
Image courtesy of A1 K9 professional dog trainers.
"The subject who is truly loyal to the chief magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures." -- Junius
"You're loyal like a dog," a friend once told me. I'm still not sure if it was a compliment, but because she is one of my oldest and dearest friends, I chose to take it that way. In a postmodern world where relative morality is all the rage, my fascination with the perception and value of loyalty remains intact. I was taught early in life that loyalty is one of the benchmarks of a moral person. Loyalty to spouses, friends, family, church, employers, employees and country was a given. Of course, even then not everyone was loyal, but to be disloyal was considered a much greater transgression than it is now. That time was not so very long ago. The expression "a man's word is his bond" was not steeped in irony and accompanied by a sneer.
The dictionary defines loyalty as faithfulness, steadfastness, devotion, allegiance, trustworthiness and dependability. Mothers are almost always devoted to their children, they're hard-wired that way. Siblings may fight bitterly, then defend one another with equal passion. Spouses are not so loyal -- infidelity and divorce rates tell a grim tale. Since the downsizing/race-to-the-bottom mentality of North American society that began in the 80s, employers and workers are rarely loyal. Employers still demand loyalty, but increasingly, they are not getting it. Despite decades of employee downsizing in the midst of record profits to move operations to Third World countries -- so much for loyalty to country -- or to "streamline," employees still struggle with conflicting feelings about those who sign their paycheques. This is less true of younger workers probably because they've watched their parents lose jobs, and they're born of a generation permeated with the materialistic narcissism of the "I've got mine, Jack" dominant culture. And yet many of the young people I teach still express a need to be loyal, even if they know it won't necessarily be rewarded.
It's a dog's life
What inspires blind loyalty in some people and not others? Some suggest that it's a fear of abandonment. People who haven't known much stability in their lives cling to what they have even if it's toxic to them. Others attribute a more healthy kind of loyalty to strong moral character, but as my friend noted, what's the point of being loyal to people who don't care about you? I think it's more complicated than that. People want to be loyal because it is easier to live with degrees of certainty than in a vaccum. Most of us yearn to believe the best about people no matter how many times we've been disappointed. It is possible to be aware of human frailties and remain loyal, although it's not always easy. This is where honour, another old-fashioned concept, comes into play. Those who scoff at loyalty tend to view life through a lens of "what have you done for me lately?" rather than collaboration to the benefit of both parties. There is also loyalty to self. For me, this means staying true to my principles no matter how much harder it is than doing what others want. This has cost me jobs, money, romantic partners and even friends, but I have not regretted it -- much.
In an age as cynical as ours, loyalty is often dismissed as old fashioned, self-destructive and even stupid. And yet the dog, revered for its loyalty in western culture, remains man's best friend. Nobody said human nature was easy to understand.


Salon.com
Comments
it should only end after a betrayal, and even then, probably more than one; it depends on the betrayal's effect, and the calculation behind the betrayal.
No, in the late 20th - early-21st century, the word "loyalty" has undergone a major change. Inherent in that word, as you point out, is a sense of morality--right vs. wrong. But in an age that is media driven, loyalty is relegated to a brutal gang mentality. None of it has as its backbone (ask any pet owner) the virtue of AFFECTION or love which is reciprocal.
WTF: who is this Emma Peel 2 ???????????? I demand.....loyalty.....
I suppose you could express that as being more loyal to your principles than to people. Which isn't easy.
Confusion!! :D
"Employers still demand loyalty, but increasingly they are not getting it."
I wonder why? GASP! ;)
My previous employer taught me some great lessons, one of those is, never ever give 120 percent, they won't even give you 5 percent.
Another is, be loyal enough to keep your job until something better comes along, then jump ship and flip them the bird. They'd do the same thing to you, and will, the first chance they get.
Also, something about kicking them in the balls, but well, they don't have any...
What?
:D
Rated.
I have suffered disloyalties in my life, but I don't let them change my principle which can be summarized in the words of Ada Velez-Boardley: Loyalty is the pledge of truth to oneself and others.
I also agree with Designanator that cats are very loyal animals - at least I've been blessed in the cat department.
Relevant post.
♥
"Buts first we make sure we're in the will!" the dog answers back.
"But who will feed us and tell us night night stories?" The monkey, the voice of reason, asks.
"We'll hire somebody!" they both growl.
Boohoohoo!!
Monkey rated!!!!
Emma, loyalty is fine and wonderful, but it needs to be deserved... Dogs keep on being loyal no matter what, poor creatures...
I like the ideas you post about and question the reasons I continue to remain friends with several. Yet I find my lists are shrinking as time goes on.
Loyality is a strange misunderstood human trait and yet the dogs have it too. You make me think Emma. Thanks for this and write more girl. I have missed ya.
Nicely outlined, both defense and offense.
I see loyalty as a virtue but not an unqualified one. Were the Republican congressmen who did NOT vote to impeach Nixon being loyal to a fault? How much credit do the loyal SS officers who supported Hitler to the end merit? Should I have ratted out married colleagues who were having affairs? It seems there are higher principles and that the virtue of loyalty depends on what one is loyal too.
Thought-provoking article and nice to see a non-meta post from you.
"Do unto others as you would have others do unto you."
If loyal you are to others, then loyalty will come back to you tenfold.
A sense of loyalty is taught, I believe. A special kind of paying it forward, in kind.
I believe that this applies to friendship, love, business -- whatever human relationship that can be imagined. Norwonk and others have got me thinking that perhaps my essay should have been about honour, not loyalty, although I believe they can exist together.
"Most of us yearn to believe the best about people no matter how many times we've been disappointed."
Too true, but there's a limit to it for me, after which loyalty is just an exercise in masochism. I'm loyal as a dog (that's a compliment as far as I'm concerned), but too many kicks and not enough scratches behind the ears and I'll find some other porch to lay under. :-)
There is still good news about marriage.
People still do unto others even to those who do throw others under the bus. Nothing blind or stupid about this form of loyalty. Whether we speak the language of quantum physics or refer to proverbs of indigenous peoples we can't escape the fact we are all connected---like it or not. We are our brother's keeper.
"With all things and in all things, we are relatives". Sioux
Yeah, we live in a post-modern cynical age but it is passing away----the changing of the guard has started.
Oh, if it's okay with you I want to tweak the part of about a man's best friend being a dog: A good man's best friend is a good woman and add a dog a best woman friend for the wife and guy friend for the husband and you have heaven. Maybe that is heaven !
The dictionary defines loyalty as faithfulness, steadfastness, devotion, allegiance, trustworthiness and dependability. Mothers are almost always devoted to their children, they're hard-wired that way. Siblings may fight bitterly, then defend one another with equal passion. Spouses are not so loyal -- infidelity and divorce rates tell a grim tale. Since the downsizing/race-to-the-bottom mentality of North American society that began in the 80s, employers and workers are rarely loyal. Employers still demand loyalty, but increasingly, they are not getting it.
If you stand back a tad the cctv will have a better view.
Regards - Steed
Rated, Liked, Linked.
Loyalty is about commitment and mostly about giving a damn. This isn't a world where we give so much as a fig, much less a damn about anyone but yours truly. I cringe when I read about people looking to hire killers to snuff out spouses. I think to myself why not get a divorce? I'm not stupid. I know it's not enough to do the dump, they need to turn a profit with it, too.
So we've not just lost our sense of loyalty and commitment, we've lost our bearings entirely I think. Someone I thought I knew said something recently that floored me. He suggested that if he had sufficient funds, he would walk away from his entire life, children, wife, job, obligations and start fresh. START FRESH!
How is this starting fresh? Yet, we can do it in this day and age, without so much as a blink of an eye. Dump the old, on with the new! Look back at your convenience.
It is a sad place, our global modern high tech go for the gold world. I'm glad I'm old. Or older. I'm glad my friends are my friends and my family is my family. But I'm glad I'm not going to see this world in it's continued downward spiral. As it's always been, the worst is yet to come.
My only regret is I won't read the historical accounts of our times. But I'm glad I won't be living in the world being created now, as I type. Very much so.
When Medussa, the ugly gorgon, who turns men to stone, comes into existence as a result of disloyalty, is slain what emerges is Pegasus, the winged horse of creativity, and the Sword of Discernment.
In my life, that "myth" has proven to be true.
I kind of wonder if the blind loyalty of some people is that of those in an abusive relationship as alluded to in the blog. It's someting known no matter how bad.
People were ,and still are blindly loyal to Adolf Hitler and other historical monsters, no matter how much evidence there is of atrocities committed.
People stay with companies for years no matter how poorly they are treated. And I do mean poorly. Been there done that won't go back.
The question of blind loyalty becomes truly relevant this week.
With Penn States beloved coach Joe Paterno knowlingly NOT following through with reporting the rape of a juvenile by a staff member we have people siding with him and elevating him further to god status in the face of proof and admission of guilt.
There was a mention of honor. Supposedly Paterno instilled great qualities in his players. They claim. What kind of man tries to sweep this under the rug? What kind of man looks the other way so as not to hurt his reputation, or the reputation of the school? Or for the game and his own glory?
The type of man is one with no honor. No morals. No ethics. Only ego. Only pride. Only a narcissistic view of his own worth.
The type of people who would support a monster such as this are no better than slaves. Fools who would give their loyalty to a monster who allowed children to be raped and did only the barest he needed to do, he thought, to legally cover himself. Fools who are in the thrall of a monster because of a game!
I wonder how many of his current players have enough self respect to walk away?
Personally I would be loyal to someone who walked away from the monster. Why? Because they stood up for morals, justice and ethics. In other words because they earned it.
with love, from your loyal friend...
Feb 09, 2011.. still alive here in November :D.
Rated for longevity (and the real you ;).