JUNE 15, 2012 1:08PM

A Gay Marriage Fix-- Chicago Style

Rate: 19 Flag

 images
  Hinky Dink and Bathhouse 
 
 One morning, deep in the shadows of times past, because one of them had died in 1938 and the other in 1946, Hinky Dink Kenna and “Bathhouse John Coughlin were sitting at the bar of The Workingman’s Exchange  on North Clark Street in Chicago sipping their first cup of coffee. Legends of Chicago political history, the kind of guys who’s spirits are ingrained in the collective soul of the town, they ran what was called “The Levee District.” They were politicians, of a sort. Followed by prostitutes, con men, tramps and thieves in fine cut suits, they’d been busy the past night. A steady parade of payoffs flowing in as they received visitors. Along with hordes of the poor and unemployed who they fed in exchange for votes.

 

Paging through the morning newspaper that covered all of time, including this very day, Hinky Dink said, “Well, it looks like they finally figured out how to get rid of this gay marriage ban thing. Because they did it Chicago Style.”

 

“How’s that Hink?” Bathhouse John was deep into the sports reporting of the Cubs chance in the World Series. But when he realized what his partner had said, he looked up. “Haven’t they figured that out yet? What do you suppose all those whack jobs would do if they knew that out here where we are, there are centuries full of voices saying, ‘You opposed people wanting to marry who they wanted to marry? You had a law against that? Just how stupid are you!”

 

“Especially in, what’s the date on this paper, June of 2012. It ain’t like there were no other problems!”

 

“You mean like real problems? Problems besides the government messing with people’s love lives.”

 

“Uh huh.”

 

“So what happened? What did they do Chicago Style?” How did they get rid of this silly law banning what should never ever be banned. I mean, if we can’t make a buck with something, it should not be banned, right?” said Bathhouse.

 

“We’ll yeah. But that ain’t the story. Here’s the story. Lawsuits were filed on behalf of 25 couples saying the ban on gay marriage was unconstitutional. One of ‘um was filed by a cop. A lady Detective and her partner.”

 

“Do they work for us?”

 

“No, beer for brains. This is 2012 I’m talking about. Not now.”

 

“Yeah Ok. So what happened?”

 

“So they filed the suit against the Cook County Clerk. David Orr. They sued him for not giving them marriage licenses.”

 

“OK.” Said Bathouse. “So what?”

 

“”So what Orr did? He agreed with them. He said they were right!”

 

“That is outstanding! He agreed with the folks suing him! Now tell the rest. Who had his back?”

 

“States Attorney. Anita Alverez. She said that if the courts agree, then gay marriage would be legal here without additional legislation.”

 

“So that means,” Bathhouse said, “No state reps to pay off to get this done. Guy sues you for doing something that you know is wrong. You say, ‘Yeah. Your right. It is wrong. Judge agrees. And suddenly nobody is standing up in Chicago screaming that people can’t be getting married to whoever they want.”

 

“You got it.” Said Hinky Dink. “An end run of the finest order.”

 

“By a couple of politicians.”

 

Yep”

 

“Actually doing the right thing”

 

“And, “ said Bathhouse. Doing it the Chicago way.

 
 
 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
F*ing a brilliant.
I knew this was a fantasy when you mentioned the word "Cubs" and "World Series" in the same sentence.
Great piece. I want to hear more about what Hinky Dink and Bathhouse have to say about contemporary issues. They are priceless. R
And they didn't even have to pull a knife at a pillow fight!

What? :D

RATED!
Ha! So is somebody paying you to make Chicago sound so appealing? No? Well, we'll find a workaround.
I thought the Chicago way was "They send one of yours home in an ambulance, so you send one of theirs home in a hearse." Wait...that was then, this is now. You and your damned time machine, always mixing me up. Good one.
Listening to Goodman, most excellent post!!
Love how you put this together - great post
WhatdItellya? The Chicago Way ain't ALL bad, is it? I loved this.

Lezlie
More in the same vein, sir! This is brilliantly funny and so right for today's issues.
Rated
Doug---Hinky Dink and Bathhouse have a nice package for you at the door.

John---I keep telling you. Anyone can have a bad century!

Gerald--Lemme talk to them and see what I can do.

Tink--Well, I left a few parts of the story out. That is also the Chicago way.


Pandora---With no real sports teams, politics IS our entertainment.

Matt--You remember Royko summed it up in 2 words. "Where's mine?"

jmac--He was the best.

Lamm--Hinky Dink and Bathhouse did that. I just listened. And the fact that what Alverez and Orr did is true helped a lot!


L--You unnerstan!
What a piece! Ha! Rated.
Christine---Hinky and Bathhouse appreciate your comment
PW---Whoops didn't see you there for a moment. I wonder what's in this bathtub gin I'm drinking?
Hinky Dink and Bathhouse
true Lords of the Levee
Chuck--You got it! These guys made the politicians of today look like rank amateurs. And they are all gone now, except for one guy like this that still runs Springfield. Mainly because there is nothing left to steal. And the Levee is "River North" where the 1% go to play. But oh back then. . . . .
How do you think of this stuff! Outstanding!
Bravo! Now will you marry me???
No really... RP! And again fun on a bun.
JD---Thanks! It might be the drugs. . .

Tg--Sure! But I'm kind of a slut.
I think the biggest problem on this issue is semantic. Take the word "marriage" out of the equation, and call it something else, like "Life Commitment" or something like that, which would carry the legal rights of marriage, and half the resistance to the entire issue would fade away. Or maybe I'm just naive, a condition that never plagued Bathhouse or Hinky Dink, I suspect!
Procopius---Wait.. .trying to work something out reasonably without a political end run? Am not sure I understand the concept. . . . . :)
Steve, you are allowed to get married and I want that same privilege. I want equality, not some semblance of. Not to be all hardline about it, but separate but equal is never equal.