Here’s the latest wrap-up of the Republican primary polls.
- Gingrich leads—toping one third of likely “R” voters in several states.
- Tea-partyers break for Gingrich, despite all they’ve advocated up to now.
- Religious intolerance is alive and well.
- More than half of Iowa caucus goers might change their mind.
- The Republican gasbag is deflating.
New polling by the Wash
ington Post and others reveals that some of America’s most conservative voters are still conflicted about choosing a Republican nominee. Surveying probable Iowa Caucus goers, the Post confirmed other recent polls that show Newt Gingrich opening a commanding (if minority) lead in that state. Polls reveal Iowa voters see him as the “experienced” candidate, a quality they found disqualifying in the last election.
Gingrich’s trending support is because he’s willing to make outrageous and outrageously derogatory claims about the president. Republican primary voters want a candidate that effectively expresses their outrage, even if it is largely based on made up things.
It is also likely that they don’t yet know about Gingrich’s long history of con-artistry, lobbying and professional misconduct. One wonders if the typical Iowa caucus goer knows that Gingrich was run out of Congress by his own party. I’d also wonder if they know that the Obama team is trying to steer them towards Newt.
Looking inside polls from several states reveals interesting details about the current state of the Republican race. It isn’t pretty. First, Gingrich owns tea party voters. In both South Carolina and Florida, self-identified tea-party voters (or “America’s only remaining patriots” as they prefer to be called) give Gingrich 40 percent margins. In Iowa and New Hampshire, tea-partiers are breaking for Gingrich in smaller but still significant numbers. When it comes to the tea party ideology, of course, Newt is the least conforming candidate of the bunch. For this voter, anger seems to trump any belief that they may have owned in the past.
The latest CNN-Time poll provides confirming evidence that religious intolerance plays a significant role in conservative voting patterns. While Gingrich polls among “born-again Christians” in the same percentages in his overall total, Romney gets only about half as much support from Iowa’s big evangelical community as from other Iowa Republicans. As WaPo’s Chris Cilizza notes, “Of all the different groups in the poll (old, young, rich, poor, men, women, etc.), none gives Romney a lower share of the vote than born-again Christians.” Although one can certainly argue a different cause, the differences are statistically significant. And if you don’t believe that religious bigotry plays a role in conservative ideology, just ask an atheist.
The most recent Washington Post-ABC poll of likely Iowa Republican Caucus voters pretty much confirms CNN’s findings. Likely voters break for Gingrich by nearly 2-1. Still, Gingrich’s support still tops out at one third of likely caucus goers.
And that brings us to the most interesting data in the WaPo poll. One third of likely Iowa caucus goers—an amount equal to all of Gingrich’s support—say there is a good chance they’ll change their mind by caucus day. When added to those who say that there is a less likely (but possible) chance they’d switch, over half of voters still haven’t locked in for any candidate.
Lastly, Gallup reports that only “half (49%) of Republicans now say they are more enthusiastic than usual about voting in next year's presidential election, down from 58% in September.” And in Gallup’s new daily tracking poll (12/8) Gingrich is down two points (34%) while Romney is up two (25%). Paul, Bachmann, Perry and even Santorum are also up.
Sorry Democrats, Candidate Newt Gingrich is still no sure thing. But what started out as an unwinnable election for Obama is starting to look like it could become his to lose.


Salon.com
Comments
Newt does harness the anger of Conservatives because he does such a good job of humiliating Obama and his policies. Sure he carries some baggage, but at the end of the day, the fact he got booted out of Congress probably helps his effort to be seen as an outsider. And if Fannie/Freddy wanted to pay you thousands of dollars to provide advice, would you turn down the money?
The issue with Newt is electability with independents. If the Republicans are feeling confident they choose Newt if the election is going to be a nail-biter they should choose Romney. Your enthusiasm numbers scare me, but when the pulpit is finally shared by Obama and the Republican Nominee, that should be all the Republicans need to get out the vote. I don’t think it matters who they nominate, anybody can do a better job than Zero, Owe-bama, Nobama, The Campaigner in Chief and the independents know this.
In general, I don't think how people vote is a very good indication of bigotry. If a conservative Christian doesn't vote for an atheist, perhaps it's just because the Christian disagree with the atheist on many issues. And vice versa. It doesn't necessarily mean that the one hates the other.
The Democrat stalwarts (liberals) are going to be choosy...and they are going to teach Barack Obama a lesson he won't soon forget. Some will stay home and not vote; some will vote for a third party candidate.
MY GUESS: Our next president will be a Republican...most likely, Newt Gingrich.
For all the Democrats HOPING for his nomination--be careful of what you hope for.
For all of us who want to see the success of a progressive agenda...we are screwed royally.
If the law is overturned Obama is going to be seen by any intelligent person as an abysmal failure.
Obama boxed himself in a corner when he decided people making up to $250K were the middle class and should not be taxed more. Great for the campaign. Since he had to keep a promise about incomes that liberals have never called middle class before and never thought didn't need a tax hike, he couldn't pay for Obamacare with a tax. If he had it either would not have passed or he would have broke his promise. But it would not be under challenge if he passed it a a tax. I guess he figured he would rather take his chances with the court rather then the broken promise.
If overturned he has accomplished zero in the minds of his supporters and even worse in the minds of opponents.
The law goes down, he goes down. And he will whine and cry on TV because such injustice for those he was trying to help while ignoring the Constitution. And then further ignoring it with all the special receptions to the mandate. Many unions, private companies and whole states are exempt because it would be too burdensome. The whole point was full participation so it would not be too burdensome.
These exemptions are another Constitutional violation.
The Equal Opportunity clause. This was not brought up in the original cases concerning the Commerce clause. I assume because he hadn't handed out all the exemptions yet.
I don't know legally if any now arguments can be introduced, but it would not surprise me that the Justices would allow any and all Constitutional issue to be heard. No sense waiting to hear a second challenge should the first one fail.
BTW while I am convinced it is unconstitutional. I am not convinced it will be overturned. I can see a possibility where the court will not strictly adhere to the logic, but be concerned for the disruption caused by overturning. They will never say that but I think it could happen.
Also I think this law can in no way be severable. It is al or nothing in my opinion.
They had four years, and they spent that time building and praising the Teabagger base instead of finding rational ways to challenge Obama. (There are many ways to do that, but some of them would be like shooting themselves in the butt; Obama's drinking at the same corrupt money trough as the GOP.)
Now it's general election time, and they realize that some of those Teabagger foundations of racism, hatred of the poor, and unquestioning support of the One Percent might not win them fans. People will be afraid if the Eye of Newt should fall on them, and redact, imprison and bankrupt them. But the GOP doesn't seem to want anyone else.