Chauncey DeVega

Chauncey DeVega
Location
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Birthday
September 11
Title
A (Sometimes) Respectable Negro
Bio
Editor and Founder of the blog We Are Respectable Negroes He has been a guest on the BBC, Ring of Fire Radio, Ed Schultz, Joshua Holland's Alternet Radio Hour, the Burt Cohen show, and Our Common Ground. His essays have been featured by Salon, Alternet, the New York Daily News, and the Daily Kos. The NY Times, the Daily Beast, the Utne Reader, Washington Monthly, Slate, and the Week (among others) have featured his expert commentary and analysis on race, politics, and popular culture.

Editor’s Pick
MAY 1, 2012 3:07PM

Further Proof that Racism is Not an "Opinion"

Rate: 20 Flag

Blackness comes with no expectations of safety, care, or security.

Mediated realities. The pictures inside of people's heads. Life worlds. Bonding social capital. Lifestyle enclaves. The Big Sort. Red State and Blue State America. The color line. Residential housing segregation. Dense and exclusive social networks. The purpling of America.

Social scientists have developed an extensive vocabulary in order to discuss how people live in their own bubbles, and are exposed to a very narrow slice of the broader world. In matters of politics, and the Common Good, this means that what should be clear, commonly understood, and shared priors are often anything but--instead, they are made contingent, circumstantial, and open to debate and evaluation.

These gaps in experience can result in humorous, albeit very revealing, gaffs: Mitt Romney's joke about a 10,000 bet or his suggestion that young people can easily borrow 20,000 dollars from their parents and start a business. Romney had no malignant intent here--he simply does not have any friends who are poor, working class, or even barely middle class. His life world, despite his vast wealth, is limited, by choice, to those like him.

In discussions of race and racial inequality a similar dynamic also holds. While American popular culture is dependent on a type of insincere and false multiculturalism and diversity (black and brown bodies are present, but the lives behind them are often flattened and caricaturized; the white gaze still operates in the popular imagination), day to day life and society remain extremely segregated. For some, this is a result of "Whitopian" dreaming and deliberate action where the good life is defined precisely by one's ability to avoid people of color.

For others, segregation and racially homogeneous friendship and social networks are either 1) just a matter of life because race and class are intimately related to each other in America or 2) the result of a type of rational ignorance where many white folks are happy and secure knowing that they can live a quite normal and productive life (one that is guilt free) in which they will not have to encounter people of color as their bosses, neighbors, teachers, confidantes, or friends--unless they so choose.

Consequently, there are profound divergences in first principles. By implication, it is difficult to find consensus on any number of public policy issues or matters of public concern (see the huge divides in public opinion by race regarding the Trayvon Martin killing).

For example, according to public opinion surveys a significant majority of whites believe that America is a meritocracy, racism is a thing of the past, black people have an equal chance at success in the United States if "they just work hard," black children and white children have the same life chances in America, and the goals of the civil rights movement have been attained.

In addition, 80 or so percent of white respondents say that they have a close friend who is a person of color. If one does even some cursory math, this would suggest that blacks for example have at least 3 close white friends in their social network. Perhaps most absurdly, a significant percentage of respondents in a recent survey believe that racism "against" white people is a bigger problem than discrimination against racial minorities.

Given all of the overwhelming and readily available evidence to the contrary for how race over-determines life chances (and the advantages of Whiteness), this data suggests that a majority (more than 50 percent) of the white American public is in the midst of a type of mass delusion, denial, and psychosis.

In all, because shared experience(s) is/are bisected by the color line, what remains is a veil of ignorance. Thus, the existence of racism, and deep veins of white supremacy in America, are reduced to an "opinion" as opposed to one of the most documented and well-researched facts in contemporary social science. Racism is real. It is not something that people of color imagine and make up for their own narrow and personal "gain."

We are not crazy when we say that racism is killing us. We are not delusional or insane when we say that race still matters. Three recent news items help to remind us that reality is biased in the favor of our standing hypothesis that racism is real, even in post-racial Age of Obama America.

An elite unit of the New York Police Department is being investigated for operating under a standing order where its officers were instructed to shoot black people in the head like "animals"--for dead men tell no tales.

More benign, but no less problematic in its implications, the Russel Sage foundation has released a compendium of research on the relationship between race and class in America. Some of their findings include:

Stereotypes are pervasively used in cross-class encounters. Brain imaging scans show that rich people are often seen as competent but cold and untrustworthy, according to studies from psychologist Susan Fiske. By contrast, poor people are viewed as lacking both warmth and competence, and are often blamed for their poverty. In one study, Princeton students reported their reactions to a peer who was described alternately as rich or poor, and lazy or hardworking. Respondents gave strongly negative reactions to both the lazy and hardworking poor peer; by contrast, the work ethic of the affluent peer did not polarize ratings.  

Your social class may influence how you are racially identified. Individuals are less likely to be identified as white and more likely to be identified as black if they have ever experienced markers of low socioeconomic status such as incarceration or unemployment, according to psychologists Diana T. Sanchez and Julia A. Garcia.

Recently, the W.K. Kellog Foundation's Healing for Democracy conference brought together some of the leading scholars and researchers on social inequality and public policy. Apparently, the collective subconscious of American society remains sick with the disease of racism:
Hinojosa said it is “irrefutable” what is happening in America today. “We are clearly becoming a more multicultural, multiracial, mixed country. That is the future.” But she noted that the changing demographics are causing tension and fear among the majority. “There’s an element of unconsciousness there,” she said, “but there’s also an element of consciousness which is saying – at this moment I’m in the world of being a non-Hispanic Anglo…I don’t want to become a minority.”

One panelist, Dr. David Williams, professor of African and African American Studies at Harvard University, cited studies documenting that when Latinos and African Americans were treated by physicians for a broken bone in their leg, they received pain medication significantly less often than white patients with the same injury

“How on earth do we make sense of this?” Dr. Williams asked. “How is it possible that for the best trained medical workforce in the world to produce… care that appears to be so discriminatory? The answer: unconscious discrimination. Research shows that when one holds a negative stereotype about a group and meets someone from that group, without their conscious awareness, it is an unconscious process and it is automatic. They will treat that person differently and honestly not know that they did it...”

Dr. Gail Christopher, vice president for program strategy at the Kellogg Foundation, explained that centuries of a racial hierarchy in America has left its mark on our society, especially pertaining to how people of color are perceived by whites. “Our society assigns value to groups of people,” she said. “It is a process that is embedded in the consciousness of Americans and impacted by centuries of bias.”

During the discussion today, panelists shared insights demonstrating how people make unconscious decisions. Dr. Phillip Goff, assistant psychology professor at UCLA, showed examples of how law enforcement officials can be motivated by unconscious bias not only to race, but also to what they perceive as threats to their masculinity.

The people that are supposed to protect us are in fact killing us. The caregivers who should do no harm and take care of us when we are sick are instead leaving us to suffer. These facts ought not to be surprising.

Nevertheless, they are no less damning.

Ultimately, I don't blame white folks for practicing rational ignorance about the grotesque realities of white supremacy in post-civil rights America. If by birthright and color, I could choose to ignore such matters I would too. Such a choice is unethical. However, I would be saved much mental energy. God and fate have not allowed me such a privilege and luxury. I would not want it any other way. 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
It's something unfortunately some people seem programmed not just by upbringing, but as to group identity, if class cuts across that too, if in ways that can make things better and worse at the same time. Me, I'm a weird person, so not so much as to feeling, although then I often run into ethnic identity enforcers so to speak, and not just white either. People need to feel a part of things, "man is a social animal, and no man is happy alone, lest he be a beast or god," Aristotle, and so they get channeled into identities they may not even really feel are valid, but, play along with, since the alternative is exile, and no one really likes a lone wolf. Over time in the American case, it seems like class is becoming more of a sense of identity than ethnicity, if that has its own tensions too, per the dreaded one per cent, although it also means that there a lot more blacks with money than is usually allowed as part of the discussion, as that doesn't fit in. And then take Zimmerman; how does he fit in that, and what of Asians? On balance, America is still more tolerant of race than are say the Han of Tibetans or Russians of Chechnyans, and younger people definitely don't seem as socially encoded, and there have been empires before in which race was barely perceived at all, as in Late Rome, if the Romans didn't seem to be able to quite accept the Germans, and which was their undoing in no small part, as was the British in India too, ironic as to Northern Indians being radically assertive often as to being "Aryan." It's obvious though that isolating the poorest blacks is a bad idea, if upper class blacks often do that too, as class matters a whole lot as to how you are valued. Mellencamp wasn't all wrong to speak of Little Pink Houses, but, there does not exist a classless society in the history of civilization, and never will in any complex society, because the division of labor means that power has to be distributed somewhat unequally as to "Management and Labor," even in the Soviet Union and Mao's China, where the apparatchiks ruled instead of the capitalists, and really just became the latter after 1989, if with significantly more of a police state. And of course as to division of labor, men with guns always, always have a say, often the last one, like at the end of the Roman Republic, when things got so divided by class and new identities from the Mediterranean basis, that only a Caesar could rule.
Do you think a gritty tv series about black people living with racism would help in the white mentality thing?
Of course "black children and white children have the same life chances in America." Then they emerge from the womb and all that changes.

Excellent piece. Thanks.
What a crybaby you are. I will give you an example of an African American man I would be very happy to have over for dinner, and be proud to call my friend: Mr. Herman Cain, late of the Republikan presidential nomination race...race, as in contest, not biological distinctiveness (eye roll). Mr. Herman Cain (and he has fucked a lot of white women, and who cares) would slap you upside your head, kick your butt, and put you in a management trainee program to put your life energies to practical use, like making a better pizza, topped with a LOT OF MEAT, for real men to eat. You are a snivelling veggie pizza eating sissy...wink
Women make 77cent on the dollar, unemployment among blacks and latinos is double or triple unemployment among whites in the same cities. Blacks and latinos are convicted and serve more time in jail than whites... it goes on and on... the numbers don't lie.
Another excellent piece. ~r
I think AMericans in general are deluded about meritocracy. 99% of them have NO chance to equal the fortune of Romney, regardless of race. Add racial factors and it gets harder to get even part way there. The whole "meritocracy" concept is a vital part of why many white Americans can't seem to understand that they are voting against their own economic interests with "spoil the rich" policies. They still think one day they will be rich.
"Social scientists have developed an extensive vocabulary in order to discuss how people live in their own bubbles, and are exposed to a very narrow slice of the broader world."

Does this explain your racist views against white people? Wait, I forget. You are not white so you can't be racist. Only white people can be racist.
The Mock-u-mented American Experience is indeed the all consuming mockery that is now the USA Consensus His-tory. A Fairy Tale between "gentlemen" allowing former West Point classmates turned opposing Generals turned Washington insiders to turn and face each other with some measure of prestige in the face of the crimes of Hell and Brimstone, just make a few equivalences and then we can all make like it never happened!

So, driving anywhere you want anytime you want with no fear of the police is normal, but DWB is just an equivalent driving experience! The same thing, yes?! Doing 20 years for a 3rd Rock is the same as walking with Community Service after an Ounce of Powder, Si!?

Ad Naseum.

Americans are COWARDS on race. The Hawaiian Haole are not, they've admitted acknowledged and appropriated the crimes of their great-grandparent Missionaries and there is no BIG LIE to cover up like some Peyton Place secret everyone sees but no one is supposed to ever talk about, like, say, how that one Slave looks exactly like his MASTER ... and our inter-mixing continues at a staggering rate, the vast majority already enjoying multiple lines of heredity and parent culture- and a GREAT LIFE!!!
It's not a meritocracy for anyone. The children of the rich don't deserve what they get, and the children of the poor don't deserve what they get. At one time race decided who got to advance in the middle class. Now everybody's f**ked.
You never fail to make me think. I was prepared to raise issue with you on the "expectation of meritocracy" and would in a one on one dialogue. But that would not obviate the fact that you are indeed right in the totality of your argument here. Thanks.
Chauncey -
"the result of a type of rational ignorance where many white folks are happy and secure knowing that they can live a quite normal and productive life (one that is guilt free)"

Please explain to me what I am to be guilty about.
As a Latina/Hispanic woman whose family has lived in the United States for centuries, I'm disheartened by how easily Europeans can immigrate to the U.S., and meld into "the majority," no questions asked. Yet, people like me are treated like "foreigners" in the only country our families have ever known.

In my neighborhood alone over the past few years I've encountered increasing numbers of immigrants from the U.K. They are everywhere!! The hospital, the bookstore, the mall, etc. I have nothing against the Brits. I'm as big an Anglophile as any other American. They are charming people, and we share a common heritage through language, history, etc. (But I can same the same thing about Spain. They're charming people, too!)

Why aren't more Americans questioning all of the Brits coming to the U.S.? How do they get here? Do they have visas? Green cards? How are they walking into all of these jobs so easily? Aren't they taking jobs away from Americans?

Anyway, another example of the perplexing hypocrisies in our country.
What is the source of unfo on the shooting order from nypd please elaborate.
That people are in prison merely because they are black, are discriminated in jobs because they are black, are denied loans because they are black, are cheated financially because they are black, have a higher death rate from medical treatment because they are black, are kept away from living in certain areas because they are black, are given inferior educations because they are black, all these things and more are fully supported by statistics and cannot be denied by well informed people. The facts are out in the open for anyone to discover. To not acknowledge those facts is beyond ignorance. It indicates stupidity and unfortunately stupidity is incurable.
Black people, no doubt, have all the potentials of anybody of any other color since skin color is no indication of mental or physical ability or lack of ability.

But these denials are well understood by black people and a great many of them are correctly very angry for these unjustifiable denials.

I don't know what to do about this except to not participate in these abuses and to help where ever I can.
Of course racism is alive and unwell in America. And though we have made a great deal of progress ameliorating de jure racism, we've made much less progress when it comes to de facto racism. Until we make substantial progress in that area, too, America will remain crippled by what I call the Curse of Columbus.

That said, I'm in agreement with Don Rich, or at least with his assertion that there has never been a society free from racism. But that "everybody does it" is certainly no justification for such an evil. Rather that reality ought to make us ever watchful to guard against what seems to be a genetic predisposition to racism across the human species.

A particularly interesting historical example is the so-called Seminole tribe, which was not a tribe at all, but an agglomeration of Indians from various Southern tribes, escaped slaves and renegade whites. Indeed, the so-called Seminole Wars of the the 1800's were in fact equally slave rebellions. Yet even in that mix and even facing a common enemy, racial tensions and differences reared their ugly head within that community.

When I lived in Orlando, I was asked to speak to a group interested in their Seminole ancestry. Imagine my surprise when I was the only "white" person in the room -- everyone else would have been deemed black, and none would have been considered "Indian" -- except by themselves.

One glaringly obvious example of racism is the treatment of the Black Man in the White House, a man who by any objective measure is the embodiment of the American Dream. Yet he is despised by the very same "real Americans" who adored his predecessor, who was by any objective measure the antithesis of the American Dream.

For all his gifts and accomplishments, they view Obama as unfit for that position and view him as "black" even tho he is half-white, even tho he was raised "white" -- whatever that means. I've said it before, and I'll say it again -- given my upbringing, that is lower socio-economic class and of "mixed" heritage, I am more "black" then Barack Obama, even though my skin-tone is somewhat lighter.

Despite all that, I remain hopeful that race will become less of a problem with each succeeding generation, and particularly as more and more of those born in the first half of the 20th Century begin to lose political and economic power and die-off.

It is quite clear that while young people may not be voting in elections, they are voting with their organs. One example of what future Americans will look like is actress Rosario Dawson, who is deemed black by most of "white" America, but who lists her ethnicity as Puerto Rican, Afro-Cuban, Irish and Native American. I say she is what future Americans will look like, but I realize that is only in my dreams.

Unfortunately, the consequences of the racial divide in America are exacerbated by the class divide, and make no mistake, America is no more a classless society than it is a post-racial society. And until America deals with income inequality, racism and classism will remain a serious problem.
@Tom Cordle

Having participated with fellow Americans who were black in demonstrations in Tennessee in 1963 against the racist treatment in the area I am no stranger to the inequalities suffered by black people in the USA but my objections to President Obama have absolutely nothing due to his race. It is disgraceful that this has ever been brought up on the political scene. But the violence he has done to basic Constitutional rights and his failure to live up to the expectations of those who voted for him are very disturbing to me. I realize this is an off topic comment but since Obama's name has been brought up it seems appropriate to me to mention that there are other vital issues in the matter.
Everything is marked by race and class and there is obviously more than enough horrifying evidence to support this sad fact. The least that could be done it would seem is to acknowledge loud and clearly that this is so.

In the Romney out-of-touch category--I remember when the elder Bush was entranced by a price scanner in a grocery store. He hadn't been in one if 25 years.
loudly and clearly

in 25 years
"In the Romney out-of-touch category--I remember when the elder Bush was entranced by a price scanner in a grocery store. He hadn't been in one if 25 years."

fun - but not so true-
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/bushscan.asp
"In addition, 80 or so percent of white respondents say that they have a close friend who is a person of color. If one does even some cursory math, this would suggest that blacks for example have at least 3 close white friends in their social network."

Unfortunately, cursory math does not work here - for example, let us say there is a military unit with 25 whites and 5 black men - tightly knit and everyone likes everyone. If you ask all the white guys how many black men there are in there social environment, each would say 5, implying a universe, using your logic, of 125 black men. If you ask the black men how many white guys, they would say 25, again implying a universe of 125 white men.
What your 'cursory math' ignores is the overlap where one friend is also considered a friend by lots of other people.
So rather than an example of how 'whitie' is either lying or deluded, the 80% figure is merely what it is.
@ the traveler

How about Romney advising students in financial trouble to borrow $20,000 from their parents to solve their problems. (see: http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2012/04/27/romney-borrow-money-from-your-parents.html )

Does that satisfy your sense of being out of touch with reality?
@Jan
My criticism wasn't addressed to you unless you're a Birther or a Muslim/Maoist/Kenyan true-believer, which you obviously are not. Certainly, there is much to criticize about Obama's presidency. But the simple hard truth is that the only viable alternative in 2012 is in no way viable, in fact a Romney presidency is to0 horrible to even contemplate.
@ Tom Cordle

I understand generally your viewpoint but the point of basing criticism against Obama on his race has the unfortunate consequence of indicating that all criticism of him is race based and I found that totally objectionable. You might take a look at http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/05/02/the-constitutional-crimes-of-barack-obama/ to get a full picture of my very strong dismay at Obama and his appointees which has nothing to do with race.
Tom:

"One glaringly obvious example of racism is the treatment of the Black Man in the White House, a man who by any objective measure is the embodiment of the American Dream. Yet he is despised by the very same "real Americans" who adored his predecessor, who was by any objective measure the antithesis of the American Dream."

I don't dislike President Obama because he is anything other than taking this country down the toilet. He can be black, he can stick a cigar up an interns you know what, as someone else did, or even eat his family dog. I don't care.

-Did he close Gitmo in his first year?

-Does he publish bill before they are voted on?

-Did he refuse to bring lobbyists into the White House

-Provide an option for a pre-filled-out tax return they you could just sign and not pay to have it done?

-End no-bid contracts?

-Forbid companies in bankruptcy from giving exec's bonuses?

-Allow imported prescription drugs?

-Require employers to give 7 paid sick days per year?

Shell I go on?
Catnlion
Didn't I just qualify my comment in my reply to Jan Sand? Didn't I point out my charge of racism was leveled at Birthers and Muslim/Maoist/Kenyan true-believers -- or does that characterization apply to you? Didn't I just voice criticism of Obama above? Now please cite the occasions when you similarly criticized Bush the Least during his eight-year rain of error.
You black fellers should have voted for Ron Paul, because even though he's an active racist, his plans to end the wars on terror and drugs would have done more to advance the cause of blacks than anything since the 13th and 14th amendments (and, all whiteys are racists in some way, but some are more active as they succumb to these false thoughts, and some are more passive in their reactions when confronted with them).

Blacks aren't dying...well, they are, but more are ending up incarcerated or in the military (and, thus sent away). Either way, entire generations of black males have been lost to murder, jail, drug abuse, or some combination thereof.

It's disgusting, and we keep letting it happen. At least with Paul, though he may mumble "that word" under his breath at you, his policies would have made up for his personal, misguided feelings about race...and then some.
It is the illusion of meritocracy that keeps non-thinking followers of conservative ideologies in the voting booths. If it were anything but an illusion, wouldn't the numbers of the rich amount to more than 1%? It is frustrating to witness the mindlessness of this belief.

Lezlie
There is only one solution to a brain that evolved to determine differences and similarites and create bonds and tribal groups based on those assesments.
Unity through Hate.
If we had a new race, of perhaps aliens or humaniod feline mutants created by evil scientists, that threatened all human life, we could comfortably come together in our common hatred and form long lasting bonds that would erase our own petty genetic difference recognition programs.
Unfortunatly this isn't going to happen any time soon, so I guess we're stuck with our current trends for another 10 - 15 thousand years.
Tom,

Yes I did.

-Tarp, never should have been considered

-Drill baby drill, never happened

-Tax cuts should not have had sunset provision

-Borders wide open

-OSB, not dead yet

-Playing games with North Korea

-Earmarks allowed to happen

-Cross border trucking agreement with Mexico

Just to name a few.
If I could only learn to type.

That should have been OBL
I agree with Tom and Jan.

Chauncey:
I disagree with you on your statement "God and fate have not allowed me such a privilege and luxury. I would not want it any other way".
Could you please emerge from your inferior position and move on to where I think you should stand?
All men are equal.It is the American society that created this cancer of slavery and inferiority and now does not know how to get rid of it.
Rated for freedom and equality for all,finally.
Do you think that values within a community and within each individual home have anything to do with this? I can plainly see why and for what reason some students succeed and those who don't. It begins with if you have money or not, if you don't then you better be one of the lucky ones to get picked in the random selection for a better school. EVen if you get in, then there's rules, which a lot of kids do not follow and a lot of parents make excuses for. Then, there's the tiering... the better scoring kids to better schools, the second tier is charters, and the last tier is neighborhood schools, which will always have the bottom of the barrel in students with lowest scores. In those schools, which I am in, I see a lot. I see hard working minority students, getting scholarships, going to college, trying to do what no one else in their family has accomplished. I also see gang bangers, kids who have made a choice to go that route... I see abused kids, not physically, but kids who are rough around the edges, who do not have support, their mothers have 10 kids in one bedroom home, or pregnant teens who wanted to get pregnant because they "fell in love" with the boy... kids who waste their education, despite the easiest assignments, keep asking what MORE we can do for them. How about show up? Do the work? We baby them, by the thousands. I've heard students in passing say "f*ck them white teachers, I f*cking hate whites"... because a teacher asked them to do work? Because they were asked to leave when their private conversations spilled out in the middle of a math lecture? You see, reverse hatred (whether you think its valid or not) is alive and well. And me, coming from the Seattle area, never saw how hateful people can be, until I came to the midwest. So, racism, of all kinds... alive and well. And I think, some people, even minorities, like to perpetuate it as much as some "whites" who must "subconsciously" feel.
@peeling an orange

I don't think it's 'reverse racism', it's just anger and hatred.

The powers that be have defined racism narrowly in order to include some economic element (power stuff); that's just a semantic ploy to capture a word and forgive other behaviors.
That means the rest of us end up struggling for a word to define how many groups hate. That they do is irrefutable.
While some whites hate blacks, some blacks hate whites, some blacks hate Asians, some Koreans hate Japanese (and vice versa), etc and so on... - all of them have 'reasons' that we may not understand or share.
If we look closely at most haters, their expressed 'reason' may not be a sensible response to their own life but seems to be displaced anger.
They may hate because of historical wrongs that they see as unremediated.
They may hate because it is much simpler to blame someone else for their life or their situation than to work at changing it.
They may hate because it is the only thing they have within themselves that defines who they are and it provides a focus for their own feelings of helplessness.
They may hate because it gives them a platform to feel superior.
I have no idea what propels people and it's not my responsibility to forgive people their anger as justified.
Forgiving an adult for their hatreds is like forgiving an adult criminal for his actions because he/she had a tough childhood; at some time, an adult must be responsible for themselves and their own behaviors.

On the other hand, OS has 'allowable' hatreds; it is perfectly acceptable here to express feelings about certain groups of people, to generalize and make statements that are clearly factually non-sustainable - those 'acceptable hatreds' makes OS the equal of Stormfront but with different allowable targets and only slightly better language standards.

OS has 'allowable' hatreds; it is perfectly acceptable here to express feelings about certain groups of people, to generalize and make statements that are clearly factually non-sustainable - and that makes OS the equal of Stormfront but with different acceptable targets and only slightly better language standards.
Traveler: I agree with much of what you said... I'm not sure what to do with your comment in the last paragraph. Stormfront? Yikes. Maybe I don't read the most controversial posts, or respond, or had nasties... I know they exist... I do see overall that OS is a liberal media source, with some conservatives... I do see overall themes... with which I do not agree... but I can say that I do agree there's a lot of "well here's the facts" when they really aren't facts at all.
This is the first time I've read your work, so I hesitate to comment because of what you may have written in past posts. This piece is accurate. If I were to suggest areas to help fill in some concepts, I'd suggest two:

1White Privilege. The idea that you don't have to be racist to live a life that takes advantage of racism. See esp. Tim Wise

2. The illusion of racial symmetry. Discrimination and Reverse Discrimination are surprisingly unrelated concepts.
This is the first time I've read your work, so I hesitate to comment because of what you may have written in past posts. This piece is accurate. If I were to suggest areas to help fill in some concepts, I'd suggest two:

1White Privilege. The idea that you don't have to be racist to live a life that takes advantage of racism. See esp. Tim Wise

2. The illusion of racial symmetry. Discrimination and Reverse
Discrimination are surprisingly unrelated concepts.

This comment may post twice. Sorry if it does.
"An elite unit of the New York Police Department is being investigated for operating under a standing order where its officers were instructed to shoot black people in the head like "animals"--for dead men tell no tales."

Interested and exciting - but untrue.
The truth as reported in the papers is that the leader of this unit is being investigated based on complaints of members of the unit.

"Given all of the overwhelming and readily available evidence to the contrary for how race over-determines life chances (and the advantages of Whiteness), this data suggests that a majority (more than 50 percent) of the white American public is in the midst of a type of mass delusion, denial, and psychosis."

This statement is based on a bad logical statement I dealt with in a prior comment and the writer has no basis beyond hyperbole for this.

"We are not crazy when we say that racism is killing us. " You may not be crazy but you will be wrong. I refer you to all of the data on the causes of crimes published by the FBI and other agencies.

It is not surprising that the writer sees the opportunity of being a 'race man' but it is a bit embarrassing that people actually don't call him at his game more often.

I refer readers to 'Mau Mauing the Flak Catcher' by Thomas Wolfe for a model of his behavior.
I agree with you.

Racism is a toxin that corrodes the fabric of our common humanity, it needs to be seen for the poison it is. A big problem is people do not take it seriously enough and see it as a right of free speech.

That is easy to say..... when you are not personally affected by it or having your children and friends, demeaned so badly. And there is so much racism out there these days.... truck loads of it!
Traveler,
Hyperbole, maybe. Be careful where you take this, though, because in terms of White Americans grossly, and I mean grossly, underestimating the current effects of and continued functional existence of racism in the US, I think he's right. Most people I speak to about this don't tend to have an awareness of it that is adequate, let alone comprehensive.
@Kosh: I hope you will add Chauncey DeVega to your favorites. He writes with conviction and passion, but most importantly, he writes with the facts behind him, and he can prove it. Your point about the relative cluelessness among white people about the true reach of systemic racism in the U.S. is right on the money. That is the reason I am so patient and willing to try to explain it in my own way. No one can understand what s/he doesn't even know.

Lezlie
Nicely done! Thanks for the mindful prodding...
Lezlie writes: "He writes with conviction and passion, but most importantly, he writes with the facts behind him . . . "

The facts? Not if what he wrote about the Zimmerman/Martin incident is any indication.

But for the sake of argument, let's say that everything Chauncey writes about race is totally correct, that white folks really are THAT racist, and THAT clueless about being racists. If so, what follows from that? What "action items" show up on our societal "to do" list because of that? In other words, even if he's right, what different does it make? A lot of this seems to be about who gets to claim the title of Victim. Once we award black people the title, what then?

Or let's go the other way. Let's say that Chauncey is wrong -- that America really is a meritocracy, and that people are rewarded in proportion to the amount of effort they put into improving their own lives. What that means for black people is that they should study hard, become educated, work hard, and do everything they can to improve themselves.

Now let's say that Chauncey is right -- that America isn't a meritocracy, and that people are not rewarded in proportion to the amount of effort they put into improving their own lives. What does that mean for black people? Doesn't it mean . . . the same thing? That they should study hard, become educated, work hard, and do everything they can to improve themselves? Since under this scenario there is no meritocracy, the rewards may not be as great, or may not come at all. But what other option is there? Drop out of school? Don't become educated? Don't work hard?

Whether he's wrong or right, whether or not we award black folks the victim crown, does it matter in any significant way?
As we move farther from the time of institutional segregation, race will not be the gulf between people groups. Economic will be. As more and more minorities move into the upper economic levels they tend to leave behind their cultural identity and adopt one based on education, mobility, and wealth.

You do not have to point to entertainment or sports to see upward mobile black people because they are working as accountants, teachers, business owners, engineers, doctors, lawyers, and they share more in common with those of their own social and economic background than race. The same is true of everyone else including whites. It's not race it is net worth that divides us.

Chris Rock made a joke about living in a wealthy neighborhood. He said he had to become a star while all his white next store neighbor had to do was be a dentist. All joking a side, all they both had to do was make enough money to live in the same neighborhood. Chris Rock's neighbor could just as easily be a black dentist or engineer.

Isn't that what everyone is working for in the first place?
Some scientists (social scientists included), along with the media and the clergy in America develop new vocabulary mainly to justify social injustice. The relevant issue is poverty, not racism. The most racist people are the militantly politically correct ones; those who describe everything as "stereotypes" and "generalizations." This is censorship. Also, these "surveys" are not infallible. Other surveys can lead to an opposite conclusion. We have seen that before in the nature vs, nurture wars.

Remember that preference/taste is mostly genetic. Therefore, there is only one solution in a severely racist society like ours. Fix income inequality, eradicate poverty and you will have a good chance at even abolishing racism. R
Thoth,
Maybe.

One thing I can tell you about racism is that it shows up blatantly in an awful lot of areas, even after we control for class. Racism is still an unexpectedly powerful force in America in and of itself, independent of class, and therefore has to be addressed for what it is. I wish it weren't so but some of my wishes don't get granted, including this one.

Not only is Mr. DeVega not wrong about racism, from what I know, he's not even exaggerating.