Recently, a prayer banner was taken down at a local high school in the state where I live. The girl who wanted it removed is an atheist, and invoked separation of church and state. Obviously this set a lot of people off. Rhode Island is a very religious state, which is the reason we've had so much trouble getting people on the same page about gay marriage, whereas in neighboring Massachusetts, there's been much more progress.
Every time I hear about a skirmish over religion, especially regarding separation of church and state, I always feel odd. Part of me thinks I should jump in the midst of the fight and defend my atheist brethren. The other part of me thinks, "Gee, why didn't they just leave well enough alone?"
The truth is--when it comes to church and state--I don't mind.
By which I mean, I don't mind that the separation is, let's face it, non-existent. The white elephant in the room is that our Founding Fathers were obviously hypocrites and religious extremists (blame historical circumstances, I'm not trying to take potshots at Jefferson) so when they set up that separation they left a lot of contradictions behind. The word "God" is everywhere--money, pledges, fast food joints, etc.
Perhaps the Founding Fathers meant separation of church and state to be a sort of "Don't talk about home at work" kind of thing. I'm sure they never anticipated that vast landscape that would one day become American spirituality.
When I say I don't mind that the separation doesn't exist, I don't mean that I'm happy about it. I wish it did exist, but it doesn't, and so I don't think about it all that much. I certainly don't bother invoking it unless religion is being thrust in my face. It seems to me most moderate religious followers of any belief system find bombastic proselytizing to be distasteful. (Why else would Tim Tebow be getting so much flack?)
I haven't been a lifelong atheist. It's something that I've adopted fairly recently, in fact. And when I did, it was something like coming out of the closet all over again. I accepted the fact that not everybody was going to take to it, and that I was going to face prejudice and ignorance. I had to keep reminding myself that my beliefs, just like my sexuality, is personal. I had to remember that I'm in a minority.
That doesn't mean I allow myself to be pushed around, it just means knowing when to fight your battles.
A prayer banner?
I probably wouldn't have fought that battle.
Battles like that do for atheists what fighting Eminem did for GLAAD when they went after him as a homophobe, clearly not understanding him at all. It made GLAAD look stringent, as if they took themselves too seriously and didn't understand art (two things, which, if you're gay, should never apply).
Now atheists seem the same way whenever they go after Christmas displays or the pledge of allegiance.
They're just not fights I want to have.
Maybe it's because, for me, religion is like a relationship that just didn't work out. It doesn't mean I don't love the person I used to date or wish them well, it just means that it wasn't for me. I do believe that most religions, at their core, mean well and promote kindness and generosity. The problem is they've become so warped that more and more people are fleeing towards something that even I, as an atheist, find disheartening--despair.
Being an atheist doesn't mean I don't see the good in people, or the beauty of art, or the fascinating cosmic threads that connect all of us as human beings. It just means I don't accept the idea of god or heaven or hell or--
Well, you get the picture.
I have a belief system. Organized religion just isn't a part of it.
Still, anything that promotes positive energy in the world is not something I'm going to take issue with. I tell everyone that when I did go to church, my favorite part of mass was shaking people's hands and saying "peace be with you." It was such a pure gesture, and to be honest, it's what I miss when I think about going to church. I wish I could do it in a secular way. Just walk up to people on the street and say "Peace be with you." It really is a lovely idea.
So no, I don't mind religion. I mind nutjobs, and extremists, and Bible beaters, and anyone who promotes hate and intolerance.
But religion I can live with. I doubt I'll ever practice it again, but it doesn't bother me that it exists.
As for bellowing about church and state, I'll do it if I feel compelled, but honestly, do we really need any extra arguments in the world?
The Broccoli Blog
It's Almost Good for You
Kevin Broccoli
- Location
- Providence, Rhode Island, United States
- Birthday
- July 19
- Bio
- Thoughts, musings, ramblings, and occasional insight from the outside.
MY RECENT POSTS
- The Facebook Fishbowl
March 26, 2013 01:18PM - The People Who Ruin My Life on
Facebook
March 14, 2013 12:35PM - Sobriety Tests Can Be Fun!
January 04, 2013 02:31PM - Sobriety Tests Can Be Fun!
January 03, 2013 10:20AM - The Jekyll and Hyde Drinking
Game
January 03, 2013 03:11AM
MY RECENT COMMENTS
- “http://www.cbsnews.com/8
301-503544_162-20088274-503544
.html
And here's
Romney. Gr…”
January 05, 2012 02:48PM - “http://thinkprogress.org
/lgbt/2012/01/04/397355/rick-s
antorums-top-10-most-outrag
230;”
January 05, 2012 02:47PM - “I never understand
people who say "why do you
care?" Why do
you care
t…”
February 28, 2011 12:34AM - “Rob, you should see if
Sheen needs a lawyer. You're
probably
the only person
lef…”
February 26, 2011 01:22AM - “Rob, he did seriously
break the law. He's had
altercations
that have
involved se…”
February 25, 2011 04:55PM
Kevin Broccoli's Links
Kevin Broccoli's Favorites
Updates
-
My Contenders for the Song of the Summer 2013
-
At least the government conspiracy theories are over
-
The Quality of Mercy: Mad Men Season 6, Episode 12
-
origins
-
Purgatory at Cumberland Farms
-
Open Call - Talking to the Cats
-
In Light and Darkness of Adam Lanza
-
New York Times to partner with Byliner and Vook

Salon.com
Comments
I tend to come from a "live and let live" perspective...and try not to let "religious" matters intrude into my life any more than necessary.
I don't even mind proselytizing; fact is I often do it myself for agnosticism. And I enjoy my many conversations with the Jehovah's Witnesses who stop by my house often...although I suspect many of them kinda wish they hadn't!
Those two positions may seem similar to some such as those who label themselves agnostics. They are not. They are, in fact, diametrically opposite. One is a belief the other a lack of belief. Agnostics, as with religionists, require that a lack of belief be labelled a "different" belief. This gives them legitimacy in their argument that, from the religious point of view, "we all are believers - just believers in different philosophies", and gives the "agnostics" the false position of being "neutral" and standing between two opposing beliefs. Both are wrong. Lack of belief is not a "different" belief.
.