It always seemed to me that by the time Baby Boomers came of age, they would be a political force to be reckoned with, a voting bloc for sweeping change. These are the people who went to San Francisco with flowers in their hair; who sat down en masse and refused to buy what the Establishment was selling; and who turned the nation against the unwinnable war in Vietnam. They probably were never a statistical majority, but they sure as hell were the most vocal and the most visible.
Instead, according to a report in the May 2012 edition of the AARP Bulletin, the surviving group has become an ideological Bell Curve, that iconic
representation of a “normal distribution” our teachers once either terrorized us with or saved our bacon with, depending on which end of the curve you tended to fall.
Technically, I fall into what AARP calls the “Silent Generation” those of us ages 66-83 who preceded in birth the true boomers. But at 67, I consider myself on the cusp and therefore, an honorary member of the boomers, who fall between the ages of 47 and 65. And I most certainly shared their characteristics, as described in the AARP article--
- Older boomers more likely to support Democratic issues than younger boomers
- Frustrated with the government
- Especially concerned with their own personal financial future
- Almost half say life has gotten worse in the U.S. since the 1960s.
-- in contrast to those of the Silent Generation--
- Has consistently had conservative views on government and society
- Once part of one of the most Democratic generations, now the most Republican
- Favored McCain over Obama in ‘08
- Likely to favor Republicans on most issues, except Social Security
The Silent Generation (66-83) represents 17% of American voters, versus 37% for the Boomers(47-65) .
But something strange happened on the way to Social Security, which turns out to be not so strange when I consider my own political evolution. With the predictable shifting of the sands of time and the gradual assimilation of the counter-culture into the workaday society, the curve has seriously flattened, leaving any chance of voting as a bloc nearly out of the question. Many more categories are required to categorize the 50+ voters than just Democrat and Republican. And with this group’s almost 70% turnout rate at the polls, there will be plenty of them, but with what effect?
To illustrate the point, I have reproduced the chart on the right-hand side of the page of the article, based on data from the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press:
Staunch conservatives: highly engaged tea party supporters
All adults: 9% Ages 50-64: 11% Age 65+: 15%
Main Street Republicans: conservative on most issues
All adults: 12% Ages 50-64: 11% Age 65+: 14%
Libertarians: free market, small government seculars
All adults: 9% Ages 50-64: 9% Age 65+: 10%
Disaffecteds: downscale and cynical
All adults: 11% Ages 50-64: 15% Age 65+: 11%
Postmoderns: moderates, liberal on social issues
All adults: 13% Ages 50-64: 11% Age 65+: 8%
New coalition Democrats: upbeat, majority-minority
All adults: 10% Ages 50-64: 9% Age 65+: 11%
Hard-pressed Democrats: religious, financially struggling
All adults: 13% Ages 50-64: 16% Age 65+: 15%
Solid liberals: across-the-board liberal positions
All adults: 14% Ages 50-64: 14% Age 65+: 13%
Bystanders: young and/or politically disengaged
All adults: 11% Ages 50-64: 6% Age 65+: 3%
While people age 50 and above are 44% of the total number of eligible American voters, their near-70% turnout rate should be enough to warrant significant attention from both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. The challenge for them is to try to figure out how to address such a surprisingly diverse constituency.
As for any gender differences, the AARP article cites over-50 men’s top issues as jobs, the deficit, government competence and health care costs. For women, the top issues are health care costs, jobs, Social Security/Medicare and government competence. These stats were pulled from the AARP Bulletin’s 2012 Election Issues Survey. While the order of importance is slightly different by gender, the issues are virtually identical.
It will be interesting to watch the two Presidential candidates handle these challenges; that is, if they even recognize them.
Source: AARP Bulletin, May 2012, Vol.53 No.4


Salon.com
Comments
That usually works for three to five years.
David: Although I have only crossed over in a presidential vote, I do go through the process of weighing both candidates every time. I dislike the way we all get clumped together when we are so extremely diverse.
r.
We watched as our nation assumed massive amounts of debt while slashing education and healthcare. I think after we regurgitated
Reagan's Kool-Aid, a lot of us became painfully cynical about trusting Republican leadership, and the subsequent history bore us out.
I hate to admit it, but I count myself among the Reagan Republicans who thankfully jumped ship, and I know countless others. It may be because I reside in a liberal hotbed, but I'd like to think it's more about watching the American Dream break asunder due to phony patriotism and rampant cronyism.
Great post!
ccdarling: I am a definite Postmodern. There is no chance in hell for Romney to get my vote.
Jon: You're welcome!
john b.: Yep
Pond: Don't feel bad. I was married to a Reagan Republican who, sadly, has only drifted further to the right. That might explain why we have been divorced for more than 25 years. :D
That's me.
"Postmoderns: moderates, liberal on social issues ... Ages 50-64: 11%"
On the lighter side, you might enjoy my current post, why don't they declare a war on menopause instead?
trilogy: Some days I actually seem to have MORE energy than I did back then. Go figure.
Seriously, though. I think Obama deserves another stab at the beast that is our country...
Erica K: That's what I used to do until I got really old! :D
We changed the world, and helped hold America to its promise of equal rights for women and minorities. Yes, we sabotaged our revolution with sex, drugs and rock'n'roll, but they didn't even bother trying. And their music really sucks. We had Elvis and Ray, and they were too late even for the Beatles.
Looks to me like the only thing the generations that followed us old farts managed to hold onto was sex and drugs.
Tom: Stop making me laugh. Star Wars.... lol! I have to agree with you about the music, though. Nothing compares to the music of our times.
I'm unqualified to comment on US politics, but encouraged by the 70% figure up there ~ wasn't the overall turn-out last election in the 40s ? Here anyone over 18 who doesn't vote is fined.
I don't understand why anyone would automatically vote non-encumbent ( Phyllis ? ) Doesn't it take ( at least ) 2 terms to turn a ship around ?
Australian.
All adults: 11% Ages 50-64: 15% Age 65+: 11%*
15% here me thinks.. emphasis on cynical.
Still think no one should vote in the presidential election of 2012 - that would send a clear message of dissatisfaction to every party..
Rated for once upon a time the dems were repubs and the repubs were dems - nowadays have no clue who is what, don't think they do either.
Phyllis: Kim's comment alerted me to the fact that I had missed your comment. That happens when I am answering previous comments, and a new one sneaks in. Are you saying that you always vote for the challenger in all elections? I'd love to hear your rationale for that.
Seer: They ARE pretty screwed up, that's for sure. No one could blame you for giving up on the whole system.
I'm afraid *that* is what will take our country down more than any other of the fears people have.
I've always voted on the liberal end of the spectrum, but my heart isn't in it for anyone, more and more.
Haven't gotten to the botanical gardens yet, but thanks for reminding me. That would be a great place for shooting photos.
Very interesting and well presented article, Lster.
And yes, it usually takes a few years for policies enacted today to come to fruition. Most of them don't really impact until well after the second term though the half life is getting shorter lately. (Bush tax cuts.) I heard on Morning Joe this week that if we had followed Jimmy Carter's recommendations for energy conservation and exploration, we would be off of foreign oil by now. Kind of sad.
The Baby Boomers weren't monolithic when we came of age; it's just that the ones left of center were far more visible and were more artistically influential, which in music was a big deal at the time. Nixon may have gotten more of the young vote than McGovern did. A lot of the Boomers ended up in the core of the Christian Right. Same passion, different direction, different conclusions. Felt betrayed by different things.
I applied for AARP the day I turned fifty. If I had to be old, I wanted my discounts!
{G}
Phyllis that's 'cause you didn't grow up in Kansas with him - he wasn't called the hatchet man for nuthin' ;).
Well done Lezlie.
HUGGGGGGGGGG