
My buddy calls me yesterday, during the game.
I don’t answer the phone.
He calls back later.
S. comes looking for me. “Can you call him back? That’s the second time he’s woken me up looking for you.”
I pretty much only talk to my parents and my brother on Sundays – years of working on the phone during the week have resulted in my designating Sunday as a day without talking on the phone unnecessarily.
I call my buddy back during a commercial. He is spitting fire as he tells me “somebody threw a shoe at the president.” My mind is elsewhere – the Atlanta Falcons had already won their game, and I was dozing off during the one-sided mismatch between the lackluster Denver Broncos and the highly motivated Carolina Panthers.
“What shoes?”
“Didn’t you hear about this? It’s got to be all over the news.”
‘Didn’t I tell you I was watching the game?”
My lack of interest in any details ratchets my buddy’s level of exasperation up. His impatience is literally dripping from his voice as he tells me “an Iraqi reporter at a press conference in Iraq threw his shoes at President Bush! Can you believe that? This shit is crazy.”
There is silence, because I am trying, while I am listening to him, to see what happened on the last play. I move to pick up my remote to rewind the action, but realize it will be a waste of time until I hang up the phone.
“So the president got hit with a shoe.”
“Man,” my buddy yelled, YOU DON”T THROW STUFF AT THE PRESIDENT! He’s the president. He’s a head of state. I’m not talking about people off the street – this guy was a member of the press!”
In the middle of a nice, quiet, relaxing Sunday afternoon, I’m supposed to be worried about George Bush? And after I think about it for a minute, I add Barack Obama to the list – I can’t worry about him all the time either.
I don’t know what triggers my response, but it is sudden and unrestrained. “WE BLEW UP THEIR ENTIRE COUNTRY AND WE EXPECT TO BE GREETED WITH OPEN ARMS? What did we liberate? I’ve been following this closer than you have, I guess.
We blow up everything. We wipe out a big chunk of their economy. We kill people by the thousands.
THEN we show up and tell them we will help them rebuild everything we just blew up. Waste a HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS – do you hear me – A HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS doing a half-assed job of that, and now we’re leaving. Oh yeah, and we had no business doing any of this in the first place. I’d be feeling real good about America right now if I was that reporter.”
“But it’s the PRESIDENT, man. The PRESIDENT of the United States. You just can’t do that.”
“Why not? He wasn’t in the United States. That’s their country. We don’t run shit over there.”
“Man, you’re crazy. You DO NOT do that to the president of the United States.”
Our American government plays at a kindergarten-level of diplomacy, a kind of posturing at international relations pomp and circumstance we revere as if we really mean the things we say, while we are very, very likely to be killing someone, somewhere, in secret, at this very second.
Our rhetoric speaks of spreading justice and democracy around the world when what we practice is a doctrine of control of sovereign nations and what we perpetuate is the continued existence of global inequality. If even one tenth of what has gone on in Iraq had happened here, millions of us would have choked to death by now on our own rage at the inhumanity and barbarism of our attackers.
Thank God my buddy didn’t call me back during the Dallas Cowboys-New York Giants game.
I might have had to take MY shoes off – and I wear size 15.


Salon.com
Comments
I don't remember the grenade that was thrown at W. a few years ago in the Republic of Georgia generating this much news.
I do remember when my friend Bobby Rashad Jones bear-hugged Bush and lifted him off the ground after receiving his USNA diploma back in the spring of 2001--before all the shit went down. That little incident made the front page of the Washington Post and almost cost Rashad his commission.
Kris, I am on vacation, and like you, the only news that made it through my filter yesterday was the shoe-throwing -- and I cheered. I might have to blog about it. I am basically non-violent, but as Stellaa says, this is the perfect gesture for a man who's killed perhaps hundreds of thousands of people. I believe shoes may be the outer limits of non-violence, but I'm probably stretching it a bit. Thanks for the post.
Rated
rated
Your buddy's outrage is just pure and simple American Exceptionalism. Somewhere I read that the Iraqi press also had instructions to call GWB "Your/His Excellency." Can you imagine?!
to dogs! (oh come on, you knew that was coming)
And Yes the Panthers did look pretty good. As a Falcon's fan, I would have preferred a different outcome.
This piece got a sweet piece of above-the-fold real estate on the regular salon.com page (as of 5:50 pm est). Hope you get a chance to see it.
Great read as usual.
This may be the first time Bush has really had to face the idea that some Iraqis are legitimately angry at what he's done. I'll bet it was a shocker for him.
BTW - if he thought Bush was a dog, why didn't he use a rolled-up paper instead of a shoe (I wouldn't hit my dogs any more than I would my kids, but I understand that this is the instrument of preference )?
Amidst all the hoo-hah, did anybody see the news that our own gov't, including McCain, on Thursday last definitively pronounced the policies of GITMO and Abu Ghraib tantamount to unambiguous torture and thus war crimes? That should have been the lead story of the weekend, and all the talk shows. But the mainstream US press is conspicuously silent, as in almost total blackout. Here's a foreign link.
http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed2/idUSN11414139
rated! Go Falcons!
Here we have posters who don't have the intellectual chops to distinguish between legitimate protest and physical assault, to understand that the history of the world didn't start with the attack upon Iraq (can you imagine how a shoe-thrower at a Saddam Hussein press conference would have been treated?), and to understand that thanks to policies which they in their ivory tower decry, they have the life and liberty to make fools of themselves here.
And what about a bit of perspective and proportionality? While the usual suspects are whooping it up on the streets of Baghdad (is Paris closed?) the duly elected representatives of the new democracy are enthusiastically endorsing a pact for the future with the United States of America. Interesting that the marginalized in America sympathize with the marginalized in Iraq.
Gordon, Gordon, Gordon...
I actually moseyed over to Levinson's pad, because I generally like his stuff. Holy moly. He has this pedantic post about speech being protected under the first amendment, but not actions. (Paul, dear, the incident happened in Iraq, and that's another country, sweetie! And they don't have a first amendment. Or White Castle sliders.) Levinson posits that an act of assault is not protected, and the Iraqi govt should "throw the book at him"
Folks, for criminey's sake, you can HEAR the guy getting the living crap beaten out of him by Iraqi goons during Bush's Q&A. Justice, Iraqi style, not learned but certainly refreshed at the hands of the American occupiers.
Delusions of grandeur emanate from your every word Gordon. Do you ever go back and read your comments? Ever? I'm trying to remain civil and objective. I don't care that you disagree with my post or anyone (make that EVERYONE) else. It's the words you choose. If you were of true intellect and high moral standard, you would simplify your comments to constructive criticism. I refuse to stoop to the curb and your level. Clear?
But facts are facts, and although I am indeed an admirer of both Palin and Paglia, I never claimed that the former had anything to do with "intellectual." You made that part up. Not nice.
But you're from San Francisco. "Enough said." ;)
Sour Grapes my man, sour grapes.