Carl Kozlowski

Carl Kozlowski
Location
Pasadena, California, United States
Birthday
July 26
Title
The Laughing Libertarian
Company
Southland Publishing/Funny Scoop Productions
Bio
I'm a standup comic and reporter who was named "America's Funniest Reporter' by The Laugh Factory comedy club. My official website is www.americasfunniestreporter.com, where i have well over 100 funny Sedaris-style essays, oddball investigations, and celebrity profiles. You can also buy my book, a spoof of self-help books that has earned raves from Esquire editor/bestselling humor writer AJ Jacobs and superstar comedian Carlos Mencia called "Seize the Day Job! The Humor Book Al-Qaeda Kept You From Reading," there. I am also a spoken-word storyteller on the LA comedy scene and am finishing a book of David Sedaris-style essays. I'm also a co-host of the KABC 790 AM Los Angeles radio show "The Jake, Brant & Carl Show." The essays here represent only MY opinion, not that of anyone else afraid to be associated with free thought.

MY RECENT COMMENTS

Carl Kozlowski's Links

Salon.com
AUGUST 14, 2009 7:24PM

DISTRICT 9: Smart and Stupid

Rate: 2 Flag

by Carl Kozlowski  

  

Is it possible for a film to be both a brilliant, exciting piece of entertainment, and also a completely illogical piece of heavy-handed political propaganda? It is, if the new science-fiction oddity “District 9” is any indication.

Led by a stunning performance by Sharlto Copley, who is not only unknown to audiences outside South Africa, but who had never acted in anything but short films before, “District 9” blasts through its running time with a furious mix of action and satire. Yet its central plotline, focusing on what might happen if space aliens approached Johannesburg and were then held in a segregated district for nearly three decades, is riddled with holes and bangs viewers over the head with its allegories of racial discrimination harkening back to the evil days of that nation’s apartheid policies.

The film kicks off with a fast-paced blend of fake newscasts and faux-documentary footage shot by a camera crew that’s been assigned to cover a mass evacuation of aliens from their home in the city’s District 9. The aliens had come in a giant mother ship back in 1982, but no one has ever figured out why they arrived and left the ship to hover eternally over Johannesburg.

In a series of darkly witty and disturbingly tense newsclips, it is revealed that humans helped bring the million aliens found aboard the giant spacecraft down to earth. But tensions have exacerbated between humans and aliens over the last 27 years, with the ugly space creatures taking pleasure in wreaking havoc on society and generally living at odds with the humans around them.

Finally, the government decides to trick the aliens to sign forms that will force them into being evacuated to a new tent city 240 kilometers outside the city. But when many of the aliens don’t want to move and the human cops start playing a little too rough, fighting breaks out unexpectedly.

Even worse for the humans is that their mission’s leader, a nerdy bureaucrat named Wikus (played by Copley), stumbles across some nasty fluid the aliens have secretly developed and is now transforming into an alien himself. When he has to go on the run to avoid being turned into the world’s greatest scientific experiment, the film turns into a suspenseful chase thriller augmented by Copley’s ever-more-tragic performance, as he loses his humanity and is terribly aware that by extension, he’s losing his wife and their life together.

With stellar special effects, superbly seamless editing between the fake documentary footage and the “newscasts,” and Copley’s multilayered, star-making role, there’s plenty to recommend “District 9” – and the film has scoredan almost unmatched 97 percent approval rating from US and British critics on the Rotten Tomatoes site.  But once viewers step back out of the theater and into the light of day, myriad questions will unfold to anyone who gives the film a second thought.

I’ll place the countless questions under a SPOILER ALERT:

The film never explains why the aliens came to earth, which creates a nice sense of foreboding and mystery for a while until it dissipates with the realization that the writer/director Neil Blomkamp will never bother to explain it. The aliens – who look so much like the space beast in “Predator” that a lawsuit might be called for – and humans manage to communicate, despite the fact subtitles are used to explain the aliens’ language for the viewer and no explanation is given of how the aliens have come to understand earthly English without speaking it themselves, and how the humans understand them in return.

Worst of all, the film attempts to utilize its faux-documentary approach throughout its running time despite the fact that cameras would surely have been banned from the premises while the government attempts its dastardly experiments on Wikus in his hybrid human/alien state. And when Wikus is on the run, dashing through streets and leaping over and climbing under spaces into which humans could never fit, the documentary crew is ludicrously there with a perfect shot at all times. If you think that NBC’s sitcom “The Office” occasionally films an unbelievable angle, this might result in scoffing laughter.

There’s also a little thing on earth called gravity, yet the aliens’ mother ship is able to float above it for nearly three decades without falling from the sky. (Come to think of it, why don’t spaceships EVER fall out of the sky in movies like this and “Independence Day”? And how come, with perhaps the exception of E.T.. – who was still hardly a beauty queen – all film aliens are the ugliest creatures imaginable?)

But on a serious note, the film is attempting to score points off apartheid – a policy that was eradicated by South Africans in 1994, a full 15 years ago. The aliens are dark-skinned, and all the humans pursuing them are white, despite the fact that the government and all levels of society have been integrated or even overwhelmingly black for the past decade and a half. But since this is a movie that has to push an agenda, the aliens (blacks) wind up far more sympathetic than the white humans chasing them.

This might have been brilliant 20 years ago, as a piece of agitprop designed to stir the masses against the elitist white power structure. But coming so late in the game, “District 9” is like an over-decorated yet forgettable Christmas present: attractive on the surface but extremely disappointing within.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Interesting post. I was a little suspicious of this film when it was touted as a 'groundbreaking' apartheid parable: old news at best. Besides, a parable is supposed to use some metaphorical device. An apartheid parable that simply shows ... apartheid, seems somewhat lacking in imagination. I'll give this one a pass. Thanks ...
I cant say that I fully agree. The only major pill that I felt I had to swallow I'll mention at the end of this comment as a spoiler. But...I felt that this film was a tremendous example of great filmmaking. A real rarity these days. First and foremost...it passed the most important criteria of all...it was damn entertaining...the whole way through and for a less than a 1/4 of a budget of tentpoles that this film just blew away.

I loved that this film didn't take the route of dumbing it's audience down...almost everything you questioned was either a very logical given (in three decades some sort of communication, let alone understanding each other should have been possible) or explained sub textually (tech was thematic throughout) or in subtle asides in some very carefully crafted dialogue. I also don’t mind having any movie give me a reminder that history can repeat itself...and what better a setting than Johannesburg. I agree about the some of the camera shots, but at least it kept the film tonally consistent for the viewer...so, not a bad call in my opinion.

As far as "why" they were here...only hints were given, but nothing concrete as you pointed out, and yes it really did help a nice sense of foreboding and mystery...but it would have been insane from a producers point of view to do give that away even if there is a hint of a franchise possibility. Which Peter Jackson had in mind from the get go...a TV franchise has already been in the works halfway during production of DISTRICT 9. An example of this is why they cut out, in the theatrical release, Ripley finding out that people were being cocooned and inseminated in ALIEN. Otherwise...there goes the major plot point if a sequel was made. Great money for the studio/producers…great surprise for you.

I overall thought this movie is and will be considered by most others a classic in its genre. The tone, editing, stylized writing and direction alone will have this film wind up in film classes worldwide. I'll take DISTRICT 9 as my only Christmas present every year and throw it in for my birthdays as well.

*******SPOILER*******SPOILER*******SPOILER********

Okay, maybe you figured this one out, and maybe I might have missed a beat that explained it...but the big pill I had to swallow was how a fluid, biological or not, whose main use is to power a mothership, can completely alter a human DNA the way we were shown. I know they mentioned that others humans have changed but all have died...hell, how is that even possible when it took 20 years to make this fluid in one confined space? Anway…that was the pill that I needed to buy a $5 Dasani at the theater to wash down.
And Steven...you're nuts if you give this film a pass.