BlogShots

Jonathan Wolfman's Blog

Jonathan Wolfman

Jonathan Wolfman
Location
Maryland, Northwest of The District,
Birthday
January 26
Bio
Visit, too, please: www.talkingwriting.com www.doesthismakesense.com www.reortergary.com (pal talk news network)

JANUARY 25, 2012 7:18AM

ABORTION RATES -- Lowest Where It's Legal

Rate: 18 Flag

 

     Do liberal abortion laws coincide with lower abortion rates?

     The World Health Organization and The Guttmacher Institute, which study reproductive health, just published a paper in The Lancet, among the most respected medical journals anywhere, which says they do. The Guttmacher Institute reports, too, the more self-evident truth that "when contraception rates are high, abortion rates are low."

     Ironically, the study says, where abortion is illegal and/or heavily restricted, particularly in parts of Africa and Latin America, women have far more abortions, per capita, than in parts of the world where it is legal, such as Western Europe and here, in the U.S. And in South Africa, where abortion is permitted, the death rate for women who die as a result of unsafe abortions has declined 90% since abortion there became legal in 1996.

      World-wide abortion rates dropped from 35 per 1,000 women in 1995 to 29 per 1,000 in 2003. (A decline of six per 1,000 over eight years is significant.) From 2003 on the rate has steadied. A primary reason for the leveling, the study says, is a decline, globally, in access to birth control. Birth control has declined largely, the study indicates, because Western aid money for contraception has fallen off as aid to fight AIDS and malaria has grown.

      The increasing far-right drumbeat against choice and birth control are not only misogynistic. They defy science, ignore what we know about human behavior, and are destructive to women everywhere and to their families.

__________

[The chart is from the Guttmacher Institute. The percentages, by region, of abortions that are considered medically unsafe by Guttmacher and by the World Health Organization, are cut off from the chart on the right-hand side, so I have reported the 2008 figures for that below the chart.]

 

Note:  Unsafe abortions as a percentage of total, by region:

Latin America  95%

Africa  97%

Asia  40%

Europe  9%

North America  40.5%

Oceana  15%       

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
To some this may feel counter-intuitive. To me, it makes a great deal of sense.
The increasing far-right drumbeat against choice and birth control are not only misogynistic. They defy science, ignore what we know about human behavior, and are destructive to women everywhere and to their families.

yep...back to back alleys and carnage...how doomed are children born to those who never wanted them at all...so scary...thanks Jon
Muse no reason to be scared unless we sit on our collective bum. :)
Correct, besides the right knows no logic, only what is "best" in their own shortsighted little minds...
Ray so very true. Thank you.
Makes tons of sense. Thanks for this post.
Ideally I cringe at the thought of abortion, but realistically I support women's rights to decide for themselves.
Matt yes; and if this study is on the ball, being FOR choice diminishes the incidence of abortions.
Something like how marijuana use was a bit lower in the Netherlands where it's been quasi-legal.
This kind of statistic is in tune with Taoism and Hegelian dialectics. Namely, that if you press too strongly in one direction, one inevitably causes the direct opposite of what one intends. Sort of like Newtonian physics: "for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction."

It reminds me of "dry state" jurisdictions in the United States.

Strong Protestant/Baptist, anti-alcohol, pro-temperance, "dry-counties" in the deep south (and even the northeast) have the highest incidence of DUI, DWI and alcohol-related fatalities in the nation.

One might think this is counter-intuitive, too.

But if you study it, in depth, you realize it makes total sense.

For example, if one lives in an Irish/Italian working class neighborhood in South Philly, there are many local corner bars and pubs. You can walk there. You can get very drunk there, too. But you can also walk back home. No need to drive back home.

In the deep south, in dry counties, people have to drive very, very far just to have a few drinks. Since it takes a long time, and people rarely get to some of these large bars/dancehalls, they go "all out" when they get there, and get very drunk. Then they have a long way to drive back home, when they are done. This increases their chances of dying in a DUI/DWI related accident.

This dialectical truth just goes to show that the best policy is to LEGALIZE, LOCALIZE and REGULATE many things. The "public health" issue you are afraid of is often better achieved through legalization and regulation than through an outright ban. An outright ban just shows that legislators don't understand human nature.

r
Interesting statistics. Lots to think about.
Thanks again for my morning read.
RW the analogies are really interesting. Thanks!
Makes sense to me, thanks for reporting.
Sheila you're so welcome.
They do what they want and it makes me sick. I remember the coat hanger abortions and have they no conscience?
HUGGGGGGG
Linda they, yes, have no conscience.
Jon you and your figures. The Christian Evangelicals talk to God, who I assume mysteriously interprets numbers different than you and I!
Reminds me of the senseless arguments those against adoptees' rights to their original birth certificates used to make: they contended that if records were unsealed, then pregnant women would opt to abort rather than adopt out their child to prevent their 'right to privacy' being breached. Yet in the two states that have *always* had open records, Alaska and Kansas, have also had adoption rates that were higher than the national average and abortion rates that were far lower than the national average. Ya gotta love those strawman arguments! Well done, Jonathan.
Being right won't influence ideologues my friend, it just infuriates them. Sort of like thinking that teens will be abstinent from sex. It has never been that way, will never be that way and truth be told the vast majority of abstinence supporter had active secret sex lives in high school.
Thanks for another informative post.
Pro-Choice means women have the final say on what happens to our reproductive organs and this includes termination of pregnancy via abortion. Adoption is an option. Neither choice should be decided by men sitting on the bench.

If a person wants something bad enough, they'll get it. Legal or not. This includes abortion.

Prohibition doesn't work.
Preaching doesn't work. Teaching can. With education and health professionals, we can team up and teach our children that abstinance alone won't keep pregnancies from occurring. Passing out condoms and birth control pills alongside sex ed will substantially decrease numbers of unwanted pregnancies and lower the abortion numbers, and of course adoptions are still a viable adoption for those women not wanting to terminate pregnancy.
crapola...adoptions are a viable option...

back to my WIP
I'd heard this before, and I can attest to the Latin American trend. Abortions are very, very common down there, despite the image of the region as very Catholic. ... But only the middle class and wealthy can afford abortions performed by doctors. The poor are just straddled with large families and "home remedies."
On January 22, 1973 a law was passed that gave women the right to choose to have an abortion in a safe sterile place, if she so chose to. Rather than use a back alley, kitchen table butcher. The key words are choose, chose, CHOICE!

Those CHOOSE not to have abortions, still have the right to make that CHOICE. But who are these people, more often than not men, telling women that they cannot/should not choose? What gives "them" the right to make OUR CHOICES for us?

Women Unite for Reproductive Rights! R
B. Thanks so much for this.
bob :) i don't care what the mysogynist bigots think; it's not them I', trying to influence . It's us, to a sense of greater urgency.
On the other hand, I should also point out, just for the sake of intellectual honesty, that abortion is highly legalized and regulated in communist nations like Cuba and the former Soviet Union. I was reading a book called "Steeltown: USSR," last week and the author was discussing how the Soviet Union had the highest abortion rates on earth.

The author basically said that this was caused by a variety of factors. First, it was due to the legalization of abortion and full emancipation of women and reproductive rights in Russia. Second, condoms and birth control were not widely available (as was the same with all other forms of mass produced consumer goods).

In Cuba, which does have trade with Europe and Canada, condoms and contraceptives are widely available, but abortions are still widely used, often as an ex-post facto method of birth control. In fact, I think Cuba has the highest abortion-rates of any nation on earth.

I am pro-choice, but I am just trying to say that the numbers and causal analysis you cite may only hold true for the United States.
Thank you JW..

Rated for a clear eye.