Editor’s Pick
OCTOBER 8, 2008 12:01AM

Thoughts on the debate from an uninsured voter...

Rate: 7 Flag

So technically, I just found out that I was approved for insurance.  I am still waiting for proof of that, and I am biting my nails, so to speak, about what the insurance company will deign to cover.  I really am anxious about this.

This is why tonight’s debate was important to me.  I liked one thing more than any other, and that was Obama’s ability to connect the current financial crisis to issues family face on a daily basis.  I don’t think he or McCain answered questions well regarding how the current meltdown affects regular people.  I have a lot of older co-workers, for example, who are worried about retirement.   Almost everyone I work with (except me) has money invested somewhere.  However, I do think Obama made the point several times that families are a microcosm, in a way, of the federal government.  When money is tight, you adjust your spending.  You prioritize your needs, and above all, you take care of the fundamentals first (job, health, family, education). 

What does this have to do with being uninsured?  When money is tight, you cut the highest expenses first, and few things are more expensive for individuals in this country than health care.  My story is that I changed careers and, to do that, I quit my full-time job to be a full-time student.  As a result, during that time, I was uninsured.  (I also took on a TON of debt, but that is another post).  I used to take advantage of preventive care services.  The problem confronting the uninsured is that you can’t do that!  I have gone two years without the basic preventive care necessary to prevent long-term medical care and expenses.  I now have a great job that I love but there are no benefits attached.  I am happy with that decision.

Recently, however, I developed a problem breathing, and not having a history of asthma or allergies, I decided to get checked out.  Walk-in clinics are not cheap, but when you can’t breathe, you don’t have much of an option.  Here’s the adventure.  I initially got checked out prior to deciding to apply for health coverage.  The fact is I can’t afford it.  I lived off of student loans, credit cards, and what no longer exists in my 401k in order to make a life change I will never regret.  Now I have the responsibility of paying people back, which I don’t mind.  But it’s not easy, and keeping my expenses low is a priority. The policy I was recently approved for is expensive (although among the cheapest of available options), and I question whether it wouldn’t be better to use that money at a walk-in clinic as needed. 

What does my breathing problem have to do with this debate?  It illustrates the problem confronting people like me that I think McCain did not adequately address.  I was seen for difficulty breathing prior to being approved for coverage; does that make it a pre-existing condition? I don’t know.  But I do know I have a problem, so I went to the doctor anyway.  Without insurance, I would have paid $75 for a walk-in visit, $97 for the Nasonex nasal spray I was prescribed (yes, $97), and $140 for the antibiotic to treat an upper respiratory infection.  Instead, I saved $191.  That’s great.  Except that I had to charge it, because I have no disposable income for other than food and gas after I pay my bills and, now, my health insurance plan. 

The kicker is I had a bad sinus infection two months ago that precipitated the difficulty breathing (I don’t know if the two are connected).  I didn’t have the money to see a doctor at the time, so I took OTC medications and the problem seemed to resolve.  Now, I have more complications and no money to deal with them.  Yes, I saved money on this recent visit.  But why is getting basic health care so expensive to begin with?  If it wouldn’t have cost me $100+ to have the sinus infection checked out, I wouldn’t even have to go to the doctor and pay 2-3 times that amount now. And it could be that the sinus infection had nothing to do with anything, and that I have a totally separate and new problem.  For which I will have to see a pulmonary specialist.  And we all know that “specialist” = more $$$.

I have a feeling that I am like most of the uninsured people out there.  We all hear the horror stories of people in terminal, life-threatening, chronic situations who are denied coverage and suffer, sometimes die, as a result.  But I believe a majority of people are in the middle.  Do you buy insurance, or put that money to use where it will have an immediate effect?  Insurance makes sense in the long run, but few probably see how it affects them today.  It’s a tough choice to make when you are struggling to make ends meet. 

The fact is, without insurance, I wouldn’t have bought that antibiotic. I wouldn’t have bought that ridiculously overpriced Nasonex (do people really need more proof of the need for regulation in the pharmaceutical industry?).  And I would still have difficulty breathing, a problem that could escalate in financial cost, but also in personal cost.

People shouldn’t have to make a choice between basic care and putting food on the table.  Between filling the gas tank, and taking care of themselves.  I am lucky to have credit to pay for the care I needed today, which not everyone has.  But using credit to pay medical expenses is a double-edged sword. 

You have a chance to vote for a lot of things this year.  Healthcare reform is one.  There is no easy solution.  But there is a candidate whose plan doesn’t resolve the issues I’ve mentioned: getting approved for individual coverage in the first place, affording it on a month-to-month basis, and having quality, low-cost preventive care.  That candidate is McCain.  Is Obama’s plan the ultimate solution?  I am no expert in such things.  But I do know what it’s like to go without insurance, and how difficult it is to maintain as an individual.  Obama’s plan, call it socialist if you like, takes care of people like me.  Maybe you don’t care, because you have insurance (probably through your employer).  Under Obama's plan, you'll get to keep that insurance.  But I work just as hard as you.  I deserve the same care, and I shouldn’t have to sacrifice in order to get it.  Remember that when you go to the polls this year.  You are voting for policy that affects EVERYONE.            

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
DM - thanks for your perspective. My mom, who isn't old enough yet for Medicare, has been in this boat for years. We've offered to pay her premiums, but it is difficult to get it.

Her health care is definitely crisis management. I can't imagine a tax credit making much difference to her circumstances. Also, it isn't clear how McCain's plan will deal with the folks whose employers don't actually offer insurance - which is pretty much most uninsured.
DM, I've done the "on again, off again" dance with insurance a bunch of times. It's only a pre-existing condition if you disclose it, so don't.

As far as your health insurance company is concerned, you never went to that clinic, you never took those antibiotics and those medical records don't exist. They aren't going to scour the medical universe looking for any trace of you.

I know this, because that's how I've handled stuff I don't want my insurance company to know about (such as, say, going on Wellbutrin, an anti-depressant, even though I was taking it while quitting smoking) because I don't want that to be part of my "public record," because it can be construed as treatment for depression, which would make me pretty much uninsurable.

This is a really crappy, crappy game, but you have to play it to your advantage. If they don't ask (or even if they do) you don't tell.
I don't think the insured really have a good perspective on your situation DM. Thanks for the outstanding post.

After a career change, I am uninsured and have been for over a year. Because I work for a small business, the employer plan isn't a great one... and it refused to accept me because of a documented heart abnormality. I still get a little over $60 per month to go toward insurance that I could theoretically procure on my own, but I have applied with over 10 different insurers over the past year and all have refused to cover me because of this minor non-symptomatic heart abnormality.

My heart was good enough for the Navy to accept me, but apparently not safe enough to insure. Experts and hotlines have basically told me that the only way I'm going to get covered is if I go to work with a much larger company (or the government) that offers a broader health care plan.

Since becoming uninsured, I have piled up approximately $2,000 in medical bills stemming from two minor incidents: a nasty case of toncilitis and an emergency room visit for what was likely a panic attack (probably brought on at least partly by the fact that something seemed to be wrong with me and I knew that I did not have insurance). I refused treatment and testing in the ER incident because I knew I would not be able to afford anything the hospital prescribed.

The situation is appalling. Healthcare is a right.
Although McCain says his plan will give $5,000 to every American, the plan he's published gives $5,000 to every household. Every time I've bought insurance, they treated us like four individuals to cover, not like a unit.

American health insurance is a disgrace. For all the things wrong with the NHS in England, it's better than what we've got.
Also, a $5000 tax credit isn't a check for $5000, it means you can deduct $5000 from your taxable income, doesn't it?

In my world, that amounts to a savings of about $125.
Also, a $5000 tax credit isn't a check for $5000, it means you can deduct $5000 from your taxable income, doesn't it?

My understanding is that it's a so-called refundable tax credit, meaning that it's a direct reduction of the tax you pay (i.e. one for one dollars) and that if you don't pay that much in income tax, you get the balance. Not that this makes it workd. . .
You will actually never even see that money (which is right, $5000 for a family, and I believe $2500 for an individual). It goes directly to the insurer, and the difference goes back to the government if your plan is less than $5000/$2500. As far as I understand the plan. It is patently unfair for individuals applying for insurance coverage to be denied based on prior history, when the same doesn't apply for group plans. I know the law (in FL, and perhaps nationally) makes provisions for victims of breast cancer as far as pre-existing conditions go. Which means someone lobbied to change that standard. Why aren't there groups advocating to change the pre-existing conditions clause for everyone?
Lack of health insurance has a TREMENDOUS effect on the health of this nation. Below is a chart -- one of many -- showing how SHAMEFUL the USA system is.

I want to hear the shouts "We're No. 38." Thank you.

Shalom,
ZWrite


LIFE EXPECTANCY
1 Japan 82.6 79.0 86.1
2 Hong Kong (PRC) 82.2 79.4 85.1
3 Iceland 81.8 80.2 83.3
4 Switzerland 81.7 79.0 84.2
5 Australia 81.2 78.9 83.6
6 Spain 80.9 77.7 84.2
7 Sweden 80.9 78.7 83.0
8 Israel 80.7 78.5 82.8
9 Macau (PRC) 80.7 78.5 82.8
10 France (metropolitan) 80.7 77.1 84.1
11 Canada 80.7 78.3 82.9
12 Italy 80.5 77.5 83.5
13 New Zealand 80.2 78.2 82.2
14 Norway 80.2 77.8 82.5
15 Singapore 80.0 78.0 81.9
16 Austria 79.8 76.9 82.6
17 Netherlands 79.8 77.5 81.9
18 Martinique 79.5 76.5 82.3
19 Greece 79.5 77.1 81.9
20 Belgium 79.4 76.5 82.3
21 Malta 79.4 77.3 81.3
22 United Kingdom 79.4 77.2 81.6
23 Germany 79.4 76.5 82.1
24 U.S. Virgin Islands (US) 79.4 75.5 83.3
25 Finland 79.3 76.1 82.4
26 Guadeloupe 79.2 76.0 82.2
27 Channel Islands (Jersey and Guernsey) 79.0 76.6 81.5
28 Cyprus 79.0 76.5 81.6
29 Republic of Ireland 78.9 76.5 81.3
30 Costa Rica 78.8 76.5 81.2
31 Puerto Rico (US) 78.7 74.7 82.7
32 Luxembourg 78.7 75.7 81.6
33 United Arab Emirates 78.7 77.2 81.5
34 South Korea 78.6 75.0 82.2
35 Chile 78.6 75.5 81.5
36 Denmark 78.3 76.0 80.6
37 Cuba 78.3 76.2 80.4
38 United States 78.2 75.6 80.8
When politicians talk about the uninsured, I think about the massive expense of childbirth - something that a big chunk of the population goes through. How can anyone pay for that? I was uninsured for a while as a student and paid $200 just for an annual visit to the OB/GYN.
Excellent column.

When you don't have health insurance, as I currently don't because I'm also in the midst of a career switch, you worry regularly whether a "symptom" is something that should be ignored because statistically it's a minor thing that doesn't require medical treatment or something serious that early treatment will cure.

Tip: Don't eat red beans. It's a long story.

Shalom,
ZWrite
$5000 for a family is a joke. When I was unemployed a few years ago (2001), dirt cheap (high deductible, emergency only) insurance was about $700 a month. For a family of four. Add in the terror that I had to hunt and dig to get insurance at all for my daughter. She'd just had a routine childhood outpatient surgical procedure (about as complicated as ear tubes). But because she'd had surgery within the past six months, she was nearly uninsurable. We eventually got a policy just for her through some state program for children because no one else would take her. Lucky for us she doesn't have any kind of long-term chronic illness. I will never forget the panicky feeling when company after company told us they'd take three of us, but not her. Sorry, your kid is out in the cold. Off you go.

We have employer health care now, for which I'm very grateful. I remember how scary it was when it ran out.

What McCain is forgetting is that with the tanking economy and rising unemployment, there are also rising numbers of uninsured people.

At least Obama acknowledged that as members of the senate, they both get pretty sweet plans.