Nancy Davis Kho

Nancy Davis Kho
Location
Oakland, California, USA
Birthday
April 30
Bio
I'm a writer, a reader, a bike wife, a mom, and a music fan. And they don't call me Aunt Blabby for nothing. I figure if half of you are laughing WITH me and the other half AT me, we're all still laughing. I look forward to finding out which side you're on.

Nancy Davis Kho's Links

MY LINKS
Editor’s Pick
JULY 25, 2011 7:59PM

Flying Babies

Rate: 10 Flag

Not welcome on Malaysian Airlines

There's been a kerfuffle in the media lately about the fact that Malaysia Airlines has banned babies from flying first class. It's just the latest in what seems to be a string of a zero baby tolerance situations that have ignited debate about where babies do and do not belong.

You people do realize that the babies have nothing to do with this, right?

It's not like they're the ones demanding their parents buy them the first class plane tickets or take them to see Harry Potter 8 on opening day during naptime so they'll whine all the way through Voldemort's penultimate scene with Snape (yeah, I'm talking to you, parent in the Regency Theater in Bend, Oregon.) They're far too busy forming teeth in their pink gums and learning to hold their rubbery necks up. Babies aren't what need to be banned.

Clueless parents are.

You've seen them, the parents who board the planes with a September issue of Vogue magazine, an iPod, and one diaper under their arm that is already used up by the time the flight attendant is demonstrating the oxygen mask. They apparently think that airplanes are a Magic Zone, where strangers will overlook the smells and noises and repetitive tray slamming of a runny-nosed tot in a way that doesn't happen on terra firma. They're oblivious to the hairy eyeball stares of fellow passengers who use every molecule in their retinas to plead, "Do SOMETHING to quiet your child down!!"

No one expects a baby to be silent and spend their flight flipping through a Wall Street Journal.  They do, however, expect the parents to make an effort.

I live 3,000 miles away from my parents, so I know a thing or two about flying with young kids. I used to regard my solo cross country flights to the grandparents with the grim determination of a soldier preparing for battle: the odds may be stacked against you, but preparation can tilt the fight in your favor. I started with a giant black diaper bag backpack that I packed in stratum, to be excavated layer by layer as the states passed beneath us:  toy, snack, clean clothes, toy, snack, clean clothes.

I'd pack twice the number of diapers my kids had ever been known to need for an equivalent time on earth, and a gross of wipes. A small pouch held Baby Benadryl, Jr. Tylenol, some bandaids and a nasal aspirator just in case. Reading material for me? The Sky Mall catalog, and only if both kids were sleeping. Slipping on the sleep mask to try and ward off jet lag? Fat freaking chance.

When my oldest daughter was a year old I made a stupid rookie parent mistake, flying from one coast to the other with her when she was sick.  As a result of this error in judgment that haunts me still, we spent 8 hellish hours (it included a layover in Philadelphia) which I remember as a blur of wiping nose, wiping butt, nose, butt and hey! there's some more barf!

I jiggled her, walked with her, sang to her. Tears were shed, and the baby cried too. I looked like Medusa by the time we landed, which not coincidentally came about 16 minutes after she finally fell into a peaceful, fever-free sleep  in my arms.  (We looked bad enough that when my husband saw us at baggage claim, his jaw dropped and he said, "What did you do to my daughter?")

But it was obviously worse for the passengers around me who had no skin in the game and just wanted to get some rest. As they disembarked I apologized to anyone who would listen. Finally a businessman stopped and put his hand on my shoulder. "You don't need to apologize. You did everything you could." (He probably regretted the shoulder pat, what with the dried vomit there, but he was too classy to show it.)

That's the day I realized that  the well-intentioned flailing of parenthood can count just as much as the result. And it's the least the child, and everyone else around you, deserves.

Author tags:

travel, parenthood

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
So good, so funny and so true.
The same people who are stupid about animals (can't hear their own dogs barking) are as clueless with their children. Could we stop hating kids please?????
I love babies. Some parents are new to the game and mean no harm, others really couldn't care less. Clueless is right. ~r
You nailed this one! It's also the parents who refuse to buy their kids a seat and deal with a screaming kid the entire flight. Effort counts when the outcome is going to be uncertain.
Excellent post. Yes, it's not the baby's fault. Yes, parents can be clueless. (And yes I've done my share of flying with kids with enough crap to need my own Sherpa and perhaps a wheelbarrow).
Effort is everything.
We once flew in the center section of a 747 from Sydney to San Francisco (14 hours) surrounded by 11 babies who cried in shifts through the entire flight - except for the two directly in front of us who cried continuously while their parents slept. At least you made a solid effort, not those two clowns. Longest, most miserable flight ever!
I'd consider it a privilege to sit next to the Octomom
Being trapped with someone else's screaming child is a special kind of hell. One feels sympathy for the parent who tries, because so many don't, but it's still hell. That's why I always take earplugs with me on airplanes. There are good reasons why someone might have to take a small child on a plane, or at least I'm willing to consider that this is the case.

There is no good reason why anyone's screaming child should ruin my anniversary dinner at a restaurant you don't go to if you can't afford a sitter. Many people who are selfish jerks also happen to be parents. Notice I don't hate the kids. I hate the parents who bring their babies and toddlers to places they have no business being. See what I did there? There ARE places where it is inappropriate to bring children who can't be trusted not to melt down or throw food. Really!
One of the worst "date nights" I ever had when my kids were tiny was when we took the trouble and expense to hire a sitter, went to a high end fancy white linen tablecloth restaurant, only to sit next to a family who had brought their kids along. The kids proceeded to scream, run into waiters, kick chairs, etc. I wanted to chew on the tablecloth.

Making an effort as a parent is important - so is using common sense.
Love this for many reasons. When my now adult kids were tiny I flew so many times with them from Greece to NYC (nine hours) and know all the tricks and all the suffering that entails. Yesterday I got off a flight from Paris to Boston and next to me in first class was a young mother with 15-month-old baby and she did a brilliant job of distracting and keeping that kid quiet the whole time. Evidently the I-Pad is a major boon to mankind in this department. I don't even know what an I-Pad is, but intend to buy one as soon as my forthcoming first grandchild gets old enough to fly.
It all just comes down to some respect and consideration doesn't it?
Most of the flights I am on these days have small dogs in the first class section, in little carry on bags. Not sure when that started but sometimes there seems to be one dog per person in first class.
I don't hate babies. But I don't love them either. I love cats. I have four of them. They run around, get into everything ... cute little buggers. Babies on flights don't bother me. Babies in movie theaters ... something else. I don't take my cats to the movies. They'd run around, get on the laps of non-cat people, claw the seats ... basically annoy the hell out of you. So why should you bring your babies? Hey, if cats were like babies and I couldn't leave them alone, I'd get a sitter. If I couldn't afford or find a sitter, I'd just not go to the movies. After all, Netflix streaming is a hell of a lot cheaper.
I've flown long haul at least twice a year with kids since my first was 6 weeks old.

1) Listening to someone else's kid scream is never as bad as listening to your own kid scream. Never. Having a barfing kid in the seat next to you is far, far less unpleasant than being the one who gets the job of cleaning up the barf and worrying about the cause. So, when you are near this one, consider how lucky you are that it is not your kid.
The worse the kid, the more lucky you should feel.

2) It's hard to sleep on a plane, small kids need naps or they get cranky and whiny. Sometimes distracting the kid will do nothing but prolong the time before the exhausted, overtired kid finally conks out. That may be why the parent seems to be ignoring the miserable kid.

3) All long hauls should have seat back video on demand. An cranky, overtired kid who can't get to sleep in a cramped economy class seat even when it's 4 am by his body clock, will probably blearily --- and quietly --- stare at cartoons for hours. Short hauls would have fewer whiny kids with seat-back TVs, too.