Some of you may have noticed your fellow Open members -- and their Open posts -- popping up with increasing frequency on Salon. This is part of a new initiative to regularly tap into our Open talent pool to make Salon a more vibrant, expansive site. The purpose of Open Salon was to provide a platform for our audience -- which we've always boasted was the best in the world. Now we're taking the next logical step; elevating your content onto Salon, and helping make Salon a vaster, smarter, more powerful brain trust than ever before.
Judy, our Open editor, and the other editors of Salon, will be reaching out to you if you've got a post we think would work well on Salon. We'll always ask for your permission first before publishing your post on Salon -- we'll contact you through the Open Salon message system -- and, obviously, you always have the right to keep your post on Open, and only on Open. When we do post your piece to Salon, we'll offer a prominent link back to your blog, to help build your Open audience.
Don't wait for us to reach out, though. If you've got a post you think is a good fit for any of Salon's sections, and think you would like to cross-post, check out our masthead and hit up the appropriate editor.
If you're interested in having a post considered, though, here are some ver basic guidelines of what we're looking for:
Clean copy: Posts with typos, punctuation errors, or anything that requires a heavy editor's hand won't be used. (I should note: This is not a problem for many Open writers, who are sharp and exacting!)
Fast, original takes: Salon's a news site, and we're always looking for sharp, original thinking or information on breaking events or news that matter to our readership.
Well-sourced stories: If you're blogging about something you've read elsewhere, link to it. If you're making a factual assertion that could be questioned later, find the appropriate source and link to it.
Context: For personal narratives, include necessary background; while our blog fans might know your story, new readers won't. For commentary, unless you're writing on a topic that has dominated the news, make sure to summarize the issue or event you're discussing before launching your argument.
Reliability: I've read some of you for so long now that if you told me pigs could fly I'd immediately run out and buy a bigger umbrella. We will regularly look to bloggers who prove reliable over time, and reputable in the eyes of Open memebers.
Second, quick answers to some of your possible questions:
Will you ever pay for this?
There may be instances -- say, essay contests -- when there will be payment for having your Open post appear on Salon. But generally: No, there will be no payment. We start each Salon post with a link back to your Open blog; hopefully this helps promote your blog, which you can use to generate some money through Adsense, if you've set that up.
We are exploring different revenue-sharing models for the future; we have not, frankly, found one that would be easy enough for us to implement and worth your while, but we remain on the hunt.
Do I retain the rights to my content?
Yes. You retain the exact rights you have under our Terms and Conditions. You keep the rights -- we also retain some rights for use on Salon. Please re-read the Terms if you're at all unclear.
Will I get to OK any changes to my post before it goes up?
Yes. We'll clear any substantive changes we make to your posts before publishing on Salon.
Can I OK the display copy (headlines, deck) that goes with my post?
Probably not. Those often have size (and style) limitations. But we're more apt to just use your own headline if you conform to one simple rule: Keep it clear -- and as short as possible.

Salon.com
Comments
Also, what is Adsense and does it hurt?
Thank you, Kerry. You and the team just keep up the good work. :-D
I dreamed streaker thugs stole my wife two:)
a hope you teach honey mead skill and mush;
if we gulp goo soup two much we mushy two.
Thanks fir greaseball and new skunk rulers.
I'll plan on planting a lawyer tree 13- inches.
I hop if the ruler grows one-in. honest layer.
People need good fried eggs and stop hicks.
Hickcups and burps @ Twitter in boondocks.
I hope Ya hermit shack has a brick outhouse.
http://open.salon.com/blog/sueinaz/2009/12/18/when_the_kids_make_dinner
D'anator -- the Open boxes on the story pages, etc., are definitely driving a lot more traffic to your posts. It was a very smart idea for the new design.
Ginny Rose -- I'd be curious to hear Adsense reports, too. I confess, I lost my PIN, and my ads were dropped. I need to get on that. But I've heard a few people are claiming to get a decent chunk of change every month. Others?
AHPilgrim -- I take all the credit!
Ablonde -- It's a fair point, and one I'm acutely sensitive to. There's an important distinction here, which is that we're asking for permission to crosspost on Salon pieces that have already been published here on Open. We normally don't ever pay for content that's appeared elsewhere for the obvious reasons (there's no exclusivity, it could end up showing up anywhere, etc.).
Verbal: Oh, good -- I made Thomas, Judy and Joan all help me cover the bases!
I'm loving all the positive changes we've seen lately. Thanks for each and every one.
Rated
If the post stays on Open too, have you considered a Salon icon to drive Open traffic to Salon? Just wondering. (Imagine the fur flying over EP's and SP's ... heh)
This is excellent news and a wise decision.
Cheers
Blue: That's right -- we definitely want to use real names for these. Understand that might not work for some people, but Salon demands that basic transparency in all but the rarest of cases.
Wschanz -- Your browser should give you spell check. If not, I'd switch it up!
Steven Axelrod: You're the George Clooney of Open Salon.
Sally: Good idea!
Stellaa: Yes, full stories on Salon, with links back to the writer's blog.
Scanner: Unfortunately, X-rated posts probably won't be considered.
Padraig: Consider yourself taken!
Thanks for this update.
As for compensation. Even mid-range writers don't eat on words. As a songwriter, I get about five buck a month from digital downloads. For the the shitworks of my colon -- no drum track -- I'd expect nothing.
Will you consider linking to short fiction?
;)
I did not receive a request for permission, but in my case you don't need to. Post away!
One of her initial chapters lambasts otherwise well respected media outlets for their lack of science coverage: Salon.com, The Atlantic Monthly, Harpers...
I think Open Salon has some great science bloggers and I hope to see their exposure expanded!
(Did I say that out loud?)
On the "enough with the pop culture" meme -- really? Pop culture has always been key to Salon. In fact, when it started lo some 15 years ago, Salon was primarily a culture site -- movies, books, tv. It's probably at least half of what people come to us to read. I'm always puzzled when people clamor against pop culture coverage -- why don't you want to read about/understand what people are consuming and thrilling at? Sometimes, I'd much prefer reading about it so I get it, rather than having to consume it . . . (Hello, "Jersey Shore"!)
Donna: It's a good point -- and should be understood by anyone who blogs. If you eventually hope to sell a piece, don't blog it -- I don't know of any pub that pays for posts that have been published anywhere -- including a blog. Of course, I know it's tougher now to sell stories than ever before, so if you must get it out there, blog it!
On MaryT's point: It's true, the Salon letter-writers lack the mind-blowing decorum of Open Salon. No easy fix to that, but we're mulling options.
And please don't be annoyed at me but there's a typo in your post. "memebers."
So that means I personally get one free pass on spelling if I ever promote one of mine, right?