Kathy Riordan

Kathy Riordan
Location
Florida, United States
Birthday
April 27
Bio
One woman's view of life and the universe. Follow @katriord on Twitter.

MY RECENT POSTS

Kathy Riordan's Links

I also write here
A little about me
Some of my work on Iran
Articles on World War II
Twitter Is What You Make It
Christmas
What I Can't Write About
Where I've Been, Where I'm Going
Some great stuff around here
Poetry, if you like that sort of thing
Editor’s Pick
MARCH 15, 2010 1:48PM

Rielle Hunter's Big Coming Out

Rate: 47 Flag

rielle-hunter01

photo of Rielle Hunter by Mark Seliger for GQ 

 

I'm past caring that John Edwards cheated on his wife who was dying of cancer while he was running for President of the United States, fathered a child out of wedlock, denied it publicly and had a friend cover-up for him, all the while a sex tape was lurking in the background.

Past caring.

But the news that Rielle Hunter had finally gone public in a magazine interview with GQ, complete with provocative full-color photos, was too much to ignore, a gaper's block on the freeway.

According to Barbara Walters, who disclosed Monday morning on ABC's The View that she'd chatted privately with Rielle Hunter, Edwards' former mistress is said to be '"repulsed" by some of the photos GQ used in their spread and "cried for two hours" after seeing them.

The photos in question, which were taken by photographer Mark Seliger for GQ, involve Hunter lounging around in a man's shirt with no pants. . .surrounded by Kermit the Frog, Barney and Dora the Explorer.

To which we must say, huh?

This is the woman who said John Edwards should drop out of the presidential race because his astrological sign didn't favor it.

Never mind he was married, or cheating on a wife dying of cancer. 

Hunter is said to have told GQ she liked the article but not the photos, which she posed for at the time, apparently willingly.

According to the article by Lisa DePaulo, "Hello, America, My Name is Rielle Hunter," Edwards' former mistress, 45, reveals that Elizabeth Edwards found out about their affair by seeing a phone number on her husband's cell phone, which she dialed.

(It seems to me this was also the end of Tiger Woods' happy run through the jungle--the tell-tale cell phone trail.)

Rielle answered with a sexy, "Hi, baby," which sealed the deal.

She also discloses in the article that Edwards urged her to get an abortion, and said that falling in love with her could "really f*** up (his) plans to become president."  Hunter says they spent the night together the first day they met, February 21, 2006, at New York's Regency Hotel.

Hunter was employed by the Edwards campaign to follow the candidate around as a videographer.  She knows the impact of the photos, of the spoken word, of every decision.

And she doesn't want that story, with those photos, out there now?

Please. 

Edwards couldn't sink much lower in public estimation, and for many of us, we breathe a collective sigh of relief at having dodged that particular bullet.  

All I can say is, apparently, they deserve each other. 

 

On the Web:

Hello, America, My Name is Rielle Hunter - GQ

More Rielle Hunter - GQ 

Rielle Hunter Photo Shoot - CNN (video) 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I don't mean to be crude, but is cheating on a wife dying of cancer a rating of 9.7 on the "bad things" scale and cheating on a wife not dying of cancer only a 9.3? However, I loved the post. You certainly got my attention and raised some interesting thoughts.

Rated for Openality.
rated for simply good writing! Going to Google "openality" now...
curious and curiouser. rated.
the word that comes to mind as I looked at her images and read her interview was skank.

"johnny"?

his WIFE who is battling cancer, doesn't happen to be dead yet and this piece of crap is calling this woman's husband "Johnny" in an interview?

this woman is not only a skank. but she is a SKANK HO.

the lowest of the low.
barney is trying to get him some!!
I really came away from this interview with the opposite view -- I found Hunter to be oddly compelling and dizzyingly naive. It doesn't surprise me that the pictures were a shock to her -- she seems more preyed upon than huntress, and the tone of her interview implies the kind of intimacy with the reporter that would lead her to think that she could have a say in what was put out there.

It's the same kind of stupidity that would lead someone to make a sex tape with a famous politician and believe that it would never leak to the media.
Openality (Open’ ality)

Noun

(Synonym; quality)

Openality: Having the preferred length, content, and quality indicative of the very best to be found on “Open Salon”
Here's hoping Elizabeth goes into full remission.
I don't understand how someone can pose for these photos--made by a professional photographer expressly for the purpose of publication--and then be upset when they're published. What, she didn't realize she didn't have her pants on?
How dare the media exploit her by using the photos she posed for! Next thing you know they will be quoting her.
I may not have much sense in my head, but I feel like a GD genius compared to this idiot. Crying for two hours was not nearly enough. Is there no shame left in this world?

Rated.

Stephanie
Here we go -- another one who can't resist the fifteen minutes.
R
I am glad not to be a part of that world...xox
Wow, just when I think things can't get nuttier. Or skankier.
It's apparently a dizzyling naive world, Saturn. All the people in the Edwards saga seem to have been suffering from it.
This woman is a mystery to me. (Not one I'm willing to spend too much time solving.) I don't get her repulsive mixture of naive nutter and savvy attention grabber. I just look at her, blink a few times in disbelief, and look away.
I've changed the title so as not to mislead. It was an easy gimme when I wrote this flat on my back in bed today upside down with a bad back. Please also see the articles by Catherine Forsythe and Saturn Smith on the subject.
Yes. Let's hope they get married and live a living hell which they deserve. Together. Let's hope someone else will raise his children with Elizabeth after she goes...she could force that, after all.

Saturn has become an excellent apologist for anybody who commits true evil. Weird.
It still boggles my mind that Edwards impregnated a woman out of wedlock, but kept right on running for President, consequences be damned. Do these clowns have that little respect for the American voters?
All I can say is that all the folks that want the Frank Character in 'Cancer a Love Story' to ditch Astrid and get it on with Maggie -- the majority of people, so it seems -- can understand how the spouse of a cancer victim maybe needs a little love also.

The fact that John couldn't figure out how to decently conduct an affair does disqualify him from holding higher office. By that I mean with someone appropriately discrete and using protection, as well as a modicum of taste.
The whole lot of them are toooo disgusting. Talk about "kissin and tellin".
The photos are awful--there's the one of her lying back on the bed in belly-exposing sweat pants, the child on her breast--and I don't understand how she could have believed posing in this way would not lead to what GQ published. But she does seem weirdly naive, and photo shoots can take you places you don't want to go (though usually you can control whether or not to keep your pants on).

All I can say is ugh--partly for allowing a magazine like GQ to make Rielle the main circus act rather than "Johnny," who deserves a whole heavenly choir of angel-spit "ughs!"

Hope your back feels better soon, Kathy. Rated.
Very good article Kathy. Very readable and concise. I wonder what the child support arrangement is???rated....I love your stuff...!!
The grown-woman-pants-off-stuffed-animals look just skeeves me out. Ick. Anything with grownups, sexual poses, and Dora the freaking Explorer? Yuck. Just yuck.

Edwards and this woman deserve each other. I feel deeply for Elizabeth Edwards, and for their children who very likely might be without a mother and are most certainly without any kind of responsible father.
Unfortunately, I think there are no good guys in white hats here. It's a slimy mess. I part company with Saturn in that I don't see Rielle particularly defensible, but then, I don't think any of them are. Hunter clearly posed for the photos; acting scandalized that they were used is a bit much.
this just gets more and more tawdry, and her poses foster all the negative stereotypes about "the other woman." Now I feel like I need to take a shower.
She's an object of a malignantly narcissistic politician. No good will come of this as karma has a strange and savage way of balancing things out...
-r-
Blech to them both. But very good writing, Kathy._r
I really couldn't read this...I'm so unconcerned.
I kind of like the homewrecker image of the bleach blond bimbo on a bed with stuffed animals. Which doesn't belong and why? ...
For what it's worth, I don't care if she does have cancer, Elizabeth Edwards has always struck me as an ambitious, power by proxy seeking bitch.
She also discloses in the article that Edwards urged her to get an abortion, and said that falling in love with her could "really f*** up (his) plans to become president."

Now that's love. I know I would be willing to completely put myself out there (in a magazine even!) for a man who suggested I abort the evidence of our affair. This woman seems so gloriously unself-aware (is that a word?), I would kill to be that clueless.

She probably doesn't like the photos because they're AWFUL. She's not a bad looking woman but the pictures do not do her justice. She looks scraggly in the photos. Like an older, busted up version of Dee from It's Always Sunny.

(I didn't know hooker-posing on a child's bed was the new thing. I'm going to have to call my niece...)
She is just another attention starved no one. And she just happened to not be on birth control, What does that tell ya? Tells me she wants the attention and the notoriety of having the 'baby's daddy'give her big bucks for a very long time.
Couldn't GQ Photoshop her thighs to make them look thinner?
In my estimation, she's making a stink to get more press. She saw how well those Tiger Woods parade-o-girls did. They got press. She knows how the written word, the recorded image, can be used. She's trying, right now, to use them to her advantage by faking dismay.

Not such a new ploy, if I may say so.
Yes, they deserve each other. We will hear more at the deposition about the sex tape.
Imagine if he were the Democratic candidate, won the presidency, and she was the "second lady"?
Everyone does things they regret, or sometimes things they need to do that hurt others but to flaunt and receive payment for talking about these things is beyond. Vapid..
Flaunt I'll give you, rita, but my understanding is that Rielle Hunter received no financial compensation for doing this interview or the photos.
That is creepy. And Edwards' employee who covered up the scandal (or tried to) also has a strong money-grubbing streak, in my opinion. He and his wife told a funny story, though. They said Rielle would go through hotel rooms, when she was supposed to be undercover and was on the front of nearby newspapers, loudly proclaiming that she needed to find the one with the best energy. The ones with the best energy were always the penthouse suites, somehow.
It was wrong for both of them.....but I will not judge either one of them since I haven't been in their shoes. Let only God judge them.
Another vapid liar with the conscience of a gnat, or as she would likely spell it, "conscious."
The photo is creepy!
This really is an odd and sad story isn't it? I think there's more to the story and another shoe yet to drop...
Barfing? No. Back injury. Oh, you mean Rielle. The whole thing is tragicomic. Needs to be a Tom Stoppard play.
That photo was likely taken on her daughter's bed. Icky.
you can see by the photo, she's just cinderella waiting in her castle for prince charming to show up.
Personally, I think Dora the Explorer is the real star of the photo. At least she's wearing pants. I really admired John Edwards after reading his book "Four Trials". Too bad he has such obviously poor character. Well written post.
Sorry. No sympathy here. Hunter seems so hungry for her moment of fame, she'll happily settle for being a future trivia answer. Yes, it's such a shame she was "taken advantage of" by that bad bad magazine... and by the way, who are we all discussing?
Time to change the subject. The only way to kill the fame monster is to starve it. At least she did the public a service by exposing Edwards for the reptile he is.
Rielle adds new meaning to the word "dumb" as in "dumb blonde."

Although the term MILF does come to mind. (Sorry about that.)
Excellent post - and I like Saturn's comment that Rielle is the kind of person who thinks that the faux intimacy she established during the photo shoot made her think she would have some control over the publication. You have to work at being that naive.
She did not like the photos? Of course it is a common problem with people who sleep with married people. They can't feel or remember they don't have pants on. People with this handicap are at a disadvantage because they can easily fall into or others can fall into their genitals.

It's not their fault it "just happens." Remember it is hard to keep it in your pants if forget to wear any.
This man doesn't care about this "Hunter" broad hwever, he sure does think you're so much more of an attractive woman.
I usually look forward to many of your posts butt, I ALWAYS look forward to seeing your picture.
"According to Barbara Walters, who disclosed Monday morning on ABC's The View that she'd chatted privately with Rielle Hunter..."

Remember when Barbara interviewed heads of state? This has got to be easier and the ratings are better. Ask her how she feels. Make her cry, Barbara!
So if she follows the pattern, she'll have a photospread in Playboy or Penthouse, and get her own Reality TV show. She is a single mom with a titillating story.

There's got to be a target audience that advertisers are trying to reach who would watch this train wreck in progress.

Does anyone know if she was wearing underwear?
My hit on it is somewhere between yours and Saturn's.

The main word that comes to mind is that flavor-of-the-month (but I think pertinent here) diagnosis, "Narcissist." That goes for both of them. She's self-absorbed to the nth degree, and also grandiose in thinking she could help transform the world through Edwards (and that he could do it, which of course stroked his own grandiosity and narcissism).

I neither see her as evil and calculating nor naive and clueless, but as living in her own world in which things look very very different than they do to you or me. So it's not about overlooking things (his wife has cancer, he's running for President) but interpreting those things in a way that's utterly unlike how the vast majority of people would. Ditto for believing things (including that Edwards said to her) that sound ludicrous to us. And I believe that she isn't necessarily gunning to marry him and tap into his wealth and all that. I think her aims in life may be so different that it's not possible to throw conventional judgment on her behavior (gold digger, opportunist, etc).

I guess it comes from living in Calif for decades, but I've seen a lot of women who talk like she does, and they really do have a different take on the world, and operate differently. Not that it's admirable, mind you -- quite the opposite! I find it utterly self-absorbed. But it's not naivete.

It's about an entire world view that is contrary to how most people think -- and that very contrariness is a big part of it. People like Rielle are gratified by feeling they are different and better than the normal person - more "enlightened" to use a shortcut phrase.
Maybe the photographer had his pants off and she was just trying to make him comfortable by taking hers off. I always photograph in the nude when I work with female nudes. (I'm female) Maybe she is more caring than we know.
Silkstone, my focus here is primarily on whether or not she should be shocked that the photos were used, when she clearly posed for them. I don't believe she is a victim here in that regard, at all. Saturn took my initial quick title to this post and ran with it, but "evil and calculating" wasn't my intent. There was a miscommunication there, which I had hoped was straightened out earlier. It gave Saturn a launching platform, but it wasn't my intent. My intent was to focus on whether or not she is protesting too much about the photographs. I think there are no good guys here.
oh Kathy, sorry if I misrepresented what you said! I came back to this after reading it the other day and I think I conflated what you wrote and what many commenters here wrote. I hear a lot of people making her out to be an evil gold digger and I have a different impression, especially after reading that interview.
It could she did not secure the rights to the pictures and can't control the potential earnings that will come from them. Or just a cheap PR ploy to get her face in the news and sell magazines and an upcoming tell-all book. R
So.. what do you want me to answer to all this:-
Yes... as a photographer I like the shots... as a receiver I would raise hell.. but to what extend as I agreed the snapshooter take my sultry poses..
Would I gaga over these shots ?? Wise up... I´m the one taking them.. not the one going gaga oer them.. so vodznoo ??
She´s a nice chick with a nice body to sell my pix ... I have to make a living !!
To all you drewling hot-doggy types.... go see momma and "get it over with" for the moment....
From the GripeVine .... & Donah..//
I'm no good at analyzing the key players and their actions, but here's what I HOPE happens, and probably WILL based on others' experiences. BTW, I live in NC and have seen "Johnny" about town, and he is one pompous ass!!! Back to dreaming--I heard on a local news show of a female divorcee (not Elizabeth, but someone whose name escapes me at the moment) here in this gorgeous state who sued her ex-husband's mistress for alienation of affection, and the judge awarded the divorcee $9,000,000. I'm just hoping Elizabeth has the energy and the cahones to do the same to Hunter.
After all, it is a well-known fact that Elizabeth's brains got "Johnny" through law school. He is a big Z-E-R-O without her as he will probably soon learn, if he hasn't already. This probably wasn't his first affair either. His luck ran completely out with Hunter, and he deserved it. Everyone knows in all relationships familiarity breeds contempt, and if one or both partners have fallen so far out of love that there is no love to save, then, by all means, split, sign on the dotted line, then go find your Rielle Hunter or whatever dog you wish to shack up with now. Johnny, being a lawyer, should have known this. Guess his "urges" helped him make bad choices!!! You'd think he would have learned from Bill, Newt, and tons of others who thought they were smarter than that and could hide it better. Now, pretty boy "Johnny" is a hated man and will probably never get work in this state again.
My hope is that when Elizabeth dries the last tear, and the pain and anger of this mess subsides, she and her children find happiness beyond her wildest dreams. There's a great big wide wonderful world out there to discover, and since her time may be limited, I pray she remains calm and gets past the hurt soon. Johnny and Rielle aren't worth the stress.
I have a feeling there's a lot of weed involved in this story, but who really knows?
Well put. She accidentally wasn't wearing pants?
I am past caring about people who claim being "naive" (true or faked naivety) is an excuse for almost anything.
Once you are past 16, your obligation is to find out and think BEFORE you act, not "feel" (sorry, hurt, exposed, exploited, fill in the blank) afterwards.
I don't think it's possible that Rielle didn't know exactly how that was going to come off. The second the stylist pulled out the pearl necklace I think it was probably all pretty clear...I feel sorry for the kid.
I read the article in GQ and couldn't help but finish it. She sounded much different than I thought she would initially and found it to be a compelling read. However, kissing and telling is uncouth and so were the photos. It was too much information. ("Pants on the ground, pants on the ground, lookin' like a fool with your pants on the ground" came to mind.)
The truly spiritual are always misunderstood.

She just HAD to lock eyes with him and lay a cheap pickup line on him and go to his room and have sex with him that night, and then start sneaking around on a woman dying with cancer and derail his presidential campaign and get pregnant and lie about that and go along with some other guy lying about being the father and make a sex tape and deny that too and take misappropriated funds and pose half naked with Dora the Explorer!

Because it was written in the stars and it was all a part of living a "life of truth"! She just HAD to!

But you can't expect spiritual plebes like the rest of us to understand something so pure and good and true.