Blue in Texas is

living Blue in a Red state

Laura Deurmyer

Laura Deurmyer
Location
Texas,
Birthday
December 22
Bio
Proud mom to a 3rd grade son, wife of an artist/ artisan, liberal, former urban professional marooned in the sands of West TX

Laura Deurmyer's Links

Salon.com
DECEMBER 22, 2009 10:12AM

Dear Mr. President

Rate: 17 Flag

Dear Mr. President,

I have been one of your most faithful supporters.  It has not been easy; I live in the second most conservative city in the United States, according to the Bay Area Center for Voting Research.  Every time I wear my tie-dyed "Peace. Love. Change" Obama t-shirt to the gym, I can feel the dirty looks drilling into my back. 

I did not vote for you because of mass excitement or popular sentiment.  I did not vote for you because I thought that my vote would count.  I voted for you because you were the only candidate that I can remember who has inspired me to vote for someone, not just against someone else.

I've been pretty patient since you got elected.   Not everything that you've done or left undone has met with my approval, but I never expected it to.  If that's what I'd wanted, I'd have voted for Dennis Kuccinich in the primary and spent the next four years griping. 

Afghanistan doesn't thrill me, but you told us you were keen on increasing our focus there, so it's not like I can say I'm surprised.  My office mate is fond of taunting me by reminding me of your "troops out of Iraq in a year" quote, but  I do think you'll eventually get us out, so I can live with that too.

Health care reform (or the lack thereof) has me seriously pissed off; the main targets of my health care reform anger are the Democrats in the Senate.  You could have done a more forceful job advocating for real reform, but I'm still telling myself you're waiting until the conference committee bill comes out.  Then you'll twist some arms.  I hope.

What has me really dismayed is your handling of the big banks.  I know that you have probably gotten bushels of mail on this topic, and that you and your advisors are likely putting negative public reaction down to lack of understanding.  Fair enough - I don't know all that much about capital markets, derivatives, international currencies or bonds. 

I do know when I'm getting a raw deal.  The recent tax credit for Citigroup on top of everything else those amoral, short-sighted Wall Street goons have gotten from your administration goes a long way towards convincing me that hope and change is  a chimera, a fantasy, a ghost.

I don't care if you have a truck load of Wall-Street-grown experts who tell you that giving this tax credit will boost stock prices and make everything look that much rosier.  The Administration - your Administration - should not be using tax dodge smoke and mirrors to make everything look better.  That's how we got into this mess in the first place - the big banks were making decisions based on what they could get away with, what would make their balance sheets look better and what would help hide those nearly worthless  assets they had tucked away.

Your team's action to give Citi a $38 billion tax break is not a huge deal.  What's $38 billion on top of everything else the banks have gotten?  But my perception of the action is that your Adminstration really is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street.  And I'm willing to bet I'm not the only one looking through jaundice-tinted glasses.

During your campaign, you had convinced me that we didn't have to live in a world ruled by the corporate elite.  That instead, we could build a society with social justice as its foundation and lofty aspirations as its penthouse.  That we could do that in a civil manner, without radicalism and with grace. 

Now it seems that your adminsitration is going to devote itself to playing shell games with our tax money at the behest of obscenely large financial institutions, while at the same time advocating tepidly, at best, for social reforms like health insurance.

Mr. President, I am not angry.  I am saddened and frightened.  The shift in my perception of you and your adminsitration has taken from me much of my faith in our society and in the future that my six year old will face.

As much as I dislike your big-bank enabling, I dislike the bombast and hatred of Palin and Beck, Coburn and Wilson more.  I still feel that you were my best choice in 2008, and will likely be my best choice in 2012.  But I fear that the sticky ooze of lobbying, money and greed will continue to pull you in, as it has been doing, and that no fundamental change will occur in our nation during your watch. 

At least we will not be laughing-stocks abroad, thanks to your eloquence and diplomatic adeptness.  We probably will not wage new wars solely to fatten American corporations.  Maybe our racial discourse will continue to improve.

But without the driving force of a different attitude towards money, power and business as usual, we will continue to expand the impoverished in our own homeland.  Working people will continue to cope with salaries that don't pay enough to feed their families; they will continue to fear medical costs more than they fear sickness itself.  Our people will become more divided and will focus even greater attention on red herrings thrown to them by the circus media.

Sometimes I wish you had not convinced me that our society doesn't have to be that way, that our best time as a people is not behind us.  Sometimes, I wish I had stayed cynical, voting against McCain rather than for you. 

 

Author tags:

business, politics

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
OK, I have gotten this out of my system and now I can go work on my color post in some peace of mind. BTW - do any of your HTML gurus know why I have a -1 at the top of my post?
Well put. I just have to get it through my head that skill at campaigning is not the same as skill at governing. I think Obama's heart is in the right place, but has brain might have benefitted from some more time in the Senate.
Wow, you really summed up how I've been feeling. Well said!
Stick with it, TX.

My guess is you will have plenty of reasons to vote for him in 2012...rather than against whoever (or whomever) runs against him.

But I also guess that the people who voted for him but became disallusioned and who have gone over to the dark side are so damaging him...that he will lose to that "whoever"...even if the "whoever" is a major league lightweight who will do more damage to our country and the world than Bush/Cheney could even dream of doing.

For that reason, I think that in Texas...your vote will probably not count again.

So be it.

I doubt mine will count even here in New Jersey...if I am still around to cast it.

The forces of darkness will take over in 2012...because enough people were not willing to "stick with it." Don't be one of them.
Jeff - Thanks. I hope it's just a matter of either needing to accrue experience or that there is some chess-type strategy still going on. But I see the interaction with the banks, and I lose heart. I can spin the health care thing, but the bank thing is hard for me to reconcile.

librarienne - Thank you. I have been resisting feeling this way for a while now and just couldn't suppress it anymore.

Frank - it's a really fine line between continuing to stand up for your principals and inadvertently assisting those who are most against your principals by your protest. I am stymied right now - I know that there is a lesser of two evils aspect to worry about, but I also don't want to always settle for less than what we should be able to accomplish as a nation.
Hi, Blue. You sum up my own position at this point in this Administration better than I could have. I am sorry that so many of us have come to this conclusion. I try hard to not let cynicism rule my thinking on President Obama, but I get more cynical by the day.

When all the dust settles Mr. Obama is still the better of the choices that we had and he is making some progress in important areas. I do think, as do you, that his biggest failure is turning out to be his being the hand maiden of the financial oligarchs. That is both sad and sickening.

In spite of this frustration, which I share, I do hope that you and your family have a blessed Christmas and that many blessings will flow to you and yours in the coming year.

Monte
Totally agree. Have to read the 'how does All That Hope and Change Smell Now" posts? They're always top-rated, though they never get picked. To me it just seems like Nader was right -- they're all own4ed by the same people. The only way to get real change is by violent revolution. Problem there is, the only people willing to actually carry out a violent revolution are just as bad as the people they hate. So we're fucked no matter what.

Merry Christmas and stay healthy
(I mean it STAY HEALTHY. Because you're not covered).
Monte - Thank you. Happy Christmas to you and your family as well! I guess we just need to bide our time and be patient with our government for now; I am going to try to keep an open heart and not be cynical, but it is so hard.

Cat - Thank so much. (And thanks for the explanation - I was scouring my post for typos that might have caused an automatic negative rating!:))

Steven - I have read those posts by BBE, and some others - by Mick and Nana in particular - that lay out the case for the loss of hope and change pretty compellingly. I am struggling to not give up completely, and as Monte says, to not become wholly cynical.
Yes, he hasn't entirely lived up to our expectations, but he's done some significant things. Stem cell research for one. As for the healthcare plan, it's not great, but it's a first. I'm hoping they'll add to it over time. Be patient.
R
David - Thanks for stopping by.

John - I know - I am trying to be patient; remind me sometimes, OK? Thanks for the comment/ R.
Blue,
My heartfelt thanks for putting what so many of us are feeling into such gracious yet pointed words.
Rated and appreciated.
Nothing better than a good (and this is good) rant.
It would have to get a lot worse for me to ever think McCain would have been a better choice. But, that said, I'm quite disappointed with Obama for many of the same reasons you cite.

It would be a serious error for Republicans to think they're offering something better. A better way of putting it would be to say that Obama is just giving us Republican Lite, and even that is too much Republican just now. We can't counterbalance the excesses of the Right by only moving to the sort-of-right. We need something on the pretty strong Democratic side pulling seriously to get us back to the middle. Obama has bargained down to the middle before he starts tugging.

Put mathematically, if Republicans are -1 on the numberline and Democrats are 1 and we as a people are seeking the middle, electing someone that is -0.1 and then trying to take the average of the positions is not in a million years going to tug us back to the origin.
Well said. I'm betting that he'll be fine in 2012. He is a good man with a very tough job.
Dennis - Thank you. I emailed it to the White House. I really wish I could tell him...

Surly - I was in the middle of this when you posted the other day - we are on the same page, definitely. Thanks!

Kent - That's part of my angst - I don't see the counterbalance to the left waiting to emerge. The "conservative" position in untenable to me, and the liberal side is not really liberal. What's a voter to do?

grif - I so very, very much hope so! There would be nothing that would please me more than to look back in a year or two and think "What were we all worried about?"
Hey Blue. I share most of your sentiments. But it generally comes down to voting against McCain. I think it's far too early to give up on Obama. He hasn't been pres for even a year and has had to face more god-awful situations than anyone I can think of.

If, like me, you believe his heart is in the right place, then the question is how best to promote what we hope and expect is his real agenda.

If, like others who are holier than I, you think he's irredeemably compromised, have at him and start working on your griefs with the Palin/Romney/Huckabee/Jindal/RepublicanX administration that's to come.
This was so eloquently written. And your last line is the one that says it best for me.
Your post was so eloquent. Rated for content.
Abrawang - I do still believe his heart's in the right place; I am afraid that the machinery of the political system and the necessities of governance will stop him from making anything happen unless he really makes a hard and fast stand. And I don't see him doing that yet. Maybe, maybe...

Marcelleqb - Thank you so much. It hurts to let someone in our heart - even a politician that we'll never meet - if they don't live up to our expectations...

Westtexas10 - Thank you so much.
Please read this; it's a thorough look at the many successes of Obama's first year, which has been one of the hardest-working nose-to-the-grindstone years for any president in memory:

Obama's First Year: a Long List of Underreported Successes

I understand the frustration, and I'm frustrated that so many good policies have been derailed by obstruction, by disorder in the Congress and by what may be a plate too full. But I strongly feel it's not all up to the president; we're fortunate enough to live in a country where we get to play a role in our own fate, and we have an obligation to act on our hopes. If we believe his goals are worth fighting for, then we have to stand up for them, not give in after a few hard fights.