APRIL 19, 2012 5:04PM

Please Don't Write About What You Made for Dinner

Rate: 7 Flag

 

Enough already!  I am so tired of reading about food.  Mine, I realize, will not be a popular attitude in an era when everyone and the pizza delivery boy are writing about what they made for dinner last night.

 

 It was fresh and cute when Nora Ephron popularized it by including recipes for comfort food in her roman a clef and subsequent movie, Heartburn. Thirty years later, all this writing about cooking has become tedious. Yes, most of us like to eat, and I am suspicious of that slim (in all senses) minority of people who don't. In my experience, not liking to eat is associated with an ungenerous spirit or with the physical and psychological pathologies of anorexia.  But I do not care to read about your adventures in the kitchen because, in the end, it's just food; and try as you might, cooking is not art — that is, a meal does not mean, it simply is: food does not signify anything beyond itself.

 

 And here is where things get interesting: a lot of the conversations around food assume that it does signify something larger than itself.  Usually it serves as a status signifier, i.e., "My food choices demonstrate that I have more refined sensibilities and/or am morally superior.”  You can see this in wine or gastronomy snobs, and in that small, obnoxious minority of fundamentalist vegans who condemn with religious enthusiasm the depravity of everyone but themselves, consigning even cottage cheese-nibbling vegetarians to perdition right along with the hopeless omnivore.

 

Cooking is like plumbing:  both are necessary and admirable skills.  One is dismayed to see them done poorly, and gratified to have them done well. But as subjects for extended conversation, searching questions, deep thought, the give and take of philosophical dialogue?  Not so much.  Food is just food. 

 

I think a lot of people write about food simply because it is easy — let’s be honest:  you really don’t have to think too hard to write about cooking — and because interest in food is universal.  Food can be used as a quick sociological indicator:  if I tell you that I’ve developed a passion for organic maple-flavored almond butter or that my diet depends on finding wild nettles, you have some critical information.

 

Sometimes I wonder what people used to do before all this food writing, and what we’ll be writing about when it finally wanes.  The thing that sticks in my craw, a half-formed notion I can only poorly express, is the sense that writing about food has become an easy substitute for grappling with more difficult aspects of our lives. 

 

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
But there is soooo much good food out there to be savored and enjoyed... not to be a snob but to simply taste and share with friends and loved ones... BTW one of my favorite evenings is beer, delivery pizza and poker.
I see your point. Waxing on and on, ever so poetically about food has become tedious, overbearing and, as you say, a form of silly snobbery. If, however, you remain polite once or twice through my friend, Margaret's annual St Patrick's Day hyper-boiled corned beef and cabbage, or my mother's holiday "fruit salad" (canned fruit cocktail and whipped cream) you begin to develop an appreciation for the love of food and might even become a true believer in the art of technique.
I like food. I appreciate good cooking (except Mexican). It's the talking about it that gets old.
I am actually more interested in digestion. As I get older it becomes a matter of survival. Slow hearts, sluggish intestines, no teeth. It is quite a visual. I have promised myself to write more about digestion, food addictions, bulimia and anorexia. I also am fascinated with food because part of my job is to feed patients where I work and that would be several posts in itself. So I get what you are saying about food posts but don't underestimate OS writers. We take it all the way frequently.
I'm not too down with the food writing craze either. At most, I end up being annoyed because the food sounds delicious and then I can't eat it.

But this is a fantastic point: "let’s be honest: you really don’t have to think too hard to write about cooking."

Nice work.
It's not only easy to write about food, but it brings easy responses. When I post a dinner photo on Facebook, it gets lots of response, more than anything else. Ease of production, satisfying response - hard to resist!
Yes, some food writing is just about snooty, and other examples are self-aggrandizing (but, then, what blogging isn't self-aggrandizing???). But, you know, with all due respect, please don't tell me what to write. We all write about what we want to write about. We don't force anyone to read it: it's a matter of choice.

I've actually gotten some good food ideas by reading Foodie Tuesday posts and have had some fun telling stories and posting recipes of my own (though it's been a long, long time since I've done). Often, the food writing isn't about the food but about the stories. In connection to which, I recommend to you Bellwether Vance: her recipes are excellent, but it's her stories that lead to the recipes that truly delight.
It's certainly easy to write badly about food; a perusal of many

popular and middle-of-the-road food blogs reveals at best,

un-original, and at worst, appalling writing skills. You

certainly make a point regarding the preciousness of

niche food writing, the holier-than-thou snootiness, the

love/hate attitudes. (I swear on the grave of Julia Child

that if I read about another "sinful" chocolate dessert or

"amazing" hummus I will...I will...oh I don't know, X out

and go on with life.) In defense of carefully crafted and

well-done food writing, in which Nora Ephron's work is

certainly included (have you read "Crazy Salad Plus

Nine"? Find it.), it speaks as much to the writer's world as the reader's. Unlike the other two basics of life, clothing and shelter, the frequent acts of cooking and eating, whether alone or in community, are worth writing and reading about because of that connection, a sense of place, a moment in time.

Of course, Open Salon showcases some excellent food writers. And I join AtHome Pilgrim in recommending Bell's stories. In addition to Ephron, I recommend Laurie Colwin, Francis Lam, Ruch Reichl, Kim Severson, Frank Bruni, and a host of other writers that just happen to include recipes with their tales. I consider that list of ingredients and instructions the prize at the bottom of the Cracker Jack box.
Made me laugh. For food writers it's a conundrum. We have great recipes we want to share, but how do you do that without being boring or, worse, "a foodie." I like to wrap mine in personal stories that are set apart from the food, and that doesn't always work (or not to the recipe's advantage)...and it leaves out a lot of good recipes for which I simply cannot construct a narrative beyond -- This tastes great! And you should try it! But I guess that's better than all of us trying to be David Foster Wallace.