Dana Dangerous

Dana Dangerous
Location
California, USA
Birthday
April 04
Bio
Dana Dangerous is a six-foot, blonde, busty, liberal, lesbian lawyer, just like everyone else in L.A. *** One morning in 1973, she awoke on a park bench in a strange city, with no shoes. Finding herself in Southern California, she wandered the beaches of Santa Monica surviving on fish entrails and eeking out a meager living selling caricatures of Republican political figures, which she carved from tar balls that washed ashore from the many nearby offshore oil rigs. *** Ms. Dangerous got her start in politics when she landed a job as personal dominatrix to G. Gordon Liddy. That served as a springboard to her career in show business, and for the following six years, Ms. Dangerous could be seen performing eight shows a week in the back room of the Hwy 69 Truck Stop in Petaluma, California. It was there, during one of her midnight binge-and-purge sessions, that she developed her famous theories in socio-political philosophy. *** Currently, Ms. Dangerous spends her days jetting around the globe in wild shopping sprees and trying to avoid the many paparazzi who constantly pursue her. A major motion picture about her life is currently in production and scheduled for a Christmas release, starring Angelina Jolie as Dana and Danny DeVito as her longtime illicit lover, Squeaky. *** Commanding annual blog earnings well into eight figures, Ms. Dangerous has the commercial clout to write her own biographies which appear, unedited, in prestigious publications around the world.

MY RECENT POSTS

Dana Dangerous's Links

Salon.com
SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 1:37AM

Obama Continues to Dissappoint

Rate: 2 Flag
This president still can't get it out of the infield.  I would have liked to hear him announce something bold along with the end of the war.  Something like:

"Now that combat operations in Iraq have come to an end, it is vital that we turn to the problems we face on our own shores. That is why, today, I am announcing a major new jobs initiative, where every penny that we have been spending in Iraq will now go directly to putting Americans back to work.  We have already been spending the money abroad -- more than $10 billion per month for seven years.  If it's good enough to spend that money abroad on a war of opportunity, it is far better to spend it on putting Americans back to work and rebuilding our infrastructure. Make no mistake, this is not a new expenditure that will add more to the deficit.  Instead, we are taking the same ongoing money that President Bush and Congress sent overseas, and we are bringing it back home, where it will go directly to employing two million Americans, beginning next month."

Something like that is what I would have like to have heard. Instead, all I heard was the same bullshit rhetoric.  Oh, and btw, that whole "we have to honor those who served in Iraq" bit apparently doesn't extend to the LGBT Americans who served, and who lost their lives and limbs in that war.   He continues to exclude that group of Americans.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
He would only give the money to Wall Street, GM or Blackwater anyway.
But wouldn't it be nice if he'd take that money and built an IT superhighway, invest in clean energy jobs by the thousands, repair our national highways, build high-speed rail lines from coast to coast, invest in medical research, and maybe create something like giant geothermal plants, or ocean current driven electrical generators, or huge solar collector forests.

Just imagine all the GOOD that could be done with that ten billion per month, and how many Americans could be put back to work, and how many new industries could be started, and how much energy independence we could achieve. Just imagine. And then write the White House.
But wouldn't it be nice if he'd take that money and built an IT superhighway, invest in clean energy jobs by the thousands, repair our national highways, build high-speed rail lines from coast to coast, invest in medical research, and maybe create something like giant geothermal plants, or ocean current driven electrical generators, or huge solar collector forests.

Just imagine all the GOOD that could be done with that ten billion per month, and how many Americans could be put back to work, and how many new industries could be started, and how much energy independence we could achieve. Just imagine. And then write the White House.
But wouldn't it be nice if he'd take that money and built an IT superhighway, invest in clean energy jobs by the thousands, repair our national highways, build high-speed rail lines from coast to coast, invest in medical research, and maybe create something like giant geothermal plants, or ocean current driven electrical generators, or huge solar collector forests.

Just imagine all the GOOD that could be done with that ten billion per month, and how many Americans could be put back to work, and how many new industries could be started, and how much energy independence we could achieve. Just imagine. And then write the White House.
i think you get the government you deserve.
Congress holds the purse strings, not the President. Congress legislates, not the President. He can say anything, but he can't deliver unless Congress complies.
Doesn't anyone remember the original stimulus...a group of Senators led by Susan Collins stripped billions in infrastructure and other funds and put in tax cuts. Everyone complained the stimulus bill was too big...now it was too little.
They say, he promised to close Guantanamo. Congress cut off the funding and passed a bill to block the closing.
DADT...he can't issue an Executive Order to "overturn" an existing law.
Noirville says he would only give money to Wall Street or GM. What would you have him do with a system tied into the world economy, particularly when there was no authority to break the companies up. Besides, almost all of the bailout money has been repaid...we made interest! I suggest you read this post to get a better understanding about bailouts...it is based on facts, not opinions: http://open.salon.com/blog/fay_paxton/2010/04/18/sarah_palin_and_the_tea_party_need_an_economics_lesson

For those of you who are disappointed, be disappointed in yourselves. You yelled, donated and voted, then went home and let the Tea Party drown your Hope.

I think you want a dictator, not a President.
Yeah, he should have landed on an aircraft carrier and stood under a banner announcing "Mission Accomplished". Oh wait, that bullshit type of stuff was already done by the worst President in the history of the United States. At last we have a dignified individual in the Oval Office.
Wouldn't we have to actually end the war before we could do all of this? While this sounds good, it is a bi premature since troops are being sent over there everyday and troops are currently stationed there right now.

what to eat while pregnant