Trouble in Sanford! Negroes Plot Revenge for Trayvon Martin!
Holiday had been right about the tension. One of the first people I meet scans me up and down and looks at my notebook. “Write something down for me,” he says. “Get the fuck out of here.” He’s an exception. The people stopping and shopping in the late afternoon are reluctant to talk, until they get a few sentences in. And then it sounds like they’re picking up on a monologue they started weeks ago, stopping to take breaths.Do you hear the drums? The natives are restless.Jamelia Jarrells and Jakivia Franklin talk about the killing as customers stroll in and out of the convenience store where they work. There’s no air conditioning, and the door’s constantly open, so most of the lights stay off while the fans stay on.
“I thought Zimmerman should have been arrested that night,” says Jarrells. “Regardless of the fact of whether or not he thought he was defending someone, he killed someone. Even if they arrested him, and he got out that same night, I think people would have felt better.”...“If I shot somebody who looked like you, or you, shit, I’d be on death row.”
“If he was a white 17-year-old,” says Jarrells, “he wouldn’t have been shot.”
Rashid Abdul Rahman, a retiree, chimes in. “Since we’re in central Florida,” he says, “and there’s so many movements coming through here, it’s going to be OK. If we was in California, they’d be burning this up.”Burning what up? “The city!”
The national news media are going through the obligatory motions in their coverage of Trayvon Martin's murder at the hands of George Zimmerman. In an era of the 24 hour news cycle (when the public's attention span is short), the spectacle surrounding Trayvon Martin's shooting apparently still has some exhausted legs supporting it.
Race, crime, guns, violence, and the law are old elements in the American story. In keeping with this script, there are obligatory acts to our national play. The Trayvon Martin saga has featured many of them.
1. The good negro and "best black friend" of the white offender has been trotted out to defend him.
2. According to his associates and family, George Zimmerman is actually a "friend" and "defender" of the colored people. Zimmerman is misunderstood and unfairly maligned by the public, the NAACP, and the news media.
3. "Outside agitators" are riling up trouble among the good, peaceful, obedient, and docile black folks of Sanford, Florida. There would be no "race troubles" if characters like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson were not involved in the Trayvon Martin controversy.
4. The murderer is actually the victim. As a defender of white civilization, Zimmerman did what many conservatives (and others) wished they could...but lacked the courage or opportunity to follow through on.
5. White people are victims. Historically, it was an absurd fear of "white oppression" by free blacks that helped to legitimate white racism. In the present, this language has been recycled as "reverse racism." Both rely upon a White racial imagination which sees blacks as perpetual criminals, brigands, and killers.
Across the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries the formula remains the same: race, crime, guns,"scary" black men, and white fear. This holds true even if Trayvon Martin (unarmed and innocent) is dead at the hands of George Zimmerman (armed and hunting his human prey).
The historical irony is rich. For example, as demonstrated many times in places like Rosewood, Chicago, Tulsa, and East St. Louis, racial violence in the United States is almost the exclusive province of whites against blacks. Race riots are almost by definition the murderous mob actions of whites against people of color. Funny then, how in the popular imagination such matters are muddied and inverted.
The anxieties about a "negro uprising" in Sanford, Florida has a storied historical pedigree.
For example:
Negroes in Liberty City, Georgia are plotting an insurrection. They are gathering in the woods to burn down the homes of white people in retaliation for violence against them. The local Sheriff has sent out a plea for assistance to the Governor.
Evil progressives are attempting to excite mischief among the negroes of Helena, Arkansas. There is an armed revolution afoot as the black population is going to attack and destroy the white community!
The mayor has ordered 1,000 bullets! Communists are causing agitation as the negro population is planning violence and a Socialist redistribution of wealth against the good white people of their town.
Good white people have been surrounded and held hostage. Thank goodness though! A negro has been bribed to seek out help for the innocent whites laid siege in Orangeburg County, South Carolina by angry blacks. Fifty whites are in route to break the siege by 200 blacks against the vulnerable and at risk whites of Norway, South Carolina!
In thinking through the historical antecedents of Trayvon Martin's murder, and white apologists' reactions to it, here is an eerily prescient news item from the year 1904:

Memory echoes across time: our collective conscience is trans-historical. White supremacy, what is a changing thing, reaches back to the past to find life in the Age of Obama. While the temptation is to focus on the Southern Strategy of the 1960s in order to explain the virulent anti-black and anti-brown animus of the New Right and the Republican Party at present, the roots are in fact much older.
The Conservatives who instinctively rally to defend George Zimmerman are actually the intellectual and emotive kin of racist White populists who lived centuries before. In all, matters would be much improved if the reactionary Right owned their philosophical and intellectual wellsprings in the hanging tree, chain gangs, and press gangs of post-Reconstruction America.
History is real; the past is present in the year 2012. This is true for all black folks. It applied to Trayvon Martin. It also applies to someone as powerful as the President of the United States of America.


Salon.com
Comments
Oh yes indeed. History is real and is either repeating itself or just continues on and on. The more things change, the more the remain the same. Or maybe it's just that we are regressing. I would hope that there is more outrage across the spectrum of society today concerning
Nope: Adjusted for inflation, the Tulsa Race Riot , May 31 - June 1, 1921, between the white and black communities of Tulsa, Oklahoma, in which the wealthiest African-American community in the United States, the Greenwood District was burned to the ground. During the 16 hours of the assault, over 800 people were admitted to local hospitals with injuries, more than 6,000 Greenwood residents were arrested and detained. An estimated 10,000 were left homeless, and 35 city blocks composed of 1,256 residences were destroyed by fire. The official count of the dead by the Oklahoma Department of Vital Statistics was 36, but other estimates of black fatalities have been up to about 300.
The events of the riot were omitted from local and state history; "The Tulsa race riot of 1921 was rarely mentioned in history books, classrooms or even in private. Blacks and whites alike grew into middle age unaware of what had taken place."
In 1996, the state legislature commissioned a report, completed in 2001, to establish the historical record. It has approved some compensatory actions, such as scholarships for descendants of survivors, economic development of Greenwood, and a memorial park, dedicated in 2010, to the victims in Tulsa.
-A black man was elected President of the United States by a huge margin despite running against a white man.
-The reason Tryavon’s death has made front page headlines is because white on black crime is very rare.
-Watching the desperate attempt by black leaders and people like you, to exploit Trayvon’s death as evidence of racism, is evidence we have come a long way from our ugly past.
Below is a link to an excellent article that disputes everything you just wrote (written by a black man, not that it matters in today’s more accepting society):
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303302504577323691134926300.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop
I spoke to 2 old men then, both telling the same basic tale. They grabbed their guns and joined the attack. One told me he and his brother took a truckload of dead blacks to dump in the Arkansas River. Many black people were quarantined in a stadium near where I played as a kid, though it had been torn down and replaced by a grocery store. It's now covered up with a Home Depot.
So, it's not like it was a big secret in Tulsa, OK. It just took a long time before the city government officially and ceremoniously acknowledged it. I had heard about it well before we studied it in school.
I think they figure that this would hurt Obama, to have racial tensions flaring and boiling over.
If man is to survive, he will have learned to take a delight in the essential differences between men and between cultures. He will learn that differences in ideas and attitudes are a delight, part of life's exciting variety, not something to fear.
--GENE RODDENBERRY
Since Obama is black and is running for re-election, I wonder if the right wing media and interest groups are consciously trying to stoke the fires of racism, by way of the Trayvon Martin case, in order to racially polarize the electorate prior to election time?
Paul O'Rourke"
Paul, if there are any "stoking of the fires of racism", you need look no further than NBC, ABC and CBS.
The NBC edit of the 911 call made it appear that Zimmerman immediately told police that Martin was black, when, in fact, the full tape reveals that the neighborhood watch captain only did so when responding to a question posed by a dispatcher. NBC is conducting an internal investigation.
Last Wednesday, when ABC broke the news of the police video's existence and broadcast it, ABC News said "no abrasions or blood can be seen in the video." That sent the boys and girls on MSNBC giddy with delight, they HAD THEIR MAN COLD!
However, now, ABC News says, Forensic Protection Inc. has digitally improved the clarity of the video and there appears to be a "gash or mark" near the top of the back of Zimmerman's head.
The first pictures of the poor kid that was killed showed an angelic 12 year old. Everyone's heart in America was broken that the child was killed by a grown man with a weapon when all he had was a bag of skittles in his hand. It doesn't take away from the fact that a boy of 17 was killed, but can't you see that people started to feel as if another "set-up" was being put together to convict Zimmerman in the media.
People like the author of this essay, attack the white's for centuries of wrongs against blacks, but Zimmerman was a "Hispanic", half white half Puerto Rican. In order to protect its investment in the spread of racial disharmony, the once majestic New York Times, now deservedly called the New York Slimes, called Zimmerman a "White-Hispanic". I guess from now on President Obama will be called the first "White Black" President.
We have laws in this country. Sometimes they work slow and need a prodding. Today we have every agency in Florida on this case, along with the FBI. Rather than raise your sword and declare war on "white people" because on man allegedly murdered a child and did not resort to the use of his weapon to protect himself.
Wouldn't you think it better to wait for Grand Jury to analyze the "facts" of the case, evidence the media and many here don't have a clue, before coming to a conclusion that is no more justified at this point than a mob lynching.
re jmac's comment about the Tulsa race riot, which I had never heard about, there was also that terrible one on Rosewood, Florida in 1923.
I never wrote that.
The other day you claimed, after some garbled rambling, that the Founding Fathers fought the Civil War.
Thorazine much?
Very different story. History depends on which side of the creek you are on.
The more things change, the more the stay the same. Just saying...
Let's stop bringing race everywhere. Zimmerman didn't do what he did because of race. He was attacked. Now everyone who has any sense of reality and who follows the true facts that're coming out of the investigation, understands that. There is a witness (or a few), his friends and facts of his life prove that he wasn't a racist, he was injured. He did what he believed he supposed to do, as a guard watch of the development. He was told not to proceed, he didn't proceed after that. He looked for the address and walked back to his car. Trayvon came from the alley and attacked him. Zimmerman couldn't fight him so he did what he did. Was he right? This is not for us to decide. We live in the country that operates by laws, not by emotions, or by what this or that one believes.
And Donegar Descendant, you're not worried that Black Panthers are there, offering money to catch Zimmerman (that's obviously and strictly against the law, do you understand that?) and making a lot of people (black and white) extremely nervous? This is fine with you, isn't it? But you're worried that some group (I never heard of them, therefore, I'm not going to repeat your words of who they are) is there as well, "ensuring the safety of white people against possible Black violence" is very troublesome for you. Unbelievable!!!
Oh really?
THAT SAYS IT ALL, YOU RACIST PIECE OF SHIT!!!
But let me finish by quoting a real specialist in this field - Roger Clegg, president and general counsel of the Center for Equal Opportunity. That's what he said in regard to the topic we're discussing here:
"As for racial preferences: The legal justification for them today is the supposed educational benefits that obtain from student-body diversity. Naturally, preferences based on race are a more efficient way of achieving racial diversity than are preferences based on socioeconomic status.
But I would much prefer that preferences be based on socioeconomic status rather than race. The educational benefits that supposedly flow from a diverse student body are rooted in differences in perspectives and experiences—not in skin color per se. Weighing socioeconomic status would provide such diversity to a similar degree as race, and without the ugliness, divisiveness, and myriad other costs of racial discrimination.
In a society that is increasingly multiethnic and multiracial, we simply cannot have a legal regime that sorts people according to skin color and what country their ancestors came from, and which treats some better and others worse based on which silly little box they have checked.
Final caveat, though: I doubt that the educational benefits of any sort of diversity can justify admitting students other than those most willing and able to do work at a high intellectual level."
That's exactly what I was talking about, you....
Kudos to you and your writing on issues that've plagued our country for much too long.
I apologize. You did not write the comment I quoted. You had written a comment that appear just above it and I painstakingly thought it was your posting.
On the other hand, when did I ever write that the "Founders" fought in the civil war?
And, I voted for him seven times (like he was gonna lose my state, anyway...we were like the only ones almost dumb enough to give Mondale the nod in '84), so it ain't like I didn't want him there in the start...I just ain't been very happy with him since he got there, and most of what I don't like is well within him power to reverse.
you can't live with them!
you can't live without them!
I'm sorry that he is dead, but he's dead too. Will encouraging a racially polarized event bring him back to life, or, like Rodney King, will that put more people in the grave?
I'm with RW as to seeing some real downside risk to Obama over this, and, it wouldn't take a rocket scientist to see overseas either. Not at all, as they get certain uneasy features of American life that we aren't very honest about, noting however that being "hypocritical" about what was actually something of a haunting statement of Rodney King, "People, why can't was all just get along," is the tribute our vices pay to that tolerant virtue, some would argue.
I'm sorry that he is dead, but he's dead too. Will encouraging a racially polarized event bring him back to life, or, like Rodney King, will that put more people in the grave?
I'm with RW as to seeing some real downside risk to Obama over this, and, it wouldn't take a rocket scientist to see overseas either. Not at all, as they get certain uneasy features of American life that we aren't very honest about, noting however that being "hypocritical" about what was actually something of a haunting statement of Rodney King, "People, why can't was all just get along," is the tribute our vices pay to that tolerant virtue, some would argue.
Nothing like winning an election to ruin your career.