Errol Morris says that he sometimes pays his subjects

Over in Hitsville Bill Wyman has a fascinating post about the fact that Errol Morris actually paid Lyndie England and other "bad apples" to participate in his latest documentary, about Abu Ghrab. Morris has been widely lauded for scoring these interviews but had not disclosed that England got a check for her appearance until some journalists pushed him on the question. I suppose an argument can be made that given his stature Morris will likely profit from the film and that his subjects know that and want a piece of the action. But in my book if you call it a documentary, the subjects aren't paid beyond expenses. If they are paid, we as viewers need to know that. Right?

Salon.com
Comments
I will write about Pvt. England and the military culture that transformed her here on Open Salon soon.
Please don't anyone take this the wrong way, but Lyndie England has done women a favor by doing what she did, in that she helped put to be the stupid stereotype that women are less capable of violence, evil, etc. than men are. See also Condoleeza Rice.
But then what is a documentary? It's not exactly news, but its not a drama either. The limbo land of docs (which are often made to prove a point--a concept we as a society seem to accept) this might be ok.
I'll probably see this film. Morris' doc with McNamara is a masterpiece.