Editor’s Pick
JULY 25, 2012 8:11AM

When Social Programs Work: B.A.M

Rate: 16 Flag
 
 bam-pr

 
Just before the shooting started. They were eating pizza on the front porch.

 

That summer of 2012 when the constant heat was like a silver choke collar wrapped around the city’s neck. No one could remember it being this hot for this long. To blink was to sweat. On many days, you’d wait till the sun went down for the tiny temperature drop that would make you think “OK. Now we can eat dinner.”

 

And if you were a kid, you’d say “Mama? Is it alright if we have our dinner out on the front porch?” And she’d say, “Fine.”

 

So that’s where the two of them were. The 14-year-old girl. The 13-year-old boy. Friends. Known each other all their short lives. From the Brighton Park neighborhood of Chicago. Eating pizza on the front porch and listening to the music of the city night. And then it happened.

 

A lone gunman, not much older than the two kids on the front porch, ran out from the dark gangway separating one house from the next. He looked around, got scared, and because he had a gun, he used it. The boy on the front porch, his name was Rony, stood up in front of the girl, and he took the shots.

 

Six shots. And Rony lived. He shielded his friend. And he lived.

Many have not lived. But Rony took the shots and he lived.

 

The tally sheets on Chicago’s injured and dead now reported nightly with the routine rhythm of a weather report. Crime statistics turning to dust in an unforgiving wind. A United States Congress, according to my Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, “practically bought and paid for by the National Rifle Association.” With today’s NRA talking point being, “Now is not the time to talk about gun safety laws.”

 

And if you were to ask why that young man became a hero on that porch, if you were to ask an expert---say somebody from the University of Chicago’s Crime Lab—an institution standing squarely at the crossroads of academia and real life, they’d tell you that this young man showed what it meant to use what the scientists call “social-cognitive” skills.

 

Translation? The kid had a solid handle on becoming a man.

 

And that’s where this story gets really interesting. Because on July 13th, right in the middle of this horrifically hot and violent summer the University of Chicago released the results of a two year study on the Chicago based organization “Becoming a Man---Sports Edition” showing that the program:

 

·      Reduced violent crime arrests by 44%

·      Shows future graduation rate increases of 10-23%

·      Reduced weapons crime and vandalism by 36%

·      Reduced the likelihood of attending school in a juvenile justice setting by 53%

 

 

And that’s before they got to the money part. Before they got to the part where the learned skeptic raises the hand, clears the scholarly throat and says, “Well this is all well and good, but we have a budget crunch. And these kinds of programs, whatever it is they do, are simply too expensive.”

 

The answer to that tired concern is this. The costs of this program average $1,100 per participant. The program generated societal benefits that ranged from $3,600 to $34,000 per participant, depending on how you measure crime.

 

Read those numbers again. And then if you are so inclined, delve into the detail of the study---available on the web—where the numbers get even more impressive.

 

What’s a social benefit? It includes but is not limited to lifetime savings to victims of crimes, savings to the government, and to the participant.

 

In other words, turns out that violence and crime cost a lot of money. Prevent it and you save money. LOTS of it. Common sense to some. But now backed up by science.

 

And we haven’t even gotten to the best part. That part when the proud skeptic pipes up with, “Well, you can do anything you want with statistics. It’s all just numbers. I don’t believe it. So it must be wrong.”

 

To which anyone can now answer, “You’re wrong Sparky. This time, you’re wrong.” This study was conducted with 2,740 disadvantaged males across 18 Chicago Public High Schools. The largest study of its kind. This target group chosen because “of the sobering reality that homicide claims more lives of this group than the next nine causes of death combined.”

 

A control group was used in the study. And the same kind of rigor used to scientifically measure the safety of our food and effectiveness of new drugs governed the project.

 

The science behind the study is simply unquestionable. Which doesn’t mean someone has to like the conclusions. But it does mean that the conclusions are based on science.

 

This social program both works and saves money.

 

At the heart of the program are six core values.

 

·      Integrity

·      Accountability

·      Self Determination

·      Positive Anger Expression

·      Visionary Goal Setting

·      Respect for Womanhood

 

All of them just words. Until they are put into action. And that’s what the program does. They teach what it means to put the words into action.

 

Like that kid on the front porch who took the six bullets for his friend.

 

From the study abstract released by the University of Chicago. “While non academic or ‘social-cognitive’ skills are important predictors of student outcomes, schools devote little attention to these skills after the first few grades.”

 

So how does BAM--Sports Edition work?  The BAM curriculum, originally developed in 2001 by social worker Tony DiVittoria of the Youth Guidance Organization takes place over 30 Sessions. It’s been in place and quietly working long before science and the University of Chicago produced this groundbreaking study.

 

A tiny example of showing how the program works can be seen in the picture above,

 

Look at the picture up top of the kids lined up on either side of a long, hollow stick. The object of this exercise is for everyone to crouch down and pick up the stick and raise it up high at exactly the same speed.

 

Sounds simple, right?

 

Wrong.

 

I remember being part of a group of slightly older kids, standing in a gentle rain in a clearing in an Arkansas forest, trying to do the exact same exercise. This was a leadership development group I wrote and ran for a group of high potential leaders---back when corporations invested in things like that.

 

I remember trying to pick up that stick like it was yesterday. And it’s been seven years now. The energy, intensity, the power of that team, giving everything we had to accomplish something together. Even something that simple. Turns out that we never did it. Never picked up the stick in unison. But the trying? Together?

 

It was everything.

 

What did that exercise teach us? It gave us that feeling of what it means to put words like “teamwork” into action.

 

Which is exactly what happens at BAM---Sports Edition. It works by teaching kids what it feels like do what matters together.

 

A program resting on the values of what it means to be human. Then taking words and turning them into action.

 

And a dollar value to the program?

 

They’ve found it.

 

But even more important---they’ve found the spark in the eyes of the kids trying to pick up that stick. The same spark in the eyes of the boy who took bullets for his friend.

 

And then became a man.

 

 
Photo Credit: Youth Guidance/Hype Media . Used by permission.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Very encouraging. God bless the doers and those who so skillfully record their deeds. R
This sounds like a great program and one that could be duplicated fairly easily. I hope the study gets a lot of attention. And Hurray for Rony. I hope he gets attention too.
Gerald--Exactly!

j--the potential for duplication of this is huge. I hope it gets a lot of attention too. I'm thinking Rony is going to be just fine.

Thanks Razzle Dazzle!
This sounds like a great program, Rog. Thanks for shining your discerning spotlight on it.
I love what you write, always, Roger. But this is one of your best. Awesome.
A very timely and inspirational story! I am so glad that Rony gets to grow into being a man! I found that statement, “Now is not the time to talk about gun safety laws, " so offensive when I started hearing it on the news this week. And then to claim it was to protect the affected families...as if they might not be the first ones in line to start talking about gun regulations...I have also been listening to the costs of housing prisoners and the fact that someone will complain about 1,000 in order to set someone on the right path but not bother about the 30 - 40,000+ annual cost per prisoner per year is mind-boggling! Great post!!
Matt---It sure puts a different perspective on the idea that we have to cut programs that help people because those programs cost money. Now we know that CUTTING programs is what costs us money.

Chicago Barb! Yea!!!!! Who would have ever guessed that a social program ends up SAVING money??? I'm guessing that this is not the only one. Course that's just a guess. No science. . . .
CG, I could write a post on Climate Control and tell you 98% of all the scientists in the world agree it is going to destroy the earth at some future date. That it is imperative that we do something about it. But, there are always corporations and politicians who disregard the 98% and concentrate on the 2% and they have the money and the power. This is a wonderful program, but someone made money on those 6 bullets and are not about to finance a program that costs them money. That's why this world is doomed my friend. 2% has control over 98% and I don't see it changing in my lifetime.
scanner---I understand. But what's different about climate change is that science was already on board. Most times, in social science---there is no scientific discipline. There are only nice stories.

A corporation that makes bullets would never finance this program. Absolutely true. That's not even a goal worth trying for.

The return on the investment here comes from public money. When 10 public programs line up for public money, and there isn't enough to go around, the question becomes "How do you decide who gets what?" Often that'd decided by who you know..

But what this program has proved is that it doesn't have to be decided like that. When these people come looking for their 1100 bucks per kid and can say I can save you 3x to 5x that much because you don't have to build more jails, hire more cops, etd---and I can PROVE that savings. Not just tell a story. Then something very big has happened.

No one has to even think about doing the right thing. All they have to think about is the rate of return?

And there is a better rate of return if we prevent violence rather than try and clean it up after it happens.

Does that make sense?
JG--Jon Stewart did a hilarious piece on that "now is not the time" talking point. And yeah---turns out its cheaper to prevent violence!

Don't tell private jail makers!
I hope the study gets the attention it deserves.

Thank you for writing this excellent piece, and kudos to Rony and other kids who put most grownups to shame.

Rated!!!

Andrea
I simply do not understand the American obsession with firearms.

Gary Trudeau got in hot water last year for a Doonesbury strip that said, in effect, that while 3,000 or so Americans and others tragically died on 9/11, in the nine years since, 270,000 in the US died from gunshot wounds (self-inflicted or otherwise). Politifact checked it out, and concluded that he was probably underestimating the number.

Does this make sense to you? Not to me. Programs such as you outline are a step in the right direction (a somewhat similar one here, run by various police departments, is called VIP -- Values, Influences and Peers). I applaud such initiatives. I wish they would expand.

Most of all, I wish Americans would get serious about gun proliferation, particularly handguns and automatic weapons, which were only ever meant for one thing: Killing humans.

Oh. And stop trying to bring guns into Canada, would you? For your own good, if nothing else: It ticks off the border guards, results in confiscation and could bring fines or even a jail sentence.

(And FYI, I was brought up around and became scarily proficient with all kinds of long guns -- automatic, semi-automatic and bolt-action -- and even taught courses in hunter safety. But I got over making things go bang or boom by the time I was 20, having decided against a military career.)
Only when our elected "leaders" show:

Integrity

· Accountability

· Self Determination

· Positive Anger Expression

· Visionary Goal Setting

· Respect for Womanhood

...if lawmakers want their citizens to have integrity, they need to practice it themselves...

Great piece.
I drank these words in like some fine, vintage wine. There are answers to problems and you proved it here. We can help others in lessening the suffering of life and they will in turn pass it on like ripples in a pond. Bravo, Chicago Man for this flash of inspiration.
B---No, I don't get it either.

Kate---What you said!

Dr. S--Those ripples. They are everything. That is exactly the point.
CG, great job ... again. Was it our Nelson Algren who observed that living in Chicago is like loving a beautiful woman with a broken nose -- kind of like the Ellen Barkin look myself. Yeah, we have so much going for us, well you know the grit, guts and guile that spins this great town on its heart and soul, with never missing that chill when heading north on LSD at night ....
Then, this past week we had this 'Murda Park' scene out south and many other kids being hit by drive by's ... its out of control. Your program has the heat that works. Let's make it happen. So good to hear of real, hands on solutions that work.
Thanks for sharing.
Highly Rated>>>>>>
The story of Rony has me on the verge of tears.

What I can't get out of my mind is a comment by a troll on one of the recent posts about Aurora. He said it was only white men who shielded others from bullets in the theater because black men don't do things like that.

So I want Rony to be black.

It's a stupid even to think of it. It's unworthy to give the troll that much attention. But I can't let go of the fact that someone would actually say that.

The rest of it, wonderful and thank you. It sounds like it would pay for the whole program to keep just one of those kids out of jail every year.
Great post, Rog. Love the way you write, and the way you see the world. R.
Inthis---Yep. Good call! It was the man in the picture above who said.

"Yet once you've come to be part of this particular patch [Chicago], you'll never love another. Like loving a woman with a broken nose, you may well find lovelier lovelies. But never a lovely so real."

And yes it is out of control. Folks at the bottom getting squeezed in ways that folks at the top can't even fathom, the splintering of the gang culture, words no longer having meaning, a brilliantly shrewd, tough mayor who has yet to figure out what democracy means and so draws an often weak inner circle around him and doesn't let anyone through that circle---FOIA records of his calendar are telling---and then of course the guns. Tough times for a lot of people and this program offers hope.


NC--I know what you mean about the trolls. You intellectually know that they are just words, that the person is likely a whack job, etc---but it still gets to you. Been there too.

And yes---that ratio--and that kind of thinking----keeping one kid out of jail pays for the cost of the program. It is a different way of thinking, s its hard for some to "get" it at first. But once you do, all sorts of possibilities emerge.

Deb--Coming from somebody of your obviously world class talent, that means a lot. Many thanks.
Andrea---Just saw I missed writing you back yesterday. Sorry! I hope this gets attention too. I am grateful salon featured it. And a friend forwarded it to some of his friends who are in a position to give this program attention. We'll see. Sometimes attention on the internet is totally random. I once had a piece get like 7,000 hits in 2 hours just because some guy named Roger Ebert tweeted it. So you NEVER know!
Roger, I like what Dr Spudman said about this piece. I drank it in lie a fine wine as well...I do with many of your pieces.
Its important for all of us to pound away at the cost issue. It is the best argument against the naysayers. It takes the power back for the forces of good. Wonderful piece.....simply wonderful, and it has inspired very fine comment and general discussion.
Gary---We do need to hammer at the cost issue. We need to own it. Because the thinking as got to change from "What do we cut?" To "What delivers a return?"
This is a riveting read. Oh, and I agree with the comments of Boanerges. Especially having just returned from Turkey - a totally different mentality and culture - guns and shootings seem so alien and incomprehensible to me. Excellent writing, Roger, one of your best.
R♥