All that is necessary for the survival of the fittest

is an interest in life, good, bad or peculiar--Grace Paley

Juliet Waters

Juliet Waters
Location
Montreal, Canada
Birthday
August 01
Bio
Montreal writer, book critic, single mom, ex-Expos fan, now rooting for the Portland Seadogs. Currently working on a book about Developmental Coordination Disorder. Also learning to code. Visit me at my new blog: Familycoding.com

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 7:53AM

Freedom: Which Character Is Franzen?

Rate: 15 Flag

Franzenfreud

“There had always been something not quite right about the Berglunds.” This is the general consensus among the Berglunds' former neighbours when, long after they’ve moved, Walter Berglunds' name suddenly re-surfaces in an unfavourable New York Times feature.

Freedom is Jonathan Franzen’s five-hundred page development of just what that “not quite right” something is; and how it is that Walter went from left wing ideologue “greener than Greenpeace” to  lackey for a West Virginia coal mining company and  figure of national media contempt.

This is not, however,  as much Walter’s story as it is his wife Patty’s. One of the great ironies of the Oprah book club scandal of 2001  is how devoted Franzen actually is to creating complex women characters. Freedom, I would argue, is written very much for women readers, much more than The Corrections ever was ( so I'm not surprised that  Oprah has picked it for the her next Book Club), and much more for those readers than it is for the critics who are falling all over themselves to praise it (and I’m not bucking that trend.) 

But there’s also plenty in here to like by readers who hate Oprah and/or mistrust critics.

Curmudgeons will love the character of Richard Katz, former alt-rock star and perennial post-punk girl magnet. He is best friend to Walter, but ultimately lover to Patty. In a world teeming with lifestyle missionaries, Richard is a grounding reminder of a brief moment in the 90s when cynicism had a certain integrity. As Richard explains “I don’t do belief. I don’t do vision.”

Yesterday, Curtis Sittenfeld argued in The Observer that Richard was something of a stand in for Franzen, who like Richard, toiled in obscurity for decades until achieving commercial success in 2001. 

Franzen, however, does "do" belief and vision.  It might seem like depressive realism isn't actually a vision, but it's the one that's been keeping psychiatry going for over a century.  I don't think Franzen is Richard, but this book would be nothing without the balancing force of Richard’s irresistible negativity. He, Walter and Patty are the love triangle that keeps this novel as philosophically balanced as a geodesic dome.

Patty seems apolitical. But she is really only in a rigid state of rebellion against an intensely liberal family. She is a gentrification pioneer, and daughter of a famous public defender and feminist politician. Patty pushes strollers though “broken beer bottles and barfed-upon old snow.”  She cooks from The Silver Palate cookbook and uses cloth diapers. “She was already fully that thing that was just starting to happen to the rest of the street.” So much so that the people who end up emulating her  seem to have always disliked her.

There’s a hashtag popular on Twitter right now, #franzenfreud, that is unfortunately being used by women writers envious of Franzen’s current literary success. But franzenfreud is also a perfect description of just exactly what it is Franzen is so good at.  He creates characters that you can’t help wanting bad things for. Only to turn around and make you love them as though they were part of the same tangle of rage and affection that people often usually only feel for members of their own family.  

Bad things do happen to the Berglunds. Terrible things. And at a certain level they are undeniably, and often, terrible people.  Patty loves her son Joey to a point creepily close to incest. Joey, barely a teenager, starts sleeping with the girl next door, and then moves in with her trashy cougar mom and her redneck boyfriend, because unlike his parents, they let him do whatever he wants. It’s easy to write him off as your garden-variety teenage sociopath. But gradually, using satire like paint stripper, Franzen patiently exposes the humanity that is almost always there if you get to know people well enough to let it emerge.

At one point Richard looks at Walter and sees exactly how Walter has “snapped under the pressure of thinking in too much detail about the fuckedness of the world.”  Franzen writes like someone who has snapped like that countless times, but then, every time, beaten the path back to sanity a little wider.

Author tags:

jonathan franzen, freedom, books

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
"It might seem like depressive realism isn't actually a vision, but it's the one that's been keeping psychiatry going for over a century."

As one who suffers from this, I appreciate this line.

And now I will read this book.
Nice review. I invite y'all to read about my personal experience with Franzen last Friday night...

http://open.salon.com/blog/dkinne/2010/09/17/the_novel_endures_-_jonathan_franzen_freedom
Deborah, I'm glad you're going to read it. I think you'll probably like it.

David, thanks for letting me know about your post. I really enjoyed it. Franzen's not coming to my town, so I'm going to have to live vicariously through him.
I'm loving the book, and love every opportunity to read about other takes on it, so thank you for yours!
I can't help seeing something of myself in every single one of Franzen's characters, which must mean that he is something of a genius about what makes us all (or at least me) tick.
Just started reading this book...I'm looking forward to it. I loved "Corrections". I'll tell you what I think later.
I was a lucky recipient of the book for Salon's book club discussion, where the discussion is bordering on nauseating. I loved the book, don't appreciate the Franzen-bashing and Franzen-envy. I like your question, it gets to the heart of the writer within the novel. But you didn't answer the question. After hearing him speak in Seattle last week, very enjoyable, I would cast my vote for Walter.
Glad I've become a magnet for Franzen lovers. Yes the book club discussion has become infested with trolls and I felt the need for a clean space to talk about it.

I think there's a lot of Walter in Franzen. But I bet there's a certain amount of Patty too in ways that might be difficult to see. There's that famous Flaubert line "Emma, C'est moi." And Franzen strikes me as very much a writer in the style of Flaubert. Patty does a lot of the things that Franzen did in his life, in terms of refusing to follow the family script with potentially dire consequences. There were a lot of years where he must have felt very disconnected from society and his family, when his books weren't selling, and he was scrapping by. I bet he developed a lot of petty obsessions and rages against neighbours, and family, and whoever. I be he had his fair share of dangerously weird groupie types. And I would imagine he would have drawn on that sort of shadow self that all writers have, no matter how successful they become. That specter of social isolation that writers sometimes share with housewives.

He maybe even be Joey, since Patty seems to mirror that kind of over invested mother figure who seems to represent Franzen's mother, from what he's written.

But I don't think he's just Richard. No way. From everything I've read of his, he cares far too much about life and writing and art, and I believe women, to be that person.
Now that I've had some coffee I'm a little embarrassed that all I could manage to choke out earlier was "Nice review." I really enjoyed this piece much more than that, but at an early breakfast table friends know not to expect much more than sporadic grunts from my corner.

Reviews are meta-conversations, and it seems to me they serve one or more of the three primary levels of possible reader interest: 1) Should I see/read/eat/attend this? 2) If I do, what can I expect my experience to be? 3) How does this fit into the Grand Scheme O' Things? And then there's the meta-meta "is this review interesting?"

I tend to dabble in 1 & 2, sharing my enthusiasms with others, telling them why I think they will like what I like. I admire writers like yourself who are more analytic and expressive in a holistic sense, putting the subject into a larger context.

Nice review. :)
I remember the flap about Oprah and the "Corrections." Thing is, his book really WAS a lot better than many (most?) of her other picks. That Curtis Sittenfeld is some writer, too. Loved "An American Wife."
This "Atlantic Monthly" piece kicks Franzen to the curb but good.

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/print/2010/10/smaller-than-life/8212/
Thanks David K. It's always nice to get an elaboration on "nice review."

And David E, I thought the review in The Atlantic was an embarrassment. Franzen is writing in third person intimate. He's supposed to be sticking as close to the p.o.v. of the characters as possible, and using the language in which they would think. Writing in unfailingly articulate, insightful, impressively crafted prose would have created far too much distance. I think a critic who doesn't recognize that has no business reviewing contemporary literature.

Kicked to the curb? If Franzen even reads this, he'll probably have a good laugh and brush this guy off like a mosquito.
Great piece, Juliet. Franzen has said numerous times that while The Corrections drew largely from his parents, Freedom is purely fictional. But no author can create such authentic glimpses into their character's minds without drawing on his own life.

As I read this, I did get the feeling that Richard's artistic integrity and ambivalence towards fame are drawn from Franzen's rocketing into the limelight with The Corrections.

Yet, I also feel like Walter's increasingly choleric idealism and Abigail's bitterness over toiling in obscurity bear more than a little resemblance to Franzen.

Speaking of his earlier works... I didn't mention this in my post http://www.open.salon.com/blog/hapamama/2010/09/01/a_night_with_jonathan_franzen_in_santa_cruz, but at Franzen's Santa Cruz appearance, my friend brought a yellowed copy of his earlier (and lesser known) novel Strong Motion. It was like was reunited with a long-lost child... he called some people over to look at it and wrote a personalized message in it!
Of course he's writing in the Third Person, Julie. But he's "understood" by our "popular" culture in the first, as I point out here

http://fablog.ehrensteinland.com/2010/09/05/holden-franzen-vs-the-world/
If you are looking for a partner based on lifestyle and physical chemistry as well as personal beliefs and common interests, you may try -- SeekInterracial.c o m -- Good Luck :)
I thought the Atlantic reviewer pretty well tipped his hand in this: "Many people who eschew great books for the latest novels do so because they want precisely this kind of thing. (Every new book we read in our brief and busy lives means that a classic is left unread.)"

In other words, Franzen's just a whipping boy for this critic's personal bias. You could change out the details for any other recent novel and it would read the same. And he misses the obvious point that much the same criticism could be pointed at many of the "classics" back when they were new.

Ah well. Not a nice review. :)
I have not yet read The Corrections, but read some of Freedom in the New Yorker, and felt just as you described about the characters and story, love-hate. I really don't need to love my characters to enjoy them, but there's something in the tone of his narrative that is unlikeable. I'll read it on the basis of this post alone, though. and the Corrections.
So many people are talking about this novel, I'm going to have to fall for public peer pressure and buy it. :)
Don't buyt it. Steal it. That's REAL Freedom.

In today's NYT Bobo Brooks sez he likes the book but feels it could have been better had Franzen made the characters more religious.
Meme promised herself - no more Kindle downloads this month. The autobiographer insists she doesn't remember making that promise. The book is a pure pleasure.
David E, He obviously means more Christian, since he seems to ignore the part of the book where Joey rediscovers his judaism.
I really enjoyed "The Corrections", so I'll definitely add this one to my list. Of course, that means I probably won't until get to it until about five years from now!

Great review - thanks.
I enjoyed your review and I'm very much enjoying this book. Thank you.
Correct Juliet. That's why Chritianity is a fascist cult.
welcome to our website:
===( h t t p : / / w ww . e b ay 2 1 . c om / ) ====

Q u al i t y is our D i g n i t y; Service is our Lift.

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33

Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16

free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
===( h t t p : / / w ww . e b ay 2 1 . c om / )===
The Corrections was great, This sounds wonderful too. Thanks for writing this.
I loved that book, one of my recent favourites actually. Freedom for me is all about dressing up. I know it's a bit off topic, but you should try it yourself. Even wearing a simple scarecrow costume at halloween can bring out the inner you, try it, you will love it.
thanks for sharing this post, it is really very interesting, i love this post by Franzen's during reading i realize that he is something of a genius about what makes us all mark., i am taking a time for thinking on it more, great job

dog training videos
I've been a logic kid my entire life, so I was always weary of one guy giving out gifts to 6 billion people in less than 24 hours, but...

I really found out when I was 8 or 9.

Teeth Brilliant
a Christmas gift for my father, which one is better? http://www.newflybuy.com ...
there are a lot of products on sale. Which one is better for 48 years old mom? Handbag,glasses or biniki? Please help.