Dear Mr. President,
I have been one of your most faithful supporters. It has not been easy; I live in the second most conservative city in the United States, according to the Bay Area Center for Voting Research. Every time I wear my tie-dyed "Peace. Love. Change" Obama t-shirt to the gym, I can feel the dirty looks drilling into my back.
I did not vote for you because of mass excitement or popular sentiment. I did not vote for you because I thought that my vote would count. I voted for you because you were the only candidate that I can remember who has inspired me to vote for someone, not just against someone else.
I've been pretty patient since you got elected. Not everything that you've done or left undone has met with my approval, but I never expected it to. If that's what I'd wanted, I'd have voted for Dennis Kuccinich in the primary and spent the next four years griping.
Afghanistan doesn't thrill me, but you told us you were keen on increasing our focus there, so it's not like I can say I'm surprised. My office mate is fond of taunting me by reminding me of your "troops out of Iraq in a year" quote, but I do think you'll eventually get us out, so I can live with that too.
Health care reform (or the lack thereof) has me seriously pissed off; the main targets of my health care reform anger are the Democrats in the Senate. You could have done a more forceful job advocating for real reform, but I'm still telling myself you're waiting until the conference committee bill comes out. Then you'll twist some arms. I hope.
What has me really dismayed is your handling of the big banks. I know that you have probably gotten bushels of mail on this topic, and that you and your advisors are likely putting negative public reaction down to lack of understanding. Fair enough - I don't know all that much about capital markets, derivatives, international currencies or bonds.
I do know when I'm getting a raw deal. The recent tax credit for Citigroup on top of everything else those amoral, short-sighted Wall Street goons have gotten from your administration goes a long way towards convincing me that hope and change is a chimera, a fantasy, a ghost.
I don't care if you have a truck load of Wall-Street-grown experts who tell you that giving this tax credit will boost stock prices and make everything look that much rosier. The Administration - your Administration - should not be using tax dodge smoke and mirrors to make everything look better. That's how we got into this mess in the first place - the big banks were making decisions based on what they could get away with, what would make their balance sheets look better and what would help hide those nearly worthless assets they had tucked away.
Your team's action to give Citi a $38 billion tax break is not a huge deal. What's $38 billion on top of everything else the banks have gotten? But my perception of the action is that your Adminstration really is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street. And I'm willing to bet I'm not the only one looking through jaundice-tinted glasses.
During your campaign, you had convinced me that we didn't have to live in a world ruled by the corporate elite. That instead, we could build a society with social justice as its foundation and lofty aspirations as its penthouse. That we could do that in a civil manner, without radicalism and with grace.
Now it seems that your adminsitration is going to devote itself to playing shell games with our tax money at the behest of obscenely large financial institutions, while at the same time advocating tepidly, at best, for social reforms like health insurance.
Mr. President, I am not angry. I am saddened and frightened. The shift in my perception of you and your adminsitration has taken from me much of my faith in our society and in the future that my six year old will face.
As much as I dislike your big-bank enabling, I dislike the bombast and hatred of Palin and Beck, Coburn and Wilson more. I still feel that you were my best choice in 2008, and will likely be my best choice in 2012. But I fear that the sticky ooze of lobbying, money and greed will continue to pull you in, as it has been doing, and that no fundamental change will occur in our nation during your watch.
At least we will not be laughing-stocks abroad, thanks to your eloquence and diplomatic adeptness. We probably will not wage new wars solely to fatten American corporations. Maybe our racial discourse will continue to improve.
But without the driving force of a different attitude towards money, power and business as usual, we will continue to expand the impoverished in our own homeland. Working people will continue to cope with salaries that don't pay enough to feed their families; they will continue to fear medical costs more than they fear sickness itself. Our people will become more divided and will focus even greater attention on red herrings thrown to them by the circus media.
Sometimes I wish you had not convinced me that our society doesn't have to be that way, that our best time as a people is not behind us. Sometimes, I wish I had stayed cynical, voting against McCain rather than for you.


Salon.com
Comments
My guess is you will have plenty of reasons to vote for him in 2012...rather than against whoever (or whomever) runs against him.
But I also guess that the people who voted for him but became disallusioned and who have gone over to the dark side are so damaging him...that he will lose to that "whoever"...even if the "whoever" is a major league lightweight who will do more damage to our country and the world than Bush/Cheney could even dream of doing.
For that reason, I think that in Texas...your vote will probably not count again.
So be it.
I doubt mine will count even here in New Jersey...if I am still around to cast it.
The forces of darkness will take over in 2012...because enough people were not willing to "stick with it." Don't be one of them.
librarienne - Thank you. I have been resisting feeling this way for a while now and just couldn't suppress it anymore.
Frank - it's a really fine line between continuing to stand up for your principals and inadvertently assisting those who are most against your principals by your protest. I am stymied right now - I know that there is a lesser of two evils aspect to worry about, but I also don't want to always settle for less than what we should be able to accomplish as a nation.
When all the dust settles Mr. Obama is still the better of the choices that we had and he is making some progress in important areas. I do think, as do you, that his biggest failure is turning out to be his being the hand maiden of the financial oligarchs. That is both sad and sickening.
In spite of this frustration, which I share, I do hope that you and your family have a blessed Christmas and that many blessings will flow to you and yours in the coming year.
Monte
Merry Christmas and stay healthy
(I mean it STAY HEALTHY. Because you're not covered).
Cat - Thank so much. (And thanks for the explanation - I was scouring my post for typos that might have caused an automatic negative rating!:))
Steven - I have read those posts by BBE, and some others - by Mick and Nana in particular - that lay out the case for the loss of hope and change pretty compellingly. I am struggling to not give up completely, and as Monte says, to not become wholly cynical.
R
John - I know - I am trying to be patient; remind me sometimes, OK? Thanks for the comment/ R.
My heartfelt thanks for putting what so many of us are feeling into such gracious yet pointed words.
Rated and appreciated.
It would be a serious error for Republicans to think they're offering something better. A better way of putting it would be to say that Obama is just giving us Republican Lite, and even that is too much Republican just now. We can't counterbalance the excesses of the Right by only moving to the sort-of-right. We need something on the pretty strong Democratic side pulling seriously to get us back to the middle. Obama has bargained down to the middle before he starts tugging.
Put mathematically, if Republicans are -1 on the numberline and Democrats are 1 and we as a people are seeking the middle, electing someone that is -0.1 and then trying to take the average of the positions is not in a million years going to tug us back to the origin.
Surly - I was in the middle of this when you posted the other day - we are on the same page, definitely. Thanks!
Kent - That's part of my angst - I don't see the counterbalance to the left waiting to emerge. The "conservative" position in untenable to me, and the liberal side is not really liberal. What's a voter to do?
grif - I so very, very much hope so! There would be nothing that would please me more than to look back in a year or two and think "What were we all worried about?"
If, like me, you believe his heart is in the right place, then the question is how best to promote what we hope and expect is his real agenda.
If, like others who are holier than I, you think he's irredeemably compromised, have at him and start working on your griefs with the Palin/Romney/Huckabee/Jindal/RepublicanX administration that's to come.
Marcelleqb - Thank you so much. It hurts to let someone in our heart - even a politician that we'll never meet - if they don't live up to our expectations...
Westtexas10 - Thank you so much.
Obama's First Year: a Long List of Underreported Successes
I understand the frustration, and I'm frustrated that so many good policies have been derailed by obstruction, by disorder in the Congress and by what may be a plate too full. But I strongly feel it's not all up to the president; we're fortunate enough to live in a country where we get to play a role in our own fate, and we have an obligation to act on our hopes. If we believe his goals are worth fighting for, then we have to stand up for them, not give in after a few hard fights.