Should Rush Limbaugh Be On the Armed Forces Network?
Until his advertisers began departing in droves over the weekend, one imagines that Rush Limbaugh was having the time of his life.
His verbal attacks on Georgetown University law student and reproductive rights activist Sandra Fluke brought him the sort of attention he loves, the kind of outrage that allows him to rail anew against the supposed humorlessness or stupidity of his detractors and to pose as the victim of his cultural enemies.
Limbaugh may no longer do drugs, but he's still an addict. Consider how he escalated his attacks over the week: the more he was criticized, the more outrageous his comments became. Give him a hit of sweet, sweet controversy and he wants another, bigger hit.
At least until it started hitting him in the wallet. Over the past 72 hours, Limbaugh's show has lost at least seven major advertisers,including Quicken Loans, LegalZoom, Sleep Number, Carbonite, ProFlowers and Go To Meeting - companies who devote a major portion of their advertising dollars to talk radio.
In a rare attempt to act contrite and staunch the financial bleeding, Limbaugh released a statement on Sunday which at least used the words "I sincerely apologize to Ms. Fluke." It wasn't actually an apology, of course. In Rush's World, where he is never wrong, the national outcry was the fault of those who didn't *get* his art of illustrating "the absurd with absurdity." He allowed only that his "choice of words was not the best."
This may be enough to assuage some of his advertisers (although the CEO of Carbonite says it isn't), and if he can lower himself to show a little humility on his show this week, still others may return. It depends on the willingness of the public to keep up the pressure on advertisers and stations to hold him accountable for his words and actions.
One of Rush's biggest enablers has so far escaped attention: the Armed Forces Network. For years, Limbaugh's show has been beamed around the globe to service members, military support staff and families. Other attempts have been made to remove him from that network and have failed.
This is the time.
In his more customized attacks on Fluke, it's easy to overlook the fact that Limbaugh has a two-decade long track record of classifying women as inferior goods. This is the man who coined the term "Feminazi," who once stated that "feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream." In Rush World, most women are either babes, sluts or whores. They're cunning and manipulative or whiny and weak. There's not much middle ground.
Freedom of speech is not absolute. As a society, we've generally agreed that pornography, obscenity and hate speech has a limited place on the airwaves. Defining an entire gender by ancient (and usually pretty lewd) stereotypes as a way to keep them in lesser status is a form of hate speech.
So the question becomes: does Limbaugh's brand of misogyny really have a place on government-funded airwaves? Particularly when it's beamed to a military where some 30% of American servicewomen are sexually assaulted by fellow soldiers at some point in their deployment? Does he foster a view of women and their role in society that allows our servicewomen to be seen by fellow soldiers as comrades and equals?
No.
VoteVets, a coalition of veterens of Iraq and Afghanistan today released a statement calling on the Department of Defense to drop Limbaugh's show:
Rush Limbaugh has a freedom of speech and can say what he wants, but in light of his horribly misogynistic comments, American Forces Radio should no longer give him a platform. Our entire military depends on troops respecting each other – women and men. There simply can be no place on military airwaves for sentiments that would undermine that respect. When many of our female troops use birth control, for Limbaugh to say they are “sluts” and “prostitutes” is beyond the pale. It isn’t just disrespectful to our women serving our country, but it’s language that goes against everything that makes our military work. Again, we swore to uphold our Constitution, including the freedom of speech, and would not take that away from anyone – even Limbaugh. But that does not mean AFN should broadcast him. In fact, it shouldn’t.
Indeed.
Our military deserves better than Rush Limbaugh's brand of "discourse." We all do.


Salon.com
Comments
The mid-level officer ranks are sympathetic to the anti-homosexualism stance (and they self police their own iffy members in the latrines, those who are apt to adopt a 'wide stance' whilst dissimulating defecation in the nefarious attempt to make contact with their camouflaged desperate gay brethren in an adjacent stall for purposes of a depraved, furtive 'homosexual coupling'...wink). Only the senior, executive, and public relations oriented, political generals make the politically correct obeisances to the homosexualist agenda. The Marine Corps is still proud of its fag bashery, all the way to higher command levels. Rush is still their hero. Obama hasn't the guts to screw around with this culture war when he will need full military co-operation for brinksmanship with Iran. Maybe after the election.
I just added a statement from female veterans who belong to VoteVets, calling on the Dept of Defense to drop Limbaugh. They make a pretty compelling argument.
Can you imagine being a military family with teenage daughters and having them subjected to Rush's 3-day rant (with 53 separate insults) against Fluke for speaking up for women's health? Then knowing that your tax dollars are supporting this sub-human filth? Luckily, the radio, unlike Rush, has an "off" switch.
I've signed the petition and am passing it on. Good job!
Hopefully enough listeners and advertisers have rebelled.
Cas47, the only time I see the word "fascist" thrown around is when a conservative bully can't think of anything intelligent to do, so they resort to namecalling. That seems to be a trend in the GOP.
WE are all practicing OUR First Amendment rights by criticizing this unrepentant douchebag. WE are all practicing OUR First Amendment rights by telling advertisers we will not purchase anything from them. WE are all practicing OUR First Amendment rights by telling the networks to take him off the air.
There is nothing stopping il douche from speaking. He can't expect to say whatever he damn pleases AND get paid for it. Nobody else has that entitlement. The 1st Amendment guarantees NO ONE the right to have a radio show.
Certainly Rush's first amendment rights do not entitle him to a platform on armed services radio, and canceling that show based on it's quality and content would not be a violation of his rights, it would simply be intelligent.
I'd like to see Rush exercising his first amendment rights standing on a street corner wearing army surplus clothing and begging for change in some tiny rural town in a remote corner of Texas. That would really improve the quality of life for the vast majority of Americans if such a Limbaugh harm reduction program were implemented.
Our armed forces deserve to listen to something patriotic, not somebody who hates the majority of Americans, as Limbaugh does.
--Keith Olbermann said someone was a “mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick.” Olbermann receives great fan fare from the far left for his nightly talk show on Al Gore's TV network.
--Chris Matthews described Hillary Clinton as "witchy" and a "she-devil" due to her campaign against then Senator Barack Obama.
--Liberal radio host Mike Malloy called Michele Bachmann a "skank" and a "phony-ass broad".
It's tough to take Limbaugh's critics seriously about their stance when the same people were so lenient with the above examples. Is it okay for free speech to have bounds on the right, but not on the left?
---Your strategy would make sense if the critics would have went after the others BEFORE Limbaugh made his comments last week. Maybe they were busy for the twelve months between Bill Maher calling Palin a "dumb twat...cunt" and Rush's idiotic rant? Some sort of chronological order would make sense, but it seems that liberal men get a "Free to Be a Misogynist" card. Again, hard not be a skeptic of those who have been so offended in the past week.
cheap polo ralph Lauren
http://www.ralphlaurenbrandpolo.com/men-c-1.html
How does that overweight addict sleep?
Didn't Hitler's radio propaganda broadcasts teach us anything?
Nobody is paying for the programming. There are no commercials- go to YouTube and look for AFN Commercials. You see the programs are given free.
And, liberal radio is on, Ed Shultz...I think that's his name. I haven't listened to radio in two years.
If you were to watch the news channel you'd see everything- not just FoxNews.
Your article is uninformed- or slanted. And, just like you we can turn off the TV or radio when we do not wish to hear the crap.
I stopped listening to Rush about 10 years ago. I just could not contain my ire and disgust. However, you must know he is only here on the airwaves because of a loyal and dollared fan base. Many do listen to him.
I think our response to him should be what we'd do to an errant child. Ignore or isolate- everytime he is horrible. Only give attention when he's good.
Great post, Heather.
We do have the fairness doctrine. It's called ratings and paid ads. Once the ratings drop so do the ads. When they disappear so will the programming. It's fair because people get to listen to what they want to hear. People don't listen, you lose your spot.
If so, what ratio of hours on the air, prime time access, etc.?
If not, why not? ... no, wait, If not, WHY THE HELL NOT?????
Through all of these years he has continued to disparage and disrespect the President. The Armed Forces Network is the LAST place Limbaugh should have had a platform for his vile opinions.