Blackness comes with no expectations of safety, care, or security.
Mediated realities. The pictures inside of people's heads. Life worlds. Bonding social capital. Lifestyle enclaves. The Big Sort. Red State and Blue State America. The color line. Residential housing segregation. Dense and exclusive social networks. The purpling of America.
Social scientists have developed an extensive vocabulary in order to discuss how people live in their own bubbles, and are exposed to a very narrow slice of the broader world. In matters of politics, and the Common Good, this means that what should be clear, commonly understood, and shared priors are often anything but--instead, they are made contingent, circumstantial, and open to debate and evaluation.
These gaps in experience can result in humorous, albeit very revealing, gaffs: Mitt Romney's joke about a 10,000 bet or his suggestion that young people can easily borrow 20,000 dollars from their parents and start a business. Romney had no malignant intent here--he simply does not have any friends who are poor, working class, or even barely middle class. His life world, despite his vast wealth, is limited, by choice, to those like him.
In discussions of race and racial inequality a similar dynamic also holds. While American popular culture is dependent on a type of insincere and false multiculturalism and diversity (black and brown bodies are present, but the lives behind them are often flattened and caricaturized; the white gaze still operates in the popular imagination), day to day life and society remain extremely segregated. For some, this is a result of "Whitopian" dreaming and deliberate action where the good life is defined precisely by one's ability to avoid people of color.
For others, segregation and racially homogeneous friendship and social networks are either 1) just a matter of life because race and class are intimately related to each other in America or 2) the result of a type of rational ignorance where many white folks are happy and secure knowing that they can live a quite normal and productive life (one that is guilt free) in which they will not have to encounter people of color as their bosses, neighbors, teachers, confidantes, or friends--unless they so choose.
Consequently, there are profound divergences in first principles. By implication, it is difficult to find consensus on any number of public policy issues or matters of public concern (see the huge divides in public opinion by race regarding the Trayvon Martin killing).
For example, according to public opinion surveys a significant majority of whites believe that America is a meritocracy, racism is a thing of the past, black people have an equal chance at success in the United States if "they just work hard," black children and white children have the same life chances in America, and the goals of the civil rights movement have been attained.
In addition, 80 or so percent of white respondents say that they have a close friend who is a person of color. If one does even some cursory math, this would suggest that blacks for example have at least 3 close white friends in their social network. Perhaps most absurdly, a significant percentage of respondents in a recent survey believe that racism "against" white people is a bigger problem than discrimination against racial minorities.
Given all of the overwhelming and readily available evidence to the contrary for how race over-determines life chances (and the advantages of Whiteness), this data suggests that a majority (more than 50 percent) of the white American public is in the midst of a type of mass delusion, denial, and psychosis.
In all, because shared experience(s) is/are bisected by the color line, what remains is a veil of ignorance. Thus, the existence of racism, and deep veins of white supremacy in America, are reduced to an "opinion" as opposed to one of the most documented and well-researched facts in contemporary social science. Racism is real. It is not something that people of color imagine and make up for their own narrow and personal "gain."
We are not crazy when we say that racism is killing us. We are not delusional or insane when we say that race still matters. Three recent news items help to remind us that reality is biased in the favor of our standing hypothesis that racism is real, even in post-racial Age of Obama America.
An elite unit of the New York Police Department is being investigated for operating under a standing order where its officers were instructed to shoot black people in the head like "animals"--for dead men tell no tales.
More benign, but no less problematic in its implications, the Russel Sage foundation has released a compendium of research on the relationship between race and class in America. Some of their findings include:
Stereotypes are pervasively used in cross-class encounters. Brain imaging scans show that rich people are often seen as competent but cold and untrustworthy, according to studies from psychologist Susan Fiske. By contrast, poor people are viewed as lacking both warmth and competence, and are often blamed for their poverty. In one study, Princeton students reported their reactions to a peer who was described alternately as rich or poor, and lazy or hardworking. Respondents gave strongly negative reactions to both the lazy and hardworking poor peer; by contrast, the work ethic of the affluent peer did not polarize ratings.Recently, the W.K. Kellog Foundation's Healing for Democracy conference brought together some of the leading scholars and researchers on social inequality and public policy. Apparently, the collective subconscious of American society remains sick with the disease of racism:Your social class may influence how you are racially identified. Individuals are less likely to be identified as white and more likely to be identified as black if they have ever experienced markers of low socioeconomic status such as incarceration or unemployment, according to psychologists Diana T. Sanchez and Julia A. Garcia.
Hinojosa said it is “irrefutable” what is happening in America today. “We are clearly becoming a more multicultural, multiracial, mixed country. That is the future.” But she noted that the changing demographics are causing tension and fear among the majority. “There’s an element of unconsciousness there,” she said, “but there’s also an element of consciousness which is saying – at this moment I’m in the world of being a non-Hispanic Anglo…I don’t want to become a minority.”The people that are supposed to protect us are in fact killing us. The caregivers who should do no harm and take care of us when we are sick are instead leaving us to suffer. These facts ought not to be surprising.One panelist, Dr. David Williams, professor of African and African American Studies at Harvard University, cited studies documenting that when Latinos and African Americans were treated by physicians for a broken bone in their leg, they received pain medication significantly less often than white patients with the same injury
“How on earth do we make sense of this?” Dr. Williams asked. “How is it possible that for the best trained medical workforce in the world to produce… care that appears to be so discriminatory? The answer: unconscious discrimination. Research shows that when one holds a negative stereotype about a group and meets someone from that group, without their conscious awareness, it is an unconscious process and it is automatic. They will treat that person differently and honestly not know that they did it...”
Dr. Gail Christopher, vice president for program strategy at the Kellogg Foundation, explained that centuries of a racial hierarchy in America has left its mark on our society, especially pertaining to how people of color are perceived by whites. “Our society assigns value to groups of people,” she said. “It is a process that is embedded in the consciousness of Americans and impacted by centuries of bias.”
During the discussion today, panelists shared insights demonstrating how people make unconscious decisions. Dr. Phillip Goff, assistant psychology professor at UCLA, showed examples of how law enforcement officials can be motivated by unconscious bias not only to race, but also to what they perceive as threats to their masculinity.
Nevertheless, they are no less damning.
Ultimately, I don't blame white folks for practicing rational ignorance about the grotesque realities of white supremacy in post-civil rights America. If by birthright and color, I could choose to ignore such matters I would too. Such a choice is unethical. However, I would be saved much mental energy. God and fate have not allowed me such a privilege and luxury. I would not want it any other way.


Salon.com
Comments
Excellent piece. Thanks.
Does this explain your racist views against white people? Wait, I forget. You are not white so you can't be racist. Only white people can be racist.
So, driving anywhere you want anytime you want with no fear of the police is normal, but DWB is just an equivalent driving experience! The same thing, yes?! Doing 20 years for a 3rd Rock is the same as walking with Community Service after an Ounce of Powder, Si!?
Ad Naseum.
Americans are COWARDS on race. The Hawaiian Haole are not, they've admitted acknowledged and appropriated the crimes of their great-grandparent Missionaries and there is no BIG LIE to cover up like some Peyton Place secret everyone sees but no one is supposed to ever talk about, like, say, how that one Slave looks exactly like his MASTER ... and our inter-mixing continues at a staggering rate, the vast majority already enjoying multiple lines of heredity and parent culture- and a GREAT LIFE!!!
"the result of a type of rational ignorance where many white folks are happy and secure knowing that they can live a quite normal and productive life (one that is guilt free)"
Please explain to me what I am to be guilty about.
In my neighborhood alone over the past few years I've encountered increasing numbers of immigrants from the U.K. They are everywhere!! The hospital, the bookstore, the mall, etc. I have nothing against the Brits. I'm as big an Anglophile as any other American. They are charming people, and we share a common heritage through language, history, etc. (But I can same the same thing about Spain. They're charming people, too!)
Why aren't more Americans questioning all of the Brits coming to the U.S.? How do they get here? Do they have visas? Green cards? How are they walking into all of these jobs so easily? Aren't they taking jobs away from Americans?
Anyway, another example of the perplexing hypocrisies in our country.
Black people, no doubt, have all the potentials of anybody of any other color since skin color is no indication of mental or physical ability or lack of ability.
But these denials are well understood by black people and a great many of them are correctly very angry for these unjustifiable denials.
I don't know what to do about this except to not participate in these abuses and to help where ever I can.
That said, I'm in agreement with Don Rich, or at least with his assertion that there has never been a society free from racism. But that "everybody does it" is certainly no justification for such an evil. Rather that reality ought to make us ever watchful to guard against what seems to be a genetic predisposition to racism across the human species.
A particularly interesting historical example is the so-called Seminole tribe, which was not a tribe at all, but an agglomeration of Indians from various Southern tribes, escaped slaves and renegade whites. Indeed, the so-called Seminole Wars of the the 1800's were in fact equally slave rebellions. Yet even in that mix and even facing a common enemy, racial tensions and differences reared their ugly head within that community.
When I lived in Orlando, I was asked to speak to a group interested in their Seminole ancestry. Imagine my surprise when I was the only "white" person in the room -- everyone else would have been deemed black, and none would have been considered "Indian" -- except by themselves.
One glaringly obvious example of racism is the treatment of the Black Man in the White House, a man who by any objective measure is the embodiment of the American Dream. Yet he is despised by the very same "real Americans" who adored his predecessor, who was by any objective measure the antithesis of the American Dream.
For all his gifts and accomplishments, they view Obama as unfit for that position and view him as "black" even tho he is half-white, even tho he was raised "white" -- whatever that means. I've said it before, and I'll say it again -- given my upbringing, that is lower socio-economic class and of "mixed" heritage, I am more "black" then Barack Obama, even though my skin-tone is somewhat lighter.
Despite all that, I remain hopeful that race will become less of a problem with each succeeding generation, and particularly as more and more of those born in the first half of the 20th Century begin to lose political and economic power and die-off.
It is quite clear that while young people may not be voting in elections, they are voting with their organs. One example of what future Americans will look like is actress Rosario Dawson, who is deemed black by most of "white" America, but who lists her ethnicity as Puerto Rican, Afro-Cuban, Irish and Native American. I say she is what future Americans will look like, but I realize that is only in my dreams.
Unfortunately, the consequences of the racial divide in America are exacerbated by the class divide, and make no mistake, America is no more a classless society than it is a post-racial society. And until America deals with income inequality, racism and classism will remain a serious problem.
Having participated with fellow Americans who were black in demonstrations in Tennessee in 1963 against the racist treatment in the area I am no stranger to the inequalities suffered by black people in the USA but my objections to President Obama have absolutely nothing due to his race. It is disgraceful that this has ever been brought up on the political scene. But the violence he has done to basic Constitutional rights and his failure to live up to the expectations of those who voted for him are very disturbing to me. I realize this is an off topic comment but since Obama's name has been brought up it seems appropriate to me to mention that there are other vital issues in the matter.
In the Romney out-of-touch category--I remember when the elder Bush was entranced by a price scanner in a grocery store. He hadn't been in one if 25 years.
in 25 years
fun - but not so true-
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/bushscan.asp
Unfortunately, cursory math does not work here - for example, let us say there is a military unit with 25 whites and 5 black men - tightly knit and everyone likes everyone. If you ask all the white guys how many black men there are in there social environment, each would say 5, implying a universe, using your logic, of 125 black men. If you ask the black men how many white guys, they would say 25, again implying a universe of 125 white men.
What your 'cursory math' ignores is the overlap where one friend is also considered a friend by lots of other people.
So rather than an example of how 'whitie' is either lying or deluded, the 80% figure is merely what it is.
How about Romney advising students in financial trouble to borrow $20,000 from their parents to solve their problems. (see: http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2012/04/27/romney-borrow-money-from-your-parents.html )
Does that satisfy your sense of being out of touch with reality?
My criticism wasn't addressed to you unless you're a Birther or a Muslim/Maoist/Kenyan true-believer, which you obviously are not. Certainly, there is much to criticize about Obama's presidency. But the simple hard truth is that the only viable alternative in 2012 is in no way viable, in fact a Romney presidency is to0 horrible to even contemplate.
I understand generally your viewpoint but the point of basing criticism against Obama on his race has the unfortunate consequence of indicating that all criticism of him is race based and I found that totally objectionable. You might take a look at http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/05/02/the-constitutional-crimes-of-barack-obama/ to get a full picture of my very strong dismay at Obama and his appointees which has nothing to do with race.
"One glaringly obvious example of racism is the treatment of the Black Man in the White House, a man who by any objective measure is the embodiment of the American Dream. Yet he is despised by the very same "real Americans" who adored his predecessor, who was by any objective measure the antithesis of the American Dream."
I don't dislike President Obama because he is anything other than taking this country down the toilet. He can be black, he can stick a cigar up an interns you know what, as someone else did, or even eat his family dog. I don't care.
-Did he close Gitmo in his first year?
-Does he publish bill before they are voted on?
-Did he refuse to bring lobbyists into the White House
-Provide an option for a pre-filled-out tax return they you could just sign and not pay to have it done?
-End no-bid contracts?
-Forbid companies in bankruptcy from giving exec's bonuses?
-Allow imported prescription drugs?
-Require employers to give 7 paid sick days per year?
Shell I go on?
Didn't I just qualify my comment in my reply to Jan Sand? Didn't I point out my charge of racism was leveled at Birthers and Muslim/Maoist/Kenyan true-believers -- or does that characterization apply to you? Didn't I just voice criticism of Obama above? Now please cite the occasions when you similarly criticized Bush the Least during his eight-year rain of error.
Blacks aren't dying...well, they are, but more are ending up incarcerated or in the military (and, thus sent away). Either way, entire generations of black males have been lost to murder, jail, drug abuse, or some combination thereof.
It's disgusting, and we keep letting it happen. At least with Paul, though he may mumble "that word" under his breath at you, his policies would have made up for his personal, misguided feelings about race...and then some.
Lezlie
Unity through Hate.
If we had a new race, of perhaps aliens or humaniod feline mutants created by evil scientists, that threatened all human life, we could comfortably come together in our common hatred and form long lasting bonds that would erase our own petty genetic difference recognition programs.
Unfortunatly this isn't going to happen any time soon, so I guess we're stuck with our current trends for another 10 - 15 thousand years.
Yes I did.
-Tarp, never should have been considered
-Drill baby drill, never happened
-Tax cuts should not have had sunset provision
-Borders wide open
-OSB, not dead yet
-Playing games with North Korea
-Earmarks allowed to happen
-Cross border trucking agreement with Mexico
Just to name a few.
That should have been OBL
Chauncey:
I disagree with you on your statement "God and fate have not allowed me such a privilege and luxury. I would not want it any other way".
Could you please emerge from your inferior position and move on to where I think you should stand?
All men are equal.It is the American society that created this cancer of slavery and inferiority and now does not know how to get rid of it.
Rated for freedom and equality for all,finally.
I don't think it's 'reverse racism', it's just anger and hatred.
The powers that be have defined racism narrowly in order to include some economic element (power stuff); that's just a semantic ploy to capture a word and forgive other behaviors.
That means the rest of us end up struggling for a word to define how many groups hate. That they do is irrefutable.
While some whites hate blacks, some blacks hate whites, some blacks hate Asians, some Koreans hate Japanese (and vice versa), etc and so on... - all of them have 'reasons' that we may not understand or share.
If we look closely at most haters, their expressed 'reason' may not be a sensible response to their own life but seems to be displaced anger.
They may hate because of historical wrongs that they see as unremediated.
They may hate because it is much simpler to blame someone else for their life or their situation than to work at changing it.
They may hate because it is the only thing they have within themselves that defines who they are and it provides a focus for their own feelings of helplessness.
They may hate because it gives them a platform to feel superior.
I have no idea what propels people and it's not my responsibility to forgive people their anger as justified.
Forgiving an adult for their hatreds is like forgiving an adult criminal for his actions because he/she had a tough childhood; at some time, an adult must be responsible for themselves and their own behaviors.
On the other hand, OS has 'allowable' hatreds; it is perfectly acceptable here to express feelings about certain groups of people, to generalize and make statements that are clearly factually non-sustainable - those 'acceptable hatreds' makes OS the equal of Stormfront but with different allowable targets and only slightly better language standards.
OS has 'allowable' hatreds; it is perfectly acceptable here to express feelings about certain groups of people, to generalize and make statements that are clearly factually non-sustainable - and that makes OS the equal of Stormfront but with different acceptable targets and only slightly better language standards.
1White Privilege. The idea that you don't have to be racist to live a life that takes advantage of racism. See esp. Tim Wise
2. The illusion of racial symmetry. Discrimination and Reverse Discrimination are surprisingly unrelated concepts.
1White Privilege. The idea that you don't have to be racist to live a life that takes advantage of racism. See esp. Tim Wise
2. The illusion of racial symmetry. Discrimination and Reverse
Discrimination are surprisingly unrelated concepts.
This comment may post twice. Sorry if it does.
Interested and exciting - but untrue.
The truth as reported in the papers is that the leader of this unit is being investigated based on complaints of members of the unit.
"Given all of the overwhelming and readily available evidence to the contrary for how race over-determines life chances (and the advantages of Whiteness), this data suggests that a majority (more than 50 percent) of the white American public is in the midst of a type of mass delusion, denial, and psychosis."
This statement is based on a bad logical statement I dealt with in a prior comment and the writer has no basis beyond hyperbole for this.
"We are not crazy when we say that racism is killing us. " You may not be crazy but you will be wrong. I refer you to all of the data on the causes of crimes published by the FBI and other agencies.
It is not surprising that the writer sees the opportunity of being a 'race man' but it is a bit embarrassing that people actually don't call him at his game more often.
I refer readers to 'Mau Mauing the Flak Catcher' by Thomas Wolfe for a model of his behavior.
Racism is a toxin that corrodes the fabric of our common humanity, it needs to be seen for the poison it is. A big problem is people do not take it seriously enough and see it as a right of free speech.
That is easy to say..... when you are not personally affected by it or having your children and friends, demeaned so badly. And there is so much racism out there these days.... truck loads of it!
Hyperbole, maybe. Be careful where you take this, though, because in terms of White Americans grossly, and I mean grossly, underestimating the current effects of and continued functional existence of racism in the US, I think he's right. Most people I speak to about this don't tend to have an awareness of it that is adequate, let alone comprehensive.
Lezlie
The facts? Not if what he wrote about the Zimmerman/Martin incident is any indication.
But for the sake of argument, let's say that everything Chauncey writes about race is totally correct, that white folks really are THAT racist, and THAT clueless about being racists. If so, what follows from that? What "action items" show up on our societal "to do" list because of that? In other words, even if he's right, what different does it make? A lot of this seems to be about who gets to claim the title of Victim. Once we award black people the title, what then?
Or let's go the other way. Let's say that Chauncey is wrong -- that America really is a meritocracy, and that people are rewarded in proportion to the amount of effort they put into improving their own lives. What that means for black people is that they should study hard, become educated, work hard, and do everything they can to improve themselves.
Now let's say that Chauncey is right -- that America isn't a meritocracy, and that people are not rewarded in proportion to the amount of effort they put into improving their own lives. What does that mean for black people? Doesn't it mean . . . the same thing? That they should study hard, become educated, work hard, and do everything they can to improve themselves? Since under this scenario there is no meritocracy, the rewards may not be as great, or may not come at all. But what other option is there? Drop out of school? Don't become educated? Don't work hard?
Whether he's wrong or right, whether or not we award black folks the victim crown, does it matter in any significant way?
You do not have to point to entertainment or sports to see upward mobile black people because they are working as accountants, teachers, business owners, engineers, doctors, lawyers, and they share more in common with those of their own social and economic background than race. The same is true of everyone else including whites. It's not race it is net worth that divides us.
Chris Rock made a joke about living in a wealthy neighborhood. He said he had to become a star while all his white next store neighbor had to do was be a dentist. All joking a side, all they both had to do was make enough money to live in the same neighborhood. Chris Rock's neighbor could just as easily be a black dentist or engineer.
Isn't that what everyone is working for in the first place?
Remember that preference/taste is mostly genetic. Therefore, there is only one solution in a severely racist society like ours. Fix income inequality, eradicate poverty and you will have a good chance at even abolishing racism. R
Maybe.
One thing I can tell you about racism is that it shows up blatantly in an awful lot of areas, even after we control for class. Racism is still an unexpectedly powerful force in America in and of itself, independent of class, and therefore has to be addressed for what it is. I wish it weren't so but some of my wishes don't get granted, including this one.
Not only is Mr. DeVega not wrong about racism, from what I know, he's not even exaggerating.