By Daniel Rigney
Republicans are often inclined to romanticize guns and warfare, but not all Republican wars entail the dropping of literal bombs. Some Republican wars are symbolic and metaphorical. In each instance, they call for acts of rhetorical and political aggression against a host of enemies both foreign and domestic, both real and imagined.
Lately the Republican Party and its presidential candidates (and debate audiences!) have been firing their missiles at a broad array of ideological targets. Here are ten fronts on which the party seems to be waging its ongoing war against the future.The War on Science. In their opposition to the cosmology of the big bang, the evolution of life, and the acknowledgement of anthropogenic climate change, religious fundamentalists in particular continue to resist the weight of current scientific thinking, especially as it challenges literal understandings of ancient worldviews. Among Republican debaters, only Jon Huntsman has had the moral courage to stand up to the religious right in his respect for modern science.
The War on Renewable Energy and Environmentalism. The Republican war on renewable energy and the environment comes less from religious conservatives than from the carbon industry, most of whose ad campaigns now project a deeply-felt concern for the creation of a sustainable future. My personal favorite is the ad from ConocoPhillips, featuring cute ducks swimming in a pond in the shadow of an Oklahoma refinery. Meanwhile, the carbon industry’s richly-funded lobbying and political campaigns tell a rather different story about what oil companies are actually doing to what’s left of the natural world.
The War on Family Planning. Large segments of the conservative coalition (and especially the Catholic magisterium) oppose not just abortion in most or all circumstances, but also artificial birth control and even breast cancer screenings if they are performed or referred by conservatively-incorrect organizations such as Planned Parenthood.
More broadly, this and other campaigns related to sex and reproduction have had the aim of rolling back several decades of gains by the women’s and gender equality movements, including efforts to legalize same-sex marriage. The campaign against family (planning) in particular is, in considerable measure, a War on Feminism and its achievements.
The War on Labor. Organized capital continues to erode the hard-won gains of the organized labor movement over the past century, preferring to negotiate with disorganized, individualized labor. The real effect has been to suppress wages and reduce benefits for workers in the interests of owners and corporate executives. MSNBC’s Ed Schultz recently called this campaign the “right to work for less” movement.
The War on Intellect. Willard Romney’s recent dig at President Obama for having friends in the faculty lounge at the University of Chicago is just the latest attempt to disparage what George Wallace used to call “pointy-headed intellectuals.” Oh, did I mention that Romney has graduate degrees from both Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School? God forbid that anyone in the White House should have a capacity for abstract thought, or what psychologists call “intelligence.”The War on Islam. It is no more fair to blame Islam as a whole for the atrocities of its worst practitioners than to blame Christianity for the Ku Klux Klan. Yet some in the Republican party still seek to inflame anger toward Muslims in general and to call for holy warfare against the infidel. George W. Bush should be given due credit for not whipping up this fervor during his administration, using it to launch a holy war against Islam per se. If he had done so, there’s no telling how many foreign wars President Obama would now be trying to extricate us from.
The War on Immigrants. Republicans have never fully received the notion that the United States has always been and continues to be a nation of immigrants trying to make better lives for themselves. Why start now?
The War on the Non-Rich, as it has been waged in Republican class warfare campaigns since Reagan, is a persistent attempt to rig our laws, and especially our tax laws, in ways that benefit the richest of the richest. If you want to know who’s won the class war since 1980, consult the last thirty years of American economic statistics. The American class war has had a clear winner. The jury is in on this question. The Republicans won. Big time.
The War on Voting. The Republican voter suppression movement sweeping the Midwest and other regions of the country in recent months sounds deeply principled on the surface. It’s all about making sure that voters really deserve to vote. A millimeter below the surface, the movement is actually and obviously an attempt by Republicans to make legitimate voting difficult or impossible for any constituency that might vote the wrong way. Has there ever been a more cynical campaign waged in the name of “integrity”?
The War on Social Responsibility. Those in the economically libertarian wing of the Republican Party, with deep emotional roots in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries (read: Social Darwinism, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Ayn Rand, Ron Paul), are still living in the ideological fantasy world of mom-and-pop capitalism. In the real world of unrestrained corporate capitalism, it’s everyone for himself, and the omniscient, infallible Market God (and his lobbyists) have the power to decide who shall dominate.
The opposing idea that we are all profoundly connected to each other, and that we rise and fall together, is utterly foreign to this way of thinking, and to this battle plan.
The Republican party is fighting a cultural, political and economic war on at least ten fronts. Its growing addiction to unlimited and secret campaign financing (via the Citizens United case) may be enough to make the party competitive in 2012. But the Republican war against the twenty-first century is just beginning, and history bats last.


Salon.com
Comments
__♥$$$$$♥__LOVE__♥$$$$$$♥
_♥_F_$$$$$$$$__$$$$§§(¯`v´¯)♥
♥$$_O_$$$$$$$$$$$$$$(¯`(●)´¯)♥
♥$$$_R_$$$$$$$$$$$$$$(_.^._)$♥
♥$$$$_E_$$$$$$$$$(¯`v´¯)$$$$♥
_♥$$$$_V_$$$$$$$(¯`(●)´¯)$$♥
___♥$$$_E_$$$$$$$(_.^._)$♥
______♥$_R_$(¯`v´¯)$$$$♥
________♥$$(¯`(●)´¯)$♥
___________♥(_.^._)♥
I'm very, very optimistic, the Web has overall made Divide & Conquer tactics much less effective. While zealots can spend the day at redstate.com, even the average American now can compare parties far better than in the past, and, become uniters- not dividers. (As far as the current R Party goes, it is this simple: whatever they say look at the opposite and there YOU have it! Classic example today, run a Racist TV ad intentionally, then, immediately try and play the "Race Card" itself against the insulted groups- tried and true, this one ... )
Seems a much better description of them.
R♥
My grandfather was an immigrant who was a loyal Republican. But the Party he supported seems a distant memory. I wrote about him today, so check it out if you're interested:
http://open.salon.com/blog/kristenraney3/2012/02/07/niels_nielsen_the_story_of_a_republican_immigrant
Like you, I have seen the things being done and have ascertained where the lies begin and the truth ends. I like to find things out as much as I can on my own. Of course, this means I have to rely on hours of research and resources that I can only partially verify for veracity. Then I have to filter out the facts, dissect the opinions and the logic (or lack thereof) of the opinion holder and, from all that, form my own conclusions.
I know that many folks like to think they have fine and discerning minds, that they "know what's what" and don't have to get confused hearing the other side's lies. I used to be one of those guys.
Something happened to me that virtually took a metaphorical two by four to my head. Since that time, I have questioned not only the things I come across that cause me to look askance, but I have also come to question all the "truth" that I think I know.
Sadly, the Republican Party of 2012 is a sad and misshapen version of the party of the same name from 1972 on back. Of course there are coarse similarities and much of the verbiage spewing from the mouths of the Republican Talking Heads sounds similar, it has clearly become meaner, baser, less compassionate and much, much more selfish.
I could "extol the virtues" of the Democratic Party in no less savory fashion, only at the other end of the political spectrum in terms of organization, corruption, backbone, planning and integrity
Of the two, however, I would far prefer the Democratic for the simple truth that they don't really plan very well, don't have a solidly authoritarian agenda and tend to be conciliatory when opposed. I far prefer that as the power base to what the Republican Authoritarian Fascism would have ramming down our throats should they have their way and acede to power again.
What I hope the Internet does provide is the ability to research, point out, and pin down the differences between what a politician says they want, and what they're really doing (if they can be said to actually be doing anything at all in particular.) In this light, it would behoove all of us, Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Radical, Liberal, Conservative, Socialist, Capitalist, Nihilist, Muslim, Christian, Jew, Buddhist, Black, White, Red, Brown, Yellow or any of those combined in any number of ways to embrace the great equalizer of finding out truth, asking questions, and demanding accountability to the people of this nation.
My current point of view at this time is that any practice, policy, law, or piece of legislation that formally excludes or disenfranchises any group for any reason (other than maybe cold blooded killers) is against the principles and the spirit of our Constitution.
To this end, if we look at what our politicians say, do or countenance and find they are serving to limit, exclude or exempt any group from the whole, whether it is for advantage or disadvantage of said group, over the rest, then they should be fired.
We fire our politicians with the power of our voice. We vote them out and vote new people in. These are the true term limits of our elected representatives. Beyond that, we must speak to them and let them know what we expect them to do. We must demand that they seek to compromise and hammer out good legislation, that they not try to pull fast ones on us and that they comport themselves with honesty, decency and integrity. If not -- Fired.
Thanks for pointing out the Wars Against US.
No Republicans were harmed in the creation of this post.
You have a voice.
Use it.
--R--
--newt gingrich
“Is capitalism really about the ability of a handful of rich people to manipulate the lives of thousands of other people and walk off with the money, or is that somehow a little bit of a flawed system?”
--newt gingrich
"Crony capitalism, where people pay each other off at the expense of the rest of the country, is not free enterprise. And raising questions about that is not wrong."
--newt gingrich
"Are there no fair questions about the distribution of wealth without it being seen as envy, though?"
--matt lauer
"I think it’s fine to talk about those things in quiet rooms..."
--mitt romney
"The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid dens of crime that Dickens loved to paint. It is not done even in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. "
--cs lewis
gamechanger-- occupying republicans
Here's a link to the KulturKampf Kickoff, 1992:
http://youtu.be/iO5_1ps5CAc
Nearly every business in this town has FOX being broadcast and if you want to see the truly ugly and ignorant side of these town folk it is on full display from Mickey D's to the local banks whenever the President makes an appearance. With the exception of my bank because they did change the channel when it was requested.
Now, what I want to read is: a woman somewhere who STILL votes Republican, and why...