I wrote Salon's traditional "Year in Politics" wrap, and my introspection featured a lot of thinking about Open Salon. I talked a little bit about how some extreme (and nasty) early Obama partisans got my back up, and how some of the kinder, smarter (in my opinion!) Obama supporters talked me down. I also thanked some Hillary Clinton supporters who were always kind and supportive to me.
Interestingly, a lot of the people I mentioned (and some I didn't, and thought of later, and probably should have!) wound up here, on Open Salon. I don't really think that's an accident. In my solipsistic way, I think part of the smart, searching, striving, embracing tone of Open Salon grew out of the nastiness of a short period of the primary campaign, when a lot of us, even (especially?) those of us who sometimes disagreed, were horrified by the rhetorical excesses of too many Democrats on the Web. Part of me can't believe Open Salon opened (for its early beta, anyway) in that crazy time; part of me thinks it makes perfect sense.
I'm aware I'm not posting as much as I used to on my Open blog, but I'm actually reading and lurking even more than I used to. Words can't really express how much I love what Open is and is becoming. Happy holidays, everyone. Thanks for everything.

Salon.com
Comments
I love you Sloan (don't be jealous Zerry).
I'm glad I stumbled upon OS, it was a happy accident.
You speak for me so often and so eloquently; it's a relief to know you are out there with a real voice.
thank you and wishing you and everyone in OS the best in the new year
Thank you, Joan!
I've never really written anything but a resume before, but the wonderful people here took me in as one of their own.
It's been a thrill for me to be accepted by so many great people, so I must humbly thank you. I wish you a very Happy New Year!
PS. You can lurk in the shadows of my blog anytime.
Thank YOU and OS members for inspiring me to want to write well, often and better every single time. Rated.
A wonderful article from our very thoughtful and insightful Editor in Chief. It illuminated a great deal that I found puzzling in the past year. Brava!
There aren't a whole lot of editors (I know of uh. . .NONE) who would publish something titled---"What I Got Right and Wrong in 2008"
Doing things like that, the gracious tone, the incredible ability to take a punch and still genuinely smile----I find it, and I know others do too, to be inspiring.
Open is a place where the community really does offer the kind of thought provoking and musically poetic
power that's bigger than any one voice. It's that kind of power that gets stuff done.
Happy Holidays to you---and here is to what we are all becoming!
Roger
Kelly summed up what I feel perfectly. Thanks for OS!
Amen
Open wasn't "spawned," it was born of creative excellence and marketing savvy, not to mention dedication to Truth, Justice and the American Way.
Happy New Year, Superwoman!
Thanks for your incredible work on Salon, and for giving all of us the opportunity to aspire to the excellence established by your thought-provoking and brave work. For myself, I thank you for the encouragement and support of my work on this incredible forum.
I admire your courage a great deal.......facing down opponents with a strong, informed, and confident reasoning.
Happy new year, and as Jimmy has mentioned, come by and play more often!
Affectionately,
G
I'm struck though, that you are so in-the-trenches about the process and the people and that you didn't draw back and speak even a little to the overall impact of Salon, and of Open Salon if it had any. Yes, it provides you with an opportunity to interact and maybe those stories are a more objective statement of your effect than just something abstracted away. I find people I know usually know what Salon is and a few might know Open Salon. I'd be fascinated if you knew any kind of stats or stories about whether anyone calling the shots reads these on a regular basis. As editor-in-chief, I mean, it would seem that some of your effect in politics is “just getting the magazine out,” “getting it seen by the right folks,” “focusing it,” etc.
And, incidentally, as long as you're beign candidly reflective, I'm curious whether you as editor-in-chief endorse, encourage, or merely tolerate the strange preference for highly sensationalized pictures and headlines that make the page, many of which seem the antithesis of any kind of reasoned/logical study of a political issue. I don't know if you'll agree with that one, but it seems like a giant disconnect in how the magazine is organized and a constant source of meta-buzz here at OS among those people who are struggling to get a serious message out.
paula
To God Almighty, thank you so much, I love you too, but I feel you are needed more on other OS blogs this week, so I appreciate your taking the time to be here;
Thank you, Monsieur Chariot, we all miss you but I notice your wonderful comments regularly;
And Kent Pitman, thank you for all your great work here. I'm not sure what you're asking about Salon and OS's wider public impact; you'd probably be as good a judge of that as I am! On the Open cover: I don't get involved with Open cover decisions, at all, but I don't see them distorting the content on Open. They're our best take at pulling together and dressing up our version of the best of Open every day, and of course that's subjective.
Happy new year, everyone!
Watch for some articles that I think you will like as soon as I learn how to post Word docs.
One thought I had about that would complicate your staffs' work but could offer many more opportunities for OS members, old and new, to get some recognition. Would it be possible to organize OS in the same way as Salon, with a main cover and then a series of topical pages? That would get a lot more people some recognition and would allow those who really want to focus on politics, or media, or cooking, etc. to direct their posts to those subjects through the tagging process.
Regardless, I am hooked on OS, and like many others I got to Salon because I was impressed with your cool and incisive comments on MSNBC.
Happy New Year, Joan.
Monte
The level of writing, exchange, debate, is at times spectacular. Amy T the other day was complaining because of the extremes of debate and passionate promotions of ideals. Complaint? I thought it was a finest hour!
These brilliant people, frequently with superior ideas, can this site somehow begin to use, promote these sterling examples, ideas, problems solved? Can this, in some small fashion, become a think tank and submit the fruits of our abilities to those that may be able to do? Can we lobby Congress? A huge chunk of this 'family' are bright enough to 'do' something. And as a group, the potential is staggering. Can we become a voice?
We have a magnificent playground here, for that I thank you. Can it become more? Should Special Editor's Choices be published in Salon proper and paid? There is another ambition.
Dean
A belated thank you: for your sense of humor, sense of balance and fairness, and for your enthusiasm.
Most of all, thanks for Open Salon.