![]()
Some doctors are now attempting to prevent intersex infants through off-label use of a synthetic steroid. This can, these physicians say, stop infant girls from being born lesbian or intersex (see below).
Here is a report on this bizarre Brave-New-Bigotry from The Advocate. (edited for length)
-----
"A Northwestern University report details dangerous experiementation in fetal engineering in which doctors use a synthetic steroid to prevent female babies from being born with 'behavioral masculinzation', a propensity toward lesbianism, bisexuality, intersexuality, and tomboyism.
"The paper, published in the Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, is authored by Alice Dreger [and others, see below], professor of clinical medical humanities and bioethics at Northwestern. It 'details extremely troubling off-label medical intervention employed in the U.S. on pregnant women to intentionally engineer the development of their fetuses for [so-called] 'sex normalization' purposes.'
"According to the researchers, pregnant women at risk for having a child born with the condition 'congenital adrenal hyperplasia' (CAH), an endocrinological condition that can result in female fetuses being born with intersex or more male-typical genitals and brains, are being given dexamethasone, a synthetic steroid, off-label, starting as early as week five of the first trimester to try to 'normalize' the development of those fetuses which are female and CAH-affected.
"Like DES, a drug widely given to pregnant women in the 1970s which was shown to cause cancer and reproductive abnormalities in children and is now banned, dexamethasone is a synthetic steroid. Researchers say that the dose reaching the fetus is 60 to 100 times what the body would normally experience and [yet] almost 90% of fetuses exposed do not benefit from it.
"[Many scientists] claim this is a dangerous experiment on pregnant women and their fetuses that may turn into a tragedy like the one experienced with DES. [Concerns include] reproductive abnormalities that [may] extend to second generations and higher rates of certain cancers."
-----
Findings were obtained from professor Alice Dreger of Northwestern University's medical school, Ellen Feder of American University, and Anne Tamar-Mattis, executive director of Advocates for Informed Choice. They note that male fetuses may also be affected by the synthetic steroid.
-----
NOTE:
"Intersex is the presence of atypical combinations of [congenital] physical features that usually distinguish female from male. An intersex individual may have male and female biological characteristics. Some people (whether physically intersex or not) do not identify themselves as either exclusively female or exclusively male."
--Wiki
Are American parents this uneasy?
Is our culture this cowardly, this averse to raising tomboys and lesbians that experimental time and dollars are considered well-spent...on this?


Salon.com
Comments
I'll tell you = they are sitting at home shoving chikin sammiches in to their hypocritical mouths.
I am not a "fundie" by any stretch but, I do believe that our lack of respect for life is a crime.
Using abortion on demand logic-it is none of your business what a woman does with her body, that separate entity has no rights. You seem to give it more humanhood because it is desired less because of some future perceived abnormality by mommy that you find repulsive. Mom's motive is none of your business.
You seem to want to give the baby more rights because you think the parent's motives are terrible-you sound selectively Pro-Life on this one.
However.. this hormone does cause brain damage, heart damage etc to everyone, CAH or not. What's more, CAH itself can cause severe health problems, but this drug does nothing about those.
What it will do, in the 1 in 8 where it has the desired effect, is to make the genitals more female, and the brain more female. It may actually increase the rate of transsexuality and/or androphilia in male foetusses. It definitely harms the foetus in other ways though.
P.S. I am very much female and spent most of my childhood up a tree, I was even climbing trees before I was 4 years old, so I don't understand the purpose for this, either. Are we really trying for Stepford? I hope these women understand that, if they are successful, they are preventing someone like them from being born. A woman of scientific mind, I mean. Their morals can go to the evolutionary dustbin, as far as I'm concerned.
R
It sounds like an SNL like ad " Never suffer from brain freeze again, eat ice cream and gelato without fear of doubling over in agony"-------check with you Dr first as some users have experienced temporary paralysis of their prominent hand simultaneouslywith an incredibly itchy anus which can be dangerous especially if you are operating a motor vehicle.
Forgive me if I walk around the actual drug and its ramifications while going to the 'seed' of the matter. Conception. Perhaps it would have been better had I chosen to write another essay but here goes:
When I was in my reproductive years..people were playing around with the timing of inception in order to get the desired sex of the child they were going to carry. People do have surrogates and women choose fathers with desired qualities via sperm banks. Gay parents have several options.
Ever see a monarch choosing a mate that was not going to produce good looking healthy heirs? Women lost their head over that issue.
Some people prefer to choose the children they adopt in order to "get" a child that they feel might be compatible with their family or belief system. I did. I adopted through an agency that matched children according to their faith, race and ethnicity. In the early 60s it was common practice. We wanted a child that looked like us.
The sexual orientation of a child may also be important to families. You and I know know that love should not have conditions....But the orientation of the children is a huge problem for some. Children raised in such homes often have tortured lives and my run away.
Therefore, I don't consider the practice of choice... bigotry. Something else....but not bigotry.
I do... consider the interruption/alteration of a growing fetus stupid and potentially harmful to both child and mother. It is odious. The thought of what if...needs to come before the pregnancy. However....
What if a woman was carrying a child that would only be 2 feet tall and she could take a drug that would give this child the opportunity to be 5 feet tall. Would that be okay?
I would like to see more people think before they have a family and understand that the child they have may not be the perfect replica of themselves. I would like to think that most people would think more than twice about bringing children into the world that they cannot care for. What we desperately need in this country is more respect for life before a child is conceived. In this respect our society has completely failed. Too many unwanted are aborted or left to fend for themselves in homes where the man of the night was a sex for pleasure partner and never the intended care giver or provider.
Thanks for giving me the microphone. I've left the stage.
http://open.salon.com/blog/artlouis/2012/05/31/a_poignant_consultation_at_an_abortion_clinic
I never dreamed that this would come true.
Abortion is a terrible thing, there are no two ways about it, but I have never been in favor of banning it, because often it is a necessary evil.
When it starts getting used for gender selection, or for other rarefied purposes such as you describe here, it could amplify public revulsion against it, and even bring about a constitutional ban.
I put gender selection abortion and this kind in the same bag.
R♥
Science to protect life,yes.
Science to manipulate the genetics of a fetus is a crime.
~R~
• more, far more, will I achieve; treading in the steps already marked, I will pioneer a new way, explore unknown powers, and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation.
o Victor Frankenstein “
It didn’t end well.
My mom, who got blamed for everything, poor old dear, bless her soul, sorry mom, said, “oh if we were all the same, what a boring world it would be.”
I’m bipolar. I am not, under any circumstances, supposed to say that, though. Out of pride , I ought to say “I am a person with bipolar.” Screw that. If I didn’t have that gene or whatever, I wouldn’t be the brilliant wonderful sunshiney person I have finally finally become.
I say, let them raise their freaks .That’s what they’ll be. On the playground, a perfect little specimen will be teased : “I heard your mommy engineered you! “ or something like that. Because the proportion of unengineered kids will always be greater. You can send them to posh sheltered private schools or whatnot, but then…they…will get sick and die. That is the way the human immune system works. Poor babes, they will be on antibiotics their entire lives.
I don’t think Mother Nature will put up with this.
My mom used to say, “Don’t you fool with Mother Nature!” …she meant herself, but also…more than that..
This can't possibly be good for either mother or child. And I say that as a straight woman who spent most of her childhood in jeans because they made it easier to play, roller skate and ride bicycles.
rated
Just wondering, Jon, if there were a prenatal test for homosexuality, do you think conservatives would bend their principles and approve abortion? Just for this one eentsy exception?
And what's next: Hormonal modification to ensure adult conservative voting preferences...?
Rated (as I shake my head).