JUNE 24, 2012 4:22AM

Making Best of America's Maybe Lose-Lose Egyptian Election

Rate: 1 Flag

In one sense of course it isn't America's election in Egypt at all. Some mainly though not exclusively on the Left will argue that to even think such a thing is the actual problem in American foreign policy.

Yet, America has provided and provides a large amount of economic and military assistance to the Egyptian state, and has done so moreover in pursuit of the vital end of peace between Israel and Egypt, the last time such peace having failed generated mobilization of six divisions of Russian paratroopers, massive Russian fleet movements with tactical nuclear weapons, and an American move to DEFCON 3; that's what happened in the Yom Kippur War in 1973.

Thus, one way or another America has an interest in the Egyptian elections, and so it is rather a question of what that interest actually is and how we pursue that interest.

The Muslim Brotherhood candidate was leading the race in the early returns, and yet who one might call the "regime candidate" allegedly pulled ahead, and all the while there was the curious episode with Mubarak's health, one day on life support, the other vanishing from discussion.

Meanwhile large crowds have gathered at the site of the protests against Mubarak at Tahrir Square, awaiting an announcement from the military as to who won the election that was supposed to have been made Thursday.

Obviously, America would prefer a government in Egypt that was familiarly democratic in the sense we know it, and yet that isn't going to be the case in many ways with the Muslim Brotherhood, if not in all ways.

As to women, what the Brotherhood will want objectively speaking will stick in the craw of many Americans, and yet, is military rule better as to human rights, overall?

Similarly, if there is a Brotherhood government, whatever protestations that they may make, clearly they will be less friendly to Israel than Mubarak was, if most Egyptians thought him an Israeli puppet, and hated him because of that in not a small number of cases, always the argument for Israel to come to a deal with the Palestinians, if that takes two to tango too.

When you look at the real choices in Egypt, it has a decent case of being lose-lose for the United States.

We lose if we greenlight a full coup, as to being hypocrites, which might be necessary if things get ugly with the announcement of a Shafiq victory, as Brotherhood candidate Morsi's supporters may well take to the streets in a violent fashion and then go underground like the FIS did in Algeria.

30,000 people died in Algeria when that happened, best case.

Of course, such talk could be a bluff, if Sadat was killed by Brothers who took that path, a path also trodden by four of those on planes a certain day, and by Ayman al Zawahari, now in charge of Al Qaeda too.

If we become more of a target for Arab and Muslim hatred for having encouraged a bloody coup, bound to be perceived in certain quarters as at the behest of the Israelis and their supporters, the blowback factor would be high: lose.

And yet, if we greenlight the full transfer of power to the Muslim Brotherhood, that may well lead to a rise in Islamists everywhere greater than what has transpired to date, and in fact generate more conflict with Israel, which would be possibly an even more dangerous form of blowback too, if all of this again points to the interest in a settlement between Israel and the Palestinians, if there's not the slightest hint of that in the card now: the march of folly.

How you chose says a lot about who you are, in that you either accept the risk of being a naive fool or a bitter old man, in effect.

So which will we, and which would you?

I would take the chance, in that it creates strategic pressure on Israel to do a deal, if it also creates an even greater need to put a gun to Iran's head that is real too, i.e. actual military deployments to Diego Garcia, as the last thing we need is an Israel that sees a Brotherhood Egypt, pressure for the "Brotherization" of Syria, and any vacillation with Iran, if the Arabs then have to pressure and give Abbas cover, or we will all regret the Arab Spring soon enough.

finis

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Well, well, well. The Middle east becomes curioser and curioser. As you know Don-san I'm supporting Russia/Iran now for personal, entirely selfish reasons. Like Volodya and the Mullahs I NEED oil prices to go up drastically soon because I bet some of my own marbles on that outcome. I thank the Goddesses that the Russo-Syrians splashed that Turkish Delight jet, let's see what Erdogan, whatever the fook his name is, will do. Betcha the US will stay out of giving any guarantees to the Turks. Let them ratchet up tensions with Syria, that will mean Volodya iz gonna settle with the Turks by increasing Russian air patrols on the northern Turkish border and bringing in more support to Syria by maritime resupply. Obongo don't have the GUTS to go toe to toe with the Russkies now. Ha ha ha, the November election ties Obama's hands. Volodya will play that weakness to the hilt.

Iran needs to start stirring up Shia militancy in the Saudi oilfields. You know that in Iraq so far this month the death count of Shias in bombings is way up. Russia/Iran need to spread these hotspots of Shia/Sunni conflict into a larger conflagration to consume the region, spike oil prices, seriously harm the West, and shore up the mullahs in Tehran. And Bibi needs to strike the Iranian nuke facilities soon, forcing the US to increase its unconditional support of Israel, thereby relegating the Palestinian issue to the back of the backburner. Bibi and the Mullahs need each other, ha ha ha. Pray for a Third World War, where there is no direct confrontation between the US and Russia, but where both sides step up the tempo of arming their proxies in the region, keeping oil prices very high for the foreseeable future, destabilizing the world economy and ushering in a crypto fascist political economy and society in the US and Europe...wink
As always, so cheery, alwyas rooting for the positive.
You need this song and a hug AC Yegoda-Yezhov.
Next time your found, with your chin on the ground
There a lot to be learned, so look around

Just what makes that little old ant
Think hell move that rubber tree plant
Anyone knows an ant, cant
Move a rubber tree plant

But he's got high hopes, he's got high hopes
Hes got high apple pie, in the sky hopes

So any time your gettin low
Stead of lettin go
Just remember that ant
Oops there goes another rubber tree plant

When troubles call, and your backs to the wall
There a lot to be learned, that wall could fall

Once there was a silly old ram
Thought he'd punch a hole in a dam
No one could make that ram, scram
He kept buttin that dam

Cause he had high hopes, he had high hopes
He had high apple pie, in the sky hopes

So any time your feelin bad
Stead of feelin sad
Just remember that ram
Oops there goes a billion kilowatt dam

All problems just a toy balloon
They'll be bursted soon
They're just bound to go pop
Oops there goes another problem kerplop
Frank liked that one.
There was a hip hop rhymer named Don-san
Who shrugged off strategic reality unlike a grown mon
By hiding in an Amerika-first platitude
And not showing Yezhov any gratitude...winky
Belief yields will.