-- Mark's unnamed Jewish woman, a friend to Jesus who places perfume on his head in the days before his murder --
---
The viciousness with which Rome of late has gone after American nuns for what it consider their hyper-focus on the poor and outspoken positions on the Ryan-Romney Budget proposals, health reform and women's health issues generally, as well as on more general economic reform, reminds me that a few serious scholars in the field of historical-Jensus research have more than once wondered above a whisper whether one of the four canonical gospels (and the first written), Mark's, could have been composed by a woman.
In brief -- and I'll give this fuller measure another time -- the Markan scene in which an unnamed woman places costly perfume on Jesus' head as he visits a Bethany household struck by leprosy...this is, by some historians, thought to be a signature, Mark's anonymous signature.
She herself, on this thinking, may well be Mark and if it could be shown to be, it'd be rather significant not simply because of all of the misogynous history it would challenge but because of what Jesus says specifically of her.
When, in the story, she's admonished by the men in the scene for presuming such a closeness, Jesus upbraids the men, telling them in effect that only she intuitively understands that his body may well shortly be in need of some perfume.
This is to say, only a woman, this woman, understands fully the risks Jesus has assumed through three-years' increasingly strident anti-poverty agitation, three years' repeated symbolic performances modeling his Kingdom of God program here-on-earth, performances rife with radical notions of equality in an empire and in the shadow of far-too-complicit Jewish political authority, both now increasingly dependent on the grinding rural exploitation at the core of systemic inequality, a slap in the face to a Justice-demanding Jewish God.
As one researcher has put it, whether or not one could ever really show that Mark was a woman, for the woman in this scene,
Easter came early that year,
that is, she seems thoroughly to understand the man's program and what it will surely cost him but that his agenda will survive his death, rise and live on.
Further, Mark has Jesus tell those assembled, that is, Mark tells his/her readers as well as the group in the scene what none of his male companions seem to understand: their friend is certainly going to die, and pretty soon, and for the God of Justice.
The scene ends, most remarkably, with Jesus telling the men that when the stories of his work spread (after he's gone) the stories will be told "in memory of her", that is, in her honor (not theirs).
Is there a more symbolic and fundamental raising up of marginalized women in all of our common religious literature? For in ancient Near East cultures poor women were often regarded as barely persons let alone as people to remember, to honor. Could this vignette be Mark's signature?
No proof will likely be found either way. Certainly by the time 'Mark' was declared part of an official canon (in 325 C.E.. at Nicaea) if the unnamed woman had ever been known or written of, the earliest known copies of 'Mark' do not say whether or not they had been scrubbed.
What I do know is that the American nuns who have objected strenuously to the new (male) oversight of their work have, some of them, started a nine-city bus tour under the leadership of Sister Simone Campbell. Here's a brief Associated Press piece on the new Nuns On The Bus Tour.
A group of Roman Catholic nuns has begun a nine-state bus tour protesting proposed federal budget cuts, saying it...felt called to show how Republican policies are affecting low-income families. The tour...started in Des Moines [is] organized by Network, a Washington-based Catholic social justice group criticized in a recent Vatican report that said some organizations led by nuns have focused too much on economic injustice.... The Vatican asked American bishops to look at Network’s ties to another group of nuns it is reorganizing because of what the church calls “serious doctrinal problems.” Sister Simone Campbell, Network’s executive director, said the...tour [is] in response to...the federal budget in Congress. “We’re doing this because of what’s happening on the Hill,” she said.
I know who's on that bus with those women; that rabbi hopped on this bus long ago.

Sister Simone Campbell



Salon.com
Comments
Though I will say that in the early years prior to one Cgurch, there were women in ldrshp positions in many, many Jesus-communities, incl some of Paul's House-Churches.
(By the way, I have forgiven you for
that horrific image from the other day..you know the one..
nuff said! yikes..3 inches...)
first of all , this means i am named after a girl! mark is my
middle name, cuzza st mark. Mom was going through a
religious phase then. Don't worry. It didn't stick, for her...
This i love much:"three years' repeated symbolic performances modeling his Kingdom of God program here-on-earth, performances rife with radical notions of equality "
Performance artist extraordinaire, our savior boy.
Much in need of perfume indeed
after the hot water he
found himself in..
Nuns on the bus! You go, girls!
Ah that Ratzinger. Makes me ashamed to be German sometimes.
R
i think i just love the 'idea' of mark as a woman, and as i understand it none of the authors of the canonical gospels identify themselves, so i guess i am free to believe it as being so. :)
I love this, btw. It's the nuns who are striving to turn Catholicism into a real force for good. It's the women, not so much the men, working on those economic issues you mention.
I applaud every loving action these intelligent women may make.
R
The extreme Christians take these stories and weave them into they insist we should all believe. I don' think that Jesus ever meant to say he was coming back to take a busload with him back to heaven. He meant that we should all get it together before we destroy the world and ourselves.
I believe he was married or in love with Mary Magdalene as she was a prostitute but he held her high just like other women. I also think it was his mother Mary that put the respect that he grew to have about women. I do believe there were women writing these stories because of who HE was.
Too bad he cannot come back and explain a thing or two to some of these radicals especially these republicans that want women bearin and birthin babies with very little say.
HUGGGGGGGGG
Even the stories ABOUT women in Jesus' life are from a male's perspective.
Clerics today might resent this because it challenges their beliefs.
and misunderstanding at the hands of the damn russians
and the chinese! cubans, too. ay.
he saw his shit a happening in germany.
well, something else happened there. some say nietzsche was to
blame. idiots!
i say we still got our hegel. they are still working on
figuring that old beer/coffee-loving mumblehead.
"Not curiosity, not vanity, not the consideration of expediency, not duty and conscientiousness, but an unquenchable, unhappy thirst that brooks no compromise leads us to truth."
Hegel's "Stammbuch" (Album)
Lezlie
Lezlie
The New Testament does offer a much more enlightened view of women. Too bad that view isn't shared by a lot of fundamentalist Christians today -- "wives, be subject to your husbands" is still the "natural" order and sex is still for procreation only -- women's duty, and they need not enjoy it; indeed, it's somehow unseemly if they do. No wonder we're so forked-up when it comes to sex.
As for the speculation about Markie, it ranks in there with the speculation that Jesus was gay. Interesting, but in my book, an irrelevant distraction from the real message, which damn few pay any heed these days, that is that the twin pillars of Jesus' teachings are pacifism and communism.
you're doing here a great job: denying Bly and his disciple James. Better than reuniting American boys with their father, who spends too much time in the factory, you should send them to the nuns to become, by a proper education in social values, a better man!
If you have to find in Bethany the argument for thinking Mark is a woman, then I know a lot of Markan texts to declare him a man.
The same construct could be applied to John. He didn't rely on Mark as source, and yet he mentions the woman of Bethany.
I guess if Mark could be a woman, there are enough reasons to assume the three other evangelists are also woman.
Would Jesus be on the bus?
There's a yes and a no.
Yes, Jesus got on very well with women.
No, Jesus wasn't about government or governors, certainly not to take side between Republicans and Democrats.
And Jesus didn't mind taxes.
Jesus was more of a one to one relation: you and your neighbor.
Being a construct themselves - Jesus and these men around him - a more important question is: would you be on the bus, Jonathan.
From your posts, I guess the answer will be: yes, I am!
I also like the way you help this Jesus slip into a physical body and let him take part in this action.
Whenever you speak of him,you manage to turn this historical figure into a contemporary person.
You are incredible.
Rated for Jesus among us,and for you as his deciple.
If he shows up,please let me/us/know.
You make an interesting point here.
"...damn few pay any heed these days, that is that the twin pillars of Jesus' teachings are pacifism and communism."
To be religious is a matter of definition,and I did not mean it in any specific way.
It is fascinating how much life you put into him,and to be quite honest:If he happened to come now in order to sort out the mess we are in right now,I would very much appreciate this.
Those old Church fathers, they really knew how to keep women subservient.