in office negates that success, and then some.

5. It is simply amazing to me that so many people knew this guy was a complete shark, and still went along with him. Think Richard Hatch on the first season of Survivor. Scary!

6. Uh, Extraordinary Rendition and "Enhanced Interrogation" twisted into some pale pretence of shadow legality... Syping on American citizens, torture, racial profiling... need I say more?

7. "I answer to another father" mentality - Again, need I say more?

8. To be honest, I don't know this.

9. Complete incompetence is more like it. Katrina (Heck of a job Brownie); Alberto Gonzalez; Guamtanimo Bay; Iraq; Unlawful Surveillance on Americans, Waste, corruption, The US Economy, Hank Paulson..... Bush is still convinced that he was doing God's work and would be vindicated "by history" If this doesn't fit the criteria of "crackpot irresponsibility", I don't know what does.

10. Though I don't know if W. was suicidal, he didn't mind sending undershielded service men and w0men into harms way (no body armor or chielding on tanks...). To me, this qualifies!

So, though I agree that Nazi gets thrown around way too much now a days, one has to look at the frightening similarities.... And the revelations keep coming!
@dvorasnell
You raise excellent points and I fully agree. Nevertheless, I maintain that GWB fell far short of Hitler. As I point out in my article, "suicidal determination" is the key point, and GWB certainly didn't have that, as shown by the contempt most people feel toward him today. His proven lack of empathy (see Vincent Bugliosi's book) is pretty terrifying, but arguably par for the course for a self-proclaimed "war president." My argument is that Hitler comparisons are always a distraction from real issues, as if a leader needs to pass an arbitrary "Hitler test" before he or she can be considered a problem. GWB wasn't terrible because he was "Hitler" but because he was GWB, and that was bad enough.
The best reason Obama is not Hitler

We have seen Hitler's birth certificate.
Alan, a wonderful and interesting post.

Dvorasnell, yeah, there is no full scale similarity, but still resemblance is chilling. Every time Glenn Beck spouts that under Obama we are moving towards fascism, I want to strangle the man for blatantly lying and misrepresenting. I know he's paid for it, but still, W is sooo much closer to Hitler, only total morons can't see it.

GalaxyMan, a good take on Stalin. I disagree on one point only.
Regarding racial predjudice. It was not only towards the Jews. During the Stalin's rule lots of small nations have been deported from better lands to far and inhospitable regions. The incomplete list would include Crimean Tartars, Volga Germans, Kalmyks and many other ethnic minorities. Minorities of foreign origin - Koreans, Poles, Germans were ecpecially targeted for extermination. You will find a comprehensive picture of ethnic deportations and cleansing on the Stalin Wiki page. So he definitely gets a full point on this scale.
An important thing you left out is his anticommunism.
The similarities between the US and the
Third Reich are actually more interesting, and relevant.
Fabulous. And I agree w/ Juli: the moment you make a Hitler/Nazi comparison in an argument, you lose, as far as I'm concerned. I got cranky w/ The Fiance for interrupting me while I was trying to finish reading this terrific post. Rated!
I have to say- this list is nonsensical. You've yanked out 10 unrelated factoids about Hitler and implied that these are ingredients that make up Hitler. So I suppose you are a vegetarian, , never had kids or married, and have a knack for forging coalitions (Ghandhi?) then you're 30% Hitler already.
As David Duke once said when asked whether he agreed with Hitler :" well, if Hitler advocated the use of toilet paper then I guess I would have to agree with him". In other words- Hitler should be villified for certain things he did- genocide, warmongering, etc, but NOT everything he did or everything in his personal habits was deplorable. There is nothing wrong with being single. Nothing wrong with a food obsession. Nothing wrong with being a failed artist. Nothing wrong with triumphalist architecture. There is nothing wrong with all of these things put together. This sort of meaningless factoids is what causes so many people to post nonsense on the internet like 'oh yeah? Hitler was a vegetarian too' 'So? Hitler won a democratic election too', etc, etc.
@icedmilkcoffee
This comment genuinely perplexes me, since the whole point of my essay was to argue that a politician's similarity to arbitrary Hitlerian "factoids" most definitely does not make him or her into Hitler (see the reference to "reductio ad Hitlerum" above). So yes, icedmilkcoffee, I emphatically agree with you on this point.

Otherwise, I have to argue that the aspects I chose are more than mere "factoids" and anything but trivial. Let me show you what I mean:

* "Nothing wrong with being single." Of course not, unless being single means having no normal, consensual human relationships and a whole series of love affairs that ended in suicide and attempted suicide. A person like this really has nothing to lose and has no business running other people's lives.

* "Nothing wrong with a food obsession/odd health habits." No, although your typical politician will always avoid displaying any habits that make him or her seem strange and keep them from participating in barbecues or the occasional round of beers. If the politician doesn't feel a need to be seen as "one of the boys," it might be a good idea to ask why. I mean, if your candidate doesn't think they're "one of the boys/girls," then just what do they think they are...?

* "Nothing wrong with triumphalist architecture." No, most great leaders try to leave something behind, and despite the high cost of monumental buildings, they may well be worth the trouble for later generations. The trouble starts when your leader starts building the victory monument (plus a whole new "capital of the world"!) before the war is even started, let alone before it's won, and doesn't care how many slave laborers have to die and how many valuable resources have be diverted in order to get it done on time for the parade. Now that's when we're getting into Hitler territory.
Love your list! Wonder if Letterman would read it on his show? That sure would set people straight about who Adolph really was! However, I think those who don't get satire may have been confused by "The Producers," especially after it was made into a Broadway musical comedy! I write musical but making one about Hitler is akin to creating one about llynching for this African-American female.

Some people don't get the joke. I still know white people who think Archie Bunker legitmized their racism and black people who think the show promoted such views.

Rated
Amen! If all these Little Hitlers were truly evil I think we'd be in a lot more trouble. Don't these idiots realize that attaching Hitler to every little thing they consider "evil" does nothing but water-down the atrocities the man committed?

What's funny is that all those right-wing nutjobs that are so eager to brand Obama as Hitler fit that list quite nicely.
Great argument. Also, Hitler was not black. He couldn't be less black.
(That is not meant to be funny.)
Brilliant. People who play the Hitler card are just telling me I am not communicating with an intelligent life-form and to slowly back away. Though, I'm grateful he has some #5 characteristics ... clearly played out in sanity, reality, and compassion ... not so manifest in Hitler's choices. ;-)
Thanks Alan. You answered my post without even seeing it. Thanks.
The best article I have seen on Obama as Hitler so far!!! Brilliant!!
Hitler was the leader of the most horrible Fascist movement. Therefore he is referenced, when discussing the dangers of Fascism. It is not his personal characteristics that are significant. It is the political beliefs he had, and his position on the political spectrum that are instructive.
Hitler rose to power in opposition to what he called "Jewish Socialism." His enemies were Communists, Socialists, Unionists, and what the German People referred to as French Liberalism. In spite of the attempts at revisionist history, by those on the right of the political spectrum, Fascism is a right wing ideology. People on the left reference Hitler, when they want to point out the dangers of right wing philosophy. People on the right reference Hitler and Fascism, during political debate, because they are ignorant.
Interesting, let's try this! Obama, out of 10:

1: Beyond his family, every "relationship" has proven to be 100% expendable, regardless of the previously acknowledged closeness or length. Check!

2: Every complaint raised against his new policies is met with statements that boil down to "Get used to it." Check!

3: Man who chain smokes but exercises substantially, despite the obvious contradictory effects. Check!

4: Vague, and hard to substantiate. Obama gets a "maybe" here--he's failed lots, and is now a chain smoker. Smoking is a well-known self-medication for dealing with stress and anxiety, but chain-smoking would be overkill for a healthy human psyche. However, this is less of a personality test and more of a "snowflake" test--no two snowflakes are a like. Partial credit.

5: Surreal popularity? Check!

6: Fanatical Prejudice? Check!

7: Neurotic identification with a subclass of people? "Selma got me born!" Hm. Check.

8: As stated, another personality quirk, with a misleading categorization. However, restated, without changing the meaning: Obsessive overspending of vast fortunes on projects that his country can neither afford, nor serve any purpose other than to exalt him personally. In that case? Check!

9: Pushing through healthcare "reform" that is generally agreed to not be useful or needed, multiplying the national debt by positive integers within weeks of taking office, spending money that no one can confirm the final location of? Check!

10: Eternal mantra of "Yes we can!", complete lack of interest in tact, stated interest against being cautious, and a willingness to knowingly and habitually perform acts dangerous to his health. Check.


Okay. So, depending on how we interpret #4, we have either 9.5 or 10, out of a possible 10. Pity about the misleading article title.
Actually, Stalin was a butcher worse than Hitler. The big difference is that Stalin WON WWII, with the help of the United States, and his best buddy FDR. Hence no Stalin-jokes.
ok, lets try: Was Reagan Hitler:

A complete absence of normal human relationships. Pretty much. He was divorced, and his relationship to Nancy was more than weird.

An utter lack of empathy for the suffering of others. Yes. See: “Welfare/Cadillac Queen”, or “we begin bombing in 5 minutes”

Excentric health habits. This is a no-brainer

A previous history of failure ending with treatment for acute psychosis. Halfway. A great actor he was not.

The ability to forge vast coalitions and bring together vastly different people. Sure

Fanatical racial and ethnic prejudice. Welfare queen, meaning “black”, again. Also equating the Soviet Union with “Evil Empire” is pretty much Hitler 1:1

A neurotic identification with his own people. Yep. Also known as “American Exceptionalism”

An obsession with art and architecture. Ok, I will give him a pass on that one.

Crackpot irresponsibility. Absofucklinglutely

Suicidal determination. Sadly,, no. Still 8 out of 10 ain’t bad. That’s more than GWB who only has a Nazi grandfather to show for. Also. Reagan was Irish, and Ireland was an ally of Nazi Germany.

In any case, lets just agree that the new Hitler is an American
Anyway, this whole list is non-sensical. It does not matter whether you like architecture or have peculiar eating habits or don't smoke — in that case, Michael Bloomberg would be Hitler — or like dogs or cars. It matters whether you are a genocidal mass murder in foreign lands who has a big following by his people.

In that respect, George Washington would qualify (Slave trade), Andrew Jackson (Indians), McKinley (Philippines), Roosevelt (Germans), Ttuman (Japanese), LBJ and Nixon (Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia), Reagan (El Salvador, Nicaragua) Bush I and II (Iraq).
@Modeski
Regarding Stalin's reputation: Yes, because the victors write history, at least for the first couple of generations. Sometime after World War II General Curtis LeMay, who helped bomb Germany and Japan halfway back to the Stone Age, supposedly remarked that if the Allies had lost the war, he and his colleagues would have been tried as war criminals. Of course, the US did essentially lose the Vietnam War (although there was no act of surrender, and none of those responsible for the war were ever brought to justice), and his reputation has suffered accordingly.

Regarding Reagan et al.: Sure, and these days it's very easy to place many of our more vocal right wingers, not to mention their rabid followers, squarely in the Hitler camp. In fact, some of them even appear to go beyond Hitler in their contempt for allegedly inferior peoples (e.g. that meme showing up on Internet forums about "turning the Middle East into glass," along with "kill them all and let God sort them out" etc.). The difference is the extent to which they really would go to fulfill these fantasies. My thesis is that most of these jokers are fools and cowards who don't appreciate the ramifications of their professed bloodlust. I hope I'm right about that, but sometimes I have my doubts...
@Modeski
I beg to differ. If its just genocide you're talking about, there are countless Hitler's and would-be Hitlers around. I see Hitler's distinction in his determination to go all the way. Nearly every other homicidal dictator blinks at some point and tries to save his skin. Hitler never did, which is also what impressed his followers so much. Find another politician who has no "brakes," and you have the makings of another Hitler. Otherwise it's just a meaningless insult.