This is a hilarious/sad post, re-posted on the fab American feminist website Jezebel.com, from Nerve.com. about what happens when women -- gasp! -- get angry:
What struck me was that both Rex and the attorney had delivered ill-timed, emotionally charged information, and when I'd expressed proportionate anger or irritation, the blame somehow boomeranged back onto me. I'd been expected to remain amiable, though by any objective measurement, that expectation was ludicrous...
Had their mothers and the women before me never displayed anger in front of them? Or were these men so conditioned by notions of women as the gentler sex they didn't understand that I wouldn't put up with their crap?
I've been a feminist since I was a little kid...But it's weird to me that many straight men watch professional sports and action films, or back their friends up in bar fights, and find those displays of aggression admirable— but when a woman loses her temper for a specific and valid reason, these same men judge her for what is, like burping, a human reaction.
How do we alter the notion that a woman who stands up for herself, her loved ones, or her beliefs is the one who's causing trouble? By accepting once and for all that legitimate female anger isn't the hallmark of a bitch, cunt, ballbuster, or drama queen. We're nearly 52% of the population— it's time for more men to understand our behavior isn't aberrant, and for more women not to feel "guilty" for not staying in the narrow range of traditionally accepted emotional responses. Women are multi-faceted humans with a full range of ambitions and emotional needs. Guys, sometimes we disagree with you, but sometimes we disagree with each other. Which is how it should be.
I grew up in a family where the women -- hmmm, how to put this delicately -- shouted their goddamn heads off all the time. Rocket-boosted by alcohol and/or mental illness and/or an unwillingness to confront the malfeasants making them nuts, the explosions were pretty constant.
There was no notion chez Kelly that polite, calm, quiet = ladylike. Incoming verbal RPG was more their style which, funny thing, I adopted as my own.
Which, funny thing, has made a lot of people nervous: colleagues, bosses, boyfriends, family, neighbors and friends. One woman my age, who now knows me very well indeed, initially told me she found me intimidating. Me? I'd heard it a lot.
Because I don't suffer fools gladly. Or at all.
This has made for a sometimes volcanic relationship with my husband, who also has one hell of a temper -- in direct contrast to his usual quiet, calm demeanor. No one can believe him capable of such anger. Me? No problem.
I'm always a little eerily fascinated by women who refuse to get angry. I'm in awe if they are now calm and mature enough to simply find a better solution than anger, but sometimes it is exactly the right riposte to bullshit, cruelty and deception.
Here's a recent blog post by a Canadian friend, emmapeel2, a woman my age, on the same subject. And, also from Open Salon, yet another great post, by Beth Mann, a woman who is fed up felling guilty for getting angry.
Guilty? Not at our house!
For many women, and those around them, rage is really the worst four-letter word.
Jose, my husband, and I had two massive fights, early on, that actually involved telling the other -- at midnight, living 30 miles apart -- to piss off and go home. His involved a $150 cab ride.
It taught us both a lot about one another, as both of us had been badly bullied when younger.
Some of the important lessons we learned from a full-throated expression of our anger:
I have limited bandwidth for bullshit
I am able to set and keep my boundaries
I won't hold a grudge -- I'll talk to you tomorrow, just not right now
I value/trust you enough to let you know how I really feel, not fake cheer and surface politesse
I have weak spots! You've just found a few of them
Fighting with someone you love won't kill the relationship, but clinging to unexpressed stuff might
I get it -- you arrived at this mid-life affair with baggage. Some of your anger is generic/vestigial and has nothing to do with me, really
It's OK to get really angry with me. I deserve it sometimes for being such an asshole
I'm able to apologize and mean it
I can accept your apology and move forward
Anger is an emotion that both men and women feel. But only men are socially sanctioned to express it publicly and clearly and forthrightly.
Women who get angry terrify people, because...?


Salon.com
Comments
and ruled the city that is still named after her.
I know from experience that the woman woman who doesn't blow her top whenever wronged is headed for some problems further down the road. Moreover, when you do so, I get to understand just how pissed off you really are. It makes me realize that, if I caused your ire, I have a responsibility to make it up to you as best I can. If you just stay quiet and polite, I'll just let things slide and THAT won't please you at all.
.
skypixie, you get it....So many (truly nasty) women paste on a BIG smile and a SWEET soft voice but truly wish you murder as they do. Better we all know what page we're on, seems to me. Passive aggression is every bit as aggressive but you can't fight back (and clear the damn air) when someone is cooing/lying insistently, "No, I'm fine."
Gary, thanks! High praise. It has changed my worldview, through Jose's constancy, to realize I can get (not stay) angry and still be loved. I think many women are terrified that anger = loss of love/respect/acceptance, when in fact it can have the opposite effect.
Keck! I grew up around both and it's bad shit. You got a problem? Say so, as calmly as possible. I can't address a problem you refuse to discuss clearly with me....talk about a power play!
Women who get angry terrify people because ... they know we aren't going to back down until a change is made, and they don't want to change.
Really huge generalizations follow!
It seems to me that men more often get mad about an incident that already occurred. Incident - Retaliation (of whatever sort) - Done. No future expectations.
Women are better at cataloging all prior infractons that fit this on-going problem that is pissing them off. They don't care so much about retaliating for the past as they do changing future behavior. Changing future behavior is way more scary than taking the heat for something done previously.
It is ironic that anger can undercut our credibility or persuasiveness.
I now try to do a lot more negotiating and lot less yelling. It seems to be working.
Very true. In "Malled" I talk about how many customers came in just spoiling for a fight, ready to verbally kick the shit out of lowly retail workers who can't fight back. I call them pre-pissed. Didn't matter what you said or did, it was your turn to get creamed.
Bernadine, thanks. I don't want to be around chronic anger, but it's crazy if you really are upset to deny it. I can't see (unless it is endangering you [and it could be]) not speaking your mind.
Great comments too ~ particularly your 'pre-pissed' from Malled.
Linn, that's the power indeed....you assume I have none, or am too fearful to show it? Just wait...
Kim and Johnathan, thanks much!
So why bother reading it at all?
I found great happiness when I studied the "Gurlesque" poets and learned how to sculpt a poem from an angry place. Depression, ulcers, tears of pain, are all the result of anger turned inwards.
I married a real SOB the second time and got some big time practice being angry. I think I worked out a lifetime of anger on that fool when I found out what he did to me.
rated with love and lovely anger
Why read at all? To give you all of you angry women equal chance to be heard, "Duh".
Thanks for making the time to comment and rate.
"and for more women not to feel "guilty" for not staying in the narrow range of traditionally accepted emotional responses."
Narrow range indeed. So narrow, sometimes I can't even fit.
Thanks for the mention and I hope all is well and your world.
I think women are "allowed" a very narrow bandwidth of emotions/reactions that don't make others uncomfortable....like that's a problem because...? Because, then the listener has to (re) adjust their ideas of what we're going to do or say.
But, to be fair, I suspect for many men it's as constricting/limiting to not be able to easily express tenderness or sadness.
I think it also depends on the larger culture of the company and industry you work in...As a career print journalist, I work in a rough-edged biz where women are valued for being tough, decisive and and as aggressive as the story requires. So I think it's been a good fit for me in that respect as I can largely simply be myself and still earn a living.
In my experience, it was always an issue of power and control. The person 'allowed' to express usually has the last word, so to speak.
This was certainly the case with my ex, who would decide what I was intending to say within a few words, then cut me off and declare the conversation closed. Naturally HE was allowed to keep speaking, but if I tried to respond, he would remind me that he was "not going to argue" with me. I tried many ways, over several years, to get around it, but the only thing that ever worked was the time I turned the tables.
Every time he opened his mouth to speak, I held up my hand and loudly reminded him that he had declared this conversation over. After ten minutes of this, he was so frustrated and upset (gosh, go figure!) that he was standing over me in my chair, shaking from head to toe with desire to throttle me.
The look on his face when I calmly said, "Now do you understand how I feel when you won't let me talk?", was priceless!
Unfortunately, the lesson didn't stick, hence one of many reasons that he is my ex.