Sacramento, California, USA
July 03
Oh god, not the old bio bs again....I am, variously, a writer, editor, knitter, foodie human being type person . My blogs are and I am also Newly Single, and that seems to be the place I'm writing from--oops, also a writing/comp teacher, and that should be "from which I'm writing"--these days. However, my interests are eclectic; my opinions are endless; and I'm not shy about expressing them. Except when I am--and only I know when that is, unfortunately after the fact at times.


ByJane's Links
Editor’s Pick
SEPTEMBER 2, 2008 2:03AM

A Lesson for Myself...and you too maybe

Rate: 7 Flag

Last night when I went to bed, I had the feeling that Sarah Palin would become McCain's Harriet Miers. The allegations that Palin's youngest son, the four month old, was really her grandson--it all seemed familiar to me and I couldn't figure out why. Oh yeah, Desperate Housewives: didn't Bree banish her pregnant daughter to a home for unwed mothers, fake her own pregnancy and then palm her grandson off as her son. This is exactly the case that was being made about Sarah Palin. But Desperate Housewives, that's a comedy, isn't it? A satire in which Bree plays the most extreme of feminized women, the Stepford Wife. Was it really possible that the GOP didn't know that, that they were using the TV program's plot line as a model case? Then when I got up this morning, the story had changed. Now Palin's daughter, the one who rumor had it was the actual mother of the baby, was presented to the world as, yes, pregnant, five months alone, which seems to preclude any thought of the four month old being hers.

Whatever. My point isn't the state of Sarah Palin's uterus or her daughter's because, really, it's all a non-issue for me as far as considering Palin a viable candidate for Vice President. She's not, as far as I'm concerned, for reasons that have nothing to do with her children or her children's children. The story is significant to me, however, not for what it may say about Palin, but that it reveals the assumptions that I, that so many of us are ready to make about the Republicans: they will say or do anything to get what they want, so suspect everything.

Here's the lesson: I--we--must try to separate the candidate from the Party. The latter sucks; the former is human. The Party (either one, the Democrats are no angels either) is like some huge demonic being, and it swallows good people, chewing them up and regurgitating them in some new form, recognizable perhaps, but no longer human. That's what they've done to McCain; they've processed him like some soy-based sausage so that he is palatable to the Party. In so doing, though, he is lost to those of us who hoped he truly could be the maverick reaching across the aisles to create change. He withstood the Viet Cong and the Hanoi Hilton; the Republican Party, unfortunately, did him in.

It makes me sad to see McCain on TV now, because I like him. I do. And I think he is honest and well-intentioned and on his own, he might not have been that bad for America. On his own--without undue influence from the Party--I might have been able to trust him to do what was right for the country, rather than what was expedient to the GOP. But he's not on his own, is he, and therefore a good man is lost to us. I feel sad that Sarah Palin is taking the flack for the Party's choice. I'm sure she too is honest and well-intentioned, but she's a pawn now in the Republican playbook, and we all know that pawns never win the game.

Your tags:


Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:


Type your comment below:
This is a thoughtful post. Thanks for putting into words what I've been thinking about. The weekend hasn't shown anyone's good side, especially on the internet. It's like when you get into a really ugly fight with someone, say a bunch of ill-considered things, and then feel awful afterward. Like you said so well, we have come to believe the Republicans will do or say anything to retain power (as they actually have and so we become inclined to want to do the same. Maybe it's just human nature, but I hope after this all plays out, we curb our worst impulses and get the country back on track.
This post makes me immensely sad. To really examine the idea that the Republican Party will do or say anything to get what they want. Because I honestly do believe that. This is not a thought accompanied by paranoid hysterics, it's a conclusion I reached very early on in the Bush era. But here is the thing: the party is composed of individuals with very harmful ideas and impulses. Yes, I agree it's irresponsible to automatically tar the individual with a broad brush; I know at least one Republican, personally, who is a decent, compassionate, generous, thoughtful human being. On the other hand the voter cannot rely on trust. Let's truly examine that individual running for public office: what sort of policy can we expect from him/her? From what I've read on Palin in the credible press, she is not someone I would have ever wanted to run for public office. As for McCain, I did like him once, but during this campaign he's displayed a level of cynicism that I can't be just laid at the feet of the party. No one should have to become and automaton just to get elected.