Do liberal abortion laws coincide with lower abortion rates?
The World Health Organization and The Guttmacher Institute, which study reproductive health, just published a paper in The Lancet, among the most respected medical journals anywhere, which says they do. The Guttmacher Institute reports, too, the more self-evident truth that "when contraception rates are high, abortion rates are low."
Ironically, the study says, where abortion is illegal and/or heavily restricted, particularly in parts of Africa and Latin America, women have far more abortions, per capita, than in parts of the world where it is legal, such as Western Europe and here, in the U.S. And in South Africa, where abortion is permitted, the death rate for women who die as a result of unsafe abortions has declined 90% since abortion there became legal in 1996.
World-wide abortion rates dropped from 35 per 1,000 women in 1995 to 29 per 1,000 in 2003. (A decline of six per 1,000 over eight years is significant.) From 2003 on the rate has steadied. A primary reason for the leveling, the study says, is a decline, globally, in access to birth control. Birth control has declined largely, the study indicates, because Western aid money for contraception has fallen off as aid to fight AIDS and malaria has grown.
The increasing far-right drumbeat against choice and birth control are not only misogynistic. They defy science, ignore what we know about human behavior, and are destructive to women everywhere and to their families.
__________
[The chart is from the Guttmacher Institute. The percentages, by region, of abortions that are considered medically unsafe by Guttmacher and by the World Health Organization, are cut off from the chart on the right-hand side, so I have reported the 2008 figures for that below the chart.]

Note: Unsafe abortions as a percentage of total, by region:
Latin America 95%
Africa 97%
Asia 40%
Europe 9%
North America 40.5%
Oceana 15%


Salon.com
Comments
yep...back to back alleys and carnage...how doomed are children born to those who never wanted them at all...so scary...thanks Jon
It reminds me of "dry state" jurisdictions in the United States.
Strong Protestant/Baptist, anti-alcohol, pro-temperance, "dry-counties" in the deep south (and even the northeast) have the highest incidence of DUI, DWI and alcohol-related fatalities in the nation.
One might think this is counter-intuitive, too.
But if you study it, in depth, you realize it makes total sense.
For example, if one lives in an Irish/Italian working class neighborhood in South Philly, there are many local corner bars and pubs. You can walk there. You can get very drunk there, too. But you can also walk back home. No need to drive back home.
In the deep south, in dry counties, people have to drive very, very far just to have a few drinks. Since it takes a long time, and people rarely get to some of these large bars/dancehalls, they go "all out" when they get there, and get very drunk. Then they have a long way to drive back home, when they are done. This increases their chances of dying in a DUI/DWI related accident.
This dialectical truth just goes to show that the best policy is to LEGALIZE, LOCALIZE and REGULATE many things. The "public health" issue you are afraid of is often better achieved through legalization and regulation than through an outright ban. An outright ban just shows that legislators don't understand human nature.
r
Thanks again for my morning read.
HUGGGGGGG
If a person wants something bad enough, they'll get it. Legal or not. This includes abortion.
Prohibition doesn't work.
back to my WIP
Those CHOOSE not to have abortions, still have the right to make that CHOICE. But who are these people, more often than not men, telling women that they cannot/should not choose? What gives "them" the right to make OUR CHOICES for us?
Women Unite for Reproductive Rights! R
The author basically said that this was caused by a variety of factors. First, it was due to the legalization of abortion and full emancipation of women and reproductive rights in Russia. Second, condoms and birth control were not widely available (as was the same with all other forms of mass produced consumer goods).
In Cuba, which does have trade with Europe and Canada, condoms and contraceptives are widely available, but abortions are still widely used, often as an ex-post facto method of birth control. In fact, I think Cuba has the highest abortion-rates of any nation on earth.
I am pro-choice, but I am just trying to say that the numbers and causal analysis you cite may only hold true for the United States.
Rated for a clear eye.