The student movement which reached its 100th day on May 22nd was attended by half a million protesters including students, educators and people from many communities and businesses in and outside of the province was a strong movement that echoed its message in other parts of the world including New York, Vancouver, Calgary and Paris.
If you read none of this piece, I urge you please, to take a look at this link to have a modicum of fair and informed knowledge about what has been transpiring in Montreal for the last 101 days between students and the incumbent government of Premier Jean Charest. The rest of this piece will shed more insight with references and links to news from various media articles.
The student movement is and always has been a peaceful movement, which actually represents a large portion of Québec society and their values, and not only a fringe, radical movement of a few spoiled, self-entitled brats, which is the image the Canadian media is giving the Québec students by repeating the same broken record of an argument, that "Québec students pay the lowest tuition in the country. "
The student strikes are far deeper than what they seem on the surface. In fact a study into their recent history will easily reveal that the student strike is not simply related to increased tuition fees, but to much broader issues affecting all of society. Some of these important leading events were the Salon Plan Nord (where the contrast between the government's planned investment of 30 billion dollars or so for environmentally destructive development and potentially corrupt projects on Inuit land and their 'lack of funds' for education became clearer.)
In the light of Premier Charest's proposed increase of student loan limits but not freezing of the fees (which brought the issue of student debt to light), the education minister, Line Beauchamp, resigned, stating her reason for her action not as the consequence of the riots but that she did not see herself as part of the solution. She was immediately replaced by Michelle Courchesne, who immediately drafted and signed Law 78 which raises the fact that Mr Charest once again hides behind his ministers – rather than facing his responsibilities as the leader of a province and solving issues, but rather attacking the youth with police force that used clubs and pepper spray to subdue them.
History has demonstrated in many instances that power corrupts; and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Montréal has been living riveting examples of this during the last three months through her most promising potential: the students of today; the intellects of her tomorrow. Nations who try killing the spirit of their youth by burdening them with physical, psychological and financial scars, while their leaders spend millions of unaccounted and unnecesssary dollars to exercise their power are bound to fail in the long term. Mr Charest is only a provincial example. Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is no less corrupt and unscrupulous when it comes to squandering and increasing the annual federal spending to $276 billion — an increase of nearly 30 per cent, since he came to power in 2006.
Students are the conscience and the pulse of a society. We need to listen to them with open ears and unbiased hearts. They have limited means to express what they believe is right and is important for their future. Our generation cannot be too proud with the legacy we are about to leave them. The least we can do is allow them the right to free education and development of their potentials and intellect so that they will, if we are lucky, find solutions to the problems we have created so irresponsibly in our reckless life times.
Finally, I would like to share the following letter which was sent out by Professor Daniel Weinstock, Director of the University of Montreal, Centre for Research in Ethics, on the day of the march of the half million in Montreal to mark the 100th day of this movement.
* * *
An Open Letter to English-Canadians, who might be feeling that Quebeckers have taken leave of their senses.
An open letter to my English-Canadian friends. Please circulate in your networks as you see fit.
You may have heard that there has been some turmoil in Quebec in recent weeks. There have been demonstrations in the streets of Montreal every night for almost a month now, and a massive demonstration will be happening tomorrow, which I will be attending, along with my wife, Elizabeth Elbourne, and my eldest daughter Emma.
Reading the Anglo-Canadian press, it strikes me that you have been getting a very fragmented and biased picture of what is going on. Given the gulf that has already emerged between Quebec and the rest of Canada in the wake of the 2011 election, it is important that the issues under discussion here at least be represented clearly. You may decide at the end of the day that we are crazy, but at least you should reach that decision on the basis of the facts, rather than of the distortions that have been served up by the G&M and other outlets.
First, the matter of the tuition hikes, which touched off this mess. The rest of the country seems to have reached the conclusion that the students are spoiled, selfish brats, who would still be paying the lowest tuition fees even if the whole of the proposed increase went through.
The first thing to say is that this is an odd conception of selfishness. Students have been sticking with the strikes even knowing that they may suffer deleterious consequences, both financial and academic. They have been marching every night despite the threat of beatings, tear-gas, rubber bullets, and arrests. It is, of course, easier for the right-wing media to dismiss them if they can be portrayed as selfish kids to whom no -one has ever said "no". But there is clearly an issue of principle here.
OK, then. But maybe the principle is the wrong one. Free tuition may just be a pie-in-the sky idea that mature people give up on when they put away childish things. And besides, why should other people pay for the students' "free" tuition? There is no such thing as "free" education. Someone, somewhere, has to pay. And the students, the criticism continues, are simply refusing to pay their "fair share".
Why is that criticism simplistic? Because the students' claim has never been that they should not pay for education. The question is whether they should do so up front, before they have income, or later, as taxpayers in a progressive taxation scheme. Another question has to do with the degree to which Universities should be funded by everyone, or primarily by those who attend them. So the issue of how to fund Universities justly is complicated. We have to figure out at what point in people's lives they should be paying for their education, and we also have to figure out how much of the bill should be footed by those who do not attend, but who benefit from a University-educated work force of doctors, lawyers, etc. The students' answer to this question may not be the best, but then it does not strike me that the government's is all that thought out either.
And at least the students have been trying to make ARGUMENTS and to engage the government and the rest of society in debate, whereas the government's attitude, other than to invoke the in-this-context-meaningless "everyone pays their faire share" argument like a mantra, has been to say "Shut up, and obey".
What strikes the balance in the students' favour in the Quebec context is that the ideal of no up-front financial hurdles to University access is enshrined in some of the most foundational documents of Quebec's Quiet Revolution, in particular the Parent Commission Report, which wrested control of schools from the Church and created the modern Quebec education system, a cornerstone of the kind of society that many Quebeckers see themselves as aspiring to. Now, it could be that that ideal is no longer viable, or that we may no longer want to subscribe to it. But moving away from it, as Charest's measures have done, at least requires a debate, analogous to the debate that would have to be had if the Feds proposed to scrap the Canada Health Act. It is clearly not just an administrative measure. It is political through and through. Indeed it strikes at fundamental questions about the kind of society we want to live in. If this isn't the sort of thing that requires democratic debate, I don't know what is.
So that is why tomorrow I will be taking a walk in downtown Montreal with (hopefully!) hundreds of thousands of my fellow citizens. Again, you are all free to disagree, but at least don't let it be because of the completely distorted picture of what is going on here that you have been getting from media outlets, including some from which we might have expected more.
Daniel
---------------------
Füsun Atalay ~ Copyright © Will of my Own - 2012
* * *


Salon.com
Comments
It was the way up for the children of brick layers and cloth cutters to the middle class.
Free education is not an idea this old socialist will put away. Already public education is under attack everywhere - in many areas of this country your kids will get a quality high school education only if you send them to private (read schools for profit) schools.
As for college and university, we saddle our children with a couple of hundred thousand dollars worth of debt and then fifty percent of them can't find a decent job. Public education is being distroyed and wealthy universities hoarding their endowments, gouging their students and paying some profs and administrators a quarter million a year are helping to dig its grade.
r
". . .wealthy universities hoarding their endowments, gouging their students and paying some profs and administrators a quarter million a year. ."
That is part of what students are fighting for - it's all part of the elite sytem trying to protect itself regardless of what happens to the poorstudents with thousands of education debts and NO jobs to pay them off. I am all for free education. It is the best investment for a society's future. Thank you!
I'm so glad that you posted this Füsun. I had no idea what is going on.
;-0
.
"The new legislation imposes heavy fines on students, unions and their leaders for picketing or demonstrating within 50 metres of campus buildings, and requires protest organizers to submit demo routes for any gathering over 50, eight hours in advance, effectively ruling out spontaneous action."
A friend of mine is covering this every single day for the Canadian Press and told me several sections will be shot down.
Ma Belle Province is falling apart.
HUGGGGGGGGGG
-Sky, I can't believe you had no idea!
-Linda, don't worry about La belle Provence - we lived through the October crisis and lived to tell about it didn't we? Hugs to you.
Thank you for your fine report. R>>>>>>>
Thank you all for reading and commenting. I sent pms to some.
-Daniel, I'm not surprised you haven't heard any of this, for mainstream media is terrible for reflecting what really goes on. Thank you for dropping by and expressing your thoughts.
Appalling, how the old guard are trying to cover p their insincere motives while trying to keep those of us still trying fo the better from succeeding.
It's ugly news.
Rated
Most of all, I find it infuriating that comments such as this; "Quebec students pay the lowest tuition in North America, and therefore, they should not be complaining," which of course is meant solely to marginalize the issue, are parroted by ANYONE with even half a brain.
Voicing such an argument is the very converse of logic to begin with. “If I have to pay more, then so should you?” What the hell? Doesn’t it seem much more logical to say; “hey! I want to pay less too! Let’s get together and do something about that?”
But then that’s just me; maybe I’m the backassward fool here.
This reminds me of the things I frequently heard growing up in the 50s, 60s and 70s, such as:
during the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S.; “the blacks have it a lot better now than they used to; so they should just keep their mouths shut, or just go back to Africa! (as if their ancestors arrived here willingly while enjoying lobster and champagne on a Princess Line cruise ship);”
during the War in Vietnam; “America, Love it or Leave it!” UmmK? What does the war in Vietnam have to do with loving the U.S.?
during the hippie movement; “get a haircut and get a job, then you won’t have anything to complain about!” Uhhh, you old fart, you’re missing the point – I don’t want to be like you; apparently the length of hair is directly proportionate to the amount of brain cells one has, you buzz-cut moron!
There’s an acronym; “TANSTAAFL” – Their Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch” used to educate accounting and/or finance students to the fact that, while people will say something is “free,” someone, somewhere pays for everything and “free” always comes back to us in one form or another for us to pay. This is often erroneously used to stifle many issues ESPECIALLY education cost issues.
But! Those who use it to this end are in fact using it egregiously incorrectly, when they should be thinking the reverse of what they do, e.g. how much do we pay out in costs associated with a lack of “free” education by "passing the cost on to the students, thereby making it their responsibility and free for us"?
A double whammy (beware, I use very technical jargon) of volumes upon volumes of violent crimes costing individuals and tax payers collectively billions of dollars annually at minimum and that’s just the cost of the crimes themselves, add to that the accompanying system costs of policing, judicial and penal systems (although much of that could be cancelled out by eliminating the war on drugs) and it reaches light years beyond insanity;
Absurd health care costs associated with ignorance and depression-related illnesses because the undereducated are, well, undereducated;
A triple whammy (don’t say you weren’t warned) in lost wages, making it rather difficult to buy things to perpetuate this wonderful capitalist economy we have, resulting in lost tax revenues and the now necessary government social support required for the under educated.
TANSTAAFL indeed!
So maybe those over-indulging jackasses who seem to think that they shouldn’t be paying for education or in the case of a divided Canada, shouldn’t be allowing someone to have a less expensive education than they do should think a bit longer before they open their ignorant mouths; it’ll come back and get them eventually.
And all this doesn’t even begin to address the massive cost of the loss of freedom of the press.
I'm totally okay, just in another mode of thinking right now and it's not conducive to serious and heavy thought. Gotta laugh and love right now.
[using my best (and it's pretty good) Arnold Schwarzenegger impersonation from that famous Movie, "Terminator" :
Ah'll be baack. [vrooom! vrooomm!]
I have many ex-pat friends who won't return to their home countries due to changing politics. A dear friend has watched Holland go from being one of the most enlightened countries in Europe to just another control-freak government out to prove it is more conservative than it's neighbors (England and Germany).
The world is messed up. I'm gonna stay hiding out in China.
I am totally in support of the principles of the Student Movement. I believe, and hope, that youth and old alike around the country will join in and promote their views of Status Quo in Canada. I agree entirely with your analysis of the issues, they were well expressed.
The status quo is indeed a dismal one, where taxpayers are, without any choice, footing the costs of continuos wasteful spending in this country. G10 Summit extravaganzas, building of prisons, purchasing warfare toys, corruption in civil servant spending, and on and on.
We enjoy several social services in this country which are not self-funding but rely heavily on the tax pot. Examples are Health care, RCMP, Old age pension, Welfare, National defense, Public Schools. We see these services as essential. Why is University education not in this list. Are we not encouraging our youth to strive to learn, prepare themselves for taking over the future of this country. Why do fighter jets have more priority over education and self-betterment. What say do we taxpayers have in this decision?
I grew up in the sixties, and believe that our generation accomplished an impressive amount of social change in the past 40 years. We rebelled against our parents' values. Moral issues such as Women's rights, racism, sexual harassment, prejudice, gay rights, abortion, sex before marriage- all went through significant transformation, and all for the better! My generation also demonstrated, got abused by police and political "leaders" and media at the time. But we did not give up, and fought these issues relentlessly, as they arose. Imagine the irony of Mick Jagger, Paul McCartney, Elton John, getting knighted? The previous generation scoffed at them and refused to acknowledge their genius in music and personal merits at the time. We know better now, don't we.
I urge all of you to listen to our youth, guide them in difficult times of phenomenal social change, admit our mistakes, and work with them to try to correct them. There is a lot of young brainpower and energy out there...
Governments, Please stop police brutality, and treat our youth in a dignified and intelligent manner. Show leadership and maturity, lead by example. Start addressing this as a national issue, rather than point fingers at Quebec and promote further polarization of this country. Stop playing these events in political calculations.
WE NEED A TRUE LEADER!
an ex-pat Ontarian
What a spokesperson they have in you!
I'd no idea this was going on and I am in your debt for this. Rated.
We must support the rights to demand proper channels to hold such protests.
We must support the rights of freedom of the press to direct our attention to these protests.
I have been aware of the ongoing protests Fusun. And reading on what is happening in Canada.
I thank you for bringing this issue to a broader audience.
She is in practice now and has a great paying job for life.
In contrast (exactly what the students in Quebec are protesting) most young adults cannot expect to be able to pay for it and are relegated to less expensive alternatives with no prospect or assurance they can even be employed. Quebec's media portrayal is shameful but predictable as with any politically motivated activity. Hell I know students that have applied for jobs with me and HAVE a college degree (and debt) but read on a 5th or 6th grade level and couldn't find their ass without an app. Entrenched money and politics are hard to break. Hopefully the students in Quebec will win their quest. In America though they have been amusing and distracting young people and stealing an education from them and the ones that truly want to learn can't. Great post.....o/e r******
The open letter brings up so very many good points - especially the need for reasonable debate and not a quelling of opinion and action.
Thank you so much for always shining the light on such crucial issues. Rated with admiration.
I've been following this on the CBC, which has devoted considerable resources to coverage, and has consistently pointed out that the issues are far more widespread than tuition fee hikes. They include the investigation just getting under way into organised crime and the construction industry, bribes and general thuggery.
I've seen student leaders and ordinary citizens interviewed, giving well-reasoned and articulate responses to questions ranging from how long this will last to their discontent with the Charest government and this latest attempt to throttle debate and dissent.
And, while of course there has been reporting on instances of the police being attacked and of students still attending classes being intimidated, the coverage I've seen has been balanced, fair and, insofar as can be the case with such a broadly based protest, comprehensive.
Some of the comments are worth a distinct post on their own. Thank you!
Boomer Bob - Your comments are right on every point. As a frim believer that ignorance is the root of all evil, I could not agree more with you that the staggering health costs are the direct results of undereducation.
Christopher - I know you'll be back. I'm tickled that for once I wrote something almost as long as you might. Be good my friend.
Stillgreen, Thoth - Thanks for your comments.
Youngsih person in Montreal - I am extremely touched by your passion, insight, articulation and analysis of the situation as you expressed it. I wish you had written this post as your comments certainly explain mine far better. Thank you very much for taking the time and commenting. I believe that you are a good representative of the majority of youth who have been fighting relentlessly on this mission and I wish them all the victory they so richly deserve for them and for their posterity.
Kate - Hiding our heads in the sand doesn't do much good, but to each her own. Thanks for reading.
Loverofbooks - Thank you for your time and another riveting comment. You make many valid points about our generation, what we have learned fromour own experiences and why we should indeed support this movement rather than sit on the sidelines criticising students. Thank you!
Jonathan - Thank you, as usual, for your open mindednes.
Mission - You are welcome. Thank you for reading and commenting.
Erica - Absolutely. Education should be an equal opportunity, available to eveyryone regardless of their financial status.
O/E - Your example demonstrates how a good education can serve well, but one should NOT have to kill oneself just to obtain scholarships and work day and night just to pay them off up front. I hope you're right about Quebec students winning their fight. Thank you for dropping by.
Michelle - Thank you, it's lovely to see you here with your comments.
Mary – Thank you.
Tg – I don't know what you mean. I'm not familiar with Wisconsin politics, my friend.
Mary-Ann – Canadians hardly pay low taxes at all. That is a total misconception. In Quebec alone we pay a sales tax calculated on first a Federal tax levied on the item and then a provincial tax added upon the already taxed total. Where else do you pay tax upon tax? Unlike Americans, Canadians cannot deduct their mortgage interests from their income taxes – just another example. Besides, more than about free education, this is about government's accountability of their reckless spending of peoples money.
Boanerges - I understand where you are coming from. I am part of the media too, just not mainstream by choice. I cannot deny that greater media is still controlled by big wigs and not eveything that transpires is shown unless one investigates in search for balance.
Don’t approximately 70% of the population oppose the strike?
Don’t approximately 70% of the Montreal students oppose the strike?
Where strike votes have been taken, have they ever been by secret ballot?
Weren’t the tuition hikes first proposed a few years ago?
Even after the increases won’t Quebec tuitions remain the lowest in Canada?
Isn’t the Quebec government facing proportionally the biggest deficit and carrying the biggest debt in the country?
Doesn’t Quebec receive proportionally the highest rate of transfer payments from other parts of the country?
If it’s true that Quebec’s finances are in the most precarious state and they’re already receiving the largest subsidies from elsewhere and the tuition rates are now and will remain the lowest, a tuition hike doesn’t seem so out of line to me.
I just learned that the students of the University of Ottawa have occupied the university offices to oppose tuition hikes in the footsteps of their Quebec counterparts. You can read more at the following link:
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/krystalline-kraus/2012/05/activist-communiqu%C3%A9-ottawa-students-occupy-offices-universi
Why was the letter written only to Anglo Canadians? Aren't most citizens of Montreal/Quebec bilingual? Or is the division somehow a cultural one masquerading as a political one? I would love for you to write more about the unique tensions between the English and the French.
None of this is making the mainstream news in my region. I knew nothing of this protest and here there are a half million people in the streets of Montreal, at least according to the student who commented above. Is the news, in fact, being suppressed, even in the U.S.?
Lezlie
Stim, Sarah, Jeanette - Thank you for reading and your comments.
DandyLion - Your questions should be answered if you read the link i provided in the text.
Congrats to you, my friend!
This is a key, important point. The protests have morphed into something bigger, and even more important. And it should only be the beginning. As Marty’s Husband wrote above, “the cognitive dissonance of the world's government is coming to a head...it's happening everywhere.”
A lot of comments here have been about the state of finances in Quebec, but I go back to your title....
Is freedom of press under attack in Montreal?
Honestly, in my opinion, not all that educated or brilliant....yeah......I think "under attack" is not far off.
The question I have...still pondering as I read this....is "why?"
Am I missing something here?
Second, part of the problem with the political situation in all capitalist countries right now is the pseudo-left. This is the left that stands by occupations and protests on the one hand while trying to funnel the passions represented by these events back into a moribund parliamentary politics. We're past that in many ways, although I don't think one should entirely discount it.
Still it strikes me that even the students in Quebec buy into this myth of call-and-response. If you protest, and make your voices heard, power will have to respond eventually in some kind of productive way. Or perhaps the opposition, if they're put in power, will do the right thing and abandon the failed positions of austerity and punishing, repressive laws. These have proven to be false in both Europe and America, where opposition parties continue to lie and collude with capital and continue the policies of neoliberal control states.
So the real problem does come down to the state, and here, I'm afraid, even some of the legitimate left are still lagging behind the multitude. Noam Chomsky, for instance, for all his intelligence, continues to insist on the impossibility of fighting the state head-on. He's become one of the best propagandists for the state by constantly going on about how powerful and violent it is, how it can't be abolished, how even thinking about abolishing the state in its present form is, well, unthinkable. I think that's grossly stupid.
It's like we're trapped in a very confined space with a wounded tiger, and one side is trying to make plans on how to kill it, while there are others who keep complaining how this is impossible, how it can't be done, no matter what. But what is their alternative exactly? There is no legitimate opposition in parliamentary or so called democratic politics. Middle class solutions have reached a dead end. So they're reduced to making plans for how to sit down and have tea with the tiger. Which is more ridiculous?
In other words, in many ways, we don't have a choice. This holy-grail type belief in choice is misplaced. Contingency is by definition quite limiting, and we live in very contingent times. For that matter, so do the ruling classes, and so does the state. Acquiescence, collaboration, these really are not options, because they're totally ineffective, even more ineffective than the alternatives, and also because state regards those behaviors as EVEN MORE suspicious. The state, even though it's not a subjectivity, is the most paranoid of the paranoiacs, as laws like this one in Quebec demonstrate. And nothing sets off a paranoiac like agreeing with him.
Continue the fight. See it through. Never, never make the mistake of settling on some kind of partial solution. Keep expanding and expanding the implications. And then, expand them some more.... Really, what else can you do with a wounded, pissed off tiger?
Rated.
All over the world
When will they listen?
Will they listen?
How bad does it have to get before they listen?
Last night I heard CBC interviewing people who do seasonal work about the new regulations about Employment Insurance.
Why does police brutality always seem to happen when people protest? It seems the police are closer to the people that demonstrate than they are to the leaders who send them to commit this brutality.
Excellent post.
rated with love
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/25/world/americas/canada-hundreds-arrested-in-quebec-at-a-protest-over-tuition-increases.html
-------
@ Spence Blakely - You may like to look at the following links if you are interested. Thank you for your comments.
http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/quebec-law-breaches-canada-s-international-human-rights-obligations-2012-05-26
http://www.lapresse.ca/le-soleil/opinions/points-de-vue/201205/23/01-4527774-loi-78-un-odieux-detournement-de-lesprit-des-chartes.php
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/05/24/john-moore-its-the-older-generation-thats-entitled-not-students/
It was one of the founding fathers who lamented how terrible it would be if all people thought they were equal. Thomas Jefferson even suggested that "common folk" should not even be counted as part of America. The 1% have been around a long time.
Lawyers march against Bill 78
“Hundreds of lawyers hit the streets of Montreal Monday to show their displeasure with Bill 78.
They walked, in full court regalia, from the courthouse to Emilie Gamelin Park Monday afternoon.
"We have some people who support tuition hikes, some people who are against it, but what we are concerned about is as lawyers, as notaries as jurists, what we are concerned is that this law is attacking some fundamental civil rights upon which our constitution relies," said Remi Bourget.”
Source: ctvmontreal.ca
----------
Premier Jean Charest met with student leaders, before dozens arrested at Quebec City protest
Source: http://montreal.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20120528/mtl_negotiations_120528?hub=MontrealHome
-----------
Concordia University Political Science Professor Harold Chorney was highly critical of the Charest government's handling of the tuition issue.
Source: http://montreal.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20120526/mtl_chorney_120526?hub=MontrealHome
Dr Bramhall - Thank you for commenting. If you ever decide to write about in how it is in New Zealand,please send me a note.
May 30, 2012
Students, and government go into third day of talks.
http://montreal.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20120530/mtl_talks_120530/20120530/?hub=MontrealHome
---------
A CROP/Radio-Canada poll released late Friday shows 60 percent of Quebecers oppose Bill 78.
http://www.radio-canada.ca/sujet/Droits
scolarite/2012/05/25/001-sondage-crop-crise-etudiante.shtml
----------
Nonetheless, great report Füsun!