Synchronistic Reader

Where Life Intertwines With the Books I Read

Lauren J Barnhart

Lauren J Barnhart
Location
Seattle, Washington,
Birthday
April 11
Bio
My upcoming memoir explores the parallel life I led between religious extremism and full-out hedonism, and how I found balance on the other side. You can find my writing in past issues of Jersey Devil Press and Monkey Bicycle.

MY RECENT POSTS

Lauren J Barnhart's Links

MY LINKS
Editor’s Pick
DECEMBER 21, 2011 8:20PM

Norman Mailer's Combustible Ego

Rate: 19 Flag

images 

          I have read about Norman Mailer’s exploits for years in magazines and books. He is remembered as the womanizer, the misogynist, the disturber of the peace, the brilliant man.  He was hated and loved simultaneously.  He stabbed one of his six wives.  He ran for mayor of New York City.  These details made me think his writing would be all macho pomposity, not something that would interest me.  I was very wrong.

            I have just finished reading An American Dream, which came out in 1965 and was originally written as eight installments published in Esquire magazine in 1964.  It is a lurid story, but one only has to read a few pages to realize that this is a work of genius.  It bounces from world-wise dialogue to magnificent prose that just drips off the tongue.  I found myself reading paragraphs over and over.  Mailer is somewhat akin to Henry Miller in his obsessions, yet more combustible and bourgeois (Mailer actually wrote a book about Miller).  And within the protagonist of Stephen, lies so obviously, all of Mailer’s insecurities, paranoia, fear, weakness. 

            “I had loved her with the fury of my ego… but I loved her the way a drum majorette loved the power of the band for the swell it gave to each little strut (Mailer, 22).”

            At the start of the book Stephen murders his wife.  Like in Miller’s work, Mailer’s character is ultimately drawn to the woman he can celebrate as a goddess – a representation of the ultimate feminine ideal.  He feels he is nothing without her; that he would crumble.  His mortality is wrapped up in her – even in the way she treats him like dirt.  He is completely emasculated by her presence.

            In the aftermath of the murder and ensuing cover-up, Stephen is driven to wipe out the void by sleeping with whatever woman comes across his path.  Sex is his only solace in the aftermath of death.  But every person he meets is somehow connected back to his dead wife.  They all manage to bring up his fears – fear of loss, fear of power, fear of women, even fear of the black man, which culminates in an attack against his rival, jazz musician Shago Martin, for a nightclub singer named Cherry. 

            “Some hard-lodged boulder of fear I had always felt with Negroes was in the bumping, elbow-busting and crash of sound as he went barreling down, my terror going with him in the long deliberate equivalent of the event which takes place in an automobile just before a collision… (Mailer, 172).”

            Every character is a vessel for Stephen’s fear.  And as he charges the bull in all forms, he becomes electric with magic.  He stands on the edge, testing his own mortality simply so that he can accept it.  On the opposite end of his fear lies loss.

            At the time that this book was written in 1964, so much progress was being made so fast that the balance was thrown off kilter.  The old hierarchy that served the white man was breaking down, and as Mailer illustrates, there was a great amount of fear towards all that the white man had oppressed.  But on the reverse side, the character of Stephen initially reacts from his abusive heiress wife.  He knows the anger of the oppressed for himself.  He understands both sides, which contributes to his paranoia.  Mirrored in Stephen clenching his fist in his wife’s palatial living room, there is tension on every page that won’t let go.

            Like the character of Stephen, when I was single I often sought men who I could worship and fear.  It was the fear that drew me to them in the first place.  I wanted to conquer their overpowering charisma and become as strong as they were.  Just standing next to them, in one minute you could feel like an adored celebrity, and in the next they could say something that made you feel like nothing. They thought of themselves as Greek gods with a personal sense of mythology that must be spread to the masses via the mouth and the penis.  They desired to leave their territorial marks through mind games, disease, and numbers.  But that is a brutal simplification of the story, and I still love all of them. 

I depended on their magic to create my art.  Back then the air was filled with electricity when they entered a room.  Now the thought of being in the same room fills me with something more akin to dread.  But these world-wise, intelligent, creative genius’s all taught me how to live my life with freedom.  Looking back, I admire the intensity of my hate and my love for them.  As the main characters in the novels I write, they are held in time, when reality finds their game so tiresome. 

There is an enormous sense of relief as the character of Stephen confesses to all his failings.  In each of his outbursts, I think back and wish I had stood up to fear, not in a murderous or violent fashion, but in the wish that I could have grown into strength and vitality a little sooner in life.  I didn’t stand up to these men in my past as much as I should have because I was afraid of losing them.  I just wanted the magic to last.  But there is magic, even, in the death of a relationship. 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Fine take on the story and how it intertwines with your life. I'm grateful you have made me curious about Mailer's "An American Dream."

In my earlier years, I was drawn to this type of man by the fascination I held from the palpable sense of purpose they seemed to project. This envelopes themselves and all intimates around them, even their parents. We make allowances for these people...is it because we think, many times unconsciously, that they are singular and interesting enough to deserve a pass on most things?

Great piece....
I like the idea of the drawing from the pieces you've read and connecting it with life themes; it helps the reader understand both that much better.

What kind of magic is there in the death of the relationship, I wonder? I know there must be, but I wanted more elaboration at the end.
I read it when it first came out and remember only two scenes. The one where he comes upon his dead wife's maid masturbating to photos of him, and then their immediate coupling with the alternating devil/angel metaphor, and later when he's standing on the balcony wondering what act of moral cowardice will precipitate the onset of cancer in his body. As a man he tried always to live on the edge, emulating Hemingway, even to the absurd extent of walking a plank to reach his writing room. His writing also pushed the envelope of convention. Your review is intriguing, weaving as it does your personal ruminations into your analysis of the book.
I think the magic in the end of a relationship comes through finding yourself again - apart from the identity of someone else. Alone in solitude, processing intense feelings through creativity. Moving forward.
There is the author and then there is the author's work, and never the twain shall meet. It took me much longer finally to figure this out than it did this blogger.
Mailer was full of contradictions, that's for sure. A liberal's liberal who could veer off into disdain for the demands of women and blacks in the 70's.

I think his writing was spoiled by the early success of The Naked and the Dead; much of what followed struck me as self-indulgent. I used to collect his first and early editions but sold them off a few years ago.

Whatever you thought of him, it was a different era; general circulation magazines published fiction, and people looked forward to reading it.

r
I enjoyed reading your review of Mailer's book and seeing how a young person would enjoy it. Never having read Mailer, and that is an insult because I read A LOT, I have nothing to add except to say that when I was a young reader it seemed to me that Mailer belonged with Gore Vidal and James Michner--on the shelf with the dull stuff my parents read. Once I read Kurt Vonnegut and Gabriel Garcia Marquez there was no turning back. Keep reading whatever you like, and I will hunt among my books and if there is anything by Mailer, I'll peruse on your recommendation.
I really liked this article, very well written. I definitely feel ya as far as those type of relationships are concerned- great material for years to come
I'm glad you lost your taste for egocentric men. Been there, done that.
"An American Dream" is one Mailer work I haven't read. Perhaps I should. "Ancient Evenings" is lovely mess of a masterpiece as well.
"But there is magic, even, in the death of a relationship."

A fascinating thought, I must admit, but just what IS this magic? And how are you supposed to feel when you realize that your 8-year relationship was actually with a garden variety neurotic and masochist who was just playing a game she compulsively lost every time it was her move? I'd love to hear more about this topic...
I read this book in the '70's and appreciate this reminder of the story. Really nice post, congrats on the cover.
As a teenager in the early 1960s I was fascinated with Mailer and I loved "An American Dream". Later I attended one of his appearances introducing his film "Maidstone" . The film was a dreadful bore but Mailer bantering with angry women shouting at him from the audience was worth the admission.

Eventually, I lost interest in Mailer and considered him a writer who never came close to his potential. But then I read his "The Executioner's Song", where for once, the Mailer personality is submerged as he recounts the powerful story of Gary Gilmore. Despite being a work-for-hire (or perhaps because of that), it is the great achievement of Mailer's career and one of the best novels of the 2oth Century.
I read An American Dream about 45 years ago while doing time in prison. I’ve always thought it was the best of all of Mailer’s work and wondered, over the years, why it’s not often mentioned in the critiques of his writings. I began reading him when I stole a copy of Advertisements for Myself when it first came out in paperback. The crowd I was running with in my teens ( a term invented while I was indeed a teenager) was definitely was probably delinquent (another new term then) but our criminality only extended to things we thought should be free…music, books, poetry, liquor, dope, movies, oh… and cars.
I loved An American Dream because it was about a murderer but not a cartoon murderer…a real one. One that you could pass on the street and not realize that he was capable of murder. Or even know that he was dangerous…like many of the men I was living with at the time who had committed murder…or multiple murders and some who even liked to talk about it…but were able to pass on the street as a normal person…a passerby, just passing by. And not a hint of suspicion unless you were able to examine their thoughts.
Shakespeare was required reading in school and there were murders in Shakespeare. But that was Shakespeare, dramatic play acting and not real. The murder in An American Dream was very real and was not dramatic at all. It was ugly. And its circumstance was real. And ugly. The way that truth is sometimes ugly.
I loved your take on it. And that you were reading it probably around the same age as I was when I first read it…and that you were reading it as a female…and that you had thought it a work of “pure genius”.
When you wrote, “ But these world-wise, intelligent, creative genius’s all taught me how to live my life with freedom. Looking back, I admire the intensity of my hate and my love for them.”, I realized not only that this was true for me but that I had never known that this was true for me until you wrote it. And that’s what Writers do.
this reminds me a little of hemingway. you can see a good charicature of him in "midnight in paris"
It is important to know Which Mailer one is discussing. Mailer had an uncanny unique ability to know when a particular style and pov was enough for his readers and to change it. His early success and subsequent poor reception intensified his commitment to his work and the creation of himself as a public character in his manifestations of "Mailer." If you read his work from Ancient Evenings, Harlot's Ghost until his last incarnation as a devil influencing the life of baby Adolph Hitler, you will come away with a greater appreciation of A special and unique mind that did not stop evolving--certainly not one to be confined to a mere era gathering dust on a bookshelf or reduced to a womanizing egoist.
My blog is at jandeen.com. Thank you for your good work.
I always thought "An American Dream" was one of Mailer's best novels after he became so famous with "The Naked and the Dead." I really enjoyed the novel as a young man when I read it many years ago. Aquarius, as he called himself in "The Armies of the Night," was always exploring new territories of his psyche, always taking a chance, saying the hell with it all, just following his instincts, that Byronic streak attracted to emotional excess and self-destruction. Only Mailer would stab his wife and then write a love poem about it, which just infuriated the feminists. An agent provocateur of the first class.
I think back and wish I had stood up to fear, not in a murderous or violent fashion, but in the wish that I could have grown into strength and vitality a little sooner in life.

plenty of time to do so.
time is illusory.
it is all eternity, somehow. it is written somewhere!
Mailer was okay but his larger than life persona was hard to get past for me. he, Gore Vidal and Capote gave self absorbed megalomaniacs a bad name. i may give them another chance once i have exhausted the works of other authors who were more concerned with their work than their own narrative.
Mailer's meditation on violence and evil will not be every one's idea of a good novel to read on the beach, but An American Dream is a fully realized male fantasy wherein one set-upon, White, alcoholic , protagonist berserks himself into sequential delirium fueled rages to rid himself of the crushing banality of the culture that he feels is killing him by the inch. To do this, he commits a series of violent and insane acts, in an alcoholic haze; challenges sent him by the moon (really) whose successful completion might give him a hint of the freedom he dreams is beyond the neon-lit tarp of the Manhattan skyline. This pilgrim's progress is nothing short of an obscene fantasy, wherein our hero, a decorated war hero, former congressman and talk show host, strangles his maddening estranged wife, buggers the German maid, steals a Mafia Don's girl friend, and proceeds, in 24 hours, to lie and deceive the New York City Police Department, the Mob, with intimations that the FBI and CIA are involved invisibly in the mess he created. The plot, of course, is lurid, absurd and the product of a particular time, but Mailer's novel comes at a time when the Hemingway cult of quiet, a manly stoicism managed through a singular, privately held code of honor, was exhausted of compelling narrative potential. Mailer’s idea was to see what would happen if the man who might have been the Hemingway hero, suffering his hurts in some poetic privacy, had instead a psychotic break.

Gone, we see, is the hard-carved minimalism of the Hemingway style, with Mailer offering a delirious metaphorical ride through the ugly side of individual realization. His character, Stephen Rozack, is akin to King Lear in the rain, gone insane precisely because he no longer has the staging guiding his eye and thinking. In the clutch of his tantrums, the world finally seems to pull back its shroud and reveal the shape and purring function of its true nature; Rozack sees cities of diamonds, rains of falling stars, he smells and tastes those things never served on a plate. Mailer's great chains of metaphors deliver a dissolving sensibility that sees, fleetingly, the way everything is connected ,the hand of an anonymous God directing His actors in ways unannounced and never explained. Rid of the props and story lines, there is nothing left, an emptiness that can only be filled with increasing amounts of destruction. This is a riveting , wild, and enthralling exploration into the romanticizing of prescriptive violence. Troubling, agitated, problematic for great numbers of readers, a brilliant novel despite its flaws. It may be even because of the flaws--the unreal dialogue, the haphazard cramming of a week's worth of events into a single 24 hour period--that bring the long runs of sentences shriek and burn so splendidly, as there is the sense Roszak's state is a dream within which he must confront and conquer every blatant and disguised dread. The crash and slam of the plot dynamics--bare in mind that there is very little slack space here where one is allowed to rest and gather their wits in the midst of this ludicrous plot--get an intensity of feeling just right, that the world and the things in it are crushing down upon you, and your only option in the delirium is to obey the first fleeting voice that commands to respond, attack, destroy that which is killing you by the psychic inch. Mailer had written in his infamous essay "The White Negro" that it was one's moral responsibility to "encourage the psychopath within oneself" so to be able to experience greater and more expansive perceptions, to generate a new knowledge violently dislodged from murderous conformism. In An American Dream, he conducts a fictional field study of his theory by setting it loose in the plot of a novel, and the results are exhilarating as they are nearly unspeakable.
@George Hoffman: Actually, Mailer didn't refer to himself as "Aquarius" until "Of a Fire on the Moon", which came out a few years after "Armies of the Night". In "Armies", the first of his books in which he referred to himself in the third person, he called himself "Mailer" for the most part, interspersed with "The Reporter".
Profound: both you and Mailer. r
I cannot imagine a better compliment right now than what paging larry said: "When you wrote, 'But these world-wise, intelligent, creative genius’s all taught me how to live my life with freedom. Looking back, I admire the intensity of my hate and my love for them.', I realized not only that this was true for me but that I had never known that this was true for me until you wrote it. And that’s what Writers do." I had never known that this was true until you wrote it. Absolutely. Yes.