L in the Southeast

L in the Southeast
Location
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Birthday
November 04
Title
Retired PR Director
Bio
I am a retired Public Relations professional who now writes purely for fun and catharsis. I covered most of my memoir-type pieces in the first three years here. Lately I have dabbled in politics, current affairs, pop culture and movie reviews. Life is my muse.

MY RECENT POSTS

MAY 4, 2012 12:02PM

Over-50s All Over the Place

Rate: 26 Flag

 

 

It always seemed to me that by the time Baby Boomers came of age, they would be a political force to be reckoned with, a voting bloc for sweeping change.  These are the people who went to San Francisco with flowers in their hair; who sat down en masse and refused to buy what the Establishment was selling; and who turned the nation against the unwinnable war in Vietnam.  They probably were never a statistical majority, but they sure as hell were the most vocal and the most visible.

Instead, according to a report in the May 2012 edition of the AARP Bulletin, the surviving group has become an ideological Bell Curve, that iconic  AARP Articlerepresentation of a “normal distribution” our teachers once either terrorized us with or saved our bacon with, depending on which end of the curve you tended to fall. 

Technically, I fall into what AARP calls the “Silent Generation” those of us ages 66-83 who preceded in birth the true boomers.  But at 67, I consider myself on the cusp and therefore, an honorary member of the boomers, who fall between the ages of 47 and 65.  And I most certainly shared their characteristics, as described in the AARP article--

  • Older boomers more likely to support Democratic issues than younger boomers
  • Frustrated with the government
  • Especially concerned with their own personal financial future
  • Almost half say life has gotten worse in the U.S. since the 1960s.

-- in contrast to those of the Silent Generation--

  • Has consistently had conservative views on government and society
  • Once part of one of the most Democratic generations, now the most Republican
  • Favored McCain over Obama in ‘08
  • Likely to favor Republicans on most issues, except Social Security

The Silent Generation (66-83) represents 17% of American voters, versus 37% for the Boomers(47-65) . 

But something strange happened on the way to Social Security, which turns out to be not so strange when I consider my own political evolution. With the predictable shifting of the sands of time and the gradual assimilation of the counter-culture into the workaday society, the curve has seriously flattened, leaving any chance of voting as a bloc nearly out of the question.  Many more categories are required to categorize the 50+ voters than just Democrat and Republican. And with this group’s almost 70% turnout rate at the polls, there will be plenty of them, but with what effect?

To illustrate the point, I have reproduced the chart on the right-hand side of the page of the article, based on data from the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press:

Staunch conservatives: highly engaged tea party supporters

All adults:  9%     Ages 50-64:  11%   Age 65+: 15%

Main Street Republicans: conservative on most issues

All adults: 12%   Ages 50-64:  11%  Age 65+:  14%

Libertarians: free market, small government seculars

All adults: 9%   Ages 50-64:  9%  Age 65+:  10%

Disaffecteds: downscale and cynical

All adults: 11%   Ages 50-64:  15%  Age 65+:  11%

Postmoderns: moderates, liberal on social issues

All adults: 13%   Ages 50-64:  11%  Age 65+:  8%

New coalition Democrats: upbeat, majority-minority

All adults: 10%   Ages 50-64:  9%  Age 65+:  11%

Hard-pressed Democrats: religious, financially struggling

All adults: 13%   Ages 50-64:  16%  Age 65+:  15%

Solid liberals: across-the-board liberal positions

All adults: 14%   Ages 50-64:  14%  Age 65+:  13%

Bystanders: young and/or politically disengaged

All adults: 11%   Ages 50-64:  6%  Age 65+:  3%

While people age 50 and above are 44% of the total number of eligible American voters, their near-70% turnout rate should be enough to warrant significant attention from both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.  The challenge for them is to try to figure out how to address such a surprisingly diverse constituency.

As for any gender differences, the AARP article cites over-50 men’s top issues as jobs, the deficit, government competence and health care costs.  For women, the top issues are health care costs, jobs, Social Security/Medicare and government competence.  These stats were pulled from the AARP Bulletin’s 2012 Election Issues Survey.  While the order of importance is slightly different by gender, the issues are virtually identical.

It will be interesting to watch the two Presidential candidates handle these challenges; that is, if they even recognize them.

 

Source:  AARP Bulletin, May 2012, Vol.53 No.4

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Every time I get some mass mailing from AARP, I fold everything into the postage pre-paid envelope and write on the back, " I have no desire to be associated with lobbyists for GREEDY GEEZERS, who sell out their constituents to sell insurance! Remove my name from your mailing list!"

That usually works for three to five years.
I am a boomer. Last election I voted McCain because the man had walked some of the same trails I had walked. This time I will vote for Obama even though in most things I am a conservative. Between Obama and Romney I just can not in good faith do otherwise.
jmac: Ooops. I know what you mean, but I have a bad reading habit when it comes to the mail. Everything gets at least perused. This information was of interest.

David: Although I have only crossed over in a presidential vote, I do go through the process of weighing both candidates every time. I dislike the way we all get clumped together when we are so extremely diverse.
as a boomer...i can only to what i and my-bar-buddy-boomers discuss.1. nuthing in politics has changed, heard and seen it all too many times, not worth it.2. have never met anyone whose racial opinion has been changed by talk.3.believe religious views are private and should be kept to yourself.4.cannot effin believe we are STILL here, and gonna enjoy every freakin minute of it.......
I guess I'm between a Postmodern and Solid Liberal. I voted for Obama with great hope and faith. Disappointed, but not gonna vote for Romney no matter what.
Thanks so much for this, L. It's fascinating.

r.
Definitely not a statistical majority. Look what happened to McGovern.
As a Boomer on the younger end of the spectrum (I'll be 50 in August), I grew up post-Vietnam/sexual revolution and came of age during that manufactured Reagan fuzziness.

We watched as our nation assumed massive amounts of debt while slashing education and healthcare. I think after we regurgitated

Reagan's Kool-Aid, a lot of us became painfully cynical about trusting Republican leadership, and the subsequent history bore us out.

I hate to admit it, but I count myself among the Reagan Republicans who thankfully jumped ship, and I know countless others. It may be because I reside in a liberal hotbed, but I'd like to think it's more about watching the American Dream break asunder due to phony patriotism and rampant cronyism.

Great post!
I'm with RoaSP, turning 50 in November, watched Reagan make credit easy to get and watched it ruin lives and a country. I can't see the Republican's austerity measures as a good thing, since it's only the 99% who have to be austere. The Republicans I have voted for- Reagan in 1984 and Dole because I don't vote incumbent. But this year, I will vote incumbent because Romney will do nothing good. In fact, I propose he will be President in Name Only (PINO, POTUS-INO?) if he were to win.
Steel Breez: I am so with you on number 4! Thanks for commenting.

ccdarling: I am a definite Postmodern. There is no chance in hell for Romney to get my vote.

Jon: You're welcome!

john b.: Yep

Pond: Don't feel bad. I was married to a Reagan Republican who, sadly, has only drifted further to the right. That might explain why we have been divorced for more than 25 years. :D
"Bystanders: ... politically disengaged -- Ages 50-64: 6%"

That's me.
Although if I was a voter in national politics, it would be

"Postmoderns: moderates, liberal on social issues ... Ages 50-64: 11%"
Interesting article. I don't seem to have moved much. Stuck in the 60's all around, I guess.
Joisey: How about voting this time -- just this once? We need everybody weighing in for this important election.
I'm just glad my generation finally has a name. I thought older folks were The Greatest Generation and younger ones The Baby Boomers, and I fell in-between, on the cusp. But now I know I'm "Silent," even though I'm far from it and identify with the boomers.
jlsathre: I guess that makes you a solid liberal. I wouldn't call that being stuck, however. Just firm. :D
Lea: I know. What is an American without a label? :D You and I are about as silent as a European soccer crowd!
I am not even close to boomer age, and I still get sign up info for the AARP. Maybe they are trying to solicit early support. I don't like that here in AZ, they lobbied hard to have senior's driver's licenses renewable for way too many years without an exam and also to have large portions of residential areas exempt from property taxes and similar. Now, maybe they think they shouldn't have to pay for education, but they do expect someone's child to have enough education to take care of them when they go into assisted living, hospice and home health care.
On the lighter side, you might enjoy my current post, why don't they declare a war on menopause instead?
Right in the middle of the "boom" (at 62). Wish we had the energy we had in the 60's!!
OB: I remember feeling resentful when AARP started soliciting my membership while I was still in my early 50s. I'll trot on over to read your post.

trilogy: Some days I actually seem to have MORE energy than I did back then. Go figure.
I guess I'm Silent, at going-on-76. Never been conservative (nor, here in Canada, Conservative). If I were American, I'd have emigrated to Canada. If you guys elect Romney, I'll really go Silent - never speak to you again.
Myriad: If they elect Romney, I might be moving to Canada myself!
Disengaged? Well that splains a lot! ;) Hell, I feel more comfortable now that you've described, in your wise words, how disconnected the generational gaps can be. We're more polarized than ever.

Seriously, though. I think Obama deserves another stab at the beast that is our country...
I just turned 50 last year and get AARP literature all the time. Goes into the trash without ever opening.
Belinda T: I figure if Obama is man enough to go for another four years of hell, I am woman enough to vote for him.

Erica K: That's what I used to do until I got really old! :D
Obama is cutting benefits for the elderly; Romney will abolish them. Therefore, the vote is actually between bad and worse. R
Thank you. I've been meaning to dissect this indictment of all Boomers for some time myself. To suggest that someone born in '45 has much in common with someone born in '65 is simply ludicrous. We lived thru the Cold War and half a dozen hot wars, they lived thru Star Wars. Okay, so that's hyperbole, but you catch my drift.

We changed the world, and helped hold America to its promise of equal rights for women and minorities. Yes, we sabotaged our revolution with sex, drugs and rock'n'roll, but they didn't even bother trying. And their music really sucks. We had Elvis and Ray, and they were too late even for the Beatles.

Looks to me like the only thing the generations that followed us old farts managed to hold onto was sex and drugs.
Thoth: In reality I suppose it always is. (Sigh)

Tom: Stop making me laugh. Star Wars.... lol! I have to agree with you about the music, though. Nothing compares to the music of our times.
I came by to admire your new banner :-)

I'm unqualified to comment on US politics, but encouraged by the 70% figure up there ~ wasn't the overall turn-out last election in the 40s ? Here anyone over 18 who doesn't vote is fined.

I don't understand why anyone would automatically vote non-encumbent ( Phyllis ? ) Doesn't it take ( at least ) 2 terms to turn a ship around ?

Australian.
*Disaffecteds: downscale and cynical

All adults: 11% Ages 50-64: 15% Age 65+: 11%*

15% here me thinks.. emphasis on cynical.

Still think no one should vote in the presidential election of 2012 - that would send a clear message of dissatisfaction to every party..

Rated for once upon a time the dems were repubs and the repubs were dems - nowadays have no clue who is what, don't think they do either.
Kim: Hi! I'm glad you like my banner. I wish we could figure out a way to make everyone vote, too.

Phyllis: Kim's comment alerted me to the fact that I had missed your comment. That happens when I am answering previous comments, and a new one sneaks in. Are you saying that you always vote for the challenger in all elections? I'd love to hear your rationale for that.

Seer: They ARE pretty screwed up, that's for sure. No one could blame you for giving up on the whole system.
I am on the cusp of the Boomers, at the other end, born in 1960. It feels less and less like there will there be unity of the people, period.
I'm afraid *that* is what will take our country down more than any other of the fears people have.
I've always voted on the liberal end of the spectrum, but my heart isn't in it for anyone, more and more.
I really came over to say "Hi" and ask about the toe separator thingys and the postman pursueth status and how's the pollen and have you been to The Botanical Garden this year? : )
JT: Hi! The toe separators are great! I look forward to going to bed for the night to watch TV or write or read, so I can stretch my toes for an hour. I do see some slight improvement. The gentleman is a bit of an enigma; mercurial, somewhat secretive and inaccessible. Meh.

Haven't gotten to the botanical gardens yet, but thanks for reminding me. That would be a great place for shooting photos.
I'm generation X. Was politically liberal and then began to be more moderate. Started to see lefties as nutjobs, even. Certain events made me swerve far to the left. I want to write a post about it someday soon, cause it feels like there were some interesting shifts, in my views.
Very interesting and well presented article, Lster.
Why do I vote non-encumbent? Term limits. That's the only way, besides president and some governors, that we're going to get them. And let's face it, Clinton was going through some stuff at re-election time and Dole didn't seem so bad. But I am a firm believer in term limits for all of them and we know they aren't going to do it to themselves.

And yes, it usually takes a few years for policies enacted today to come to fruition. Most of them don't really impact until well after the second term though the half life is getting shorter lately. (Bush tax cuts.) I heard on Morning Joe this week that if we had followed Jimmy Carter's recommendations for energy conservation and exploration, we would be off of foreign oil by now. Kind of sad.
If you haven't read Generations, by Strauss and Howe, you should. They're the guys who came up with the generational terminology you're using, like Greatest, Silent, Generation X.

The Baby Boomers weren't monolithic when we came of age; it's just that the ones left of center were far more visible and were more artistically influential, which in music was a big deal at the time. Nixon may have gotten more of the young vote than McGovern did. A lot of the Boomers ended up in the core of the Christian Right. Same passion, different direction, different conclusions. Felt betrayed by different things.

I applied for AARP the day I turned fifty. If I had to be old, I wanted my discounts!
Dole didn't seem so bad?

{G}

Phyllis that's 'cause you didn't grow up in Kansas with him - he wasn't called the hatchet man for nuthin' ;).
Lezlie, this is absolutely fascinating and should be on the cover. A very good analysis. I don't always feel like a Boomer, since I'm on the young end and instead of Woodstock we had streaking, so I know how you feel. The idea that we can vote as a bloc is engaging, but I think most people are so into their own survival that they can't see beyond their faces (as in What's the Matter with Kansas?) Am sending this on to a few other people who will also enjoy it. Thanks for a great read. RRRR
I now get a 4.00 discount on my bank fees with the Royal Bank of Canada.. Guess I can save it to buy Depends. WTH am I going to do with 4.00. There are too many of us Boomers and now even AMC has taken our senior discount away. BUT we are the most vocal and I am glad I am and not like the younger generation.
Well done Lezlie.
HUGGGGGGGGGG
I forgot.. 61 this year and damn proud of it.. ahh hmmm how did we get here anyway? :)
Fascinating. I know we Boomers never achieved the promise of the power in our numbers, but regardless of the percentages, we got damn close with Bill Clinton, who is one of us (even the blow jobs are Boomeresque and really, who cares). If some big campaign mistakes hadn't been made, we might be talking about Hillary's reelection. I agree totally that the two presumptive candidates face a hugely diverse voter pool, and am concerned about the Obama campaign's ability to play the game with the cojones (and money) needed to win.
It will come down to what the pollsters find and then how their employers pander to which demographic groups to bring together the shaky coalition majority that will put them in power. Then all bets are off. All bets are already off, of course, but keeping the illusion alive that issues matter is necessary awhile longer, at least until the right drug is found to keep us passive no matter the weather.
Should have said "put or keep them in power."