
“There had always been something not quite right about the Berglunds.” This is the general consensus among the Berglunds' former neighbours when, long after they’ve moved, Walter Berglunds' name suddenly re-surfaces in an unfavourable New York Times feature.
Freedom is Jonathan Franzen’s five-hundred page development of just what that “not quite right” something is; and how it is that Walter went from left wing ideologue “greener than Greenpeace” to lackey for a West Virginia coal mining company and figure of national media contempt.
This is not, however, as much Walter’s story as it is his wife Patty’s. One of the great ironies of the Oprah book club scandal of 2001 is how devoted Franzen actually is to creating complex women characters. Freedom, I would argue, is written very much for women readers, much more than The Corrections ever was ( so I'm not surprised that Oprah has picked it for the her next Book Club), and much more for those readers than it is for the critics who are falling all over themselves to praise it (and I’m not bucking that trend.)
But there’s also plenty in here to like by readers who hate Oprah and/or mistrust critics.
Curmudgeons will love the character of Richard Katz, former alt-rock star and perennial post-punk girl magnet. He is best friend to Walter, but ultimately lover to Patty. In a world teeming with lifestyle missionaries, Richard is a grounding reminder of a brief moment in the 90s when cynicism had a certain integrity. As Richard explains “I don’t do belief. I don’t do vision.”
Yesterday, Curtis Sittenfeld argued in The Observer that Richard was something of a stand in for Franzen, who like Richard, toiled in obscurity for decades until achieving commercial success in 2001.
Franzen, however, does "do" belief and vision. It might seem like depressive realism isn't actually a vision, but it's the one that's been keeping psychiatry going for over a century. I don't think Franzen is Richard, but this book would be nothing without the balancing force of Richard’s irresistible negativity. He, Walter and Patty are the love triangle that keeps this novel as philosophically balanced as a geodesic dome.
Patty seems apolitical. But she is really only in a rigid state of rebellion against an intensely liberal family. She is a gentrification pioneer, and daughter of a famous public defender and feminist politician. Patty pushes strollers though “broken beer bottles and barfed-upon old snow.” She cooks from The Silver Palate cookbook and uses cloth diapers. “She was already fully that thing that was just starting to happen to the rest of the street.” So much so that the people who end up emulating her seem to have always disliked her.
There’s a hashtag popular on Twitter right now, #franzenfreud, that is unfortunately being used by women writers envious of Franzen’s current literary success. But franzenfreud is also a perfect description of just exactly what it is Franzen is so good at. He creates characters that you can’t help wanting bad things for. Only to turn around and make you love them as though they were part of the same tangle of rage and affection that people often usually only feel for members of their own family.
Bad things do happen to the Berglunds. Terrible things. And at a certain level they are undeniably, and often, terrible people. Patty loves her son Joey to a point creepily close to incest. Joey, barely a teenager, starts sleeping with the girl next door, and then moves in with her trashy cougar mom and her redneck boyfriend, because unlike his parents, they let him do whatever he wants. It’s easy to write him off as your garden-variety teenage sociopath. But gradually, using satire like paint stripper, Franzen patiently exposes the humanity that is almost always there if you get to know people well enough to let it emerge.
At one point Richard looks at Walter and sees exactly how Walter has “snapped under the pressure of thinking in too much detail about the fuckedness of the world.” Franzen writes like someone who has snapped like that countless times, but then, every time, beaten the path back to sanity a little wider.


Salon.com
Comments
As one who suffers from this, I appreciate this line.
And now I will read this book.
http://open.salon.com/blog/dkinne/2010/09/17/the_novel_endures_-_jonathan_franzen_freedom
David, thanks for letting me know about your post. I really enjoyed it. Franzen's not coming to my town, so I'm going to have to live vicariously through him.
I can't help seeing something of myself in every single one of Franzen's characters, which must mean that he is something of a genius about what makes us all (or at least me) tick.
I think there's a lot of Walter in Franzen. But I bet there's a certain amount of Patty too in ways that might be difficult to see. There's that famous Flaubert line "Emma, C'est moi." And Franzen strikes me as very much a writer in the style of Flaubert. Patty does a lot of the things that Franzen did in his life, in terms of refusing to follow the family script with potentially dire consequences. There were a lot of years where he must have felt very disconnected from society and his family, when his books weren't selling, and he was scrapping by. I bet he developed a lot of petty obsessions and rages against neighbours, and family, and whoever. I be he had his fair share of dangerously weird groupie types. And I would imagine he would have drawn on that sort of shadow self that all writers have, no matter how successful they become. That specter of social isolation that writers sometimes share with housewives.
He maybe even be Joey, since Patty seems to mirror that kind of over invested mother figure who seems to represent Franzen's mother, from what he's written.
But I don't think he's just Richard. No way. From everything I've read of his, he cares far too much about life and writing and art, and I believe women, to be that person.
Reviews are meta-conversations, and it seems to me they serve one or more of the three primary levels of possible reader interest: 1) Should I see/read/eat/attend this? 2) If I do, what can I expect my experience to be? 3) How does this fit into the Grand Scheme O' Things? And then there's the meta-meta "is this review interesting?"
I tend to dabble in 1 & 2, sharing my enthusiasms with others, telling them why I think they will like what I like. I admire writers like yourself who are more analytic and expressive in a holistic sense, putting the subject into a larger context.
Nice review. :)
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/print/2010/10/smaller-than-life/8212/
And David E, I thought the review in The Atlantic was an embarrassment. Franzen is writing in third person intimate. He's supposed to be sticking as close to the p.o.v. of the characters as possible, and using the language in which they would think. Writing in unfailingly articulate, insightful, impressively crafted prose would have created far too much distance. I think a critic who doesn't recognize that has no business reviewing contemporary literature.
Kicked to the curb? If Franzen even reads this, he'll probably have a good laugh and brush this guy off like a mosquito.
As I read this, I did get the feeling that Richard's artistic integrity and ambivalence towards fame are drawn from Franzen's rocketing into the limelight with The Corrections.
Yet, I also feel like Walter's increasingly choleric idealism and Abigail's bitterness over toiling in obscurity bear more than a little resemblance to Franzen.
Speaking of his earlier works... I didn't mention this in my post http://www.open.salon.com/blog/hapamama/2010/09/01/a_night_with_jonathan_franzen_in_santa_cruz, but at Franzen's Santa Cruz appearance, my friend brought a yellowed copy of his earlier (and lesser known) novel Strong Motion. It was like was reunited with a long-lost child... he called some people over to look at it and wrote a personalized message in it!
http://fablog.ehrensteinland.com/2010/09/05/holden-franzen-vs-the-world/
In other words, Franzen's just a whipping boy for this critic's personal bias. You could change out the details for any other recent novel and it would read the same. And he misses the obvious point that much the same criticism could be pointed at many of the "classics" back when they were new.
Ah well. Not a nice review. :)
In today's NYT Bobo Brooks sez he likes the book but feels it could have been better had Franzen made the characters more religious.
Great review - thanks.
===( h t t p : / / w ww . e b ay 2 1 . c om / ) ====
Q u al i t y is our D i g n i t y; Service is our Lift.
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
===( h t t p : / / w ww . e b ay 2 1 . c om / )===
dog training videos
I really found out when I was 8 or 9.
Teeth Brilliant
there are a lot of products on sale. Which one is better for 48 years old mom? Handbag,glasses or biniki? Please help.